Clément Turpin, experienced FIFA referee, is about to offiiciate at his third World Cup. First game will be England - Croatia, a full European clash.
Match #22
Group L
17 June 2026, 22:00 CET
AT&T Stadium, Arlington
ENGLAND - CROATIA
Referee: Clément Turpin FRA
Assistant Referee 1: Nicolas Danos FRA
Assistant Referee 2: Benjamin Pagès FRA
Fourth Official: Katia Garcia MEX
Reserve AR : Sandra Ramirez MEX
Vidéo Assistant Referee: Jérôme Brisard FRA
Assistant Vidéo Assistant Referee 1 : Willy Delajod FRA
Assistant Vidéo Assistant Referee 2 : Fedayi San SUI
Clément Turpin with short sleeves, that's not common.
ReplyDeleteHappy to see Turpin finaly with short sleeves :)
ReplyDeleteGood penalty decision
ReplyDeleteClip: https://streamable.com/6z83ti
DeleteObvious PK good call
ReplyDeleteCorrect PK, well spotted and called with confidence.
ReplyDeleteObvious one but with calm and serenity. Well done pk by Turpin.
ReplyDeleteGood job by VAR I guess, impossible on field nobody control that now
ReplyDeleteVAR Intervention Clip: https://streamable.com/0510i7
DeleteVery rare these days for a retake as the goalkeepers are so good at staying on their line. Good decision though
ReplyDeleteVAR control should be meticulous by Brisard. We have to believe him.
ReplyDeleteWith that freeze frame, couldn’t really see if the whole foot was past the goal line.
ReplyDeleteAgree but have to trust them , with all angles they have they probably got it correct
DeleteIt was the encroaching player getting to the ball first
ReplyDeleteBut Turpin was saying something about the "keeper".... the announcement wasn't clearly heard
DeleteI think he said keeper out
DeleteDoes the foot have to be on the line, or is it enough if it is in the air over the line?
ReplyDeleteOver the line is ok
DeleteWhy don't the referees control the mic? The stadium announcements are always chaotic because they don't know when it's on...
ReplyDeleteAgree that is working better with a push to talk button
DeleteIn Bundesliga VAR room controls the mic, gives the referee a "start“ signal and it works very good. I cannot understand why FIFA is not able to do it in the same way.
DeleteJust speaking about the announcements: Sorry, but it does not make any sense if you cannot hear the referee, if replays are shown during the announcement. Amateurish management by the TV broadcasters. So far, it‘s so useless…
ReplyDeleteI agree with you. It's ridiculous to only have one camera angle to review the penalty. Where are the other angles?
DeleteNo way was that an infringement ; England fan here but Keeper saved it very fair and square awful decision for the retake
ReplyDeleteNo way on your mind ? You are God ? You are in the VAR area with others refs ?
DeleteThe Position of the Goal Keeper is checked by the Goal line technology, so it is measured accurately.
Delete@referee analyst : it's called an opinion - people have them and they differ from person to person
DeleteAnd your opinion is bad. No worry.
DeleteOh ? You are god to decide when people can have opinions ?
DeleteSarish please, you were wrong about this one. The infringement is clear.
DeletePenalty was retaken because of the defender not because of the GK.
ReplyDeleteWrong graphic was shown...
Turpin can clearly be heard talking about the keeper though...
DeleteMaybe it’s bad communication between them but he said ‘’keeper out’’
DeleteJust heard what Turpin said, my bad
DeleteDoes anyone have a good freeze frame on the reason for the retake? Haven't seen a clear picture yet.
ReplyDeleteBrand new replays: https://streamable.com/sxxq9n
DeleteGreat pk call, but we have to see what VAR saw! Just one replay yet and that looked like it was a fair save! But it was a bad angle
ReplyDeleteDecision on GK was 100 % wrong. Part of the foot was clearly in line. However, defender encroached by touching the penalty area and prevented the attacker from scoring. They were lucky. Correct decision to retake but wrong reason.
ReplyDeleteDecision by VAR with Gk is made by GLT so completely accurate. No possibility to have false judgement here…
DeleteAccording to German television, the goalkeeper is monitored by goal-line technology, and if the goalkeeper is even 1 mm off the line, it is penalized.
DeleteThere has just been a replay confirming both feet were off the line
DeleteAnd we see it now : 100 % correct decision by Brisard ! VG ;)
Delete+1 - but beware the comments questioning if you are god
DeleteJust say GLT is not a opinion but a technological help. So you can’t tell « no way » here in front of one of the best world VAR with this technology ! ;)
DeleteI take it back. They showed a better replay.
Delete👍
DeleteBetter angle shown, good job by VAR
ReplyDeleteWe finally saw a good angle.
ReplyDeleteLook at FIFA's audacity. They only showed a replay with a better angle of Livakovic's encroachment 10 minutes after the penalty. That's terrible management.
ReplyDeleteI don’t understand why this is so delayed even for SAOT, they probably have it 5 seconds after the decision taken by VAR. Don’t really understand it tbf.
DeleteAbsolutely poor with communication also in terms of translation in other language, in Italian they reported "Fallo sul portiere", that means "Foul on keeper", as motivation for the penalty to be retaken.
ReplyDeleteAbout the announcements that don't work, unfortunately, that's nothing new for me, it was a scandal about that during the full serie A season, more announcements you couldn't hear than the ones working...
Something must be done for clarity purpose, also, broadcasters who don't have any knowledge about refereeing are in troubles when such incidents happen.
However, it was a reckless action by Modric, for me missed YC, the kick was given with a certain force, unaware of the opponent, but still a reckless challenge...
ReplyDeleteNot sure about that, not deliberate, no violence imo. Good management for this game to not show YC here.
DeleteDisagree. Clearly no intensity on the gesture. No clear force. YC should be awarded but really not mandatory.
DeleteThis is not reckless. Clearly wanted to kick the ball and didn’t see the opponent. This isn’t acting with disregard to the danger to an opponent.
DeleteFor me it's definitely careless. Acted with a lack of care for the opponent. By definition careless. Contact was minimal
DeleteWhy is it so difficult to understand the referees' English?". soo bad
ReplyDeleteTurpin have good abilities in english. We saw him numerous Times in uefa referees documentaries in english.
DeleteDon’t think it’s an English problem here
DeleteThe issue here really wasn't English... You couldn't even hear him. Like at all.
DeleteIn rugby they say "I have a decision" and the commentators shut up and the camera focuses on referee and stadium mic is opened
ReplyDeleteBut then again we hear the ref throughout in rugby so decisions are much clearer. Even if you don't agree
Agree. Very clear in rugby matches.
DeleteTurpin is my favorite referee. So confident, calm and collected.
ReplyDeletePotential foul in app before goal ?
ReplyDeleteNo. Where ?
DeleteNo good replays shown but a brief delay at ko suggests it was checked
DeleteYeah agree don’t think there is that much. On Bellingham @referee analyst
DeleteNo replays of the incident. Checked live for me nothing.
DeleteThks @crn.ple ! Didn’t detect nothing live.
Delete