Tuesday, 24 October 2023

Champions League 2023/24 - Referee Appointments - Matchday 3 (I)

Referee appointments for Matchday 3 of 2023-24 UEFA Champions League, first set of games to be played on Tuesday 24 October 2023. 


24 October 2023

18:45 CET - Istanbul (Ali Sami Yen Spor Kompleksi)
Galatasaray SK (TUR) - FC Bayern München (GER) | Group A
Referee: Davide Massa (ITA)
Assistant Referee 1: Filippo Meli (ITA)
Assistant Referee 2: Stefano Alassio (ITA) 
Fourth Official: Daniele Chiffi (ITA)
Video Assistant Referee: Aleandro Di Paolo (ITA)
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Gianluca Aureliano (ITA) 
UEFA Referee Observer: Bernardino González Vázquez (ESP)
UEFA Delegate: Olzhas Abrayev (KAZ)

18:45 CET - Milan (Stadio Giuseppe Meazza)
FC Internazionale (ITA) - RB Salzburg (AUT)| Group D
Referee: François Letexier (FRA) 
Assistant Referee 1: Cyril Mugnier (FRA)
Assistant Referee 2: Mehdi Rahmouni (FRA) 
Fourth Official: Jérémy Stinat (FRA) 
Video Assistant Referee: Jérôme Brisard (FRA) 
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Benoît Millot (FRA)
UEFA Referee Observer: Juan Antonio Fernández Marín (ESP)
UEFA Delegate: Loukas Siotropos (GRE)

21:00 CET - Manchester (Old Trafford)
Manchster United FC (ENG) -FC København (DEN) | Group A
Referee: Marco Guida (ITA)
Assistant Referee 1: Ciro Carbone (ITA)
Assistant Referee 2: Giorgio Peretti (ITA) 
Fourth Official: Simone Sozza (ITA)
Video Assistant Referee: Massimiliano Irrati (ITA)
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Paolo Valeri (ITA) 
UEFA Referee Observer: Thomas Einwaller (AUT)  
UEFA Delegate: Giel Kirkels (NED)

21:00 CET - Seville (Estadio Ramón Sánchez-Pizjuán)
Sevilla FC (ESP) - Arsenal FC (ENG) | Group B
Referee: Glenn Nyberg (SWE)
Assistant Referee 1: Mahbod Beigi (SWE)  
Assistant Referee 2: Andreas Söderqvist (SWE) 
Fourth Official: Adam Ladebäck (SWE)
Video Assistant Referee: Marco Fritz (GER)
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Nejc Kajtazović (SVN)
UEFA Referee Observer: Domenico Messina (ITA) 
UEFA Delegate: Attila Tömo (HUN)

21:00 CET - Lens (Stade Bollaert-Delelis)
RC Lens (FRA) - PSV (NED) | Group B
Referee: Radu Petrescu (ROU)
Assistant Referee 1: Radu Ghinguleac (ROU)
Assistant Referee 2: Mircea Mihail Grigoriu (ROU) 
Fourth Official: Marcel Birsan (ROU)
Video Assistant Referee: Cătălin Popa (ROU)  
Assistant Video Assistant Referee:  Tomasz Kwiatkowski (POL)
UEFA Referee Observer: Milorad Mažić (SRB)
UEFA Delegate: Frédéric Veraghaenne (BEL)

21:00 CET - Braga (Estádio Municipal de Braga)
SC Braga (POR) - Real Madrid CF (ESP) | Group C
Referee: Michael Oliver (ENG)
Assistant Referee 1: Stuart Burt (ENG)
Assistant Referee 2: Daniel Cook (ENG) 
Fourth Official: Andrew Madley (ENG) 
Video Assistant Referee: Stuart Attwell (ENG)
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Christian Dingert (GER) 
UEFA Referee Observer: Stefan Johannesson (SWE) 
UEFA Delegate: Peter Palenčík (SVK)

