Tuesday, 7 July 2026

2026 FIFA World Cup Match 94: USA - Belgium (discussion)

The first referee to get a fourth assignment at 2026 WC is Jordanian Adham Makhadmeh. He has been called upon to handle a challenging task: USA - Belgium in the Round of 16. Good luck! 


Match #94
Round of 16
7 July 2026, 02:00 CET
Lumen Field, Seattle
USA - BELGIUM
Referee: Adham Mohammad Tumah Makhadmeh JOR 
Assistant Referee 1: Mohanmmad Alkalaf JOR 
Assistant Referee 2: Ahmad Alroalle JOR
Fourth Official:  Pierre Atcho GAB
Reserve AR: Boris Ditsoga GAB 
Video Assistant Referee: Khamis Al Marri QAT 
Assistant Video Assistant Referee 1 : Nicolas Gallo COL
Assistant Video Assistant Referee 2 : Hernan Mastrangelo ARG 

47 comments:

  1. I feel sorry for Makhadmeh, he has deserved this appointment with solid performances (not amazing, not the best) but he faces a difficult match where it will test his full abilities and test him under the most amount of pressure he has ever faced. The difficulty of the match was already high, being the host nation of the tournament and a very big home (probably not as loud as Mexico but still loud). Now, with the context of the red card, there will be an extra layer to this match. With a sense of injustice from the Belgium side (rightly so) and a microscope placed on his decisions now (does he “appear” to be favouring one side or the other).

    We know that is all nonsense, there is no bias in refereeing at this level but often it is the optics and how things appear that fuel conspiracies rather than the truth or facts.

    Good luck today, biggest match of your career, hope he does well!

    ReplyDelete
  2. It may be out of place.
    But I want to wholeheartedly say C’MON BELGIUM!!!
    Put an end to this farce and leave all those corrupt despots with egg on their faces.

    With that said. I’d too would like to wish Adham and his crew nothing but the best.
    Do what is right, just, and sporting.
    And please please please don’t simply “toe the line”
    Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Soft foul on 7’ but BEL forced his hand by landing on the ball.

    Quiet start for Makhadmeh

    ReplyDelete
  4. Goal at 9’ for Belgium. USA started off almost asleep compared to previous matches.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Collina and Infantino seeing.

    ReplyDelete
  6. 11’ Some good player management there from Makhadmeh, wouldn’t have thought it was required so early or for that sort of foul but good to see him manage these early situations

    ReplyDelete
  7. Statement from the FIFA Referees Committee
    "FIFA recognizes Raphael Claus as one of the most outstanding professional referees in the world and a valuable member of the 'Team One' at the FIFA World Cup. Throughout his career, he has consistently demonstrated the highest standards of professionalism and integrity.
    Pierluigi Collina, FIFA Refereeing Director and Chairman of the Referees Committee, stated: 'Raphael Claus is refereeing in his second FIFA World Cup, having participated with us in Qatar 2022. He is an experienced and highly respected referee, and we maintain full confidence in him as a reliable official.'"

    ReplyDelete
  8. Why dropped ball when ball was sent out before game was stopped for injury

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He stopped the game before the ball had left the field (Belgium player did look to pass the ball out). Correct restart.

      Delete
  9. 17’ Game stopped for injury, appears to be a jarring incident as he fell awkwardly. Good management to stop players from getting extra instruction. Player looks to be off the field for 1m too and now to be substituted.

    Movement: I’m not overly impressed by his movement. Positioning has been okay thus far but just noticing not big sprints to really move into good positions. Seems to be moving okay but just unsure whether he has that ability to put in the big sprints

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Maybe weather playing a role although 29 degrees and 34% humidity doesn’t seem the worst of conditions. The Jordanian referee will be used to the heat.

      Delete
  10. Translation:

    The referee’s body language reflects a high level of nervousness, with several unnecessary gestures, particularly during the two Belgian injury stoppages. You can clearly sense the immense pressure weighing on the Jordanian referee…

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don’t sense the high level of nervousness you mention, the gestures were more so to the benches to stop giving players instruction during the injuries.

      Delete
  11. I think it's been positive so far for the Jordanian referee. Clearly not feeling pressured to give the US decisions as he has rejected a number of foul claims. I really wish him the best as he has been very good in this tournament

    ReplyDelete
  12. I'm not convinced that was a foul

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And they scored directly from that freekick...

      Delete
  13. The USA scored from a free kick that shouldn't have been awarded.

    ReplyDelete
  14. A very soft free kick to award for the 1-1 equaliser, but in my opinion there is slight contact on the back of the American player’s foot. Therefore, it is a decision that can be supported.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree with your assessment. Not enough to be considered a clear error but ideally shouldn't be awarded

      Delete
  15. On a side not. I’m glad that they got the uniforms properly sorted out for today.

    The pre tournament friendly that they played was a disaster with both teams wearing light colors.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Foul leading to the USA goal should not have been given. The USA striker, was already falling to the ground prior to the BEL def put his arms on the back. A few softer earlier fouls seems to indicate an inconsistent line.

    USA score from a deflection from the resulting free kick. Minutes later Belgium take the lead again.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He fell because of contact on the foot… not because of arms.

      Delete
    2. I just think with what we have seen this tournament that small bits of contact have generally been let go to maintain a higher bar for fouls. When you start giving softer fouls but then letting others go, you start becoming inconsistent with your decision making.

      Delete
  17. No foul on 1-2 from Belgium. Good non decision by referee.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Belgium respond straight away which thankfully takes a but off the focus off any controversy over the US freekick

    ReplyDelete
  19. 35’ Good YC, reckless challenge

    ReplyDelete
  20. Correct YC for reckless. Well assessed

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Many it seemed would have not gone with YC this World Cup, Good to see.

      Delete
  21. Trump is gonna cancel the yc too? 😂

    ReplyDelete
  22. If Makhadmeh comes through this match with a strong performance, I think he becomes a genuine candidate for the final

    ReplyDelete
  23. I don’t know if it’s me but he looks like Collina

    ReplyDelete
  24. I really appreciate the way the referee establishes a certain level of authority, reinforcing and supporting his decisions through firm and clear non-verbal communication, particularly during the few instances of dissent.

    ReplyDelete
  25. As we get towards the end of the first half, you have to say well done to Makhadmeh. Correct decisions, good management, bar for fouls seems to be medium (not the high bar we have seen through the tournament) but seems to be relatively consistent. Some good management, no big KMI’s missed and have to say it’s been solid first half.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agree. Just some issues with two decisions of corners / goal kicks including one corrected by VAR. But agree with your comment. Well done at all.

      Delete

Thank you for writing a comment on our blog!