Friday, 3 July 2026

2026 FIFA World Cup Match 86: Argentina - Cape Verde (discussion)

Argentina - Cape Verde is a very unexpected KO game in the Round of 32, it will be officiated by Canada's referee Drew Fischer, third game in the competition for him. 



Match #86
Round of 32
4 July 2026, 00:00 CET
Hard Rock Stadium, Miami Gardens
ARGENTINA - CAPE VERDE
Referee: Drew Fischer CAN 
Assistant Referee 1: Micheal Barwegen CAN 
Assistant Referee 2: Lyes Arfa CAN 
Fourth Official:  Katia Garcia MEX
Reserve AR: Sandra Ramirez MEX 
Video Assistant Referee: Aramando Villarreal USA
Assistant Video Assistant Referee 1 : Ivan Bebek CRO
Assistant Video Assistant Referee 2 :Tatiana Guzman NCA 

204 comments:

  1. Foul for Argentina and YC missed for Capo Verde at 4’. Elbow in face and SFP.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Games would end with less than 7 if you got every card you wanted.

      Delete
    2. Thks for the ridiculous comment. Good night.

      Delete
    3. He didn’t call the foul because if he had, he would have had to give a yellow card.

      Delete
    4. I wholeheartedly agree with you Referee analyst. The comment made by CWY2190 is the definition of ridiculous.

      Delete
  2. Romero clear YC not given ‘10.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This World Cup is a total farce. They don’t call anything, even obvious fouls, and then Drew Fischer gives a completely imaginary free kick to Messi when there was absolutely, absolutely no foul here at any point. Unbelievable.

    ReplyDelete
  4. No foul at all there. All Ball!
    Fischer shows absolutely zero intent of blowing for a foul.
    But he realizes that it's his MLS buddy Messi and we get a late whistle.
    Gifting Messi a goal scoring opportunity.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You're saying he is corrupt? If not please choose your words more carefully.

      Delete
    2. We are supposed to believe that "Arbiter" is a referee/someone who follows refereeing, yet we have these comments... "The ref is bought"... Profound contribution, Arbiter.

      Delete
    3. Sorry but Arbiter never spoke about corruption. You interpreted his words like that. It’s obviously different.

      Delete
    4. And what does saying it's his "MLS buddy" imply? Don't act dumb.

      Delete
    5. I'm a realist. I understand that's bothersome to some of you. But I frankly don't care. Much like I don't believe in Santa Claus, I don't believe in FIFA being true and honest. It is what it is and I challenge you to change my mind.

      But in regard to this match. It now makes sense as to why Collina sent Fischer. They're okay with "burning him off".

      Delete
    6. I stand by my MLS pal reference. I've seen plenty of Inter Miami matches with Fischer and the way he (and most MLS referees) interacts with him.

      Delete
  5. So, you're saying he is corrupt? If not, please choose words more carefully.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You said it, I didn't. If that's where my comment takes you. That's on you pal. I simply stated what everybody should have been able to see.

      Delete
  6. I don't envy the Cabo Verde manager. The man and his team are up against it all. And when I say, "against it all", I mean every aspect of the game.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Easy half in this match. Average performance by Fischer with a big foul forgotten for Argentina at 4’ and a stonewall invented one for Messi. Nothing special to say in addition.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I would add non-linear technical decisions and a personality deficit that is making him too weak

      Delete
    2. Personality?
      Fischer has the personality of a limp pasta noodle.
      So, no surprise there.

      Delete
  8. Half time overall good performance from the Canadian referee Fischer and his crew nothing to expect in the second half still we it will be one way traffic

    ReplyDelete
  9. Clear YC missed to Romero at 58min

    ReplyDelete
  10. Big mistake to not issue YC there even for WC26

    ReplyDelete
  11. Is there more crystal clear missed yc than this?

    ReplyDelete
  12. But HOW On EARTH Romero isn’t booked for his harsh foul. That’s too much…too much !

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The reason is pretty straight forward. But I'll be accused of certain things if say it. ; )

      Delete
  13. Ooooh, things get interesting when one of the actors doesn't stick to the script. Hahaha
    Let's see how this plays out.