21:00 CET - Berlin (Olympiastadion)
1. FC Union Berlin (GER) - SSC Napoli (ITA) | Group C
Referee: Irfan Peljto (BIH) 
Assistant Referee 1: Senad Ibrisimbegović (BIH)
Assistant Referee 2: Davor Beljo (BIH) 
Fourth Official: Dragan Petrović (BIH)
Video Assistant Referee: Pol van Boekel (NED) 
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Piotr Lasyk (POL) 
UEFA Referee Observer: Marinus Koopman (NED) 
UEFA Delegate: Thura Win (ENG)

21:00 CET - Lisbon (Estádio do Sport Lisboa e Benfica)
SL Benfica (POR) - Real Sociedad de Fútbol (ESP) | Group D) 
Referee: Clément Turpin (FRA)
Assistant Referee 1: Nicolas Danos (FRA)
Assistant Referee 2: Erwan Finjean (FRA) 
Fourth Official: Ruddy Buqut (FRA)
Video Assistant Referee: Willy Delajod (FRA) 
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Bastian Dankert (GER) 
UEFA Referee Observer: Edgar Steinborn (GER)
UEFA Delegate: Neil Morrow (NIR) 

133 comments:

  1. Newcastle Dortmund Umut Meler
    PSG Milan Gil manzano
    Young boys m.city makkelie?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Szymon Marciniak is to referee the PSG-Milan match on Wednesday. Is it possible?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. After Borussia Dortmund - Milan, should be impossible.
      With his Slovenian VAR appointed on Tuesday as AVAR, I think that Vincic should get the game in Paris.

      Delete
    2. Ain't no way Vincic.. my Predict was Makkelie/Taylor

      Delete
    3. Chefren! Did he mess something up in this match or what?

      Delete
    4. I meant that after having handled Milan on previous matchay, should be impossible to see Marciniak again with the same team, it is not about performance, but about the management of appointments!
      Makkelie with PSG is very difficult to happen in short time after the famous game with Real Madrid, but I wish him that in future he can meet again the French team.
      Taylor is impossible in a group with Newcaslte.
      To make predictions, you should consider many factors, you can't do that so easily!

      Delete
    5. What is your prediction Chefren?
      My Predictions
      Newcastle-Dortmund: Umut Meler
      Paris-Milan: Vincic

      Delete
    6. Vincic in Paris, while I would really appreciate, based on current form, to see Kruzliak with Dallas in Newcastle.
      Possible to see Dias as well.

      Delete
    7. and he was able to referee Man City twice in a row last season?

      Delete
    8. KO stage and appointments for semifinal and the final were definitely particular situations.. we know! It is different in group stage, you have many referees to appoint.

      Delete
    9. Ok, thank you Chefren for explaining this.

      Delete
  3. Massa with another good appointment, he currently looks rather in than out regarding the EURO.
    Guida then a logical choice for the - on paper - easier game in group A.
    Nyberg with another top match. Will be interesting, how far he can get in his first Elite season, if he continues like that.
    Petrescu in a low-profile, but important game, given the group situation. Also good for him to get a second group stage match so soon.
    In group C, it is hard to say, which game is the more difficult/important, but two logical choices there, I think.
    And two top names for group D also makes sense, as the situation there still seems relatively open.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Michael Oliver with a brilliant game

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I have a different idea about Oliver appointment, the game in my opinion would have been suitable even for a Category 1, knowing committee management. The most important game for Real Madrid was the previous one in Naples, and indeed there was Turpin, but after that I think they are expected to qualify without any doubt. Take a look also at Real Madrid home game against Union Berlin. So I think that this appointment was a choice including at least two factors: maybe due to English team and previous assignment, not so many games for Oliver and also the fact that English referee doesn't seem to be at his best at moment. I expect an easy win by Real Madrid but in a game that goes against the known style of English referees, and that's the interesting factor.

      While for Turpin in Benfica - Real Sociedad the choice is fully reasonable, because group is fully open and these two teams can easily fight for qualification, being maybe on a very similar level.

      Delete
  5. About the rest of appointments, in my opinion one should have expected a less experienced name than Letexier in Milan, but committee made a similar choice to the other clash, with Turpin in same group and they used the opportunity for full French assignments, sometimes this can lead to certain particular choices, but still reasonable to me.

    Peljto continues with basically good games, this one is important for qualification on paper for both teams, but surely more interesting than Braga - Real Madrid because more crucial (Spanish team, as I said, very favorite). Nevertheless, surely less sonorous on paper. The Bosnian continuing on this path, can definitely find big appointments in future.

