Tuesday, 8 September 2026

Champions League 2026/27 - Referee Appointments - Matchday 1 (I)

2026/27 UEFA Champions League. Please find below the referee appointments for the first set of MD1 games, to be played on Tuesday 8 September 2026.  


8 September 2026

18:45 CET - Bruges (Jan Breydelstadion)
CLUB BRUGGE KV (BEL) - ASTON VILLA FC (ENG)
Referee: Sandro Schärer SUI
Assistant Referee 1: Stéphane De Almeida SUI
Assistant Referee 2: Jonas Erni SUI
Fourth Official: Anojen Kanagasingam SUI
Video Assistant Referee: Fedayi San SUI
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Bastian Dankert GER 
UEFA Referee Observer: Kyros Vassaras GRE
UEFA Delegate: Artur Azaryan ARM

18:45 CET - Athens (Agia Sophia Stadium)
AEK (GRE) - LASK (AUT) 
Referee: Luis Godinho POR
Assistant Referee 1: Pedro Martins POR
Assistant Referee 2: Gonçalo Nuno Soares Vaz Freire POR
Fourth Official: André Narciso POR
Video Assistant Referee: Tiago Bruno Lopes Martins POR
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Fábio Oliveira Melo POR
UEFA Referee Observer: Hugh Dallas SCO
UEFA Delegate: Miroslaw Ryszka POL

21:00 CET - Madrid (Estadio Santiago Bernabéu) 
REAL MADRID CF (ESP) - FC INTERNAZIONALE MILANO (ITA)
Referee: Michael Oliver ENG
Assistant Referee 1: Stuart Burt ENG
Assistant Referee 2: James Mainwaring ENG
Fourth Official: Samuel Barrott ENG 
Video Assistant Referee: Andrew Dallas SCO
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Michael Salisbury ENG 
UEFA Referee Observer: Elmir Pilav BIH
UEFA Delegate: Peter Lundström FIN

21:00 CET - Dortmund (Signal Iduna Park) 
BORUSSIA DORTMUND (GER) - VILLARREAL CF (ESP) 
Referee: Simone Sozza ITA
Assistant Referee 1: Davide Imperiale ITA
Assistant Referee 2: Giovanni Baccini ITA 
Fourth Official: Andrea Colombo ITA
Video Assistant Referee: Daniele Chiffi ITA
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Marco Di Bello ITA 
UEFA Referee Observer: Stavros Tritsonis GRE
UEFA Delegate: Luca Zorzi SUI

21:00 CET - Porto (Estádio do Dragão)
FC PORTO (POR) - MANCHESTER CITY FC (ENG)
Referee: Szymon Marciniak POL 
Assistant Referee 1: Tomasz Listkiewicz POL
Assistant Referee 2: Adam Kupsik POL
Fourth Official: Paweł Raczkowski POL
Video Assistant Referee: Pol van Boekel NED
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Dennis Johan Higler NED 
UEFA Referee Observer: Herbert Fandel GER
UEFA Delegate: Stéphanie Ford BEL  

21:00 CET - Villeneuve d'Ascq (Stade Pierre Mauroy)
LOSC LILLE (FRA) - REAL BETIS BALOMPIÉ  (ESP)
Referee: Georgi Kabakov BUL
Assistant Referee 1: Martin Margaritov BUL
Assistant Referee 2: Martin Venev BUL
Fourth Official: Radoslav Gidzhenov BUL
Video Assistant Referee: Bram Van Driessche BEL
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Ivan Bebek CRO
UEFA Referee Observer: Marinus Koopman NED
UEFA Delegate: Paul Tompkins ENG

91 comments:

  1. Istvan Kovacs with a very controversial and heavily criticized performance last night in the Romanian derby (Dinamo vs FC Steaua Bucharest).