    ReplyDelete
  14. More Messi favouritism with the YC at 68’ when Romero didn’t get one.. terrible look for Collina

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's not terrible,his fans(plenty of them) will say its justufied.

      Delete
    2. Sticking to the "script"?

      Delete
  15. What kind of yc is this..

    Very soft, but Messi is in question.

    ReplyDelete
  16. And of course unsurprisingly the Cabo Verdean player DOES get booked.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Muito mal falta mal marcada e cartão exagero.

    ReplyDelete
  18. But when someone pulls His Majesty Messi’s shirt, it’s an instant yellow card: how have we ended up with such a ridiculous way of managing disciplinary decisions in matches? It’s clownish.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Welcome to Infantino's money hungry FIFA.

      Delete
  19. One set of laws for Messi ,another set of laws for the rest

    ReplyDelete
  20. Mais uma falta inexistente esse árbitro tá mal .

    ReplyDelete
  21. Another phantom free kick for Messi. Unwatchable

    ReplyDelete
  22. Messi is Fischer buddy. I confirm.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Looks like Messi can choose when to take free kicks before the whistle too!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The whistle was heard though…

      Delete
    2. My bad. You don’t blow the whistle when the wall is still being set up though

      Delete
  24. Why is everyone so obsessed with yellow cards? Referees throughout the tournament are showing fewer cards. It’s pretty obvious that’s the current directive. Just accept it and move on.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We are obsessed by justice. And when you saw Romero’s foul and the one carded by other side, you can’t be silent.

      Delete
    2. Because we're not casuals like you. And because some of us still have respect for the game that we love. And we refuse to simply bow down and stay silent as FIFA and its referees piss all over the Laws of the Game.

      Delete
    3. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete

    4. A number of reasons:
      - first the consistency is lacking is foul recognition and disciplinary action.
      - This then leads to situations where penalties not given or fouls given in the lead up to goals or leading to penalties where they are ignored in the same match.
      - This style of play favours more physical teams and then penalises teams wishing to play football
      - It’s such a departure from the LOTG applied in every league
      - It is very difficult to manage matches with big emotion, high intensity or very physical teams without fouls or disciplinary action. Then referees end up looking like guinea pigs, almost it seems making it up as they go along.

      It’s very hard just to change something many of us have been doing for decades, can’t just change it like a light switch, just switching it on and off.

      Delete
  25. Letting the free kick be taken before the goalkeeper is set is slightly questionable management. ARG7 has been telling the referee how to do his job all match. I think a strong word would have helped by now

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ARG #7 is Fischer's MLS pal Rodrigo De Paul. He controls and dominates the referees in the same manner during MLS games.

      Delete
  26. quite one-sided foul detection and disciplinary control

    ReplyDelete
  27. Dang, can it be any more obvious? Fischer actually blew for the restart as Vozinha was still actively setting up the wall.
    That explicitly goes against basic refereeing 101.

    ReplyDelete
  28. He blew the whistle ay 71:58 when the keeper was in the center of the goal. The keeper then went to the post after.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Wow we have an amazing exciting finish to the game so unexpected fouls going one for but overall good performance from the ref 77'

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Where on earth can the performance assesseur good here ? Good for Messi yes !

      Delete
    2. There have been a couple of missed fouls and cautions, but I think much of what is written has been a touch hyperbolic. It has generally been an okay performance

      Delete
    3. In my opinion, follow FIFA guidelines no controversy and avoid headlines==good for me

      Delete
    4. Average one but too much phantom decisions in favour of Messi. Too much.

      Delete
    5. By what is written we see who has sided with Infantino, Collina, Busacca, and corporate interests.
      And we see the "radicals" who still have respect for the beautiful game and for the Laws of the Game.

