The referees in charge of 2025-26 UEFA Champions League KO Play-offs second legs. First set of games, 24 February 2026.
18:45 CET - Madrid (Estadio Metropolitano)
CLUB ATLÉTICO DE MADRID (ESP) - CLUB BRUGGE KV (BEL)
Referee: Clément Turpin FRA
Assistant Referee 1: Nicolas Danos FRA
Assistant Referee 2: Benjamin Pagès FRA
Fourth Official: Éric Wattellier FRA
Video Assistant Referee: Jérôme Brisard FRA
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Pol van Boekel NED
UEFA Referee Observer: Nuno Parreira De Castro POR
UEFA Delegate: David McDowell SVN
21:00 CET - Leverkusen (BayArena)
BAYER 04 LEVERKUSEN (GER) - OLYMBIAKÓS SFP (GRE)
Referee: Michael Oliver ENG
Assistant Referee 1: Stuart Burt ENG
Assistant Referee 2: James Mainwaring ENG
Fourth Official: Andrew Madley ENG
Fourth Official: Andrew Madley ENG
Video Assistant Referee: Marco Di Bello ITA
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Tomasz Kwiatkowski POL
UEFA Referee Observer: Itchko Lozev BUL
UEFA Delegate: Peter Lundström FIN
21:00 CET - Milan (Stadio Giuseppe Meazza)
FC INTERNAZIONALE MILANO (ITA) - FK BODØ/GLIMT (NOR)
Referee: Alejandro José Hernández Hernández ESP
Assistant Referee 1: José Enrique Naranjo Pérez ESP
Assistant Referee 2: Diego Sánchez Rojo ESP
Fourth Official: José Luis Munuera Montero ESP
Video Assistant Referee: Carlos del Cerro Grande ESP
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Guillermo Cuadra Fernández ESP
UEFA Referee Observer: Darko Čeferin SVN
UEFA Delegate: Thura Win ENG
21:00 CET - Newcastle (St James' Park)
NEWCASTLE UNITED FC (ENG) - QARABAĞ FK (AZE)
Referee: Davide Massa ITA
Assistant Referee 1: Filippo Meli ITA
Assistant Referee 2: Stefano Alassio ITA
Fourth Official: Luca Pairetto ITA
Video Assistant Referee: Daniele Chiffi ITA
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Christian Dingert GER
UEFA Referee Observer: João Ferreira POR
UEFA Delegate: Emmanuelle Puttaert BEL
Thoughts for Wednesday:
ReplyDelete- Remaining candidates are Vincic, Zwayer, Mariani, Taylor, Kovacs, Marciniak, Guida
- di Bello and Chiffi already appointed make the two Italians less likely
- In spite of Kwiatkowski, I don't expect Marciniak, because he hasn't done a game yet this year.
- Dingert could work with Vincic or Zwayer
- van Boekel could work with anyone, maybe Kovacs
- Cuadra could indicate Sanchez, but could also just be chosen as a Spanish AVAR for dCG
- Taylor only has one possible game (under normal assumptions): Real-Benfica
- For Atalanta-Dortmund, Sanchez or Vincic should be the only options
So overall, I think:
Atalanta-Dortmund: Sanchez (Cuadra)
Juventus-Galatasaray: Vincic (Dingert)
Real-Benfica: Taylor (Gillett)
PSG-Monaco: Kovacs (van Boekel)
Zwayer is the first alternative to mix things up.
I don't think Vincic will be appointed to the Juventus-Galatasaray match. because of his close ties to Fenerbahce ... vincic refereed the Galatasaray-Fenerbahce derby last year, and Galatasaray Club claimed that Vincic was close connected to Fenerbahce's vice president
DeleteJust some remarks, as discussed, Marciniak is injured so he is surely out, Mariani has a game tomorrow, Monday, so out from Wednesday CL as well. Few chances for Guida, who is about to officiate a serie A game today at 12:30 CET, but rather unlikely. Then, if we look at Oliver appointment with an Italian VAR, we could think all is possible, but on must mention as argument maybe less trust in English VARs?
DeleteAll in all, we can expect Sanchez in Bergamo and I would agree, very hard if not possible to expose Taylor in Madrid once again, after his career, but one can't rule this 100% out, Kovacs would meet again PSG and in case we could consider him among the narrow pool of officials who handle the French team. Vincic in Turin would be expected, here only other options would be Turpin (but he has another game), Letexier (already assigned in first legs) and Marciniak (injured). A different choice from the Slovenian, would be a big suprise, but it's even possible to think very easily, as you guessed, that he will be there working with the German VAR (after Dankert with Makkelie in first half). Now, thinking again to the switch of observers, I couldn't write the original names, but if I'm not wrong some of you stated that the observers from Juventus - Galatasaray and Newcastle - Qarabag have been switched. Well, given that there will be an Italian referee in Newcastle, it's impossible to think that he (Massa) was originally planned in Turin so we can draw conclusion that committee switches and changes observers between the games for some reasons, but only them and not the referees.
