Since I was asked for that, I tried to point out some key points, according to my opinion, about the process of selection for 2025-26 UEFA Champions League final referee. Not easy, but here a try.
With the semifinals of the three European club competitions now concluded, it is time to start thinking about the referee appointments for the finals, with particular focus on what is obviously the biggest of the three competitions: the UEFA Champions League.
Without going too deeply into detail, the situation is extremely complicated for the committee, for reasons we already know well, given the final game involving PSG and Arsenal. Even before considering anything else, this automatically removes two top-level candidates for the match: Michael Oliver, whose performances throughout the season have been extremely strong, and François Letexier. Regarding the latter, there may still have been some doubts regardless, whereas in Oliver's case, judging by how he was used during the season, I personally perceived a clear signal that he was among the strongest candidates without an English club in the final.
The reality of the situation therefore leaves the committee with the need to make a choice outside referees coming from England and France. Naturally, attention shifts toward referees who traditionally possess wide UEFA experience, who are at the peak of a certain career path and awaiting what would effectively be a final recognition. This is the classic scheme, but you know, sometimes hard to realize.
From this perspective, several names can be mentioned. The first one, obviously in terms of experience, is Dutch referee Danny Makkelie, who has had an extremely positive season and even went on to officiate the first leg of the semifinal. In my opinion, that happened out of necessity, otherwise they probably would have avoided using him there in order to keep him as a direct candidate for the final. However, given the committee's already difficult situation, he was still used right up until the penultimate stage.
The Dutch referee made three OFRs in his most recent match, Atlético Madrid - Arsenal and the Europa League quarterfinal before, but he still comes from a very solid overall path that would have justified a Champions League final appointment under virtually any circumstances. Among all the available names, his profile fits best precisely because of the principle of guaranteeing a completely neutral referee, and logically speaking I believe he should still be the number one choice.
There are, however, factors that inevitably create uncertainty, and those factors are represented by the teams that qualified for the final, namely Paris Saint-Germain, who have not encountered the Dutch referee for quite some time now. This is my observation regarding the entire matter: it is difficult to understand why, after all this time, including a trophy-winning campaign for the French side in between, this meeting has never happened again in one of the many relatively comfortable matches PSG have played recently.
In my view, Makkelie's candidacy for the final has not completely disappeared, and if I had to name the logical candidate, according to the kind of regular predictions that have always been made in previous years, there is nobody else truly above him at the moment. So much so that, in order to fill certain gaps, other referees with equally significant experience have in some way fallen into controversies and media backlash. Unfortunately though, opening and immediately closing a parenthesis here, modern refereeing has been criticized more and more by supporters, so perhaps certain discussions matter less and less.
Still, setting aside the Dutch referee for a moment, there are obviously others with medium-to-long UEFA experience who can be considered candidates for the final.
One of them is German referee Felix Zwayer who, at the beginning of the season, given his trajectory, could absolutely have been considered a major candidate. Unfortunately, however, he went through a season that calling negative would almost be an understatement, at least up until the group stage, where virtually every match featured two or more VAR interventions. In my opinion, this heavily conditioned his performances and his subsequent appointments in the knockout rounds, where he was only selected for Europa League and Conference League matches. It seems rather clear to me that this reflects the committee's thinking.
Now, if UEFA wanted to turn this situation in their favor by appointing the German referee to a Champions League final, it would feel extremely artificial and difficult to present as credible, with all due respect to Zwayer, who may simply not deserve such an appointment this season, even though it could still arrive in the future should he continue officiating.
There is of course a precedent that many will remember: Milorad Mazic managed to receive the final despite completely skipping the knockout rounds and being appointed directly for the final act. Still, I believe it would be difficult nowadays to see such a choice repeated, especially because in this case it would appear merely opportunistic on the committee’s part.
Moving on , and here the experience of the names to follow is lower than the aforementioned.
Let us start with Daniel Siebert, Zwayer's compatriot, who has had a genuinely very positive season and even reached the second leg of the Champions League semifinal, trying to deliver his best performance possible. In some ways, Siebert had previously been a lost gamble for Rosetti, and I think the way the Italian head of refereeing has continued to use and support him also reflects a certain desire for redemption, conceptually speaking, of course, in a positive sense, because Rosetti clearly believed in him long ago when he brought the German referee to a major competition such as the European Championship while still being only a Category 1 referee, alongside the Swedish referee Andreas Ekberg, We know well that Siebert's career has been filled with very significant highs and lows.
