Saturday, 30 May 2026

2025/26 UEFA Champions League final Paris Saint Germain (FRA) - Arsenal (ENG) - Referee Daniel Siebert (GER) - Discussion

A rather unexpected assignment for the German referee, in charge of UEFA Champions League final, good luck to his team for this milestone in the career! 


                  

30 May 2026, 18:00 CET - Puskás Aréna, Budapest (HUN)
PARIS SAINT GERMAIN FC (FRA) - ARSENAL FC (ENG)
Referee: Daniel Siebert GER 
Assistant Referee 1: Jan Seidel GER
Assistant Referee 2: Rafael Foltyn GER
Fourth Official: Sandro Schärer SUI
Reserve Assistant Referee: Guadalupe Porras Ayuso ESP 
Video Assistant Referee: Bastian Dankert GER 
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Robert Schröder GER
Video Assistant Referee Support: Carlos Del Cerro Grande ESP 
UEFA Referee Observer: Vladimir Šajn SVN
UEFA Delegate: Radenko Mijatović SVN

53 comments:

  1. Vitinha on Skelly probably the softest foul I’ve ever seen given. Seibert been very whistle happy early on.

    ReplyDelete
  2. What, I must ask, can be the case for "no handball" prior to Arsenal's goal? The arm is clearly raised high, making the body unnaturally bigger.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Are we seeing a different match? Arm is in front of his chest, not making his body bigger at all.

      Delete
    2. I speak of the other arm, Joris.

      Delete
  3. Looks like it hits the other arm of Trossard on the first Arsenal goal, no? That arm is well tucked in.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, I really don’t understand the discussion. Pretty clearly not punishable imo

      Delete
    2. Agree JorisC.
      The potential handball at 16' is a much more interesting incident.

      Delete
    3. Neither incident punishable

      Delete
    4. Agree with Mikael W, would love to rewatch it

      Delete
    5. At first, I thought the ball clearly hit Saka's arm, but looking back, it's not so clear.

      Delete
    6. It absolutely hit Saka’s hand. AFTER he played the ball. Not a handball. Unexpected, not unnaturally bigger, deflection from own body part.

      Delete
    7. Saka’s foot has barely altered the ball’s direction or speed. In other words, he isn’t playing the ball.

      Delete
    8. First of all, it absolutely did. Second, touching the ball means you played the ball….

      Delete
  4. 30s before authorizing medical staff to came in after an head injury, that’s a weird one.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Also why not be sensible and drop the ball to the keeper and an international referee blowing the whistle for a drop ball which is not required

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not required means he doesn’t have to. Not that he isn’t allowed to. Completely appropriate when players aren’t aware that play is being restarted. Nothing wrong what so ever.

      Delete
    2. By whistling he activates play before the ball is legally live. Play not live till the ball touches the ground

      Delete
    3. Whistle isn’t required to restart a regular free kick either. Yet, you can ABSOLUTELY do it when appropriate. Same thing here. You don’t understand what ”required” means.

      Delete
  6. A lot of people with a number of bizarre and nit picky criticisms so far in a game with very few incidents

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Just here to comment his game that’s it

      Delete
    2. Probably because the game is awful. Players falling about looking for cheap fouls which to be fair he is not giving.

      Delete
  7. What Arteta is allowed to do is incredible.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Frustrated PSG players with Arsenal players trying to stop every quick play, it’s gonna be important for Siebert to manage this perfectly.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Excellent decision to stop the play and give HT when arsenal player is taking so long to play the CK

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree! Sends a clear message and he has 15 minutes to explain his reasoning and calm frustrations about it

      Delete
    2. Absolutely, but it seems he made it for the wrong reason (getting ‘annoyed’ rather than making a considered tactical choice). Overall decent performance in a bizarre/poor 1half for football.

      Delete
    3. Agree @Mikael he neees to make it clearer pretty quick if he wants to control the 2nd half especially with throw in

      Delete
  10. I think Siebert delivered one of the worst first-half performances in UEFA Champions League final history. It was a very poor refereeing display.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thats absolute rubbish and you know it

      Delete
    2. No one talking about the referee after first half. Only trolls.