One more idea about the switch: Maybe Marciniak was the original idea for Juventus and as he didn't recover in time, the Newcastle referee was moved to there and Massa came in as replacement. In that case, this referee might be Zwayer?
DeleteMaybe things become clearer tomorrow.
Or maybe we are hallucinating and the change of observers happened independent from the referees...
Anyway I thought Massa deserved a better game after his group stage.
And if Vincic should be impossible for Galatasaray, Zwayer looks like the only alternative (because Kovacs and Sanchez had one of the teams in January) - Vincic could then go to Atalanta.
Very surprised to see Hernandez Hernandez in Milan.
ReplyDeleteGood appointment for Turpin.
My idea is that in this case committee kept the original decision, they didn't expect such a first leg score, but they didn't change the original appointment (differently from other circumstances). It's interesting once again to observe how different can be a 5-2 loss by Juventus in first leg than a 3-1 by Inter against a Norwegian side. The key factor for justifying Hernandez Hernandez (nothing against him personally of course, but we know how committee acts when they feel in danger of controversy) and reading this assignment is that even in case of elimination for Norwegian side, nothing extraordinary will happen, given the excellent campaign that the Nordic team has achieved so far. Honestly, this shouldn't be an argument because if they won 3-1 first leg, this means they are very good and rather strong team, or at least we can say they deserve to stay there, but it's undeniable that they are not a big name, so this can allow different reasoning by Rosetti & co.
DeleteNow, for committee, the potentially controversial point of this assignment is about the Italian team and if they will have something to complain in a context in which they feel they could do it. But it's a risk you can take, in the end. Inter on paper should be considered by far stronger than Norwegian side, if they don't win, just their fault (however, I think another Italian team would have received a different treatment).
DeleteIn the end, all Elite referees in the panel should in a way justify with facts that they belong to this category with merit and maybe, just saying that is enough without adding other arguments to discussion.
Well, he started late into the CL season, but then he had three good games, so not too unexpected to see him in KO stage. And then, as Chefren describes, Inter-Bodo might have been assessed as one of the "smaller" games of the round. A bit surprising though, that Hernandez and Siebert weren't appointed the other way round - not sure whether the Spanish actually is considered above the German at the moment or whether the match in Norway was thought to be more challenging.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteFortunately, sometimes, to counterbalance Doveri's over-celebrated style in Serie A, we have some referees with "contrary" skills, showing a red card without hesitation.
ReplyDeletehttps://streambug.org/cv/4b8c93
I would like to hear M opinion about that...
Fantastic decision!
DeleteVery clear RC, mandatory. Very good Marco Guida, quick decision, without hesitation.
DeleteNo opinion needed,RC clear as sun that was in Genoa at that time🙃.
DeleteGreat decision by Guida.
Vincic's connections to Fenerbahce and maribor owner Acun ılıcalı + he is also former Fenerbahce vice president were quite controversial in Turkey last year. Gala coach Okan Buruk and Galatasaray was very angry about it. But Vincic refereed a good derby game in istanbul..
ReplyDeleteİ think Taylor will be appointed for
Juve - Galatasaray.
And vincic for
Real Madrid Benfica -
I agree Taylor in Turin and Vincic at Real Madrid
DeleteAnd we know that Anthony Taylor will never again be assigned to a team
Deletemanaged by Mourinho.. :)
OT: Watching Forest v Liverpool. Allison Becker (GK) is wearing black tights underneath grey shorts. Minor point maybe but with Taylor refereeing this shouldn’t happen at this level. Not a good look and in breach of law 4.
ReplyDeleteMy opinion Juventus-Galatasaray:Zwayer
ReplyDeleteGood appointment for Hernandez
ReplyDeleteProblems again in Serie A.
ReplyDeleteAtalanta-Napoli: chiffi applies very well the protocol of VAR, then comes back to disallow a Napoli goal. The contact seems not too big, but I think maybe a supportable call?
https://x.com/newromantici/status/2025603535128146139?s=46
Then a penalty cancelled thanks to VAR, I think correct decision.
https://x.com/stopardioo/status/2025587547481477561?s=46
Overall, Napoli fans not too happy
Once again a poor performance by Chiffi, a referee that couldn't reach a better level in a very long career so far.
DeleteVery soft, in reality wrong penalty to Napoli, and it was not difficult to see that live, it was Napoli player to create contact, going against defender. An unexpected whistle was the reason for which VAR called him to OFR, correct to remove penalty, however 100% strictly to protocol it should have been confirmed and that's the argument for which Napoli fans are angry. Indeed, to follow, he decided to disallow a goal scored by Napoli for an alleged foul by the same attacker, in this case it was nothing, but VAR supported the decision taken by referee, creating astonishment.
