Wednesday, 1 July 2026

2026 FIFA World Cup Match 82: Belgium - Senegal (discussion)

Belgium - Senegal in the Round of 32 is the third game for Said Martinez, the referee from Honduras. 




Match #82
Round of 32
1 July 2026, 22:00 CET
Lumen Field, Seattle
BELGIUM - SENEGAL
Referee: Said Martinez HON 
Assistant Referee 1: Walter Lopez HON 
Assistant Referee 2: Christian Ramierz HON 
Fourth Official:  Andrés Rojas COL
Reserve AR: Alexander Guzman COL 
Video Assistant Referee: Guillermo Pacheco MEX
Assistant Video Assistant Referee 1 : Rodolpho Toski BRA 
Assistant Video Assistant Referee 2 :Carlos Del Cerro Grande ESP 

131 comments:

  1. Not much before the break. 5 fouls. 4 by BEL. All correct. No YC potential. Good movement and position.

    ReplyDelete
  2. OT: Some predictions for matches in Round of 16,which are known for now:
    Mexico-England: Letexier
    Paraguay-France: Elfath
    Canada-Morocco- Abatti
    Brazil-Norway: Faghani

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Officials from UEFA in MEX ENG? I don't think it.

      Delete
    2. Faghani is a dreadful referee

      Delete
    3. You could argue that a French speaking European is more ‘neutral’ than a Spanish speaking South American. Because it definitely won’t be Sampaio after the last WC. So logically if it’s not Faghani it’s a break

      Delete
    4. Faghani destroys the flow of games and he likes to be the centre of attention

      Delete
  3. Great first half by martinez

    ReplyDelete
  4. Martinez calm, concentrated, clear, flawless in 1st half

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. + 1 (I like very much him. He reminds me Garcia Aranda a little bit).

      Delete
    2. Yes, that's really true. No big gestures, natural authority, good positioning, nearly perfect foul detection, well but seldom communicating, well accepted by the players. Still 15 Min. to go, up to now best performance in the tournament and a real candidate for the final IMO.

      Delete
  5. Martinez has had great 1st halfs in all his games and then lets it go in the second half

    ReplyDelete
  6. I haven't really been following the referee in question, and to be honest, I don't know much about him.
    But from what I'm seeing in this second half, he doesn't seem confident. He failed to show a yellow card to the Senegalese player for the rough tackle on Trossard from behind.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Lets the senegal player get away with one and then books the Belgium for a similar challenge ,let himself down again in the second half

    ReplyDelete
  8. Gueuye takes 30 seconds to get off the pitch and this joker does nothing.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Replies
    1. That comment makes me downgrade your previous ones

      Delete
    2. Never ever RC. You are joking.

      Delete
  10. As two Belgians were in a confrontation before cooling break, if one of them cover his mouth is that a RC ? Or it’s just when you do it against an opponent.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. IFAB wrote opponent. They didn’t think far enough.

      Delete
  11. Impressed. Outstanding performance by Martinez.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm looking forward to Michael's comments. Based on the game so far, I expect to see a 7 or 8. But we still have 12-14 minutes to go.

      Delete
  12. Wrong offside judgement by SA system ?

    ReplyDelete
  13. Predictions:
    PAR - FRA: Ramos (Amin Omar maybe as CAF representative?)

    CAN - MAR: Oliver or Taylor

    POR/CRO - ESP/AUT: Marciniak

    USA/BIH - BEL/SEN: Tello

    BRA - NOR: Barton

    MEX - ENG: Tantashev (I save Faghani for the potential Brazil - England)

    ARG - EGY/AUS: Letexier

    SUI/ALG - COL/GHA: If Switzerland advances Elfath IMO will get it, but if it’s Algeria - Colombia, for example, maybe Zwayer?

    QF’s? IMO Vincic is locked for a potential Argentina - Colombia match. Faghani is waiting for Brazil - England as I wrote above. Sampaio maybe getting a France-Morroco or Spain-USA…

    We will see.

    ReplyDelete
  14. potential Foul by the goal scorer ?

    ReplyDelete
  15. It looks like the ball became defective during the lead up to the Belgium goal. Were they right to allow the goal to stand? I can’t find anything in the LOTG

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If the ball become deffective during play, play must be stopped and continues with new ball and drop kick. But I do not think that was case here that the ball was deffective

      Delete
  16. What kinda criterium is this?

