Monday, 22 June 2026

2026 FIFA World Cup Match 43: Argentina - Austria (discussion)

Egyptian referee Amin Mohamed Omar will officiate Argentina - Austria, second appointments for him at 2026 World Cup.  


Match #43
Group J
22 June 2026, 19:00 CET
AT&T Stadium, Arlington
ARGENTINA - AUSTRIA
Referee: Amin Mohamed Omar EGY 
Assistant Referee 1: Mahmoud Abouregal EGY 
Assistant Referee 2: Ahmed Hossam Taha EGY
Fourth Official: Alejandro José Hernández Hernández ESP
Reserve AR: Diego Sánchez Rojo ESP 
Video Assistant Referee: Khamis Al Marri QAT 
Assistant Video Assistant Referee 1 : Mahmoud Ashour EGY
Assistant Video Assistant Referee 2 : Tatiana Guzman NCA

190 comments:

  1. This match will determine whether the Egyptian referee will continue progressing to the knockout stages.
    It will be an important and difficult match for the referee.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is a crunch match for him. Not many opportunities left for referees (not all referees have had a game)

      Delete
  2. #5 AUT is fouling Lautaro imo probably can say the same for #4

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think had it been only one player (the player who ended up getting the ball) then maybe no OFR but with the second player who didn’t get anything. Then it had to be given

      Delete
  3. It seems that Khamis Al Marri is in trouble to take a decision here.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Live Full-Sequence: https://streamable.com/yg26fu

      Delete
    2. OFR: https://streamable.com/g4g308

      Delete
    3. He has got Collina and Busacca in one ear and LOTG in the other.

      Delete
  4. I don't what else you need for a penalty...

    ReplyDelete
  5. Did the referee announce in Spanish

    ReplyDelete
  6. Silly Mr Omar forgetting Argentina get a customary penalty every game! Bad on field decision!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Clear PK for me. At least one made foul before other played the ball.

    ReplyDelete
  8. This is only the second OFR for assigning a penalty in so many games, if I'm not wrong? Only previous incident was the one rejected by Faghani?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Definitely a penalty. Touch on the ball is irrelevant as the striker is clearly impeded prior to that. Surely one of the players should have been booked for DOGSO

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Definitely no DOGSO there, both players attempting to play the ball. Even if one defender was no where near. Am I surprised at no mandatory YC, but at this point no.

      I think had it been just one player, (the one player who ended up playing the ball) then I think no penalty would be given. However, that second player who came across the body, took out both legs then had to be a penalty.

      In fact, I’m surprised we saw a review at all by VAR.

      Delete
  10. Penalty given after VAR review, I dont know if it was the TV coverage I'm watching but that was a rushed announcement that I couldn't make out too well other than "penalty kick".
    Long time taken by Al Martin but got to the right decision... Eventually

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It wasn’t so much rushed as the audio wasn’t working at the beginning of the announcement. He waited a long time after making the VAR signal, waiting and waiting but should have repeated the announcement after the audio in the stadium started working.

      Surely they can work the VAR audio so it can be fed through the TV feed?

      Delete
  11. 2nd player #5 trips attacker

    ReplyDelete
  12. So since the start of the tournament, no penalty has been awarded for soft and debatable incidents, and now Argentina are given a very generous penalty that goes against all the guidelines applied so far. This is complete nonsense. There is simply no penalty here given the refereeing standard that has been established. Except for Argentina, who once again benefit from a favourable decision after Messi. Ridiculous.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That’s just a very unfair assessment in my opinion. AUT #5 definitely fouls, you can debate if AUT #4 does too. Clear penalty.

      Delete
    2. Be careful: I’m not saying there is no penalty. I’m simply saying that there is no consistency whatsoever with the extremely high threshold of tolerance that has been applied throughout the tournament. And once again, Argentina are the beneficiaries.

      You simply cannot ignore blatant fouls and then award a penalty here for an incident that is far from being a clear and obvious error. The issue is not necessarily the decision itself, but the complete lack of consistency with the refereeing line that has been established so far.

      Delete
    3. I have to disagree with you @referee analyst

      I think had it been just one player #4, (the one player who ended up playing the ball) then I think no penalty would be given. However, that second player #5 who came across the body, took out both legs then had to be a penalty.

      Look I agree with you, there seems to be some consensus on here and in the refereeing world (obviously with Collina and Busacca too) that if you make contact with the player accidentally then it’s okay (Ghana non pen, Australia non pen) and the attacker initiating contact (France non pen).