For football fans it's hard to go into detail about refereeing, the problem in this game was that Chiffi put in trouble twice the VAR, at first with penalty, then with the soft call before the goal. In the former instance, VAR felt the right to intervene because there is more focus on penalty decisions, and we know it's easier to remove them if soft, but it can be a bit different with the other pitch decisions, like possible fouls in the APP before goals scored. If a referee takes a decision, it must be a very big mistake to change, I agree it wasn't the case in Bergamo today, but as said, a whistle that Chiffi shouldn't have done. His performance will be assessed as very poor. VAR can solve something, but definitely not everything.
And of course another matchday of full controversy for Gianluca Rocchi, it's a season that he will remember forever!
Two delays in the North London derby for communication issues between the AR's and Bankes. One in the first half for AR2 Antrobus and one before the second half for AR1 Smart. Not a great look...
ReplyDeleteOther than that, another big game where Bankes has performed well. He's had a very good season and has been rewarded for that
DeleteCould get the FA Cup final at the end of the season. He hasn't done the League Cup final but Madley got appointed to the FA Cup final in 2024 without doing the league cup final.
DeleteNo problem with both decision with Gabriel, especially the goal disallowed and the potential DOGSO ?
DeleteOfficial.. Slavko Vincic : Madrid - Benfica
ReplyDeleteATM- Bru
ReplyDeleteWho is the team's main referee now, VAR or the main referee? If he had intervened, it would have been a penalty, let's just think in that direction.
I guess you’re referring to the possible penalty in 13th? Late goalkeeper tackle? But I don’t understand your point
DeleteThere is no way that's a PK, closer to a simulation than anything else correct decision by Turpin and his VAR
DeleteDefinitely not a dive, but a clear hit. However, the ball had already been played and was outside the field of play at the time of contact, and therefore out of play.
Deletehttps://streambug.org/cv/462b26
ReplyDeletePenalty area incident and a comment by Mateu Lahoz from Spanish TV.
In my opinion the first action is a simulation by attacker, but then one could discuss about the contact with left leg by keeper when attacker is alerady falling down. Nevertheless, given that we can easily say it was a looked contact, very good by French VAR to stay silent, this rrather reflects Rosetti's statements about VAR made a few weeks ago.
That’s clearly not a penalty and good decision by the spanish crew
DeleteUps I meant french crew, my bad
DeleteCompletely agree. Initial slight simulation by the attacker, followed by a technically punishable leg action from the goalkeeper. However, the ball is already out of reach and going out of play. A review could theoretically be conducted, but the logical outcome would be to sanction the simulation first with an indirect free kick against the attacker, and a yellow card to the goalkeeper for the gesture. From a tactical standpoint, there is minimal added value for VAR intervention or on-field correction in this situation. The optimal decision remains to allow the goal kick, as Clément Turpin and Jérôme Brisard ruled.
DeleteSimulation before the contact even occurred.
DeleteTake it back. Blatant contact on the thigh. Don’t look at the feet. Thats’s a penalty.
DeleteAround the 70th minute, a possible penalty for Club Brugge. Live, it looked like a late challenge by the Atletico defender, but the protests weren't very vehement, so perhaps the contact wasn't a foul (I didn't see the replay)
ReplyDeleteOnce again great game by Turpin good management at the end when players where starting to play too hard, correct foul detection. Not an hard for him and his team but job done correctly.
ReplyDeleteGreat to hearr!!
DeleteMassa opting for the more extreme sleeves rolled up version of Turpin. Becoming quite a trend.
ReplyDeleteAfter the penalty area incident in first half, here two clips from Turpin's second half:
ReplyDelete70' Penalty area incident and management
https://streambug.org/cv/899e61
85' Foul, Management
https://streambug.org/cv/35e418
The French with a regular performance, not having to engage too much himself to keep the match under control. Note how he entered the scene in the 70' minute to calm down the players. Also thank to the way he moves, it seems as his presence alone is enough to ensure control (a skill extremely rare in other referees).
Agree you can see that he is always respected by all the players and they know how he will manage those situations to keep calm everyone and that he will do what he needs to. Really big skill at this level.
Delete57' (New:Qar) Regular Uefa handball, that wouldn't be given on this ground in any other competition. I was thinking a Uefa Cat2 referee would have done for this game during the first half, but starting to liven up now
ReplyDeleteIFAB is worldwide. If UEFA teaches their own handball laws, IFAB needs to make a clear statement against it.
DeleteAbsolutely incredible game by Bodo once again.
ReplyDeleteDespite of the score so far, the Spanish from Canary Islands had a rather very quiet game at San Siro, with a correct YC, and a few minor penalty area incidents, but nothing special. Now the 0-2 should be the real end of the qualification for the Italian team, I think.