    One criterium for impeding GK another match,now impeding defender mot even being looked at.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. For me clear push by the attacker

      Delete
    2. No foul at all. Goal is ok.

      Delete
    3. Obvious foul for me. There was push strong enough to gain scoring position.

      Delete
    4. Goalkeepers are still kind of "protected", even if they were supposed to be treated like normal players

      Delete
    5. @M
      Good point. That's the problem when you defend undefendable... There was no foul in APP on the GK (Germany-Paraguay)

      And now when you have "stronger" foul in APP there is no VAR intervention...

      IMO both situations are play on

      Delete
    6. Once again: "To increase the tempo of the match, referees were recommended not to punish normal football contact and to pay attention to some specific situations which may occur in relation to the tactics of certain teams. An example is when attacking players try to prevent defending players from moving. Although keeping position is not a foul per se, when an attacking player is not interested in the ball and deliberately moves, even marginally, with the clear intention of obstructing opponents' movement and prevents him from defending, then referees, and VAR when needed, should carefully analyse the incident and intervene. This is especially the case when the tactic aims to prevent the opposing goalkeeper from being able to defend the goal" There was a foul in Germany-Paraguay....

      Delete
    7. Pushing his opponent to take a better position and score is not a normal football contact imo.

      Delete
    8. No foul here, he just touches him a bit, that's all.

      Delete
  17. Now impeding gk for spa,not even yc.

    Also protest by SEN #6,nothing.


    🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    Anything but yc

    ReplyDelete
  18. Missed 2nd YC for the foul on the keeper ? in a normal game it will probably happened

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is normal game! So this is clear missed second YC.

      Delete
    2. Agree with that but since the beginning of the tournament we saw things that are not always normal so we never know

      Delete
    3. Is it really a mandatory YC for that ? Just a IFK no ?

      Delete
    4. The keeper elbowed the Belgium player before any contact

      Delete
  19. Very solid performance by Martinez who is managing dissent without cards agree but with a lot of charisma and natural aura.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Disagree ,strong 1st half as usual ,but seems to lose his way in the second .Failed to penalise the Senegal subistution ,which took way over 30 seconds ,several missed YC and possible one red and a penalty to Belgium.

      Delete
    2. Speaking of yellow cards, I’d like to know why Rudi Garcia was booked when Belgium scored the equalizer. I admit I didn't see any replays. Does anyone know?

      Delete
    3. He is talking and dissent for the entire game so finally a YC shown. @Lincoln

      Delete
    4. Commentators seemed to suggest he threw a ball (one of the removed balls) into the crowd

      Delete
  20. Also,Tielemans can do whatever he wants.
    Ciss can do whatever he wants.

    Classic,as usual in this WC.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Trossard spent the whole game shouting at Martinez… not even a warning. Zero respect, zero consequences for his behaviour.

      Delete
    2. I just hate how all referees decided to manage the dissent situation, and after all that Collina said I’m very happy with players attitude with refs, only 4YC. That’s just terrible for all the referees in the world to let think that players can scream at refs and not getting any sanction, don’t know why Collina let that happen.

      Delete
    3. And then Senegalians weren't shouting at the referee ,surrounding him etc

      Delete
  21. Nevel foul on goalkeeper at Belgium second goal in my opinion. The goalkeeper jumped under the ball, he didn't even touch it. Big mistake by the goalkeeper, correct goal scores and good decision by the referee.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It’s not on the keeper but on the defender by the goal scorer

      Delete
    2. LoL buddy. It is the defender who has been pushed from behind!:)

      Delete
  22. A blatant foul before the equalizer… yet no VAR intervention. Huge error…. may cost Senegal the round of 16…

    Situation: https://streamable.com/tr0itb

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. From this we see that the defender took a dive after being touched... Definitely not a blatant foul...