      It appears inconsistent because we don’t know the guidelines, we can only guess. I agree that standard for foul detection is not great not just for penalty area incidents but in general play too.

      Delete
  13. Surely a retake just to give Messi another chance

    ReplyDelete
  14. Correct penalty after OFR, but generally difficult start of the match

    ReplyDelete
  15. Well,the very hard with best positioning to conclude is it penalty or not. Two players, easy block vision of the referee. Excellent team work and finally good decision.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Another referee who doesn't know English

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. it always use to be mandatory for an international referee to speak English

      Delete
  17. That a VAR takes 2min to even recommend a Review should be a sign that it was not a clear and obvious mistake

    ReplyDelete
  18. I understand: "Go! Go! [to players surrounding him] defender number one (?) didn't hit the ball, he make a...? PENALTY"..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The mic echoed a bit I think. But he definitely said “defender number 5”, not sure on the rest up to “penalty kick”

      Delete
  19. Challenging start to the match. Penalty can be forgiven as it is difficult to clearly spot onfield. VAR review could have been much quicker.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Where was this energy from var in last match with clear messi red? Deserved outcome for fifa/messi mafia.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Never a clear and obvious mistake but we know Argentina are treated differently to everyone else. Expect at least one more soft penalty to be awarded in this game

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think had the second player who ended up taking out his legs (AUT #5) then I don’t think VAR would have reviewed.

      Delete
  22. Replies
    1. Would u give both austria players a yc? Difficult to tell which player made first contact.

      Delete
    2. I think, no DOGSO is somehow correct, because there clearly was a second defender preventing the continuation of the attack.

      Delete
    3. But why not to give both players a yellow card?

      Delete
    4. Can you say a YC missed? I don’t think so. Maybe according to the LOTG but not based on instructions to referee at this World Cup.

      Based on what we have seen at this World Cup, this was not a yellow card. Consistent.

      Delete
  23. Just to add one thing: Clear and obvious mistake is only and only UEFA officiating philosophy. In FIFA, you can expect that VAR will call you for suspicious contacts in penalty area, and there is mutch more second chances for referees!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. But what we saw in the competition so far, enough number of matches to make an early judgement, the answer should be the contrary one. Must be very evident, even more than UEFA, to call, otherwise there have been mistakes for sure in previous games!

      Delete
    2. This is not the case for red cards though, you can kill someone in a FIFA tournament and no red card or review.

      Delete
    3. Agree Chefren, thus far in this tournament it is closer to UEFA than the FIFA standard you have mentioned. An incredibly high bar for VAR intervention at this World Cup, even clear errors.

      Delete
  24. Just to know,why not YC for foul on Martinez?

    I mean he has clear chance, 1 on 1 and defender stops him..

    Is this that anti card policy where you have to kill someone to get YC?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Probably, they forgot about the card, too complex assessment.

      Delete
    2. Agreed, should be DOGSO yellow.

      Delete

    3. Can you say a YC missed? I don’t think so. Maybe according to the LOTG but not based on instructions to referee at this World Cup.

      Based on what we have seen at this World Cup, this was not a yellow card. Consistent.

      Delete
  25. Referees should learn how to make announcements from Iván Barton..."

    ReplyDelete
  26. Should have stopped the game for head injury

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Also was illegal use of arms, elbow to head. Caution for reckless.

      Delete
    2. And from our angle, potential handball

      Delete
    3. Yes @RAP enjoyer, I didn’t like he almost felt for the head and ensured contact with the elbow to the head. Am I surprised that it wasn’t given?

      Delete
  27. This "modern" football approach by simply calling only the most essential of fouls and letting everything else just become a free for all is becoming impossible to watch. No blame on Amin and most others I have watched the last week or two but blame the FIFA referee committee for their weakness to serve others over player safety and the laws of the game. I for one have had enough of this charlatan approach.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agree with you @Osman, hopefully this approach at this World Cup doesn’t filter down to the confederations or countries.

      Delete
  28. I get a very strange feeling from his one-on-one interactions with the players when he is explaining decisions. The way he dismisses them, his lack of empathy, and his apparent lack of understanding of how to communicate with players in an appropriate and effective manner are concerning.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He has got a nicer demeanour so it looks weak when he dismisses them and hasn’t got that aggressive energy of Barton which so many appreciated on here.