    Petrescu in Lens, very open group. The focus is fully on Sevlla and Arsenal, on paper the teams expected to qualify, but at moment you have chancesfor all four teams. Nevertheless, it is clear how committee treats teams such as Lens. Similar handling like Youing Boys, in terms of referee's selection, mostly Category 1. Even more after good results for them, without controversy (win against Arsenal).

    And about group A, at moment Bayern and Galatasaray seem favorite teams for qualification, the game in Istanbul can be decisive. With a Turkish win, the group could be open again also to the other two teams, while with a German win, Bayern could be very close to qualification. Some seasons ago, this game would have been treated differently, now it seems there isn't much gap for the Turkish side, even more after the win in Manchester. Massa with the most interesting game therefore in Istanbul, while Guida with a less important one, but still, the losing team could say already goodbye to qualification. Regular appearance for a Category 1.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Which one is the better referee? Guida or Massa.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In my opinion this is a very difficult question.
      Having followed them for years and years, since their early games in serie A, my answer would be still Guida, but he is clearly missing in some aspects that contributed in making Massa a better referee. This must be said especially under the point of viiew of technical decisions.

      A short analysis of their profiles would be the following.

      Massa: in past years he had a style that I definitely disliked for a very long time. Being just interested in ending game without controversy, applying an extremely lenient approach and sometimes very clever in not taking big decisions, but always with a quite good technical detection of fouls In recent times, he improved and he became a strict referee, at least in some games. He looked to be a totally different referee than the one we saw in past. Nevertheless, every now and then he makes the mistake of being back at what he was (at least, that's my opinion). Keeping the strict approach in combination with his skills, can give him definitely big credit, I think he is aware.

      Guida: he always distinguished himself for being very close to players, entering in communication with them, definitely by far more than Massa (as I said before, very often interested only in "his" game, when on the pitch). I know that in this regard Mikael have a different idea about Guida, but to me his management of players has been definitely outstanding at least in domestic games. Nevertheless, his weak point is very often the technical aspect, with some evident crucial mistakes and not always a perfect foul detection (he had a poor game in Inter - Bologna, missing evident penalty and other minor situations). But in terms of acceptance and smartness he is very good. Also, troubles with many injures he got during the years, he never found a long time of excellence.

      To sum up, the best referee would be a result of Massa and Guida different aspects, merged together :) In a long-term analysis, since crucial decisions and technical accuracy can definitely ensure more success than ability to manage players, given the current trend of refereeing (interested only in the outcome of crucial incidents, no matter how referee did the rest), one should admit that Massa wins in this regard. But I'm sure with more luck, Guida could have had an Elite career as well... having said that, to me Guida is by far better than Mariani, who is now fighting for Elite spot, but that's the life. You must be not only in the right place, but in the right moment.

      Delete
    2. Is it so clear regarding Guida and Mariani anymore?
      This season, Guida already got his 2nd CL game, while Mariani has none. Guida had an EL play-off, Mariani didn't.
      And they are nearly the same age.

      Delete
    3. Thank you very much Chefren for your detailed comparison 👋

      Delete
    4. Philipp, you are right about the age of the two and indeed that's particular, but my idea is that if they wanted to promote Guida, they would have done that before. And... looking at the assignments of Mariani, it looked to me they had planned him for a possible promotion. We will see what will happen on December, but I would say no promotions to Elite for Italian referees, at least at moment.
      No CL games for Mariani so far should be related to the perfomances he showed on last season but possible that we will see him on MD4...

      Delete
  7. Szymon Marciniak said in one of the interviews that his goal now is the Euro 2024 Final. What do you think about it?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. IMO clearly the front runner is Orsato, he would be get same designated matches as Kuipers in 2020, Marciniak still 42 or 43, it would be fairy ending for him if he will be in the middle of Wembley in 2028.

      Delete
    2. Surely UEFA can’t lose (again) “very trusted elite referees” in short time (next year)

      Delete
    3. And does the final mean a loss for Marciniak for UEFA? After all, he is currently the best referee in the world, with two grand finals under his belt. There's still some time until the Euro, so anything can happen! We will see what the meeting schedule will be, what his competitors will look like, and what the political conditions will be.