      Delete
    6. Agree at @Tevinjm, no big controversies in this game so no bad optics from this performance. @DB missed cards and cautions but this has been a consistency across all matches/referees

      Delete
  30. Drew is officiating while wearing a white-and-sky-blue shirt underneath his orange uniform. He has issued a phantom card and made numerous calls favoring the Argentine side. Messi is even allowed to take a free kick while the goalkeeper is still setting up the wall. Poor performance so far.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. +1 on Messi I guess you All forgot he even escaped a RED CARD at one point in group stage
      Poor performance but according acceptable

      Delete
    2. What made it even worse is that Collina came out and publicly lied to our faces by saying that Messi's tackle wasn't serious enough to warrant a Red Card.
      That bald sellout should just keep his mouth shut. Every time he speaks, he makes it obvious that he's nothing more than a corporate shill. If his referee persona could see what he's become. He'd be ashamed of himself.

      Delete
  31. Goal kick changed to corner because Argentina ran to Fischer!

    ReplyDelete
  32. Am I dreaming, or did the referees change a goal kick decision into a corner because the Argentinians shouted at Fischer???

    ReplyDelete
  33. Querem roubar não foi nada de pênalti

    ReplyDelete
  34. Querem roubar não foi nada de pênalti

    ReplyDelete
  35. Correct no penalty/handball. Clearly deflects from head to arm, not punishable

    ReplyDelete
  36. Very good no penalty by both the ref and VAR but I think it's a PK in UCL

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Don’t think at all. Clear deflection by head.

      Delete
    2. Wrong, That's not a penalty anywhere. Not even for Messi's Argentina.

      Delete
  37. Como
    Cava falta esse Messi está mal a arbitragem.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Crucial and correct call not to give handball penalty for ARG 89’

    ReplyDelete
  39. Soft call again for Messi. In ALL the others matches, these 3 FK weren’t whistled.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There was a trip. It is a foul. The pulling was also a foul. At the very least they are supportable, but for me correct decisions

      Delete
    2. Don’t speak about the pulling but two fouls whistled before which are phantom ones. And when it’s the same on the other side at 98’, nothing. Not acceptable to be so « Messi fan » in the foul management decisions.

      Delete
  40. Where is the foul? Messi clearly dived there

    ReplyDelete
  41. Fantastic no foul decision! Should be praised for that.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Missed foul for Cape Verde in attacking third 90+8’

    ReplyDelete
  43. Essa falta no final que vergonha essa no final pipocou.

    ReplyDelete
  44. Yep,missed foul,potential yc and also potential big chance.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Unbelieveable how we waived that off!!

      Delete
  45. Ball still clearly moving and Fischer allows Argentina to play

    ReplyDelete
  46. Well Canuck ref is very biased towards ARG let's call it as it is

    ReplyDelete
  47. But When isn’t Messi who is « fouled »….nothing. What a jole this referee !

    ReplyDelete
  48. Fapul detection hit and miss

    ReplyDelete
  49. Very poor performance from Fischer. I dont understand why did he get this match

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Because FIFA had to use the host country referee somewhere in the Round of 32. He's a limited referee, so this is about as far as he's capable of handling.
      So, Collina figured he'd put him in what was expected to be a one-sided affair.
      But Cabo Verde didn't get the memo from Infantino and Co.
      Fortunately, this will the end of the line for Fischer.

      Delete
  50. Missed FK for Cape Verde on the edge of the box before full time, I admit very poor refereeing in the end even for whatever happens in extra time

    ReplyDelete
  51. There was a missed foul and probable YC in minute 4'. There was also a missed YC early in the second half for Argentina. And I'd like to see the free kick set up (whether gk in place when initially whistled) again. But other than that, Fischer has been absolutely fine, only other minor issues. It has been nowhere near the level of disaster that I'm reading about above

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Fine when we see the numerous invented free kicks for Messi isn’t realistic. Sorry.

      Delete
    2. @DB Never mind trying to present a nuanced assessment, this thread is full of people looking for something completely different. This actually must be the one of the worst threads during this World Cup.

      Delete
  52. Sorry but no personality. No charisma. No foul detection clear line except from Messi systematic gifts. Ridiculous card management with shameful no card to Romero. Just a very good point with the no penalty call. Overall, poor performance by Fischer for me.