In the semifinal second leg, he tried above all to limit the damage. Personally, I felt he looked somewhat aware of the huge hot potato he was being asked to handle. One cannot entirely rule him out as a candidate for the final, but in my opinion the fact that Zwayer is heading to the World Cup while being completely absent from the Champions League knockout phase would inevitably create headlines and comparisons, even if that would not really be fair toward Siebert himself, who may well deserve consideration. Still, I don't really see the German referee for the final, also because I think that semifinal second leg may already have represented the maximum he could handle this season in terms of mental concentration and energy.
Next I would mention Swiss referee Sandro Schärer, who has returned in excellent form. Had it not been for his injuries, the committee would probably have had far more possibilities available, and he would naturally have been one of the strongest names to officiate this year’s Champions League final.
But to summarize briefly, I think appointing him would be impossible because he missed almost the entire season. Giving him such a match based on only a handful of appearances would be extremely difficult, especially considering the others who have worked continuously throughout the entire campaign. Of course, none of this is his fault, injuries happen, but there are still certain balances and factors that need to be respected.
We then move into Italian territory with Maurizio Mariani, a referee who, in my opinion, was selected and promoted mainly as the Italian representative. From a purely technical and managerial perspective, however, I believe he remains well below UEFA's leading Elite referees. Still, with rather good performances and the backing of a powerful federation, sometimes something (everything?) can be built.
I personally think he was not considered suitable for PSG - Bayern and that João Pinheiro was preferred instead. In terms of UEFA Elite-level experience, Pinheiro is probably on a similar level to the Italian referee, not particularly long, but no short either.
Mariani nevertheless remains a possible name, also because Italian referees have often been appointed for PSG matches. However, appointing him directly to a Champions League final would honestly feel excessive considering he has never even officiated a Champions League semifinal. It would look somewhat improvised due to a lack of alternatives. As someone also wrote on the blog a few days ago, these would be extemporaneous decisions. One does not appoint the referee for a Champions League final as if it were just another ordinary group-stage match.
I hope the concept is clear, not to discredit the referee himself, but because a certain substance must exist behind such a choice. Many may disagree with this viewpoint because, reading comments online here on the blog, I notice some people believe all these referees are essentially interchangeable. Personally, I don't agree, though of course that remains my own opinion.
And here comes the discussion regarding João Pinheiro. Immediately after the match the other evening, my impression was that beyond Makkelie as the natural candidate, considering his experience and overall profile, if UEFA wanted to turn toward a different name due to the lack of alternatives, they would probably choose the Portuguese referee.
However, applying the same reasoning used for Mariani, namely the relatively limited number of Champions League matches officiated, the fact that he has only recently (OK, not very recently, but still... you understand wha I mean) become Elite, and the fact that he has already officiated the UEFA Super Cup, appointing him to the Champions League final would honestly feel like too much, too soon.
I think the semifinal second leg should in any case represent his final appearance this season. Quite apart from the fact that his performances were quite often far from perfect, there were many situations where VAR intervention might have been expected but never arrived, which helped preserve a certain external appearance while the underlying issues remained visible (at least in my opinion, of course).
That said, I have partially changed my opinion about the Portuguese referee. He certainly has good qualities, but it is also clear to me that he has been placed in situations beyond his current level for the time being. Therefore, I would exclude him as well, because it would still be a very peculiar appointment.
To follow, one could obviously mention Glenn Nyberg, who was observed by Carlos Velasco Carballo for a Europa League semifinal, but there does not seem to be any real focus on the Swedish referee at the moment. Realistically, I think he could only have been imagined as a possible candidate for this year Conference League final, nothing more, while waiting for potentially better times ahead for him.
I will finish with Hernández Hernández purely as a provocative suggestion, though perhaps not entirely so. If UEFA truly wanted to give meaning to the Spanish referee's World Cup appointment, then appointing him to the Champions League final would certainly do that. Honestly, it would be something almost unbelievable.
Returning to reality, however, I would say that the current Spanish situation is far too complicated for any final appointment to be realistically expected.
So all in all, this should be the current situation while committee having to selected the referee for Champions League final. I don't dare to write any "official" prediction, but I prefer to leave you the scene.
What do you think, who will be the Champions League final referee?
And to conclude, just a few words about Europa and Conference League: while for Champions League we have the contrary problem, here absolutely enough names for both competitions, and honestly it's hard to make a prediction.
A list of some referees who could get either the EL or ECL final:
Espen Eskås , François Letexier, Maurizio Mariani, Glenn Nyberg, Daniel Siebert, João Pinheiro, ·

I predict:
ReplyDeleteUCL Danny Makkelie
UEL François Letexier
UECL Daniel Siebert
Putting a specific referee in the top spot really undermines this blog’s credibility. I can't help but wonder if a deal was made after you met him for a drink during his match in Italy a few years ago. Honesty would be fair to your readers. For at least the past five years, you have consistently named him the top candidate for the final, yet in reality, he never stands a chance.