    3 VAR interventions in the course of 10 minutes (between mins 22-32) and huge debates after the game regarding his decisions. VAR was George Gaman (ex-FIFA ref between 2017-2018, removed from the list because reportedly he could barely speak English. He now has a reputation as one of the worst refs in Romanian Superliga).

    22': Free-kick for Dinamo, VAR intervened to change to penalty kick. Kovacs overturned his decision and awarded attacking foul, after watching the replays.
    https://youtu.be/KUTxIBncJ1k?t=66

    30': A second VAR intervention before game was restarted, for violent conduct. Red card for FCSB player.
    https://youtu.be/KUTxIBncJ1k?t=301

    32': Penalty for FCSB, VAR intervenes for the third time and Kovacs changes his decision to indirect free kick for Dinamo.
    https://youtu.be/KUTxIBncJ1k?t=411

    45+2': Disallowed goal for FCSB for attacking foul:
    https://youtu.be/KUTxIBncJ1k?t=597

    86': Penalty awarded for Dinamo:
    https://youtu.be/KUTxIBncJ1k?t=1010

    90+1': 2YC and RC for Dinamo player, for simulation:
    https://youtu.be/KUTxIBncJ1k?t=1096

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, incredible game for Kovacs.
      The first thing I want to say, Romanian league for him seems to be a totally diffeernt world from UEFA games and he seems definitely to be less confident in some circumstances.
      Said that, I don't understand what he punished after OFR in the first incident, here if no free kick or penalty, you must give simulation. Where is the foul by attacker? Not clear.
      Too long time at monitor for an Elite referee, definitely too long.
      The red card after VAR intervention is correct by book, no matter the intensity of the violent conduct, however the feeling is that referee should have managed it live.
      Correct decision to remove the other penalty after OFR, here very quick look at monitor.
      It's understandable to whistle foul before the goal scored in 45'+2, too much force by attacker. However, in case of play on, VAR shouldn't have intervened.
      The penalty to Dinamo close to the end is OK decision, but I don't like such situations, min imal contact with keeper for me, and attacker exactly looking for that, but this was the outcome.
      Very good with the last decision, simulation, player left the leg and then wexaggerating contact. Clear.
      Some good decisions but surely a rather controversial performance overall, especially regarding first incident.

      Delete
    2. A better replay of the first incident:
      https://youtu.be/vc3WeU9E_9Y?t=468

      A very peculiar situation, the defending player lunges in a sliding tackle, misses the ball, then the attacking player lands on his foot. Nothing that he could have done to prevent it, the FCSB player initiated the contact.

      I'd say that Kovacs was also unlucky that he whistled free kick instead of penalty (the incident happened right on the 16-yard line), as VAR would have probably stayed silent in that case.

      Delete
  2. The appointments are online

    Brugge-Aston Villa: Schärer
    AEK Athen-LASK: Godinho
    Real Madrid-Inter: Oliver
    Dortmund-Villareal: Sozza
    Porto-ManCity: Marciniak
    Lille-Betis: Kabakov

    ReplyDelete
  3. Wow!!!
    Someone correct me if It's wrong.
    Oliver gets to officiate an Italian team for the first time since forever. It looks like UEFA considers him the No.1 candidate for the final showpiece in Madrid next year barring any English team in the final or if he puts in strings of poor performances.
    Removing the Italian obstacle from his path with such a strong appointment is not coincidence IMO.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Actually, that’s not quite right: after that famous Real Madrid-Juventus match (a game in which he made no mistakes, by the way), Oliver has often refereed Italian teams. In any case, I agree that, with Makkelie ruled out for reasons unknown to us (as has become evident in recent years), he may well be the leading candidate alongside Letexier.

