Tuesday, 20 October 2026

Champions League 2026/27 - Referee Appointments - Matchday 3 (I)

2026/27 UEFA Champions League. Please find below the referee appointments for the first set of MD3 games, to be played on Tuesday 20 October 2026.  



Tuesday 20 October 2026

18:45 CET - Istanbul (Fenerbahçe Şükrü Saracoğlu Spor Kompleksi)
FENERBAHÇE (TUR) - SK SLAVIA PRAHA (CZE) 
Referee: Ricardo de Burgos Bengoetxea ESP
Assistant Referee 1: Iker De Francisco Grijalba ESP
Assistant Referee 2: Iván Massó Granado ESP
Fourth Official: Adrián Cordero Vega ESP
Video Assistant Referee: Guillermo Cuadra Fernández ESP
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Javier Iglesias Villanueva ESP
UEFA Referee Observer: Aleksandar Stavrev MKD
UEFA Delegate Olzhas Abrayev KAZ

18:45 CET - Baku (Olympic Stadium)
SABAH FK (AZE) - BORUSSIA DORTMUND (GER) 
Referee: Javier Alberola Rojas ESP
Assistant Referee 1: Alfredo Rodríguez Moreno ESP
Assistant Referee 2: Carlos Álvarez Fernández ESP
Fourth Official: Víctor García Verdura ESP
Video Assistant Referee: César Soto Grado ESP 
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Valentín Pizarro Gómez ESP
UEFA Referee Observer: Michael Anthony Riley ENG 
UEFA Delegate: Marcin Stefański POL

21:00 CET - Paris (Parc des Princes) 
PARIS SAINT GERMAIN (FRA) - FC BARCELONA (ESP) 
Referee: Michael Oliver ENG
Assistant Referee 1: Stuart Burt ENG
Assistant Referee 2: James Mainwaring ENG 
Fourth Official: Robert Jones ENG
Video Assistant Referee: Marco Di Bello ITA
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Daniele Chiffi ITA 
UEFA Referee Observer: Rune Pedersen NOR
UEFA Delegate: Peter Palenčík SVK

21:00 CET - Liverpool (Anfield) 
LIVERPOOL FC (ENG) - VILLARREAL CF (ESP) 
Referee: Szymon Marciniak POL
Assistant Referee 1: Tomasz Listkiewicz POL
Assistant Referee 2: Adam Kupsik POL
Fourth Official: Wojciech Myc POL
Video Assistant Referee: Piotr Lasyk POL
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Benjamin Brand GER
UEFA Referee Observer: Itchko Lozev BUL
UEFA Delegate: Nils Fisketjonn NOR

21:00 CET - Manchester (Etihad Stadium) 
MANCHESTER CITY FC (ENG) - AEK (GRE) 
Referee: Willy Delajod FRA
Assistant Referee 1: Erwan Finjean FRA
Assistant Referee 2: Valentin Evrard FRA
Fourth Official: Bastien Dechepy FRA
Video Assistant Referee: Bram Van Driessche BEL
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Christian Dingert GER 
UEFA Referee Observer: Carlos Velasco Carballo ESP
UEFA Delegate: Luis Cuervas Del Real ESP

21:00 CET - Rome (Stadio Olimpico) 
AS ROMA (ITA) - ŠK SLOVAN BRATISLAVA (SVK)
Referee: Sandro Schärer SUI
Assistant Referee 1: Stéphane De Almeida SUI
Assistant Referee 2: Jonas Erni SUI
Fourth Official: Anojen Kanagasingam SUI
Video Assistant Referee: Fedayi San SUI
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Tomasz Kwiatkowski POL
UEFA Referee Observer: Peter Sippel GER
UEFA Delegate: Thura Win ENG

21:00 CET - Porto (Estádio do Dragão)
FC PORTO (POR) - PSV (NED) 
Referee: Daniel Siebert GER
Assistant Referee 1: Jan Seidel GER
Assistant Referee 2: Rafael Foltyn GER 
Fourth Official: Max Burda GER
Video Assistant Referee: Sören Storks GER
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Robert Schröder GER
UEFA Referee Observer: Alain Hamer LUX
UEFA Delegate: Rudolf Řepka CZE

