The third set of MD1 is planned on Thursday. an unusual day in recent times for Champions League games. Referee assignments.
19 September 2024
18:45 CET - Belgrade (Stadion Rajko Mitić)
FK CRVENA ZVEZDA (SRB) - SL BENFICA (POR)
Referee: Michael Oliver ENG
Assistant Referee 1: Stuart Burt ENG
Assistant Referee 2: Daniel Cook ENG
Fourth Official: Tony Harrington ENG
Video Assistant Referee: Stuart Attwell ENG
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Jarred Gillett ENG
UEFA Referee Observer: Stefano Podeschi SMR
UEFA Delegate: Bakar Jordania GEO
18:45 CET - Rotterdam (Stadion Feijenoord)
FEYENOORD ROTTERDAM (NED) - BAYER 04 LEVERKUSEN (GER)
Referee: Davide Massa ITA
Assistant Referee 1: Filippo Meli ITA
Assistant Referee 2: Stefano Alassio ITA
Fourth Official: Fabio Maresca ITA
Video Assistant Referee: Aleandro Di Paolo ITA
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Carlos del Cerro Grande ESP
UEFA Referee Observer: Leslie Irvine NIR
UEFA Delegate: Neil Morrow NIR
21:00 CET - Bergamo (Gewiss Stadium)
ATALANTA BC (ITA) - ARSENAL FC (ENG)
Referee: Clément Turpin FRA
Assistant Referee 1: Nicolas Danos FRA
Assistant Referee 2: Benjamin Pagès FRA
Fourth Official: Stéphanie Frappart FRA
Video Assistant Referee: Jérôme Brisard FRA
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Willy Delajod FRA
UEFA Referee Observer: Alain Hamer LUX
UEFA Delegate: Danijel Jošt SVN
21:00 CET - Madrid (Cívitas Metropolitano)
CLUB ATLÉTICO DE MADRID (ESP) - RB LEIPZIG (GER)
Referee: Ivan Kružliak SVK
Assistant Referee 1: Branislav Hancko SVK
Assistant Referee 2: Ján Pozor SVK
Fourth Official: Peter Kráľovič SVK
Video Assistant Referee: Tomasz Kwiatkowski POL
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Piotr Lasyk POL
UEFA Referee Observer: Dejan Filipović SRB
UEFA Delegate: Iva Olivari-Uliša CRO
21:00 CET - Monaco (Stade Louis II)
AS MONACO FC (FRA) - FC BARCELONA (ESP)
Referee: Allard Lindhout NED
Assistant Referee 1: Rogier Honig NED
Assistant Referee 2: Patrick Inia NED
Fourth Official: Joey Kooij NED
Video Assistant Referee: Dennis Johan Higler NED
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Clay Ruperti NED
UEFA Referee Observer: Vladimir Šajn SVN
UEFA Delegate: Danilo Filacchione ITA
21:00 CET - Guingamp (Stade de Roudourou)
STADE BRESTOIS 29 (FRA) - SK STURM GRAZ (AUT)
Referee: Nicolas Walsh SCO
Assistant Referee 1: Graeme Stewart SCO
Assistant Referee 2: Calum Spence SCO
Fourth Official: Donald Robertson SCO
Video Assistant Referee: David Coote ENG
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Alan Muir SCO
UEFA Referee Observer: Carlos Velasco Carballo ESP
UEFA Delegate: Peter Lundström FIN
Brest Sturm Graz
ReplyDeleteNikolas Walsh SCO
Oliver in Beograd
ReplyDeleteMassa in Rotterdam
Kruzliak in Madrid
Turpin in Bergamo
Massa, after his NED vs GER Nations League game, now gets Feyenoord-Leverkusen. He will meet at least 3 players again within 10 days. Avoidable.
ReplyDeleteTurpin in a game that is expected to be football focused. Honestly I’d like to see him in something different; e.g. heated or rough games. Turpin has a good reputation and should be capable to referee anything.
Lindhout was predicted here. It is worth mentioning that the referee crews of Lindhout and Makkelie are the same as last weekend, domestically, when they both worked with the same AR’s, 4O and VAR. Is that a common thing in other countries as well?
Lindhout, who by his performances should actually have been demoted to the second category rather than pushed further by UEFA, making his CL debut in a game like Monaco-Barca is disappointing to me even in the new climate.
DeleteHi Mikael,
DeleteDid you base your opinion about Lindhout on the European Championship -21 or have you watched other poor games by him?