    ReplyDelete
  53. This is turning out to be one of the most outrageously biased refereeing performances in the history of the World Cup. At this point, it already looks like a pro-Messi cult, with Colina completely losing all sense of shame. That last foul in favor of Cape Verde near Argentina’s penalty area—which Fischer ignored—is simply a scandal.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I hope you're ready for what's in store for Sunday at the Azteca.

      Delete
  54. Gol irregular falta claramente ninguém viu que falha Grave.

    ReplyDelete
  55. This is offside now. Clear interference.

    ReplyDelete
  56. ARG9 offside? Clear impact so must have been onside

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He looked behind the defender who was attacking the initial head on (won by the Argentinian player) for me

      Delete
    2. Again refanalyst? Offside?

      Delete
    3. Apologies. Good decision. Didn’t change the poor refereeing performance at all.

      Delete
  57. But there is offside here ! ARG9 is clearly on active position and played the ball touching defensor !

    ReplyDelete
  58. Yep,yesterday goal was canceled,now this is given...

    🤣🤣🤣🤣

    ReplyDelete
  59. Replays? No replays? All that tech that FIFA brags about and we can't get a decent replay? How convenient.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Where is replay ? Unbelievable !

      Delete
    2. And replay shown. Very believable. Very onside. As it looked live

      Delete
    3. Not sure what you’re seeing but your commentary is becoming completely erratic. There’s your replay just now, onside but by a body width.

      Delete
    4. Yes, onside and no clear foul committed.

      Delete
    5. My mistake. Onside. Good decision.

      Delete
    6. Your inability to watch the game without bias is too apparent and all over this page. You need to watch the game more like a referee would.

      Delete
    7. We would be happy to watch the games as referees if we were watching referees enforcing the Laws of the Game.
      Instead, FIFA and Collina have given us with "actors" cosplaying as referees.

      Delete
  60. PK was gifted to Portugal for something very similar. But yeah, we're not seeing what we see.

    ReplyDelete
  61. Erro grave gol irregular da Argentina e nem o var e nem arbitragem viram vergonha senhor Fischer tem ser punido.

    ReplyDelete
  62. Everyones happy now? Talk about reactive comments

    ReplyDelete
  63. Lot's of comments on here by people who don't usually comment and simply just want Argentina to lose rather than having an objective view on the referee's performance.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. But theres some truth to the fact that messi seems to be referees differently than everybody else

      Delete
    2. Maybe but comments like the one's suggesting they purposely gave an offside goal are ridiculous

      Delete
    3. Repart. Sorry but no personality. No charisma. No foul detection clear line except from Messi systematic gifts. Ridiculous card management with shameful no card to Romero. Just a very good point with the no penalty call. Overall, poor performance by Fischer for me.

      Delete
  64. No way. You can't convince me that those animated images are better than a camera shot directly down the line with the actual players not caricatures.
    The time it takes to show the images also makes me distrust the system.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Then stop commenting on ref blog if you think the conspiracy is that deep.

      Delete
    2. CWY2190 +++ it's inexplicable

      Delete
  65. Missed (ignored) YC for excessive celebration

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think we call that a very clear YC, and also a happy Fifa with no YC

      Delete
    2. No YC for SFP so…for a celebration ^^ !

      Delete
  66. A very good point : two very good decisions of no penalty calls by canadian referee.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The crew can't make it any more obvious than it already is. They've got to maintain some sort of balance.

      Delete
    2. Would be own decision or Villareal‘s voice on the headphone?

      Delete
    3. We can ask the question yes.

      Delete
    4. Well Villarreal is pretty incompetent. So, it's hard to say.

      Delete
  67. And again Romero. This is really unacceptable disciplinary management !

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There is none for the ones in the striped shirts. They have to be kept card free for their next games. Can't possibly risk having one of them suspended.

      Delete
  68. Cabral leaving the pitch without permission, climbing up to sector A and running to row #10 to make photos and stuff.

    Not even warned… not even a yellow altough 21 player were waiting for him to restart the game.

    How about it? Is it really okay nowadays? Holy…

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. All is permited. What a pity.

      Delete
    2. It's a "SPECTACLE"! It's no longer the sport most of us grew up loving. FIFA has turned it into a CIRCUS.