21:00 CET - Naples (Stadio Diego Armando Maradona) 
SSC NAPOLI (ITA) - FK BODØ/GLIMT (NOR) 
Referee: José María Sánchez Martínez ESP
Assistant Referee 1: Raúl Cabañero Martínez ESP
Assistant Referee 2: Íñigo Prieto López de Cerain ESP
Fourth Official: Juan Martínez Munuera ESP
Video Assistant Referee: Tiago Bruno Lopes Martins POR 
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Carlos del Cerro Grande ESP
UEFA Referee Observer: Leslie Irvine NIR
UEFA Delegate: Christian Kofoed DEN

21:00 CET - Stuttgart (MHPArena)
VFB STUTTGART (GER) - CLUB ATLÉTICO DE MADRID (ESP)
Referee: Serdar Gözübüyük NED
Assistant Referee 1: Patrick Inia NED
Assistant Referee 2: Rogier Honig NED 
Fourth Official: Jeroen Manschot NED
Video Assistant Referee: Dennis Johan Higler NED 
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Stuart Attwell ENG
UEFA Referee Observer: Martin Atkinson ENG
UEFA Delegate: Mauro Tonolini ITA 

96 comments:

  1. Another Spanish referee has been assigned to an Istanbul team's home match. Rosetti always seems to choose either a Spanish or an Italian referee. I really wonder why..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. + Additionally, Cuadra, who is appointed as the VAR referee, was a VAR referee in Tukish Süper Lig matches played by Turkey's big clubs a few weeks ago..

      Delete
  2. It will be interesting to observe whether Javier Alberola Rojas can emulate Sven Jablonski’s rapid rise last season ...

    ReplyDelete
  3. Possible last step before promotion for Delajod

    ReplyDelete
  4. Management of Spanish referees: debut for Alberola, it's time for him after a few Europa League group stage games. One can agree that he can raise the level of Spanish officiating.
    Then, De Burgos is selected again, in this case clearly over Hernandez Hernandez afer his CL play off, and so the referee from Basque Country gets his second overall appearance, after having officiated at Atalanta's home one year ago. Nevertheless, I don't consider him as referee at level for CL games, or at least, better than the other Spanish who don't get games.
    It's not a case, and I answer to HB2300, that De Burgos will officiate again Slavia Praha, he did the same one year ago in Bergamo.
    So the choice is made based on that, to explain committee's point of view, they think it's a rather expected win by home-side.
    As for Sabah, after their first win in CL, they are very, very relaxed and it's the best team for allowing referees at their debut.
    Sanchez Martinez sent to Naples, at moment definitely a secondary game, but still with the Italian team, and so a certain experience with a referee coming from a major country. Similar speech can be made for Schaerer, as we discussed very likely back from a small injury, he gets Roma. But they wouldn't have appointed a big name like the Swiss, without an Italian team, even more against an opponent like Slovan Bratislava. It's absoltuely very clear how Rosetti thinks, saving all potential controversies by appointing a more experienced referee than the needed for Italian teams.
    About the rest, it's a regular one for Marciniak, again at Liverpool's hom after the famous replacement in KO stage.
    Oliver full of big games, since it's hard to officiate the CL final for him, given English teams, this is the management. Impressive.
    So the Europa League assignment was just something more, one couldn't have planned another appearance on this week.
    Second game for Siebert as well, after last week's performance in Villarreal. It was liked by Rosetti, we can say.
    However, the point of criticism can be that with so many options, having already some referees with two games in less than a week could be too much, but that's how Rosetti works.
    Gozubuyuk with a second appearance in CL, after MD1, but appointment not reported so far by KNVB site. That's strange, since they alwas report assignments in al circumstances, one should think when they don't do that (it was also guessed by a reaer some days ago here), we should then think about a late choice or replacement.
    Nevertheless, we have to wait to know whether Makkelie will appear on Wednesday's set of games to make his first appearance.
    Kovacs seems back to officiate as well, I have read about some controversy in his Romanian domestic game, but I think he will not get a big one in CL, either a secondary game or Europa League.
    Last but not least: Velasco with Delajod, it seems clear they want the French to replace the retired Bastien as third French Elite referee.
    However, on paper, he is given a too easy game for being observed by a committee member in Manchester...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As for the Spanish referees, they didn’t get a single Champions League appointment last round, but there are three of them this time. Their number one, Alejandro Hernández, is yet to make his Champions League debut this season, so I reckon he could be in line for a game in Munich tomorrow.