      Delete
    4. For me anybody but Orsato and Marciniak would be passable

      Delete
    5. In reply to Anonymous about MR Marciniak.
      They are some excellent referees in Uefa.
      Yes he is an excellent referee.
      But they are others in the group too.
      Political conditions should not come into this.
      The best referees should be their.

      Delete
    6. A man like Darren Cann is very rare, if Marciniak get 2024 Euro final and then surely Arab money or retired are very possible, I’m not try to discredit Marciniak, with all respect surely he’s one of the best referees ever and the best referee performance on WC final so far, but in 2024 he still 43, he still could appear in 2028.

      Delete
    7. Whats Darren Cann got to do with anything

      Delete
    8. His longevity on the field, after many top accomplishments

      Delete
    9. Darren Cann is no longer on the fifa list probably retire end of season

      Delete
    10. Mr Cann is still an assistant referee in the English Premier League this season and is the best assistant in English football .
      Many assistant referees should look at him style of running the line and learn from him .When he was on the FIFIA list he was in the top 3 in the world .

      Delete
    11. He isn't the best assistant in English football anymore.

      Delete
  8. Pathetic second yellow in the Roma Monza game. Its not just in England where the refs are utter clowns

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If this is the general level of refereeing in Italy (and IMO it is) why are there still 2 italian refs in CL tuesday. Pathetic....

      Delete
    2. Because Rosetti is the boss

      Delete
    3. Very hurry second YC by Ayroldi, in my opinion he still struggles, never finding a clear line in his games. On paper, you can justify this as reckless and it would be sufficient condition to say OK (but not SPA), nevertheless in reality it is a YC that shouldn't have been issued. He has been attacked by players after his decision. From such circumstances you can see why he, as very promising young referee, never got big matches and the "expected" FIFA badge, he is very far away from that. He can't find a compromise for a good officiating, it is like he has always something to show to somebody.
      Having said that, based on this performance, I think you can't comee to the conclusions by Anonymous at 13:18, but that's easy to write...

      Delete
  9. Turpin without Brisard is somehow remarkable. I can't recall the last time he had another VAR.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Didn't he have Irrati at some point last season

      Delete
    2. He had Hernandez in R16 Milan-Tottenham this year.
      But indeed surprising that the French VARs are in that order.
      Letexier often worked with non-French VARs (Irrati, San, Kwiatkowski) in recent times.

      Delete
  10. Which UEFA referees are the most trusted by the committee at the moment?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. At moment Turpin seems to be nr. 1 (all very good in recent games, unless missed second YC in England - Italy).
      To follow I see Marciniak, maybe on a similar level than the French, but he had the famous Cl final incident and he was a bit under criticism for that. Easy to see that Orsato comes as other name to be mentioned.

      Delete
    2. Chefren, do you think Turpin is better than Marciniak? Are you serious?

      Delete
    3. It is not about the fact that one is better than the other, I didn't say that, the question was who is at moment the most trusted by committee, my answer was related to the current consideration by committee (similar for the Polish and the French) but not in the detail of their technical skills.

      Delete
    4. So you think that the trio: Turpin, Marciniak and Orsato enjoy the greatest trust of the commission at this point?

      Delete
    5. What incident in the Champions League final are you talking about? did I miss something? Szymon got good reviews from the match

      Delete
    6. Absolutely: Turpin, Marciniak, Orsato and then there is a gap.

      Delete
    7. what about Taylor?

      Delete
    8. Taylor big trust by committee, among the very top Elite, but at moment quite poor period for him.

      Delete
  11. Aylordi did not whistle for a foul outside the Monza penalty area

    ReplyDelete
  12. What do you think with Petrescu, I think since last season he got “many” UCL and quite sonorous match in UEL/UECL, can Romanian have 3 elite referees or Petrescu be like Matej Jug, very very solid category 1 referee?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, for me the management of Petrescu is quite strange, I must be honest. CL debut happened when it was rather unexpected by all people, I don't remember committee members observing him in important games, but still... this of course is not something against the referee, but for others it wasn't so easy to get a debut. Maybe, I can just say this as argument for discussion, with Hategan out it was possible for Romania to have a second referee in Champions League... we should wait for the future to see what will happen, at moment it seems he is not under focus by committee but just getting such suitable CL games for him...