      Delete
  69. FIFA needs to do some magic because the star boy is on the edge before spot kicks, in penalties anything goes it's very much luck

    ReplyDelete
  70. Concerning Messi free kick and Vozinha. Clearly not possible to let him kick the ball here. Unacceptable failure by canadian referee. https://x.com/saulodias/status/2073194329934315625?s=46&t=Ok5OCp_U1mZPFDKlm4EOGQ

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nah, Fischer knew exactly what he was doing.

      Delete
  71. It was FIFA that played the beautiful corner and left the attackers open.

    ReplyDelete
  72. I think FIFA has done a poor job calculating which games will be one sided. ENG-GHA, ECU-GER, GER-PAR, and ARG-CPV all should have been appointed more "trustworthy and skilled" referees. I know hindsight is 20/20 but there aren't that difficult to judge if you actually watch the football these teams play.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Completely agree! The question is why do we have certain referees that are more "trustworthy and skilled". Any referee brought in should be able to handle any game.

      Delete
    2. Poor Take!!!! What do you mean trustworthy as if some of these referees are not good enough!

      Just because you don’t use to see them, doesn’t make them less valuable then others

      Delete
    3. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    4. Just like the actual teams playing in the World Cup, there are going to be some refs better than the others. Every appointment FIFA makes takes that into account. They're not all equals.

      Delete
    5. Let's face it. There is a group of top tier referees, mostly from Europe, S. America and Mexico and maybe one or two others, like Faghani and Barton, and then there are referees from the areas of the world where FIFA is trying to develop refereeing and soccer in general.

      Delete
    6. w- Completely agree. The problem is that certain teams as part of their game plan create "hot games" by mobbing referees, questioning every call and taking physical play to the limits. These teams then get rewarded by having the stronger referees assigned, while those that just accept decisions and move on get the weaker referees assigned, which is unfair.

      Delete
    7. As a Mexican, I'd remove Mexico from that list. We're still searching for a worthy replacement for the Archundia and Rodriguez era.
      Ramos is there and has been there because he's the best we got. I know, not very promising. Worse yet, there isn't a clear replacement for him either. Yup, that's how bad things are in Mexico.
      Horacio Elizondo (ARG) took over some time ago. And under his direction we've hit rock bottom.

      Delete
  73. Now it's a foul and YC for Cape Verde at the very same area

    ReplyDelete
  74. Yep,10 seconds added.

    Who cares about added time?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agreed. Ridiculous time management. Martinez down for at least a minute, and no more than 15 seconds are added.

      Delete
    2. And he showed his watch when the argentinian player layed down in the added time for 40seconds😆

      Delete
  75. 30 second was waisted by arg player in 120 +1 and whistling on 123 firm

    ReplyDelete
  76. Now wonder there's not added time in stoppage time just 7 seconds its a shame

    ReplyDelete
  77. Lost 1 mn and you let 10 seconds ! No charisma, no personality. Poor performance.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Idk if u watch the game! Or u just emotional supporter that is trying to put referee down because u hate certain team ?

      Delete
    2. Thks for the comment Damir but I explain my point of view. And I m not your student. So you can think whatever you want. Not my business.

      Delete
  78. Crazy. The referee was there to ensure Argentina go through.

    ReplyDelete
  79. I do believe that all the referees are competent and capable.
    But things change when the referees arrive and are told to throw away everything, they know and everything that they've done their entire careers. That's where Collina ruins capable and competent referees.

    A good referee manager recognizes and accepts that each referee is different and that they all have differing abilities, strengths and weaknesses. And he assigns his referees to matches accordingly.

    But that takes more work. So instead, they take the easy way out and just toss out blanket instructions and directives to all the referees. And expect them all to robotically perform in the same manner. No wonder we're left with this disarray in terms of officiating.