      Delete
    2. Yes and no @Adams A.A.. Oliver is a common fixture for Inter Fun fact: for the 3rd time in 4 years, Inter will start the UCL campaign away with Oliver as a referee.
      UCL 2025/2026: Ajax-Inter (MD1), St. Gilloise-Atalanta (MD8)
      UCL 2024/2025: Young Boys-Inter (MD3), Bologna-Lille (MD5), Barcelona-Atalanta (MD8)
      UCL 2023/2024: Real Sociedad-Inter (MD1)
      UCL 2022/2023: Benfica-Inter (QF 1st leg)

      Delete
    3. Considering that he was a rookie referee in the top flight at the time, Oliver learned a great deal from that 2018 experience and has matured significantly over the past eight years. To me, he is the number one choice for the 2027 final.

      Delete
  4. I cannot understand why Sozza gets an tight game between a German and a Spanish team after his medicore performances at international level in the last years. Maybe the famous Italian bonus?

    ReplyDelete
  5. It's Michael Oliver the most important "news" of this set of assignments.
    To answer to Adams A. A. above, he had already got again Italian teams (Atalanta among others) after the famous Real Madrid - Juventus in 2018, but now he gets exactly that game once again with Inter instead of Juventus. That's surely a big news. But of course given the experience and the reputation of the involved referee, it's just an expected choice, so very good that committee has worked in this way.
    Surely an appointment that breaks some unwritten rules and wants to change that old mindset.
    To follow, we see some Category 1 like Sozza, Godinho and Kabakov.
    The Italian, as I already said, must raise the level after poor seasons, I think he was rather OK yesterday in Inter - Napoli, and if he starts in a positive way the season, he can think about promotion to Elite. However, Colombo is another candidate for that.
    Kabakov: a very positive note for Bulgarian referee, the referee from Plovdiv has gone through plenty of ups and downs, to say the least,unfortunately often failing to follow up on the good things seen on previous occasions. Could they give him another try? We'll wait and see... at 40 he's reaching a crucial age if he wants to move forward.
    Then, Godinho: I think some will agree if I say tat so far he has rather disappointed the expectations, however he has definitely time, and if they seem him as good candidate for something more, it will be up to him to show it. A good performance is expected.
    Regular assignments for Marciniak and Schaerer.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thanks for the corrections. Some folks definitely have paid more attention to these matters than I do

    ReplyDelete
  7. A massive VAR appointment for Andrew Dallas but does that mean Walsh won’t appear this week?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Walsh was on a championship game on Saturday with his FIFA ARs. Would usually point to a European appointment. Dallas could be in Nyon on VAR for multiple games

      Delete
    2. Potentially being saved for the league cup quarter final instead next Sunday and have a "low key" appointment in the Championship.

      Delete
  8. With no English clubs reaching the final, I believe Oliver could be in Madrid again.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Van Boekel is the most criticized VAR in the Netherlands following the Bouwman incident, especially with today's update: "Examinations showed that Bouwman suffered several injuries, including bruising to his sternum and a bruised lung. He remains in hospital for observation.

    It seems smart to me to switch VAR and Avar around given the commotion.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Dallas warmed up for his Champions League game with 2 correct interventions in Hearts v Dundee. 84' for a penalty for handball. 90' red card for SFP. A poor game from on field referee Chris Graham

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agreed, a poor game from a referee who should be nowhere near Premiership games IMO. Dallas correctly intervening on very straightforward decisions that should have been spotted.

      Delete
    2. Chris Graham isn’t up to standards for a top flight match, if the Scottish Premiership wants to become a serious league it has to get serious and fast and resolve the major problems in terms of funding match officials:

      Delete
    3. When I say funding I’m referring to more investment in training, teaching and producing more top referees.

      Delete
    4. The worrying thing is there's a large portion of referees (if I was in charge) would be nowhere near games but yet teams, fans and players are subject to the same mediocre faces over and over.

      Delete
  11. I definitely agree with Oliver comments, getting such a big profile match to start the campaign indicates he's UEFA no 1 for the final, which he deserves no doubt

    ReplyDelete
  12. Still we don't know about Marciniak AR2 and fourth official.
    I read a post on instagram in which Kupsik, Marciniak AR2, announced that now he is back fulltime as lawyer. I think he retired after WC?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. According to UEFA.com : AR2 ist Kupsik and FO is Raczkowski

      Delete
    2. Yes now added, but twice. It seems there are issues on UEFA site and nothing more.