      Delete
  29. Stonewall foul forgotten by Amin Omar and austrian players angry - rightly - here. This policy of letting everything play on is becoming unbearable.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Especially when a South American team is involved. It’s like the Italian teams in Europe. You simply cannot allow all king of contacts with them.
      Moreover, the behavior of some argentinians players is completely unacceptable. So so provocative

      Delete
  30. He has lost control already

    ReplyDelete
  31. For me that's a red card. Clear violent intent

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Veru close. And very stupid action from AUT #5.

      Delete
    2. The AUT #5 wanted to leave something on him (didn’t see a replay of the actual contact point) but that was a YC and then a few minutes before the goal much worse contact not even a YC?

      I’ll be honest, that is why this challenge is made by the AUT player because the foul by ARG was not called earlier, the level of challenges now just increases.

      Delete
  32. Completely lost with this trends. Clear Red card missed. But YC before with arm on head. Very agressive manner after with De Paul. This referee is catastrophic.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That’s the only way to get through to DePaul. He doesn’t care. I don’t mind that.

      Delete
    2. The other is to book him ;)

      Delete
    3. I mean sometimes that works, but rarely, he seems to get worse when you do that.

      Delete
    4. This is what happens when you try to manage a physical team like Argentina with just your whistle. All half they have committed fouls and he seems happy to let them all go. The intensity of match increases, the intensity of the fouls increased.

      Delete
  33. The match slipped out of his control. I think chaos will prevail in this match. A poor first-half performance by the Egyptian referee.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Can be yellow for m allister?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No, no, Argentine players are so good, you have to protect them, never give them a yellow card.

      Delete
  35. Do you believe that Argentina can have a YC one day ?

    ReplyDelete
  36. YC 40': https://streamable.com/hfq0wf

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Replay 37': https://streamable.com/93mhnn

      Delete
  37. The 3rd time Martinez only get a warning after a yc worthy foul

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's okay, he's a nice guy. And Messi's teammate.

      Delete
    2. A clear kick out at the back of the legs of the AUT player by ARG Att, crazy not one player from ARG booked. This is what Collina and Busacca want, the referee has delivered but he is losing control of the game in the process.

      Delete
  38. Think there is enough presence and strong body language that he’s letting the match flow while holding on to control. Might need a more hands on approach later but being firm on rolling around/acting has helped.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sorry have to disagree,

      Letting the game flow with careless contact, sure, but when it raises beyond careless you can’t just use your whistle. The level of challenges has now increased and the challenges keep coming, that is not control for me. Players with emotions bubbling over

      Firm on rolling around? I don’t see how a player being hurt from a reckless challenge = firm on rolling around.

      Delete
  39. Haha disgusting kick out by martinez and nothing

    ReplyDelete
  40. Clearly below the expected standard after the first half. Hopefully, he can raise his performance in the second half.

    ReplyDelete
  41. Yep,body language that for now has said Argentina can do whatever they want.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Not good in the final part of first half, referee lost it, was lenient with situations that should have been managed strongly. Allowed some unsporting behaviors by players.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. When the Austrian players (incl team captain) approach him, he sent them away with very aggressive body language. When number of Argentine players came to argue, that was okay. But it's fine, they are nice guys. And Messi's teammates.

      Delete
    2. Yes i noticed also the difference

      Delete
    3. Yes, managing the situation without cards was always going to be difficult. Collina/Busacca don’t want the bad optics of a referee losing control but they also don’t want the referee to use his cards.

      Delete
  43. How on earth can Lautaro Martinez can make this kind of foul with a little warning far little to the one made for…the victim by referee ! This is completely non sense to act like that !

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He was more concerned about getting AUT players to stop asking about the challenge or disciplinary action, did he even speak to Martinez? Not a good look

      Delete
  44. Even the commentators said he needs to be more calm and that will calm the players.

    ReplyDelete
  45. In such high pressure, good half by Omar, but must improved in disciplinary way!

    ReplyDelete
  46. Best whistle by Amin Omar was the last one. Worst performance ever seen in this WC at the half time.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And every day a new "worst performance" found instead of finding reality between white and black. Amin Omar not at all as bad as some suggest here. 3 or 4 missed YCs, better in 2nd half, giving both teams clear warnings and communicating more and, if necessary, in a harsh way. But good physics and positioning, good foul detection and in most cases consistent, he even got the players respect back in 2nd half and had full control. So where is the catastrophe you were and are expecting on a daily basis? An acceptable, in 2nd half good performance, good ARS, too. More consequent disciplinary action needed for improvement, but a 3rd game still possible.