      Delete
    2. It will be quite interesting to compare Romanian referees' categories and appointments before and after Vassaras became the boss! Also, compare that to other similar east or central European federations without UEFA RefCom involvement and you get the answer...

      Delete
  13. Wednesday tahminleri yaparmısınız?

    ReplyDelete
  14. Newcastle Dortmund Umut Meler
    Celtic A.madrid gözübüyük
    Leipzig Kızılyıldız makkelie
    Feyenord Lazio zwayer
    PSG Milan Gil manzano
    Barcelona Shaktar Artur dias
    Young boys m.city kovacs

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Gözubuyuk impossible with Feyenoord in the same group.

      Delete
  15. Bravo onu kaçırmışım o grupta netherlands ekibi var

    ReplyDelete
  16. Lambrechts is confirmed for Wednesday (source : belgian press)...

    ReplyDelete
  17. Vincic psg milan confirmed by slovenian fa

    ReplyDelete
  18. Serie A debut tonight for Paride Tremolada in Udinese vs Lecce.

    Still a lot of room for improvement in my opinion, no clear foul line detection, missed a few obvious fouls, YC and corners.

    Clips with the two most interesting situations from this game:

    Min 5' - possible missed RC for Kabasele (UDI) for DOGSO:
    https://streamable.com/pcqs1o

    Min 72' - possible penalty for Lecce (no foul given):
    https://streamable.com/5d9bbm

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not a perfect debut for sure, some things must be reviewed, but I wouldn't be extremely negative about his performance.
      I can agree with SPA in 5', expected decision, and NO PENALTY in 72', I think that contact ended outside.
      The penalty whistled to Udinese is interesting situation as well, excellent application of wait and see with a possible goal to be scored, and then he whistled the penalty. Unluckily for him, it looks like very soft if not wrong... but given the action, you are expected to whistle thinking about a clear foul.
      He will have other opportunities in future, surely one could have expected more, but he wasn't totally poor.

      Delete
    2. The penalty for Udinese - min 48'
      https://streamin.me/v/7010f945/o

      For me penalty is the correct call, maybe soft but still very reckless tackle from Lecce defender, so expected decision.

      The penalty appeal in min 72 is an interesting situation, Tremolada seemed to be ready to whistle but he stopped in the last moment.

      Overall it was not a totally poor performance, but also not a great debut. In his defence the game turned out to be more challenging than expected, with lots of phyiscal contacts in the 2nd half.

      Delete
  19. Looking at the remaining games, it is difficult to find games for Michael Oliver and Anthony Taylor without them having repeat appointments.

    In Matchweek 5- seems Oliver doing 1,3,5 and Taylor the others so Attwell can be their VAR. Only options without repeating teams are Napoli vs Union Berlin and Shakhtar vs Antwep and Athetlico Madrid vs Feyenoord

    For Taylor in 4 he should get Benefica vs Real Sociedad. Then in 6 assuming no italian team, Union Berlin vs Real Madrid the only possibility

    ReplyDelete
  20. Massa with a good yc for kicking the ball away

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agree,I like that he has no thoughts about it,straight away fiven,as it should be.

      English style implented righ there. 😀

      Delete
  21. Good decision by Massa in 14', to book a player for a reaction, kicking the ball away after a whistle. Something that very often the Italian referee didn't do in recent times, I think that he is aware that now he is in focus after Velasco Carballo observation in EURO qualifiers...

    ReplyDelete
  22. Now penalty,maybe YC missed also?

    ReplyDelete
  23. The penalty assigned to Galatasaray is not clear to me, still needing more replays, but it looked that tackle was not targeted on opponent, it was rather the latter to create the contact, he also jumped.