      Delete
  23. This was a two-footed jump into the air. A classic attempt to draw a call. He felt pressure at the back and looked for a way to "defend" the player behind him when he wasn't sure he could get a clearance.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Some here must watch an other game. His 2 real mistakes: Waiting too long until starting to count during change of players and one!!! missed YC. That's it. A very convincing performance. But now a possible PK. Not easy to decide for BEL. For me a PK! Bad English, but right decision.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Im sorry but after everythimg thats gone this wc, you cannot give a penalty in the last minute for that

    ReplyDelete
  26. Don’t know why to call here he said ‘’white player can play the ball’’ not sure about that for me.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hundreds of cases where a defender puts their leg in front and an attacker accidentally kicks their foot. Always a free kick. Here it’s the opposite. So penalty.

      Delete
  27. For me that is a good intervention. Correct PK. Disgraceful dissent once more from Senagl

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Looks like one grabbed the arm being used to show penalty. No news of any YCs for that of yet. Then what followed... really poor behaviour from the players

      Delete
  28. very confusing public explanation. Be better to just point to spot and get on with it. Also spent far too long at VAR screen

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Quite liked his explanation tbf just need a better English

      Delete
    2. All announcements are completely unnecessary.

      Delete
  29. Should VAR react here??? Really obvious mistake??? VAR was checking 3-4 minutes, and ref watched in front of TV 10 times!!! How this is CLEAR AND OBVIOUS MISTAKE THEN??? And why they didn’t call for an OFR when Belgium scored 2nd goal.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If a defender got kicked before a goal exactly like this. Would it be a goal? Never. So blatant penalty then.

      Delete
  30. The aversion to giving out yellow cards leads to this sort of farce with dissent and lying on the penalty spot.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Senegal really making a fool of themselves

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
  32. WHAT A CATASTROPHIC DECISION!!!

    I cannot believe my eyes.

    Belgium #8 clearly planted his foot in the path of Senegal #8. It was clear for the 1st angle VAR showed the referee.

    I'm so so confused.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He planted his foot to take a shot. Whe the defender's foot landed on his it displaced that foot preventing a shot.

      Delete
    2. Unfortunately there is no Mateu Lahoz to explain that! He would NEVER give such penalty!

      Delete
    3. He's already in front of the Sengal player. He puts his foot there in his own attempt to play the ball and the Senegal player goes straight through him

      Delete
  33. Yep,no cards at all.


    Referee and whole FIFA should be ashamed with this whole no giving cards circus.

    ReplyDelete
  34. I don't understand VAR in this competition

    ReplyDelete
  35. One of the most disgusting decisions in the history of world football.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh away and take yourself for a walk. Don't be so ridiculous

      Delete
    2. Who are you to tell me what to do? This isn't your blog, so don't try to shut others up.

      Delete
    3. Stonewall penalty ,no attempt to play the ball ,the Senegal player knew exactly what he was doing.

      Delete
    4. If Ecosse is thinking about the second belgian goal, he is right.

      Delete
  36. Said Martinez's world cup has been quite eventful. A lot of big decisions failed.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Vergonha que arbitragem houve prejudicar dois gols irregulares o segundo com falta no goleiro e um pênalti vergonhoso tem voltar pra casa.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Expected intervention for me. Bit surprised he took so long at the screen, maybe preparing to say? Scenens afterwards not the best PR for football as a sport...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And he said what??? Just incredible that refs officiating games in WC don’t know 10 words in English and are not able to make one simple sentence! What a disgrace for FIFA!

      Delete
  39. No YC for this SPA what is that ?

    ReplyDelete
  40. 129' Even in Fifa that must be a YC

    ReplyDelete
  41. No YC for BEL 19 is pushing it even for this tournament.

    ReplyDelete
  42. WHAT A JOKE OF A REFEREE TO NOT SHOW YC FOR CLEAR PULLING.


    SORRY BUT THIS IS SUCH AN....I DONT HAVE A WORD...STUPID IS THE LEAST I CAN SAY.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. FIFA and the politics! You can not give to such an amateur to officiate knockout game in the WC! Period!

      Delete
    2. I presume M is from Senegal because he is sprouting total garbage.

      Delete
  43. This ref is real joke! Does he have cards??? What is this? Incredible

    ReplyDelete
  44. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Never a yellow card for SPA. Guidelines changed three years ago.

      Delete
    2. Shots on goal haven't been a YC for handball for years

      Delete
  45. How on earth is this fault by Moreira not a YC

    ReplyDelete
  46. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  47. Martinez again giving everything to the 'bigger team'

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Senegal could easily have finished the game with 9 players ,the penalty call was right . The issue was Senegal blew it in normal time ,nothing to do with the ref.