      As for Oliver, he was in France for a Europa League game on Thursday, is refereeing in the Premier League today, and is back in France next Tuesday. That’s quite a busy schedule, with not much of a break in between!

      Delete
    2. Given the performances of Bodo, I think, that's actually a good game for Sanchez, clearly better than Schärer's appointment.
      The game for de Burgos seems more open to me, I had rather expected an Elite referee there, also given the atmosphere in Istanbul.
      Hernandez surely to be expected on Wednesday, also given the AVAR appointment of del Cerro Grande. Not sure about Munich, maybe the game in Como would be more fitting.

      And yes, Oliver's schedule really seems unreasonable. I don't know, why he had to get Europa League, if he was considered for the CL game on Tuesday.

      Delete
  5. Inter vs shakhtar donest also may be officiate spanish referee or portuguese my opinion may portuguese
    Also i see here change of del cero grande after wrong penalty with inter

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, but a bit strange that Martins is working with Sanchez. If a Portuguese is appointed on Wednesday, you would have expected Martins there.

      Delete
    2. I have that feeling that will be spanish or portuguese in milan

      Delete
    3. I think The reason that is not appointed grande with sanchez is not that no portuguese referee in wednesday but i think the mistake he made inter vs club with out any intervention

      Delete
  6. i don't know if you've noticed, but Serdar Gözübüyük keeps getting assigned to matches of the exact same difficulty level. When are we finally going to see him in a big match? The types of games he's been getting for years are always the same level.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It seems as though the Dutch referee is dealing with physical issues or perhaps something else 'off the pitch,' as his career progression appears to have hit a standstill.

      Delete
    2. How did you come to such a conclusion? Because he is constantly being assigned to Champions League matches... If he had physical or mental issues, he wouldn't be assigned to any Champions League matches.

      Delete
    3. I sad physical issues because, if I'm not mistaken, he has failed a UEFA fitness test at least once.

      I didn't mean mental issues or anything specific like that, just that his career hasn't lived up to expectations. He has completely plateaued with no progress (look at his last three years).

      Delete
  7. Spain has carried the day for this first set of appointments.

    Michael Oliver with a repeat of last year's fixture: PSG Vs Barcelona.
    I pray he comes out unscathed

    ReplyDelete
  8. Looking at the referee assignments so far, if it will be a final without any english teams, Oliver seems almost predestined to referee it.

    Rojas continues his rise through the UEFA ranks, and I believe he will very soon become Spain's number one referee.

    Delajod is the next French name moving up, climbing to the number three spot behind Turpin and Letexier. The French Football Federation deserves praise for achieving the best results in promoting successful young referees.

    As for the rest, the assignments seem perfectly logical. Any claims that only certain referees officiate specific teams seem somewhat baseless to me.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Honestly, it's hard to believe that Hernandez Hernandez will appear in Champions League, after three Spanish referee on Tuesday, even more unlikely to get a game like Bayern - Arsenal (but then of course everything is possible...).
    I think he could be in Europa League.
    Also, not intervening in Inter - Brugge was a fully correct choice, not a mistake, penalty by Saggi supportable / correct decision.
    A Portuguese name for Wednesday is Godinho, he could get again Inter at home after last years' appearance in Inter - Kairat.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Looking at VAR/AVAR appointments:
    - Marciniak/Kwiatkowski still strictly avoided on UEFA level (happened at the WC though). After VARs from other countries, now it's Lasyk's turn.
    - van Driessche with Delajod could indicate another French referee with Brisard on Wednesday - maybe Letexier in Munich
    - it also means, probably no game for Lambrechts again
    - Brand and Schröder could indicate another game for Zwayer and/or Stieler; a third game for Jablonski would be extreme
    - Dingert could work with Eskas or Meler again
    - We can also expect at least one Italian with Chiffi, but Mariani, Massa and Sozza are all possible
    - Attwell could mean that Kavanagh works again
    - Higler without van Boekel for the first time in a while. Maybe it indicates no game for van Boekel on Wednesday
    - Martins (rather no Portuguese) and del Cerro Grande (probably Hernandez) already discussed above