    ReplyDelete
  24. US commentators called it very soft and I tend to agree with that. Leaning towards no penalty but no clear mistake. Don't like Massa's body language though. Seems to be impacted by the crowd.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Penalty is definitely supportable given the nature of the way Kimmich slides in. For me its a correct penalty. Would be interesting to see what would've happened if it wasn't whistler on field

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Surely VAR wouldn't have called in case of play on.
      At the end I agree it is just supportable.
      Very strict approach by Massa with yellow cards, it is incredible to notice how a referee can change his style, officiating certain games without any intent to show cards, while in other occasions being so accurate. It also depends on the moments, when you go to officiate a game, but you have nothing to gain in the medium - long term, it is easy that you relax... not the case of Massa today.

      Delete
    2. What a difference Serie A and Uefa competition makes...

      Delete
    3. Webb described it in his book: one style domestically and another one in Europe, according to the different expectations of different heads of refereeing

      Delete
  26. None existent penalty given to Galatasaray. Clear error and Var bottling a decision

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Really hate this sort of comment. Clearly made by someone who is biased towards one team.
      Anyone who has any sort of neutrality and a pair of eyes for that matter can see that Kimmoch goes in for.an unnecessary challenge. We can debate the level of contact but calling it "non existent" is just ludicrous

      Delete
    2. The referees on the pitch and in the VAR didn't understand that the penalty against Galatasaray was wrong, but you understood it from the TV. Congratulations to you. You should have been a referee. LOL. This is a serious Blog. Comments are made objectively, not as fans.

      Delete
    3. A serious blog. Yet you choose to use hyperbolic language like "non existant" and "bottling"

      Delete
  27. If the foul was called on Kim, then absolutely correct by VAR to support. If it was called on Kimmich however, an intervention is mandatory considering he stamped on his foot

    ReplyDelete
  28. 43 min clear missed penalty holding. Penalty was for Salzburgg. Holding both hands and missed yellow card. I am in shock, VAR?? Lexetier had a good view

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 43.min..Salzburg clear disadvanteged by referee! Penalty!

      Delete
  29. Yes for me the same. 100% penalty missed by the French referee 43 minute

    ReplyDelete
  30. 61 min for me a soft penalty. Long check VAR. For you guys? For me no penalty. Not a great night for the French ref

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. https://dubz.cc/c/c2e76a
      Here the penalty call.

      Delete
    2. For me correct penalty. Careless foul, nothing more, nothing less

      Delete
  31. Dear Chefren can you please put video 43 min holding?

    ReplyDelete
  32. I dont know what to say about Massa.

    Totally different halves.
    1st half very strict,2nd half very lenient...

    ReplyDelete
  33. 82 min penalty missed Massa. But that’s my feeling, last replay you see the feet keeper Galatasaray clear touch, i only doubt dogso?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Keeper clearly touch the ball, never a penalty. VAR intervention mandatory if given

      Delete
  34. 82 min cancel goal 3-1 VAR. Ass 2 Letexier

    ReplyDelete
  35. Missed YC in Manchester for throwing the ball away

    ReplyDelete
  36. Guida blows whistle 17 secs early

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think, because of the failed kick off, UEFA restarted their clock but Guida didn't

      Delete
    2. Because he started his watch when he blew his whistle at the beginning of the game, where Hojlund encroached the half of Copenhagen. So they had to redo the kickoff

      Delete
  37. Half time blew 15secs early in Manchester

    ReplyDelete
  38. I'm watching Peljto, an easy going first half with two correct yellow cards, not a challenging game. Temas focused on playing football and rather boring game. Correctly disallowed goal by AR2.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Guida with a solid first half performance. But why the rush to end the first half tho? About 44.:45. Must be a record that a ref ends the first half before 45 mins

    ReplyDelete
  40. Stopping the half before 45? How is that allowed. Surely Guida can't do that

    ReplyDelete
  41. How has Oliver been?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I watch him! Very impressive performance from him! Hope he is surely returning back to his form 👏

      Delete
  42. Very good simulation caution to Lamela by Glenn Nyberg, the Swede perfectly reading what was a clear attempt to deceive him into awarding a penalty by the Sevilla player.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Marco Guida gives a corner, looks like a clear goal kick. Ends up changing it, not sure if AR2 could have seen it or not, perhaps Irrati gave a subtle hint, maybe the Fourth Official/AR1

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well he shouldn't have changed it...