ReplyDeleteAll we read is bad PSG, bad Rosetti, and bad Ceferin. Do you really believe his semifinal appointment was out of necessity? He was never a serious contender for the final, and was only appointed to the semifinal because higher-ranked referees were unavailable due to media pressure or injury. You might argue that the media shouldn’t have a say and yearn for the way things were twenty years ago, but this is the new reality. It’s quite obvious Zwayer will get this year’s final. But of course, we’ll just see more complaints about bad PSG, bad Rosetti, bad Ceferin and poor, unlucky referee who supposedly has the whole world against him.
It's not just the conspiracies, there's a remarkable stubbornness from many of the regulars here. It's written in stone that certain referees can never do any wrong - while other referees with strong seasons and excellent performances are wholly disregarded by these experts. It's all about finding a narrative and sticking to it no matter what happens, that way you can always say that you're right. If we simply establish the idea that there's a grand conspiracy to keep Makkelie from the big finals as an absolute truth, then every final appointment with other referees becomes solid proof of that. How else could you explain it?! They've snubbed him, AGAIN. And again. And again.
DeleteI am really sorry, once again, to see all this hostility towards the blog for what is ultimately a service offered freely and without any pretension of being something extraordinary.
DeleteFirst of all, I want to repeat once again that here one person opinion is worth as much as another person opinion, so there is no absolute truth, and when it comes to credibility to defend, if we are talking about people opinions, that credibility obviously cannot be placed above everything else, because everyone has their own way of seeing things.
That said, I will not respond to the accusations being made against me, but I want to underline something very important that I have often said in the past as well.
I think that, paradoxically, the problem of this blog has been becoming so media-oriented, because people think that what is written here somehow immediately influences the committee or that there are direct positive consequences from it. That would truly be impossible to imagine, because obviously we are not the ones making UEFA decisions; rather, we are here to discuss refereeing itself.
Even if I write for pushing a referee, but tthat's not the case, I would be allowed. All people can open their own blog, we are all free to do so. But I don't understand why there is this trend to rather demolish other people's opinions, than to write the own one.
Having said that, I can also reply on the substance of the matter. You tell me that the final will go to Zwayer, indeed, he is a candidate, fair enough, but if we look at Zwayer last season and Makkelie last season, just to make a comparison, tell me yourself which of the two referees has performed better, assuming the same level of consideration. It seems quite evident that, when carrying out a certain analysis, one can observe that the German referee season has not been outstanding. There is not much more I can say beyond that.
I have no problem being criticized because, quite rightly, I put myself out there with my ideas and try to provide the best service possible, but when faced with comments like these, frankly it makes me think that the matter is being taken too seriously. Instead, I would rather read your content in a more in-depth way because, more than accusations, which can also be fair enough regarding your own choices, I would appreciate a very detailed analysis and judgment. In the end, that is the real heart of the blog, and personally I ask for nothing more.
Then, of course, I leave everyone free to think whatever they want.
Two of our estimated blog friends who stood out with the least contentual contributions recently now couldn’t restrain and showed their true faces. Accusing people of personal motives while they themselves obviously have (opposite) personal motives. Would be only fair to the readers to open up about those.
DeleteThank you, Chefren, for this magnificent blog and for everything you contribute. Thank you for your work and dedication. Those hostile comments are worthless. Their words reveal their true nature and demonstrate the kind of people they are.
DeleteI wrote this on the blog a few days ago, so I’m posting it again because the post is now directly related.
ReplyDeleteIt’s pretty obvious that this year CL final referee discussion has come down to just a few names. The issue is not only who the candidates are, but also what kind of message UEFA is sending with those standards and criteria for the biggest club game of the season.
When you look at referees from previous finals like Istvan Kovacs, Slavko Vinčić, Szymon Marciniak, Clement Turpin or Antonio Mateu Lahoz, those were referees with years of elite experience, huge matches behind them and authority built over multiple seasons. The UCL final was not an experiment for them or some rushed promotion, it was the natural peak of their career.
That’s why the criticism around names like Joao Pinheiro, Sandro Scharer, Maurizio Mariani or Daniel Siebert is completely valid. People are asking where is the long term consistency at the absolute top level, where are the iconic knockout matches, where is the proven authority in games with massive pressure.