      Delete
  47. Two versions of my half time summary.

    Great first half, the FIFA hierarchy will be pleased. 1 YC, game flowing, entertaining spectacle.

    Reality: underwhelming first half by Amin who has lacked the technical and manageable ability to get through this first half without resorting to fairly aggressive body language. Missed 2/3 YC's for me, been fairly poor in managing players. Lost control towards the latter parts of the half and faces a testing atmosphere that means he will have to "sink or swim"

    ReplyDelete
  48. Fifa should not experiment with CAF refs for games between Argentina/Brasil vs. UEFA Teams imo

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In fairness, if you're using the performance principle, this referee did deserve a test following his first game. Unfortunately he has lacked so far in a few departments but would be unfair to say he didn't deserve this game.

      Delete
    2. I agree with the performance principle, but there we're other options. Asia vs. UEFA, but Argentina isn't easy to handle vs. a team which is used to Bundesliga isn't really a growth path

      Delete
  49. After a good first game, I must say that I'm really sorry but knowing Collina and what we saw in first half, the tournament for the Egyptian referee should be rather over.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Felt a bit like you did a proper first game, now we assign you one of the most dificult ones

      Delete
    2. Maybe it will depend on will he recover in second half

      Delete
  50. "I wish I could've seen Iván Barton in this game. The Egyptian referee completely lost control of the game."

    ReplyDelete
  51. Clear foul in front of first goal against Schlager and a lot of decisions in favor Argentinia. Big team bonus from the bad referee. Martinez committed three unsportsmanlike fouls and only received a warning each time

    ReplyDelete
  52. All the CAF referees should be ruled out for the KO stage.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I now understand why Abongile Tom is only a fourth official at this tournament. He’s simply too strict for FIFA’s current culture of excessive leniency.

      Delete
    2. Don't blame the refs (from all parts of the world!!!, stop yourself thinking and arguing with this typical post-colonial arrogance), but blame FIFA, doing everything for their bankaccounts, but blaming refs who really want to take care of the players' health instead of reducing the LOTG to a theoretical textbook, which is only implemented by the very few real brave ones...

      Delete
  53. And another YC missed..
    Is he trying to break the record dor most cards missed?

    ReplyDelete
  54. 53’ throw in taken from 35 yards away from where it went out

    ReplyDelete
  55. 54’ another BLATANT YC missed… unbelievable

    ReplyDelete
  56. WOWno YC for Romero is such a ridiculous call,jeez...
    Players should kill themselves to get a card.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If there was no Dogso with the Penalty how can this be SPA? Lol

      Delete
    2. Yep,no YC is good thing🤣🤣🤣🤣

      Delete
  57. 54’ : again and again and again YC missed for Argentina…

    ReplyDelete
  58. "How many yellow cards has he missed now? I've stopped counting

    ReplyDelete
  59. When you look at refs and generally FIFA policy with less cards,this all suits Argentina and rest South American teams cause they all play phisycal style,use dark arts and generally play dirty.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No, Romero is a nice guy, no need for yellow. And in addition to that, he's Messi's teammate. Refs should protect them.

      Delete
    2. Oh yes,I forgot about that.

      Now Otamendi replaces him,maybe he will kick someone while they are on the ground.

      Delete
    3. Austria also deserves like 4-5 cards so far this match… this whole concept about less cards is a b*llsh!t.

      Delete
    4. Reminds me a bit of Lahoz NED-ARG...

      Delete
    5. Agree,but at the end what will be match headline?

      Messi and Argentina..

      Not Omar and his performance.

      Delete
    6. Yes, and Otamendi is a nice guy too. And Messi's teammate. Even if he kicks someone lying on the ground, that's okay, because in his heart he's a nice person. And most probably somebody provoked him. He should be protected by the ref.

      Delete
  60. I don’t know how much more of these referees I can bare. It ruins the entire game for me. Hopefully things get better as we reach the knockout stages

    ReplyDelete
  61. And this all just proves how UEFA refs are so far ahead from rest of the world.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. For the sake of fairness, however, such a comparison should be made in a level field, where all referees officiate without restrictive guidelines.
      In my opinion, Barton is someone who can definitely ignore those instructions thanks to his outstanding natural qualities. I hope he actually does that in next games.