    Yup, I am looking at you Collina and Busacca. The people you were as referees would be ashamed of what you've become and what you're doing to refereeing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. agree to a point. this is a good group but difficult with what comes from Collina but also the president

      Delete
  80. The refereeing remained substandard: chaotic and inconsistent disciplinary management, soft — if not completely phantom — free kicks consistently awarded to Messi, a free kick allowed to be taken before the goalkeeper was even set, and timid management of stoppage time. Fischer simply isn’t at the level required for a World Cup knockout match. No charisma, no command, no authority. In my view, it was a poor performance.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Seen enough of him in MLS and CONCACAF to know that is who he is. He got the assignment because Collina had to use the host referee somewhere in the round of 32.
      And yet again Collina got it wrong by thinking that this match would be a walk in the park for the anointed one and Argentina.
      Fortunately, we will no longer have to endure another 90 minutes of Fischer with the whistle at this World Cup.

      Delete
    2. +1 100% agree with referee analyst

      Delete
  81. This is a blog where we discuss referees, styles of referee and the politics that surround it. However, in this WC, it seems a place where people try to discharge their frustrations.

    Yesterday, it was with the 2nd disallowed goal to Croatia. FIFA and UEFA invest so much money in technology but it appears when used, some people try to fit it in their theories.

    Today, we witness a regular exhibition of a referee. IMO, he missed 2 yc. But he had a 120 + 19min of a game. More than 2h. And, he might got fouled 1 or 2 times but if a person that didn’t watch the game read the comments above, my god, it will think Fischer had the worst performance ever when it was so far from it.

    Not to speak of our tendency (I’m including myself) of be more harsh to non European referees just because we are used to a different way of referee. Of course that the average quality of an European referee is higher than the remaining confederations but there are plenty of good examples of others very good referees belonging to other continents (Martinez, Barton, Faghani - are all doing a pretty decent WC).

    My point is that criticism is welcome, is good and we should always exchange our perspectives. But it seems we are watching the games trying to find elements that justify some conspiracy theories we see on the internet.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for that. This thread has become all but unreadable. It is as if Arbiter and Referee Analyst were having beers together then Arbiter said to Referee Analyst, “I bet I can go on this Refereeing Blog and spew more ridiculous unsupported nonsense in this thread than anyone ever has in the history of the blog,” to which Referee Analyst replied, “Oh yeah??? Hold my beer!”

      Delete
    2. Cheers. Explain me on my summary where you see « ridiculous ». I m waiting for it. With a beer.

      Delete
    3. We see games like the champions league final that are refereed very well and then we get these games where big teams are favored so heavily and people pull shirts and grab all game and the ref seems to just ignore it like he's a bored Sunday league ref. So many injuries and so refs losing control of games. Most people I've talked to that don't even follow soccer have been shocked at how bad these soccer refs have been

      Delete
    4. Have to agree here @JPL was it an incredible game by Fischer? No, was it the worst of the tournament? Not by far. I would say an average performance.

      I have seen very few or little actual analysis or proper technical breakdown of the faults of the referee. Foul detection and disciplinary action was lacking but this has happened all tournament why are we being so hyper critical here? Why the Messi conspiracy has come into this conversation is mystifying.

      When it comes to referee criticism, the other factor you are not considering is that the UEFA referees get experience games at a high level so when they come to the World Cup they are better prepared. I think the criticism of the other referees from the other confeds has been valid, they have struggled and been really poor in some games but not to the same degree tonight.

      Delete
  82. And the 3-2 goal was scored by a player who should have been sent off, but nobody cares. Well done, FIFA.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It more of a YC but still a good argument

      Delete
  83. From the very start it felt like this game was going to be won by Argentina whether they won it or not. Many missed fouls against CV and stupid fouls for Messi and am I crazy or wasn't Messi off sides for that first goal he scored?? Clearly it's better for revenue and global viewership for Argentina to win over Cabo but damn I felt bad for Cabo. IMHO, theyARE the winners of this match. What a great game they played!

    ReplyDelete
  84. FIFA's boy won again but all refs will be biased towards Messi, this ref was better than most games I've watched but that's not saying much

    ReplyDelete
  85. Honestly, shocked by the tone of comments in this section. There was one clearly missed YC and few fouls we can discuss about, but most decisions he made were correct, including all of the important ones. Most importantly, I definitely didn't see any bias in his refereeing

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Neither did I, spot on here. No, it was not the performance of the tournament but the tone of the comments makes it sound like the weakest of the entire tournament or that Messi was given special treatment. Certainly not.