      Delete
  13. Now only missing name is VAR for Obrenovic in Bayern - Bodo with Del Cerro as AVAR. I think it is Jug.

    ReplyDelete
  14. A good caution for dissent by Scharer. I think the AR got the throw in call correct too

    ReplyDelete
  15. Great YC by Schärer, missed those YC for dissent

    ReplyDelete
  16. Rare situation for Schärer, with the keeper touching the ball outside the penalty area, good spot by the team, maybe missed YC for SPA (not sure about it)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Very good and deserved YC for dissent. Good spot on by AR2 I think and no card ok for me because no english players near. Acceptable to whistle without card. Very convincing debut by swiss crew on first quarter. Well done !

      Delete
  17. Bizarre incident where the keeper makes a mess of the throw out and then catches outside the penalty area. I dont think there's any question of DOGSO but a YC would have been better imo

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The player should have been booked indeed, I was surprised Schaerer just whistled free kick, but it looked he made a rather delayed assessment about what had happened. Correct by VAR to stay silent, however, no DOGSO.

      Delete
    2. I disagree, Chefren. For me, it’s more of an instinctive reaction than anything else. More importantly, there is no English player in a position to challenge for or play the ball. The only player in the vicinity simply appeals to the referee and tries to draw the match officials’ attention to the incident, without making any attempt to play the ball.

      Therefore, in my view, managing the incident without a caution is just as defensible as showing a yellow card. I can accept either outcome from a refereeing perspective.

      Delete
    3. From the IFAB.
      If the goalkeeper holds the ball inside their penalty area and continues to handle it outside the penalty area, it practically means that the goalkeeper initially had legitimate possession of the ball, so their handball offence did NOT stop a promising attack (SPA) or deny the opposing team an obvious goal-scoring opportunity (DOGSO).

      https://www.facebook.com/share/1bYYeN7ene/?mibextid=wwXIfr

      Delete
  18. Outstanding decision by Schaerer with simulation and YC to Belgian player. Very impressive body language and natural authority for Sandro. Impressive !

    ReplyDelete
  19. Good OFR by San and clear penalty for Bruges. Perhaps Scharer could detect it live but very rapid process and decision to be taken.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Clearly a punishable arm movement, I think nobody should have doubts about this one, he stopped the ball even in a deliberate way.

      Delete
  20. Here the penalty for handball after OFR:
    https://streamin.link/v/83ef352c

    ReplyDelete
  21. Another fully justified yellow card. More importantly, it is delivered with calm authority and real managerial conviction. The Swiss referee is making an excellent impression on me, despite failing to award the penalty on-field initially. This has been a very solid performance from the Swiss officiating team.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Three YC added correctly by Scharer. The referee has shown complete control of the match, both in terms of player management and disciplinary control IMO.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Godinho delivered a fantastic performance at AEK's stadium in Athens.
    The committee must be very pleased with your performance.
    Congratulations!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Godinho have a normal officiating in a not difficult game

      Delete
  24. A PSG vs English final could see Schärer……a lot of weeks and months to go however ;)

    ReplyDelete
  25. The officiating of Scharer was poor and heavily criticized by the crowd. The error regarding the penalty was far too blatant for the expected standard.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Poor ? The crowd ? You mean Belgian supporters ? Come on…

      Delete
    2. In my opinion, it was overall a very good performance by the referee, but the OFR still weighs on it because, unlike the classic handballs that are hard to see, this one should have been spotted on the pitch. Nobody is perfect, perfection doesn't exist in offficiating, but in the context of a high-level performance, there's still that regret about the OFR. Rosetti always asks for things that can be seen live, and in my view, this was one of those clear situations.