      Delete
    2. I would argue the CONCACAF refs have been good also.

      Delete
  62. I understand some leniency from referees and that is fair but to completely ignore the laws and rules of the game. Football is so far away from being the beautiful game it once was

    ReplyDelete
  63. Now blatant corner missed.
    But hey,no problem🤣

    ReplyDelete
  64. I don't why are players required to leave the pitch after injury if medical team is not invited in

    ReplyDelete
  65. Even a blind person could see that corner...
    I can't stop laughing

    ReplyDelete
  66. Howevewr, VAR correcting a wrong corner, but then not intervening for the contrary mistake must be discussed, there isn't consistency. If this should be intended because referees must have always the last word, well, we are already very far away from that with this use of VAR, so it's for me rather everything or nothing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It seems like the VAR refs can only change wrongly awarded corners.

      Delete
  67. Forget about every poor refereeing performance you've ever seen; it couldn't be worse than this."

    ReplyDelete
  68. FIFA’s message of placing greater emphasis on the football itself and less on punishment appears, once again, to have been either misunderstood or applied very poorly. I am not sure which description is more accurate.

    This performance demonstrates a lack of fundamental understanding of the game and of how the intervention ladder should be applied in practice. There is an absence of clear recognition of the decisions that are expected, which situations can be managed through effective match control and communication, and which incidents genuinely require disciplinary action. Overall, this results in a performance that falls below the expected standard.

    I move on to the next match.

    ReplyDelete
  69. It is probably very difficult for referees who are used to enforcing more tightly to try to apply their new instructions. Likely to feel uncomfortable for the whole game.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And exactly that is a problem not only for AFC and CAF, but even some American and European refs, too. The truth is simple: If you publish a book as the LOTG, only publish what you are going to implement on the field. When you tell your refs to interprete the law as some idealistic theory, but to establish leniency for the benefit of the flow of the game (in the end: War!), you destroy all your referees' authority, and in the end with the best technical players in hospitals you destroy this wonderful game. Completely. That Collin a is part of the problem, but not of the solution here is really deeply disappointing. By the way, what does a young 15 years old referee from Lesotho, Osaka or Novaralearn, when he has to learn that THIS SYYLE is what is expected from him!?!?!?
      Good night.

      Delete
    2. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
  70. This is my issue with the book one of each approach. If Laimer wasn't pushed, neither would have been booked. Because he ended up on the floor, they both get a caution

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Exactly. We have a second yellow card here only because the Austrian player went to ground. Otherwise, the referee would not have shown any card at all. Being so constrained by lenient instructions, leading to situations that are managed disciplinarily from nothing to everything, is completely ridiculous. It also destroys the personality of some referees, who struggle to adapt to these unnatural directives.

      Delete
  71. Number 20 of Austria should be cautioned for protest at all freekicks for Argentina. Doesn't accept anything at all!

    ReplyDelete
  72. 75:20 – Finally, some evidence of refereeing. Although the situation could have been managed more proactively, he showed a degree of decisiveness and correctly cautioned both players for unsporting behaviour following the confrontation.

    ReplyDelete
  73. A perfect summary of Amin Mohamed’s upside-down approach. The Argentine player commits the foul and blocks the free kick, preventing the Austrian player from taking it quickly. Yet all the Egyptian referee can think of doing is running over to block the player who has been awarded the free kick, standing right in front of him and preventing the restart, without paying the slightest attention to the Argentine offender, who is then free to get back into position. It is utterly absurd.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Unfortunately I have to agree with you

      Delete
  74. Finally a yellow for reckless in added time.. he has no backbone

    ReplyDelete
  75. This tournament is turning into a joke. We must end the collina leadership asap.

    ReplyDelete
  76. And now fully deserved YC to Paredes.

    But with the way game has been handled,I did not expect that.

    ReplyDelete
  77. Once again the inconsistency of VAR is shown again ,worse challenges in the box have not been looked at by the VAR teams ,but tonights is given ,even though it was marginal .Collina needs to sort ou now before there is a poor decision in the knockout stage.

    ReplyDelete
  78. I see a decent performance by Amin Mohamed and being aggressive may be his best ability for him when dealing with players. I can't criticize that

    ReplyDelete
  79. The ref was absolutely sensational. Excellent control of the game, very calm, brilliant communication skills with the players, a linguistic genius. And most importantly, absolutely neutral, no sympathy at all for either side.