This is not hate or personal bias against those referees. It’s about the feeling that UEFA is trying to push a new generation too quickly without the same foundation previous final referees had to build for years.
For many people Danny Makkelie is the only option that actually feels like a Champions League final referee right now. He has been around elite European games for years, major tournaments, semifinals, huge derbies and high pressure matches. Whether people like every decision he makes or not, he has the profile and experience that fits a final like this.
At the end of the day, a Champions League final should not be used to see if someone is ready for that level. It should be the confirmation that they have already belonged at that level for years.
So, my final predictions (the way I would like to see it):
UCL: Danny Makkelie
UEL: Francois Letexier
UECL: Espen Eskas
Agree
DeleteI personally am totally divided regarding the prediction for the Conference League final: Most of you mention the same names that could also be considered for the Champions League final. However, in my opinion, it doesn't make sense, for example, to assign Francois Letexier to the Conference League final. I would find the Europa League realistic for him, given his young age and the fact that he cannot handle the Champions League final this year, but for the Conference League final, I would find him significantly too "overqualified." I was rather thinking of shooting stars for the Conference League, like Sven Jablonski (although just half a year as an Elite Referee might come a year too early and, moreover, the question would arise of how one could honor Daniel Siebert's season). The names mentioned, however, are almost all too "high-profile" for me and more candidates for the Europa League or even the Champions League final. Since Daniel Siebert was not nominated for the World Cup, but has had a very good run this season, it might be a fair compromise to appoint him "only" for the Conference League final, while otherwise one could expect three World Cup referees in this season's finals. That would still be a sign of a certain appreciation, although the jump from nine appearances in the Champions League and none at all (!) in the Europa League directly to the final of "only" the Conference League would otherwise seem rather disproportionate.
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteMy predictions are as follows
UCL Danny Makkelie
UEL Sandro Schärer
UECL Mauricio Mariani
Rational:
For the UCL there was only 3 candidates when you look at experience and form Oliver, Lexiter and Makkelle. Both Oliver and Lexiter are excluded due to neutrality so Makkelle is the obvious choice.
Now UEFA could go with another candidate but generally they only go for someone with previous final experience in UEFA competitions (orsarto being the one exception) or someone with a demonstrated history of doing big champions league games so I think that the only ones with a realistic chance are
Siebert : as he is not going to the world cup I see this as highly unlikely
Zwayer: having done the EL final last year one would have expected him to be in with a chance this year but hasn't had the best season not likely
Schärer: is also an option and his performance in the semi final would indicate he is ready for another final but I don't think it will be this one
UEL
The pool is significantly bigger the two Germans and Oliver are out due to neutrality however that does give us a lot to choose from. Again I am going to use the logic that generally uefa like to appoint someone who has previously done a major final which would include all wc referees bar Hernandez Hernandez.
So for me the candidates are
Schärer having already done a super cup final and a nations League final and by all accounts putting in a good performance in the UCL semi final. I really think he is in poll position. This would be a great reward considering all the work he has done getting back to fitness.
Lexiter: I think with a world cup this year to keep him motivated uefa will not appoint him yet and instead use these finals as carrots to keep him motivated going forward he has plenty of years ahead of him to get the CL final
Pinheiro: though I do not like his style you can't ignore a man who is clearly rising through the ranks at UEFA with speed. With a super cup under his belt and a cl semi final complete and the fact that he is going to the world cup he is definitely going to be on the list. However I feel the fact that he has already done a UEFA final this year will mean he won't get another chance this year
Nyberg: Has refereed the Arab cup final which I think puts him slightly ahead of Mariani and Eskas. Having by all accounts performed well in the el semi final he does have a chance however this year I think he is more likely for the UECL or the super cup
Mariani: Another who's career has been fast tracked. Had he not done the u20 world cup final would he be here. I don't think so but when you get an opportunity take it and he definitely has. He has previous big final experience and was at the last copa america. I think he is more likely to get the ecl but we might get a suprise
Eskas: like Mariani, eskas had done a major final in the u17 world cup. I just feel if he is going to get a final this year it will be UECL or the super cup
UECL
Mariani: the obvious candidate here. He is 44 (and being Italian) may not get many other chances of a UEFA final in the coming years. He seemed to do well in the UCL quarter final he refereed. Will be very surprised if he is not appointed