      Delete
    3. Agree about OFR but really excellent skills shown about fitness, discipline and management during this match.

      Delete
  26. First 20 mn very good by Oliver with a very good no penalty decision on Vinicius and a correct dangerous FK for italian team.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Oliver's calmness is always incredible to watch

    ReplyDelete
  28. First YC for Oliver. More of a YC for team persistent fouling that the player himself. Oliver in complete control and making it look easy.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Marchniaks foul detection is embarrassing. Honestly you wouldnt even think football was a contact sport

    ReplyDelete
  30. Missed clear YC by Marciniak to Guéhi

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Protests for a possible a red card, but it was no more than YC. Not a deliberate elbowing, just a reckless action in my opinion.

      Delete
  31. How could Guehi escape yellow card there? No help from AR1 or 4th ref as Marciniak could not see it clear.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Maybe AR could have helped, clip:
    https://streamin.link/v/d6b5ca13

    ReplyDelete
  33. Clearly a punishable foul not whistled by Marciniak. Also, obvious yellow card that was missed.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Excellent officiating from Oliver in first half!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agree. As what i saw during WC, confirmation about an excellent Oliver who deserved CL final for me if his season is a mirror of his first half performance !

      Delete
  35. Very good advantage by Kabakov for 3-2.

    ReplyDelete
  36. "I admire Oliver's composure. I really would have liked to see him in that chaotic Paraguay–France match at the World Cup.

    ReplyDelete
  37. OFR for Kabakov, player provoked opponent but very clear violent conduct as reaction. Impossible to forgive this one, correct intervention.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Clips from Schaerer game:

    13' SPA or DOGSO? Keeper handball outside the box.
    https://streamin.link/v/1bdf9352

    47' Simulation
    https://streamin.link/v/ce903762

    59' OFR, penalty for handball
    https://streamin.link/v/3ebdc586

    A few additional thoughts. Very well done on the simulation, I must say. It's focused on the incident with good positioning, and he immediately sees the player doing that. However, the correct signaling for simulation is an raised arm,just like for offside, because it results in an indirect free kick. Many referees don't apply this specific detail, but that's fine, it's just my personal observation.
    That being said, regarding the situation at the start of the match with the goalkeeper handball outside the penalty area: in my opinion, starting from a basic assessment, it's great that it was called. It's something that often goes unnoticed because it's quite unexpected and unusual, and this is where a referee's ability to keep a cool head really comes out. As long as incidents are standard and routine, that's fine, but here an unexpected event factor comes into play, an incident that doesn't happen very often in a match. So, compliments to the Swiss referee for his alertness, though I think a yellow card should have been shown because the decisive element seems clear to me. The Manchester City player was just two steps away, so if the ball had slipped completely out of keeper's hands, it couldn't have been SPA. Still, it was correct for VAR not to intervene, as it wasn't a clear red card for DOGSO.
    Finally, on the penalty kick, the Swiss referee could have seen it because the arm makes that blatant gesture. But analyzing the situation, we can say the referee got caught out by the turnover in play, with the action shifting rapidly from one side of the pitch to the other. In fact, we can see the Swiss referee is still running while the incident happens, so he didn't have the mental moment to capture the situation, which he would have caught completely if he had been positioned there and play had briefly paused on that side before the cross. Let's say it's a matter of positioning and missing the view, though the incident itself is very, very clear. He could have made a small extra effort because the replay shows him right behind, so he wasn't completely blind to it. However, when you are busy adjusting your perspective to a different side of the pitch, there is a brief moment where focus on play can be missing.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Do you consider that its Md 1??

    ReplyDelete
  40. Here the incident in Kabakov game:
    https://streamin.me/v/9eb8f458

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Very unusual situation. Good intervention by Var. Anyways in general foul detection, disciplinary control and players behaviour was good. Good movement and fast decisions. He is back on track for more games. Good teamwork.