76' now Inter scored, GLT was crucial. Honestly impossible to say anything, even with closer replays. One should only trust technology.
Delete75' (Possible Newcastle penalty) Think it deflected off knee. Handball check seemed a fair while longer than necessary. Correct outcome in the end.
ReplyDeleteOn a seperate note, I think the lack of cards (and comments) says a lot about tonights games
Penalty call by Massa, handball: https://streambug.org/cv/e569dd
ReplyDeleteArm as support? Defender using the situation to make himself bigger? VAR confirmed the call.
Unacceptable call. What are they even doing? The inconsistency is unbelievable. 100 % support.
DeleteVERY good decision PENLATY
DeleteThere is nothing good about going against the IFAB. I assume you are joking Richard.
Delete(Only) three minutes added time in Milano - despite several substitutions and Haikin (keeper) timewasting 30, 40, 50 seconds again and again and again. What's the point of the 8 second rule if not enforced? Bodoe/Glimt very disciplined.
ReplyDeleteOnly one card in each of the late matches. The calm before the storm tomorrow?
ReplyDeleteIndeed, very often that's the pattern :)
Deletemy opinion respect for referees for today games
ReplyDeletebig decision PENALTY of ITALY referee and good decision
Another handball incident from Massa game.
ReplyDeletehttps://streambug.org/cv/7047ee
VAR played on, after a check.
Different outcome if ball directly on arm.
And I think supported call if whistled by referee as well.
FC INTERNAZIONALE MILANO (ITA) - FK BODØ/GLIMT (NOR)
ReplyDeleteReferee: Alejandro José Hernández Hernández ESP
40' Possible YC
https://streambug.org/cv/070bc8
42' PAI Handball
https://streambug.org/cv/4ef8ee
43' PAI
https://streambug.org/cv/639eea
55' PAI Handball
https://streambug.org/cv/5aa987
76' Goal given by GLT
https://streambug.org/cv/132b5d
Every time Turpin officiates a European game, the same predictable praise floods on this blog: “What communication. What respect from the players, only his presence is enough”.
ReplyDeleteIn my opinion, that is not just unique to Turpin.
I watched e.g. Marciniak and Makkelie glide through the league phase with minimal cards and complete control. Same authority. Same player buy-in.
The difference isn’t mystique - it’s mileage. Fifty-plus UCL matches earn you that respect.
The same effect was evident in the later years of Orsato, Brych, Cakir, Skomina, etc.
In fact, at least as far as I'm concerned, I have often stressed in the past that he is not the only one capable of this, but there are a few referees. I see the same qualities in the two names you mentioned, Makkelie and Marciniak, especially the Dutchman. Let's say the Polish has a slightly different kind of "substance" in dealing with players but extremely solid.
DeleteJust trying to explain more what I'm talking about: as for another name who has risen to the top at UEFA, Vincic, honestly I don't see this particular ability in him in the same way. However, he manages things differently, and I believe he has officiated fewer matches that could be considered real "big wars" compared to the others mentioned.
The accumulation of international experience and the aura you carry with you are the primary factors, they make you someone of a certain value in the eyes of the players. But of course, it's also necessary to be able to give credibility and to be rather versatile.
Agree with Chefren, he’s not the only one obviously but one of the best at it, there are always 2-3 top ref from every era, it was the same with Brych, Kuipers and Cakir and now it’s Turpin and co who are leading the way, and those are the best to communicate with players.
DeleteVincic may be less charismatic, but he does have another key skill: “always avoiding controversy.” He’s not exactly known as a big decision-maker in decisive box moments. If anything, he’s the guy who doesn’t make the call - yet somehow the coin always seems to land his way. And remarkably, it never really feels like it hurts the losing side.
DeleteBut if the Slovenian truly wants to reach GOAT status - and be remembered after his career for iconic, game-defining decisions - he might have to tweak his style a bit :-)
https://www.uefa.com/uefachampionsleague/news/029d-1ebd52c0e86d-cc44b76e6bc1-1000--uefa-champions-league-var-technical-explanations/
ReplyDeleteThere is a big misunderstanding regarding the official UEFA Champions League VAR explanation page. Unfortunately, the general public doesn't understand it and believes that this list, although official, represents the correct decisions. In fact, some former Italian referees, overlooking this point, commented by sharing that link and assuming it was an exclusive technical assessment by UEFA.
Instead, these are simply the official explanations nothing more, based on the decisions made by officials. Many people haven't understood this. Obviously, some of VAR interventions can even be wrong, there is no detailed explanation on that by committee.
Rosetti will surely read this, and in my opinion they should change something, as it creates confusion, especially because it would be appropriate to clarify and communicate what the correct decisions actually are.