Pinheiro: clearly a man in form having refereed 8 games this season being second joint highest. However due to having done one final already this season I think we will not see him again until the world cup
Siebert: could be a suprise package and be given the final as a consolation for missing the world cup however I think he will miss out this season but could get the super cup as a reward for his good season
Schärer: is also an option here however I just feel he will likely be the UEL final referee
Nyberg & eskas: both have a great chance to referee here however I think as someone who is from a country who are very rarely in a final and are v young they will be held back this year and will compete for the super League final
Zwayer: did the UEL last year I just don't see him being appointed for the UECL
Best case scenario:
ReplyDeleteUCL - Makkelie
UEL - Schärer
UECL - Nyberg
Worst case scenario:
UCL - Mariani
UEL - Pinheiro
UECL - Schärer
My predictions:
ReplyDeleteUCL: Felix Zwayer, but Danny Makkelie deserved the most
UEL: Francois Letexier/Maurizio Mariani
UECL: Scandinavian referee - Espen Eskas or Glen Nyberg
ReplyDeleteGood analysis, Chefren. I think it will be Makkelie. In terms of some of the controversies in the Bayern-PSG ties, two happenings could help the game: 1. Align UEFA's handling interpretations with IFAB's. UEFA's interpretations tend to lead to players being penalized more for handling (see below), and so there isn't consistency between what fans see in, say, CL, FIFA, and domestic leagues, leading to a general confusion about the "correct" call because there may not be one across all competitions. 2. Expand VAR even more than will be done for the World Cup. Expanding it for things like second YCs is great, but when everyone at home can see an error from the tv replays (e.g., Laimer's torso hitting the ball and not his hand--see https://www.reddit.com/r/soccer/comments/1t620hq/clearer_angles_of_konrad_laimer_vs_nuno_mendes/) but none of the referees know it because VAR cannot intervene, then it is time for things to change. I said on the blog a few years ago that it was sometimes impossible to spot offside from one or two tv cameras and that more should be used for that purpose, and now that is often the case. So, I think that VAR should be able to intervene for ANY clear and obvious error any time and anywhere on the field. Of course, that could open up a can of worms in itself, but right now, the errors that aren't being corrected hurt the integrity of the game and thus fans' faith in the fairness of the competition. Basically, something different needs to happen with VAR, as it isn't in the optimal stage of operation at the moment.
DeleteAI Overview
Yes, UEFA's interpretation of handball is often considered stricter and differs in practice from the general guidelines set by the International Football Association Board (IFAB), leading to inconsistencies between UEFA competitions (like the Champions League) and domestic leagues. [1, 2, 3]
While both bodies follow the same base Laws of the Game, UEFA's refereeing directives often create a lower threshold for what constitutes an "unnatural" arm position, making them more likely to penalize handball offences. [1]
Here is a breakdown of the differences as of the 2025/26 season:
Key UEFA vs. IFAB Interpretations (2025/26 Season)
Supporting Arms on the Ground: UEFA tends to be more strict. If a player’s arm is extended laterally to block a cross while on the ground, UEFA is more likely to define this as "unnatural" and call a penalty, whereas some domestic leagues might consider it a natural supporting motion.
Deflections off Own Body: UEFA directives have recently aimed to reduce "soft" penalties. Generally, if the ball hits a player's own body (foot/thigh) and then hits the hand, it is not a penalty, unless the arm is in an absolutely outrageous position.
Proximity (Reaction Time): UEFA guidelines suggest that if the ball is kicked from a very close range, it should not be a penalty, as the player has no time to react, a point that IFAB also reinforces but UEFA applies with a specific focus on "no time to react".
Arms Above Shoulder: UEFA often instructs officials to treat arms raised above the shoulder as almost always a penalty, regarding it as an automatic widening of the body. [1, 2, 3, 4]
Core Causes for Differences
"Unnatural" Position Definition: UEFA’s Roberto Rosetti has emphasized that they cannot have different technical languages in Europe. However, UEFA often applies a stricter, more rigid "unnatural position" criterion than the English Premier League, for example, leading to more penalties in the Champions League.
Subjectivity in the Law: IFAB sets the rules, but terms like "unnatural position" and "deliberate" are inherently subjective, allowing UEFA to issue its own interpretations to its referees.
Referees' Instructions: Even if the written law is the same, UEFA officials get different pre-tournament briefings on how to apply them compared to national FA referees.
In summary, UEFA often applies a "stricter" interpretation of what makes the body "unnaturally bigger" compared to the general guidance of IFAB, particularly when arms are away from the body in unnatural positions.
First of all, I would like to thank you Chefren for detailed analyses of the situation, and thanks becouse you answered positive on my question some days ago. Anyway my final prediciton,based on merit are:
ReplyDeleteUCL FINAL- Danny Makkelie
UEL FINAL-Francois Letexier
UECL Final- Glenn Nyberg
SUPERCUP- Espen Eskas