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. For me if joao pinheiro is not appointed inter vs shakhtar or any match for me it is some thing impossible or abnormal

      Delete
  11. Spanish referees were appointed for Fenerbahçe’s last two home matches in the Champions League. Just a few weeks ago, Manzano officiated the Fenerbahçe-Roma match. To me, these appointments feel like taking the easy way out. Earlier this season, Burgos was assigned to Beşiktaş’s home match as well.
    Referees from countries other than Italy and Spain should also be appointed to Istanbul teams' home matches. The atmosphere in those stadiums is unlike anywhere else, and other referees deserve to experience it too. However, UEFA clearly takes zero risks and keeps relying on the same countries..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. These are the referee appointments for just the last two seasons.
      Let's call it a coincidence

      Galatasaray
      • Galatasaray vs. Barcelona — Marco Guida (Italy)
      • Galatasaray vs. Liverpool — Jesús Gil Manzano (Spain)
      • Galatasaray vs. Union SG — José María Sanchez Martinez (Spain)
      • Galatasaray vs. Zalgiris — Marco Guida (Italy)

      Fenerbahçe
      • Fenerbahçe vs. Slavia Prague - Ricardo de
      Burgos Bengoetxea (Spain)
      • Fenerbahçe vs. Roma - Jesús Gil Manzano (Spain)
      • Fenerbahçe vs. Rangers — Alejandro Hernández
      Hernandez (Spain)
      • Fenerbahçe vs. Ferencvaros — Ricardo de Burgos
      Bengoetxea (Spain)
      • Fenerbahçe vs. Lille — José María Sanchez
      Martinez (Spain)
      • Fenerbahçe vs. Lyon — Simone Sozza (Italy)

      Beşiktaş 2026/27
      • Beşiktaş vs. Marseille — Andrea Colombo (Italy)
      • Beşiktaş vs. Midtjylland — Ricardo de Burgos
      Bengoetxea (Spain)

      Delete
    2. Because the playing structure of Turkish teams is aimed at deceiving the referee (similar to Spanish local football).

      Delete
  12. Orsato guidelines are starting to annoy me… clear foul prior to Como’s first game, not whistled by Di Bello.. this is not how football is supposed to be

    ReplyDelete
  13. With Alberola Rojas making his debut that means 6 spanish referees in the CL since the start of last season. Which I believe is 2 more than anyone else. Although the 3 in the elite list haven't always impressed recently.....

    ReplyDelete
  14. I just looking NOT-ARS, referee Oliver. Tuesday big CL-match PSG-BARCA. It is easy to referee matches, preparation enough?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oliver is not a robot, he's a human. On Thursday he was in france, now in Nottingham, and tomorrow he will travel to Paris. It's not fair to put such a pressure on a referee..

      Delete
  15. As for Oliver, the Europa League appointment could have been avoided.
    Or he could have skipped the domestic one.
    You can see, with this management by Rosetti, that is very different from old times (both Rosetti's first times and especially Collina's last times), it's hard to "give breath" to a referee, called to officiate such big games, in a few days.
    But with other referees that UEFA could have used in one of the two games for which Oliver is involved, it's clear that they don't care about that.
    Quantity before quality, very often for Rosetti quality is not an issue.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It seems Oliver is getting more rests domestically including the coming week of fixtures he would have only refereed in one of the 3 weeks. This wouldn't have happened previously but I wonder is webb looking at it to get the best out of him he needs to really manage his matches

      Delete
  16. Regarding Spanish referees, I don't how much they're taking into account a long-term matter. Let's assume that Spain is gonna have at least 3 Elite referees if nothing really serious happens. Hdez-Hdez is 44, Sánchez Martínez 43, and Gil Manzano -the weakest one- 42. Now Spain's ageing situation has changed, and retirement can come after 45 but before 50. Let's put 47 as an average. That means that in four/five years we could see three other Spanish Elites.
    Martínez Munuera is out of the race because of being already 43-44. We have De Burgos (39-40) and Alberola, who is considerably younger.
    Do they want to push Alberola first? I can understand that he has great potential (though I find De Burgos a much better referee than he is often considered in this blog), but you're closing the door to De Burgos (he could be 43-44 at the next retirement; it would be nonsense) without having two other solid candidates after them (Busquets Ferrer is not taking off, García Verdura is starting his international path in January...)