      Delete
    2. Many of the comments here were completely stupid, but this was actually one of the weakest performances in the tournament; Fischer was very poor.

      Delete
  86. @jpl
    You are wrong " discharge their frustrations"
    Nobody had Interest in this game before kickoff bare in mind comfortable match and walk over for Messi's Argentina. The ref had a good first half and average performance in the second half, For me I was ok with Messi fouls because messi is messi ( with such a huge fan base world wide) but why don't you give Cape Verde its free kick on the edge of the opponent box before full time whistle and with that decision the Canadian referee LOST ME because it was entirely unjustifiable and the narrative had to shift ( giving good scoring free kicks for one team Messi favour) and also very poorly timed final whistle ( no additional time) astonishing, yet yesterday Portugal v Croatia time went to More than excess.

    Bottom line the Canadian referee Fischer failed to handle a very easy match and to everyone who watched that game minute by minute knows it wasn't good enough except Argentineans and Messi faithful fans, period.

    ReplyDelete
  87. Is it the same match I watched that users in this blog are commenting about or another game. The referee might not have been perfect especially for not booking Romero but if anything, we have seen many such happened over and again in this World cup.
    These negative comments are simply borne out of "Messi hate" and nothing more.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Why the Messi conspiracy comes into a conversation about refereeing decisions or critical analysis of his performance is mystifying.

      Delete
    2. At some point, things need to be called by their proper name. I have never personally said that Fischer’s performance was one of the worst ever. His two decisions not to award penalties, for example, were both very good.

      However, the following points:

      * repeatedly awarding highly dangerous free kicks in front of goal, with at least two of the four being clearly non-existent every time Messi went to ground (completely at odds with the general trend of the tournament, where very few free kicks in such dangerous positions have been awarded in any other match);
      * missing a clear foul and yellow card for Cape Verde late in the game, which should also have resulted in a free kick right on the edge of the penalty area;
      * the abysmal management of Romero, who should clearly have been cautioned on two separate occasions;
      * allowing Messi to take a free kick while the goalkeeper was still out of position and in the process of setting up his wall, which is unacceptable from a referee officiating a World Cup knockout match;
      * allowing an Argentine player who had changed his shirt and received treatment during a corner kick to re-enter the field to defend after waiting for the referee, in clear breach of the Laws of the Game;
      * showing no personality, no control over the players, and a blatant lack of courage during the three minutes of added time, adding only ten extra seconds despite the Argentinians feigning an injury and wasting nearly a full minute;

      all lead me to conclude that the Canadian referee’s performance was simply not up to the required standard and, overall, was distinctly mediocre.

      You’re perfectly entitled to see it differently. But failing to recognize the contrast with Clément Turpin’s match management in the following game is, in my opinion, turning a blind eye.

      Delete
  88. I haven‘t watched the game. But this blog thread makes me sad and is the peak of what I have observed this tournament:. The last place on the whole wide web where one can discuss refereeing objectively is flooded by fans blinded by hate or favorism towards certain teams. Unfortunately, during this World Cup this place tends to become like any other Instagram post or whatsoever where you cannot talk about referees anymore.
    Refereeing performances have always been discussed critically. But at the moment there are some people that do not care about referees, but rather just want to spread conspiracies and act accordingly. This is not a criticicism against the blog owners! I guess, it is impossible to manage.
    I will still follow the blog for this tournament. But I am very much looking forward to „business as usual“ whenn all the noise disappeared and this place is about refereeing experts again.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You took my words exactly.
      At best, it comes across as "people shouting at the television". At worst, it is, well as you say @Jonas ...
      There are other outlets for that behaviour. Why destroy the purpose of this blog?
      I feel so sorry for the admins and contributors who spend so much time and effort trying to meet the original objectives of this forum - it is no wonder @Chefren, et.al. seem to have taken a back seat while all the shouting is in progress...

      Delete

Thank you for writing a comment on our blog!