      Delete
  48. What?? UNBELIEVABLE final minutes. No added time after all the delays? UNBELIEVABLE.!!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Were they played? Because it seemed he ended the match at 131 mins

      Delete
    2. extra time is 15 minutes first half till 105 minutes and the second half is also 15 finishing at 120 ,therefore the Senegal dissent lasted 11 minutes

      Delete
  49. True, so 1 more missed YC in the end, but still a good performance in a very challenging match.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yep,if you watch only 1st half very good.

      Delete
  50. This guy should not handle any matches for a long time.

    This kind of stupid decisions and not booking players should be investigated.

    Either he is not that smart or he purposely did not want to give any cards for some other reasons.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. FIFA investigating themselves? Sure!
      I can already tell you what their findings will be. LOL

      Delete
  51. Hoje vimos pior arbitragem dois gols irregulares da Bélgica colina deve tá com vergonha tem mandar embora a arbitragem de hoje .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Os golos foram todos legais. Sem margem para dúvidas

      Delete
  52. In spite of the hysterical comments from many above I think Martin's did very well. The penalty is not easy to call live but ultimately the correct decision is leaked. I didn't see the apparent mountain of cards that other posters have seen in tur closing stages.

    In a very difficult game he manage it well with good decision making and good player management

    ReplyDelete
  53. The referee extended the game by 5-6 minutes because he wasn't quite sure about the penalty decision

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. no he extended the game because of the disgraceful behaviour of the Senegal team .The guy lying on the penalty spot should have been red carded

      Delete
  54. TBH I don’t know what’s going on with some people here…Dramatic is just a word…

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think the Internet servers in Dakar may be in trouble with all the users who seem to have piled on to this thread

      Delete
  55. I never imagined that so many FIFA referees would struggle this much with making announcements in English. Perhaps it is due to the pressure? I had assumed they were able to communicate with the players in better English while on the field.

    Of course, I think that overall, many of the referees speak English quite well, but the announcements made during this tournament have not created a good impression.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They had PLENTY OF TIME to learn 3-4 sentencea for announcements! This is really circus! How do they communicate during classes, trainings, or with VAR room??? Simply incredible.

      Delete
  56. I really can’t understand the majority of the comments above.
    The penalty is clear.
    - Yes, it took some time but it’s a crucial decision, they have to see all the angles.
    - Yes, the attacker was clever. But what has to be made to award a penalty? The defender never touched the ball and prevented the attacker to try/play the ball.

    Overall good game. Good fault detection, good decision to award the second goal from Belgium.

    The dissent from the players is a consequence of this non sense FIFA policy of low number of YC. Martinez handled it as better as possible within this policy

    ReplyDelete
  57. FIFA encourages and applauds all of this while they piss all over the game some of us still respect and love dearly.
    This is the circus "SPECTACLE" that FIFA wants.
    How else can they keep the casuals entertained? Yes, the casuals.
    The ones who only watch "soccer" every four years.

    ReplyDelete
  58. Senegal poor behaviour in a major Championship a disgrace ,FIFA should ban them

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Poor behavior? In FIFA's eyes that's "entertainment" and "spectacle".

      Delete
  59. Very sad for Martinez. He managed the match very well until the penalty: very borderline situation, the mexican Var called again a referee for OFR after the big mistake in Brazil-Scotland. In this case the call are, in my opinion, supportable but not 100% correct. Very difficult decision for Martinez in front of the monitor, he was not sure about the final decision. His face was very clear. Very very bad announcement and after the penalty very bad decisions the two clear missed yellow cards.
    His world cup finished tonight, he performed well during the tournament but this end was not good.

    ReplyDelete
  60. This blog is full of hooligans who really dont have a clue.

    All the hard work put in by Chefren and Mikael etc is undermined by the fools who come on here with no integrity at all to talk rubbish.

    Penalty was a good OFR, announcement wasn't the best, performance was satisfactory

    ReplyDelete
  61. Lots of controversial decisions… but the biggest mistake was allowing the equalizer to stand after a clear foul by Tielemans. Hard to understand… and it cost Senegal the tournament.

    ReplyDelete

Thank you for writing a comment on our blog!