    Then, the most logical solution is to promote De Burgos first, maybe coexisting with the other three for a season, and then Alberola, with still 10 years of career ahead, and finally a third candidate that should show much more in the upcoming years. (Or both at the same time) So, maybe so many Turkish appointments for De Burgos mean more than a simple UCL group match. I think he's still the first in the race.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Rojas is the favourite for Clasico.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sánchez Martínez. Too risky at this point to assign Alberola with so many possibilities ahead

      Delete
    2. seems some are denying that Alberola Rojas is the favourite ... Very likely that Sanchez Martinez will get it ....

      Delete
  18. Breaking 🚨
    Anthony Taylor has been appointed as the chairman of the Central Referee Board of the Turkish Football Federation.

    The Turkish Football Federation announced the decisions taken after the meeting held in Riva today.

    The TFF announced that Anthony Taylor has been appointed to the chairmanship of the Central Referee Board, which became vacant after Ferhat Gündoğdu following his arrest. Anthony Taylor became the new chairman of the MHK.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. + Alan Snoddy, Igor Radojicic and Barış Şimşek, have been appointed as MHK members.

      Delete
    2. Anthony Taylor came to the world's most chaotic football environment as an director of elite refereeing to the committee chairman in just two months.. Unbelievable 😂

      Delete
  19. De Burgos fails to award Slavia a clear corner....which then results in a Slavia goal after the goal kick..

    ReplyDelete
  20. 19” clear penalty missed.. FEN-SLA

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. https://streama.in/lUw9ZlcdBf1YvMN/watch

      Delete
    2. Well, at least the famous Basque referee was very convinced about his call. Very clear gestures, he would have never whistled it. Very hard for VAR to join in such assessment, given the firmness of the referee.

      Delete
    3. So, in your opinion, should it have been a penalty?

      Delete
    4. No, I'm not saying that. Strong arguments to whistle penalty.

      Delete
    5. Defender made a clear impact to the atacker. IMO penalty.
      I think he would whistle a penalty if he was in a better position. His positioning was very bad in this situation.
      What about VAR intervention? Was it necessary?

      Delete
  21. Wow,one of weaker performances of De Burgos in a long time,irritating both teams equally.

    ReplyDelete
  22. I haven't seen such a terrible referee performance in a long time. Burgos is having a disastrous game.

    ReplyDelete
  23. No problems for Alberola Rojas on his debut. AR2 with two good on-field decisions to disallow Sabah goal in first half and allow Dortmund goal in second half.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Alberola Rojas with a good performance in a normal difficulty game. The biggest calls were FK + YC to SAB #3 (foul outside the penalty area and SPA due to another defender) in 22' and disallowed Sabah's goal for tight offside in 29' (AR2).

    All cards given to Sabah were correct, (22' SPA, 48' SPA (could've been avoided with a more lenient approach), 57' for cynical SPA kick, 89' for dissent), however DOR #24 was on the verge of caution for persistent infringing the LotG (17', 19', 38', 71') and DOR #21 could've been cautioned for reckless challenge (78').

    Good lost time compensation in general (1' and 2', respectively) but not adding further half a minute for Dortmund's substitution during the second half's additional time was suboptimal.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The 22' incident:
      https://streama.in/0hSxdMFcOXfFzYM/watch

      Delete
    2. And one should mention a very high level of both assistant referees in this game regarding offside/onside decisions!

      Delete
    3. Yes. Performance was good.
      But AR1 with 1 cheap flag around 80’ …

      Delete
    4. The 22’ incident

      IMO Rojas missed RC in this situation because it was DOGSO

      Delete
    5. Very good match by Arberola Rojas in his his debut in a normal game.

      Delete
  25. Remember when games used to kick off on time

    ReplyDelete
  26. Marciniak made it to Anfield in one piece!!

    ReplyDelete
  27. Wrong yellow for joao cancelo he was not deserve yellow my opinion

    ReplyDelete
  28. I think that after today, it’s become clear to the committee who should be the next Spanish elite-level referee. Burgos isn’t at the level required for Champions League matches.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Fantasy call from Oliver in Paris, about Doue foul.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Missed foul and potential YC for a foul on Olmo ? I was focus on the contact and clearly tackle on the ankle but can’t tell if this is a foul.