      Delete
  11. A very poor first half in terms of quality from the teams.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Extremley good first half from Siebert! Especially I like the way that he manage the last corner kick for waste the time. Pretty satisfied!

    ReplyDelete
  13. Don't mind him not allowing the corner. If its over the added time and the attacking team are taking ages why wait

    ReplyDelete
  14. Positive showing from Siebert, finally took action on time wasting by not letting the corner at the end be taken, the Saka handball incident is interesting, Siebert will need to be sharp in 2nd half

    ReplyDelete
  15. A good first half from Siebert in my opinion. The goal incident for me is clearly not a punishable handball and a good call to allow the goal. The Saka "handball" again for me is not a punishable handball also. Managing the game fairly well and has displayed a high level of technical accuracy and good sensible refereeing throughout.
    The temperature of this game will no doubt increase in the second half so Siebert will need to be ok his toes to manage the game effectively and well and ensure time is managed as that will be a key sticking point for the game.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Not the best game management by Siebert. He is not really doing much about Arsenal’s clear time wasting…and then decides to blow for half time before an Arsenal corner. May have been taking their time but you would always expect the corner to be taken. Especially when Arsenal are so prolific at them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I absolutely agreed with you, PSG doesn’t want to the corner,Arsenal want the corner and waiting whole game. Now he seems taking PSG side with unnecessary call

      Delete
  17. Excellent decision to blow half time whistle for Arsenal time wasting. Before the corner two players gave the ball to a third one who finally made the throw in. I'd like to see a yc in such a situation. But it is an awful game with many interruptions and time wasting and Siebert tries his best not to come into the spotlights.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Overall done well not giving in to two poor teams and looking for soft fouls. Should allow the taking of the corner kick as UEFA instructed previously to end the half/game in a neutral area

    ReplyDelete
  19. That was Unnecessary by Daniel Siebert! He start to create unwanted attention and if you going half time to start don’t give it!!!

    ReplyDelete
  20. Here’s a natural English translation that preserves the tone and meaning of your text:

    Siebert is a robotic referee with no soul and no personality. His ability to interact with players is close to absolute zero. He remains virtually unresponsive to Arsenal’s constant time-wasting tactics. Technically and physically, there is little to criticize, but from a human and game-management perspective, he is simply not at the level required for a Champions League final.

    The incident where he awarded a corner at the very end of stoppage time only to blow for halftime immediately afterward is a perfect illustration of this: no proactivity, no effective management of a team that continuously disrupts the restart of play, and no meaningful reaction from the referee. Sorry, but not everyone can be a Danny Makkelie, a François Letexier, or a Slavko Vinčić.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. +1 and that’s probably why he is not going to the WC not a big personality especially when you compare him to other top EU refs

      Delete
    2. This comment is a great moment for me and my tin foil hat! :D

      Delete
  21. Why not whistle when there is a PSG player down in the box. Obviously not s severe injury, but a potential obstacle. Psg got possession on 40 m. Keep it simple.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Referees deserve better.
    REFSY brings comfort, stability and confidence to every match.
    Built by referees, for referees.
    Our e-shop is now live — this is just the beginning.
    http://www.refsy.eu/
    https://www.instagram.com/refsy.eu

    ReplyDelete
  23. Potential handball at 16':
    www.streambug.org/cv/56f02d

    The only criteria possible to give this handball, as VG has rightly said, would be "completely deliberate handball", for making a second movement (because the ball had already been played before). I think the burden of proof for giving that decision falls some way short of what happens in this incident; correct play on.

    ReplyDelete
  24. After watching it back, I think that's a handball on Saka. Not from the first time the ball makes contact with his person but after that, his hand moves towards the ball and handles it with his left hand.

    On a side note, the broadcast should be displaying more replays from various angles. Lackluster production tonight.

    ReplyDelete

Thank you for writing a comment on our blog!