Let me first say, I don’t understand the management of Dutch referees at all.
Gözübüyük was promoted to Elite not based on skill, but because Kuipers left an empty spot after his retirement.
Lindhout had a long path before his promotion to Category 1. Three years ago, and during the Mentor Talent program (I believe he was coached by an Italian), he improved his body language and player management significantly. At the end of season 2021, he was 2nd after Makkelie imo in domestic league. But his rise stagnated after the EURO -21. He comes across as a very modest guy, and prefers to be a background-minded referee. He has some interesting skills, e.g. excellent fitness and his advantage is next level. And he improved his player management, thus it might be interesting to see him in a competition/climate where players are more technical. But yes, in my opinion, Lindhout is a decent category 1 referee, but nothing more than that.
Furthermore, there is Vd Eijk, Kooij and Nagtegaal in Category 2. To me, it is clear who has the most potential based on SKILLS (Marc Nagtegaal), but KNVB for some reason started to focus on Joey Kooij first. He had the most experience domestically. Then, Kooij was injured and all of a sudden the focus shifted to Vd Eijk. I don’t understand why… They just seem to “stick” to the order of experience and who was first promoted to the FIFA list, and they don’t care about skills. Marc Nagtegaal had a good game in 2nd qualifier round, and you would expect him to get another game after that. But instead, they had to push Vd Eijk and Lindhout. Makkelie wasn’t assigned to a play-off because KNVB had just two spots. They decided to push Lindhout in a final test and consolidated Kooij after his injury. To keep Makkelie happy, they assigned him to the Classico (which wasn’t played due to a strike). And Gözübüyük got a game in Nations League.
Talking about Makkelie, who was used many times in, let’s call it, the sensitive/challenging games (where any kind of controversy is “deathly”), without being rewarded. I think the reason why Makkelie was never considered for any UEFA finals after 2020 is mainly a political reasons - and has nothing to do with PSG - but rather Kuipers handling the EURO 2021 (and Makkelie in a semi). After EURO 2021, Rosetti could simply say to KNVB: sorry my friends, you’ve had enough for now. Rosetti had to consolidate other FA’s, like he always does, e.g. Turpin the UCL final in 2022 after a hidden path, and completely ignored a Makkelie in his prime. The 2024 UCL final was booked for Vincic, as long as he didn’t do something stupid, already before the winter break. Just like Soares Dias’ Conference League final. And so was Vincic’ SF at the EURO after his MD2 game. That is how it works, unfortunately. They just care about their own high position and “keeping everybody happy” (ask Boban…), in particular the big 5 countries.
@Ref88 very interesting to read your analysis, can I ask aftert that, what is your view on 2024-25 Champions League final? Of course it's very early, but still we know that some choices were made even months before... (if nothing happens, then...).
DeleteReplying to Ref88:
DeleteOne can forgive the U21s disaster, s**t happens (especially when there isn't var), though one must say he was fairly fortunate that this didn't really cost him. What really rubbed me up the wrong way was games last season like the PAOK-Pao semifinal where his performance was genuinely ridiculous (so bad was it that even the Greeks rejected him). Handling games a la 'Velasco-in-Brazil' should NOT be a thesis for rising up the merit list.
That all being said: I wish him well on Thursday for a good debut with Sajn.
In any case, there should be a clear candidate before winter break, who will be kept away from the most risky games in 2025.
DeleteI don't want to seem like a guy with an agenda, but I would like to put on the record that I disagree with the pushing of Ivan Kruzliak by UEFA that is evidently occurring. In my book, he was weakest of the 19 referees in the last Euro: the Slovakian never seems able to get the games under his 'grasp', trying to overcompensate for that by exaggerated body language (ScoSui) or not being able to keep a consistent line (NedAut) for the 90min. It was quite strange to me that he suddenly appeared as fourth official for quarterfinal and semifinal matches at that tournament, especially when it seemed UEFA had taken a different decision about Kruzliak earlier in the tournament.
ReplyDeleteAppreciate that new names are necessary and Letexier/Scharer/Nyberg and now Eskas (to a lesser extent Meler) are making good progress, but in the instance of this specific referee, it feels rather 'forced' to me.
A better choice, imo, would be to rehabilitate (for instance) Joao Pinheiro instead.
Busy week for Oliver.
ReplyDeleteFiery Belgrade atmosphere on Thursday, then in the middle for Man City - Arsenal on Sunday.