    ReplyDelete
  31. I‘m really not trying to overreact, but CLEAR missed RC by Oliver… Studs to face!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I clearly disagree. It's Pacho's responsability trying to play the ball with the head near to the ground. Fermin tries to play the ball and can't predict that Pacho's head is there.

      Delete
    2. https://streama.in/tQ9q1FygWOWYgOR/watch

      Delete
    3. Ah lads come on red card it's a footballing action the attacker is on the grand trying to take a shot the defender is in with a diving header. Not every contact is a red card

      Delete
    4. That is never a red card. It should have been an indirect free kick for Barcelona, as the PSG player lowered his head close to the ground.

      Delete
    5. 100% right. This is never a red card. This is also not an indirect freekick for Barcelona. Sorry. NO WAY.

      Direct Freekick for PSG is a smart and totally correct / accepted decision. That’s it.

      By the way Oliver as GOOD as always…!

      Delete
    6. I love this protection some referees provide.

      All that’s missing is for them to say that the PSG player *must* be shown a yellow card.

      Delete
    7. Defender gets there first, attacker tries to play ball. Careless, yes. Reckless, I don't think so. SFP no way

      Delete
    8. Careless? No way. Reckless? At least, YC must be given. SFP? Possible but in this situation too harsh.

      Delete
    9. According to IFAB, playing in a dangerous manner is any action that, while trying to play the ball, threatens injury to someone—including the player themself. This also includes preventing a nearby opponent from playing the ball for fear of injury.

      If a defender plays in a dangerous manner inside their own penalty area—for example, by stooping too low to head the ball near an opponent’s foot—the opposing team is awarded an indirect free kick. If the offence occurs inside the goal area, the kick is taken from the nearest point on the goal-area line parallel to the goal line.

      Delete
  32. Schaerer penalty call: https://streama.in/fByFQvU6mkRFDyz/watch

    ReplyDelete
  33. Gozuyubuk red card for SFP:
    https://streamin.link/v/0922040c
    The referee was behind the challenge so he could see the point of contact.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good decision. Actually it’s quite “rare” to see him pulling a RC without VAR input. I hope he will also show that skill in Eredivisie games from now on.

      Delete
    2. Well spotted by Gözübüyük. I have the impression that he has improved a lot in the last two years and is much more confident in his decisions

      Delete
  34. Siebert forces a PSV doctor to enter the pitch, even though the PSV player eventually did't want any treatment. Siebert really jelled to the PSV doctor—very remarkable. '86

    ReplyDelete
  35. Very positive set of games, no OFRs (unless I missed something), good officiating by almost everyone.
    Curious to see about De Burgos, to understand more about the performance.
    No problem for Delajod in Manchester. But that wasn't a game in which to appoint a committee member, as I said two days ago.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What do you think about this situation?

      https://streama.in/0hSxdMFcOXfFzYM/watch

      Was the VAR call necessary?

      Delete
    2. De Burgos Bengoetxea

      The decent level of control was assured by the Spaniard but his usual chaotic / overenthusiastic style is the opposite to current expectations. He should be praised for the ease in reaching players but the manner in which he communicates with them is really weird.

      There were two penalty appeals, both waved away: 19' - holding, could have been given but, imo, not mandatory as the ball was cleared by another player and the shirt pulling was smartly used by attacker; 71' alleged charging against Lukaku, not enough. In both cases De Burgos was very clear in his gestures, letting players know that in no way there was an offence. It's something Rosetti should be very satisfied with (decision made by the referee), although on the other hand it's risky - in case of mistake in assessment you could end up as a clown.

      Disciplinary control was okay overall:
      - two tactical offences rightly deemed not enough for an opening YC (6', 13')
      - play-on after potential illegal use of arm by FEN #3 and FK-only after tactical offence by SLA #16 (28')
      - good opening YC to FEN #91 for SPA (31')
      - play-on after late challenge by FEN #91 but even if whistled no (2)YC would be correct as he didn't want to hurt an opponent and even did everything to minimize the contact
      - well spotted handball outside the penalty area but the FK is executed too far from the penalty area (35')
      - good warning to SLA #6 after late challenge from behind (and previous foul in 16') (38')
      - dubious YC to FEN #37 for follow-through step on ankle (49')
      - biggest mistake of the game: missed holding by FEN #27 that should result in a YC (55')
      - another play-on call after action by FEN #27 ends up in an understandable dissenting behaviour from Slavia's bench, YC to coach (59')
      - YC SLA #30 for SPA holding; mandatory but unlucky moment of the game (60')
      - play-on after little push by Lukaku leading to a dangerous attack (63')
      - good advantage after tackle by FEN #91 - no replay but I guess it was (very) close to 2YC (64')
      - possible YC FEN #11 for reckless challenge (66')
      - correct YC FEN #5 for reckless SPA tackle but terrible card showing procedure (88')