      Delete
  41. Marciniak please retire as you are no longer able officiate at a decent level. Pathetic tonight

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. His performance wasn’t bad, but it was acceptable.

      Delete
  42. But what courage and firmness from Michael Oliver to enforce the rule on leaving the pitch slowly and reduce Real Madrid to ten men after Vinícius’ substitution! Brilliant refereeing!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. +1 great standards and enforcement of the rules by the entire english crew

      Delete
    2. It’s a mandatory decision. Vinicius Junior was clueless and had a picknick.

      Delete
  43. Michael Oliver is one of the world's best. Not much doubt about it

    ReplyDelete
  44. Vladimir Sajn observer in OFI - Hoffenheim next Thursday

    ReplyDelete
  45. Mixed performance by Oliver. Nothing important for the result of the game, but along with several positive aspects, a few things worth noting
    The good: the correct rule application on Vinicius' delay change. Good athletic stamina in a very hot environnement. Always close to the action without disrupting the game.
    The bad: missed YC to Huijsen for high foot on Martinez. In the final seconds missed YC to Cucurella for unsportsmanlike conduct. Very little extratime: only 1' in the first half with 2 goals + Courtois treated by medical personnel, only 3' in the second half with 1 goal + 8 changes + many waste of time by Real Madrid side

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think expectations of additional time have to change. If allowed 10s to go off, then suddenly less is required. (I will agree, 3 seemed light, but probably inkeeping with modern Uefa expectation).
      As for the foot, Huijsen has his foot below head height, Martinez saw this, headed the ball, then simulated to act as if the contact was with the boot, not ball. I think the officials got this spot on, play on was right. (Unless I missed contact, but I don't believe there was any. Martinez's behaviour was nothing to admire)

      Delete
    2. No, Martinez didn't simulate the act. On the interviews after the game there was a mark on his cheek - as noted live by the Sky Italia reporter with whom he was speaking

      Delete
    3. Also I forgot another one. Why the VAR didn't intervene for Cucurella talking to Bisseck covering his mouth with his hand? He certainly wasn't paying compliments.

      Delete
    4. Thought that rule was made up by FIFA for the WC

      Delete
  46. Regarding Dortmund’s game, the penalty whistled seems rather wrong and there was room for VAR intervention, both players are holding.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Haven’t seen it but you punish the more serious offence in terms of restart = penalty.

      Delete
    2. You’ll know what I mean once you see it:)

      Delete
    3. I also don't like the penalty given by Sozza

      Delete
  47. About penalty by Sozza:
    https://streamin.me/v/dfb4d566
    One can say that attacker starts the holding but then what follows by defender is very clear penalty. For sure correct by VAR to support but it doesn't give the idea of a 100% situation for thjis reason.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree that any VAR intervention would have been unwarranted. That said, I doubt Sozza would whistle such a penalty in Serie A under Orsato's rule.

      Delete
  48. I don’t understand why you dont like this penalty by Sozza. Clear continuous holding with both hands.

    ReplyDelete
  49. Am I the only one who thinks Michael Oliver is overweight? His belly is quite noticeable.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Marciniak had a very poor game yesterday at the Estádio do Dragão in Porto. We should not be afraid to say so.
    There were several reckless fouls that should have resulted in yellow cards, constant unsporting behaviour from members of Porto’s coaching staff without any punishment, and several confrontations between players and staff — including incidents at half-time and after the final whistle.
    It was a very poor performance from a referee who is undoubtedly one of the best in the world. Yesterday, however, at the Dragão, Marciniak seemed to underestimate the nature and difficulty of the game. His physical performance was also below the level expected from him.
    Meritocracy must apply to everyone, including the leading figures of European refereeing. Reputation and past performances should never exempt anyone from being held to the same standards as every other referee.

    ReplyDelete
  51. Whe u gain experience u handle matches in a very different way

    ReplyDelete

Thank you for writing a comment on our blog!