OT
ReplyDeleteFIFA 2019 Women's World Cup Final and Men's Supercup 2019 Assistant Referee Michelle O'Neill, from Ireland, has announced her retirement: "Time for a new chapter has come". Congratulation for what she has achieved on field and wish her luck for her future.
A definite uptick in the quality of appointments for scottish referees this season
ReplyDeleteIf we exclude the missed yellow card in 34' for ZVE player, generally expected performance in the first half for Oliver.
ReplyDeleteExcellent performance by AR1 in Rotterdam, easy going game for Massa. The assistant referee solved two extremely challenging crucial situations.
ReplyDeleteRed card for DOGSO in Monaco
ReplyDeletehttps://streambug.org/cv/31cccc
DeleteVery clear red card. In this case one must praise the Dutch referee. Firm decision.
Very long check in Bergamo in a situation that looks clear to me. Now, penalty confirmed.
ReplyDeleteHmm, for me its more a dive than a penalty though probably not VAR stuff
DeleteOkay, at least I thought it was clear… For me, fully correct penalty. We - or I - saw a careless contact initiated by the defender’s leg and a causal link between the contact and the fall.
DeleteSoft penalty and maybe even wrong (not clear, impossible to understand). Also, most of the contact outside and then something inside. VAR needed a very long time to confirm, this is a clasic case in which there isn't evidence that referee was wrong.
ReplyDeleteLuckily, this penalty was missed.
Wrong penalty by Lindhout, correct OFR for me. Defender was there before, attacker initiated the contact.
ReplyDeleteNow a very long OFR for Lindhout who doesn't seem convinced about the call by his VAR. Nevertheless, to me a fully correct intervention, Monaco attacker putting the leg ahead of defender and trying to create this penalty, but nothing in reality happened. Still to me, a 5% that another VAR could have supported, but the guidelines by committee look to be clear now. Penalty must be very clear.
ReplyDeleteAgree. Lindhout was very close to the scene. I'm surprised that he didn't see this better in real time.
DeleteLindhout's body language feels too 'stiff', looks a bit like a third-world traffic policeman.
ReplyDeleteThe two YCs were correct and according to guidelines, but the wrong PK...
The Dutch didn't manage to end this game being faultless, but overall one must say that some good progress was shown.
DeleteThe game was more a big one than a small one, not fully big of course, so hard to believe a referee at his debut being perfect there. Committee could even be satisfied, unless the penalty, of course. Curious about next assignment, I would say Europa League for consolidation.
I took an eye every now and then at Kruzliak game, and it looked like a classic performance by the Slovakian who is definitely gaining credit by Rosetti time after time... and his games have always the same progress, allowing roughness to players, being at the very borders, but never losing it, and limited crucial mistakes...
ReplyDeleteHi everyone,
ReplyDeleteNo post about 2024 Futsal WC Referees' appointments in this blog? :(
#ATAARS
ReplyDelete7:10 Possible YC 17ATA for SPA holding (FK and quick restart or advantage given?)
11:05 YC 13ATA for SPA holding
14:35 (15:50), 18:30, 22:35, 46:45 Persistent fouling by 29ARS
19:20 Changing direction of throw-in after stealing metres
21:50 Harsh defensive FK
24:30 Management of DtR vs wrong place of FK
47:15 Penalty awarded for holding/tripping, long VAR check
64:30 Possible retaliation
68:40, 70:50 Harsh challenges
87:30 Possible YC 7ATA for reckless tackle
89:15 Kicking offence by 30ARS
90+0:15 Conflict management with 4OF involved
90+3:55 Final whistle moment
#FEYLEV
ReplyDelete02:30 Play-on call in a possible SPA scenario
08:10 (10:40) Goal disallowed for offside (AR2)
11:40 Play-on call in a possible SPA scenario
21:30 Coach complaining about advantage given after offside
23:15 Wrong onside AR1 and PAI tackle
42:40 YC 18FEY for SPA holding
43:40 Good onside by AR1 at Goal LEV
45:15 Possible YC 3LEV for off-the-ball holding
49:10 Management of conflict
55:10 Handball FK
64:50 Offside AR1 and PAI tackle
72:15 Goal disallowed for (delayed) offside (AR1)
73:30 Interfering with GK, OK no YC
77:45 Advantage use, possible YC 33FEY for SPA
80:55 Dissenting behaviour of coach after play-on call
82:50 Advantage after tackle (careless-reckless)
83:05 Harsh defensive FK