      In my opinion, this performance was far from disaster described above but 55' should have been avoided.

      Delete
    3. Thanks for this report! A nice one to read.
      If possible, I will add some clips to follow!

      Delete
    4. @Whistle2 YC for SPA is supportable due to the other defender, but my feeling about the incident was red card. RC for DOGSO would have been supported by VAR as well, for me being a better decision.

      Delete
    5. Here the other penalty area incident in 71', with the previous one having been already posted above in the discussion:
      https://streamin.link/v/fdc16a95
      Once again, I must say excellent De Burgos in regards of body language and making clear that he took a decision, this aspect must be very liked by UEFA. However, in the first case, one can discuss about the opportunity to give penalty, then in this second incident I think all can agree it's OK to play on.

      The clip of the mistake in 55':
      https://streamin.link/v/297c6155
      Missed indeed a very clear YC.

      Delete
    6. As for De Burgos, I think he got it completely wrong with that penalty incident, involving the shoulder charge on the Fenerbahçe player.

      When there’s no intent to play the ball, whether it's a push or a pull, it’s a foul—and a foul inside the box is a penalty.

      Going beyond the rulebook, am I the only one who sees that Slavia player's action as completely unacceptable? If these kinds of challenges go unpunished, can you imagine what would happen during every corner, free kick, or cross into the box?

      Delete
  36. Easy game for Marciniak. 2 YCs, little more, always alert

    ReplyDelete
  37. Despite the match being relatively easy at Anfield, Marciniak is starting to return to his usual level. Another good performance.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Watched the entire Stuttgart–Atletico game and Gozubuyuk was very good in what was a difficult match to referee. He looked confident, stayed in control and managed the game very well. All sanctions were justified, and the red card was an excellent decision. Dangerous action. His decisions were consistent from start to finish. A very strong refereeing performance overall.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Clear offside by Ferran Torres before the corner that L. Hernandez headed in to score. The assistant was in a very bad position…

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. How can we be sure that was clear offside? With this angle we can just doubt about it nothing more. Do you have video or photo from offside camera? I guess this was fast counter attack?

      Delete
    2. Watching this scereenshot, one can't say it was offside, possible that attacker was in line with the ball. You should report the classic camera to discuss about offside.

      Delete
    3. had that feeling during live play and on the first slow-motion replay, but I can't confirm it.

      Delete
    4. Maybe with VAR a bit of the shoulder might be off, but saying it's a "clear offside" is a ridiculous take, most (if not all) of his body is behind the line of the ball.

      Delete
    5. Of course, bad positioning of AR. But discussion should be about player off side, not only about off side position. Did attacker try to play the ball or to have any influence on defender? For me not clear situation about off side position, no VAR stuff, and therefore significant mistake of AR because he wasn't on the line with the ball or the second last defender.

      Delete
    6. What are you talking about? The player offside played the ball afterwards so absolutely no discussion there. Furthermore, it led „only“ to a corner kick, so no chance for VAR to intervene.

      Delete
  40. I don't think I've seen any comments on Sánchez Martínez in NAP-BODO: in my opinion, it wasn't a particularly brilliant performance.
    Excellent from an athletic standpoint, he showed indecisiveness and conflicting judgments on a technical level, sometimes penalizing simple contact and other times failing to sanction extremely blatant holding (characteristic of a SPA, which, strangely enough, was not even detected by the AR).
    This lack of consistency often led to uncertainty among the players as to whether or not to expect the whistle.
    The disciplinary assessments were more uniform, though overly inclined towards tolerance.
    Honestly, a below-average performance for an Élite Ref.

    ReplyDelete

Thank you for writing a comment on our blog!