    Messi(as) of the refereeing world is born. I strongly recommend UEFA to bring him to UCL next season. At least for the final and one semi-final.

    ReplyDelete
  80. Messi should be YC for over celebrating and delaying the game.

    ReplyDelete
  81. Well,good pefromance from Amin. All in all,some YC cards not issued,probbaly due to guedlines of Bussaca and Collina,but when he saw where that lead him, second half was different and better. One Var intervention for very tough situation. I will be honest and said that Amin deserved round of 32 match, and it should be more than good for him.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't think you treat him fairly. He deserves much more than Round of 32 match, he should go on for much longer. Please, show more respect towards very good referee.

      Delete
    2. He deserved to come back to Cairo.

      Delete
    3. The guy should be on the first flight back to Cairo ,not consistent enough to referee at this level . Allowed several dangerous challenges to go unpunished ,even with the Collina directive.

      Delete
    4. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    5. The only real catastrophe was the performance of Al Ali so far!

      Delete
  82. I think, unfortunately, best he can hope for is two assignments as 4th official in knockout stages

    ReplyDelete
  83. I am very sorry for the Egyptian referee.
    After a first good performance that had suggested something important, I must say that, unfortunately, in this match he was well below expectations, and I believe the correct assessment is the one reported by the majority of those who have commented.
    Leaving apart the penalty incident, where it would have been preferable to make a clear and decisive decision one way or the other, something that unfortunately was not done, with the partial complicity of VAR from Qatar, who, however, has only limited responsibility (too long time, losing credibility).
    The referee, by awarding the penalty, would have been accepted. Once the penalty was given, a disciplinary sanction was also missing, but we know what Collina and Busacca think about these situations. Technically speaking, however, it is certainly something that can't be considered satisfactory.
    As for the missed yellow cards, we are obviously dealing with a known issue. However, toward the end of the first half there was something even more important, in my opinion, that contributes to an extremely negative evaluation of the performance: the referee loss of control. At the beginning of the match he had not been bad and had shown some authority, but the players increasingly took advantage of this permissive approach. We saw it with the kick on Lautaro Martínez, but also in other situations where the referee implemented a level of tolerance that went well beyond respecting the guidelines of Collina and Busacca. At that point, anything could have happened.
    I feel sorry for the Egyptian referee, but unfortunately he drops down To put it very kindly, his World Cup should be over after what we have seen. But let me be clear: I would be the first to welcome being proven wrong, even though one must face reality. It was a below standard level performance, by far.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. But he's done his job according to the FIFA protocol of ' protect Argentina ' at all cost . Look at Marciniak , excellent referee but when it comes to Argentina strange things happen...

      Delete
    2. Let me dis agree with you perfomance of amin omar was good

      Delete
    3. Ahmed, please stay on João. It’s better.

      Delete
    4. Unfortunately they are Alahly fans they support him and saw him as a great referee

      Delete
  84. It was a horrible watch. Amin Mohamed is not of the level of a top flight referee. Some of those tackles were borderline assault.. I counted at least 4/5 missed yellow cards in the game. It’s time to end Amin tournament now !

    Years ago FIFA use to instruct referee to protect the image of the game, which allowed referees to referee to their own personality. But now someone is going to get seriously hurt !! Collina needs to be queried on why he is telling the refs to over manage games, it’s a dreadful watch. My dad (non referee) said it’s dangerous and why are refs not clamping down !

    Barton is our shining light !!! I talked up Barton before the tournament o just hope he continues his strong way of officiating in his 2nd game

    ReplyDelete
  85. One question for Chefren,how many main referee we can expect in knock out stages. Is it possible that number will be 17?

    ReplyDelete
  86. Furthermore, we have now several replays which attest of a clear foul on Austrian player - from behind - by Mac Alister. Where was VAR Al Marri here ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. https://x.com/killeures/status/2069125786045415770?s=46&t=Ok5OCp_U1mZPFDKlm4EOGQ

      Delete
    2. Even if it was a foul,no word will be said cause FIFA got exactly what they wanted from this game;
      No talk about ref,more about player(s).

      And that's what's problematic,rhey dont want another Mateu or Sampaio that will be in spotlight.

      They want someone who handles matches like Omar or Marciniak.

      Delete

Thank you for writing a comment on our blog!