      Delete
    2. No, on closer replay Keeper got a touch

      Delete
  44. https://streamff.co/v/yAA24QU-Jk
    Here the possible penalty for Salzburg in Letexier game.
    I must say that right in front of him, this looks to be something very clear to be whistled, but the question is about the ball in play or not.
    If you stop the video before the kick from corner, you see that Austrian player is already falling out, maybe most of the holding is over. Nevertheless, it is not sure whether the action ends exactly when ball enters in play. I would say this was a miss by Letexier in taking preventive actions before the execution of the corner, he allowed players to do that, I fear that VAR was unsure whether this was a foul with ball in play or not, so no intervention. Had happened a bit later after the coming of the ball, maybe different assessment.
    Apart from that, can't find other explanations, because clear action by defender.

    ReplyDelete
  45. Second half for Peljto as a bit more challenging than the first, but still not very difficult. He gave a bonus to a player from Union Berlin at the beginning of second half, not booking him but then all correct cards followed. Also, in the middle of second half good management of a short moment of tension between players, in such circumstances he gives the idea of having similar skills to Mazic. Very firm, not influenced by players reaction, minimizing the incidents under the eyes of the players with a convincing body language in a rather calm appearance.
    All in all, another good game for him.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I thought he was a little overly strict 60th-75th minute (basically not allowing any physical contact) but realised himself in the end and adapted.
      Also for me missed YC for di Lorenzo (carrying the ball away for like 30 metres) which lead to a confrontation. The confrontation was solved brilliantly though.

      Delete
  46. 90+5 Penalty to Copenhagen in Manchester

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Shocking…

      Delete
    2. Yes! Right decision

      Delete
    3. Justice that Onana stopped it

      Delete
    4. I did not see a contact to be honest. From what I could see, it should have been an indirect free kick rather than a penalty.

      Delete
    5. Clearly contact, a clear penalty

      Delete
    6. It is worth mentioning that a Man Utd player destroyed the penalty spot before Guida received confirmation from his VAR

      Delete
  47. Good performance by English crew in Braga tonight. 2 goals disallowed correctly on field for offside, and a focused display from Oliver with consistent, clear foul detection throughout.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Added time needs to improve...

      Real wasted many seconds and Oliver should have added atleast half or full minute.

      Suprising to see that from english crew cause in my mind english refs are the best when it comes to time management.

      Delete
    2. Oliver was absolutely amazing to watch ! Foul detection was super and really focused!

      Only failed to punish Madrid on time wasting, he could have added much time!

      Overall Oliver was a joy to watch.

      Delete
    3. Yes that would be the one blemish, I remember he did similar in Man City vs Aston in the famous game where City won the PL title in 21-22, blew his whistle at least 30 seconds early in that game

      Delete
    4. Fantastically Oliver. He comes back to the top 🔝

      Delete
  48. Turpin with his classic performance-talking,being respected and as lenient as he can be.

    3 cards showed, could have showed 3 or many more.

    But overall,ok performance.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And elustondo could have gotten a 2yc i have to say as a Fan of sociedad. I think he did not give It because he should have Just called a foul in favour of elustondo two seconds before. I speak about the Situation in Minute 77 or so

      Delete
  49. Overall, there were very good performances tonight. Oliver, Turpin and Nyberg really have the players' trust and respect. Nice to se.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, Oliver and Turpin - good referee. I don’t know Nyberg, to new for me to see. Bravo Oliver and Turpin 👍

      Delete
  50. Really impressed with Nyberg. Wasnt the hardest game but a hot atmosphere and he had great authority and presence throughout

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lol :), I was not so impressed. And after Ireland - Greece it looks the same. But that’s my opinion. Nyberg have to be careful with his attitude. He is a OK ref, but not Marciniak!!!

      Delete
  51. Glad to read more positive comments about Michael Oliver, feeling happy for him because English referees are under so much pressure after conceded to have lost form!

    Hope Michael Oliver comes back to his famous best level 👌

    ReplyDelete
  52. https://streamff.co/v/yAA24QU-Jk

    Thank you very much for the clip Chefren. If I stop the clip when ball is in play it is still 100% holding and a penalty. Missed by Letexier and VAR. And it was not the only defender who was holding. By bar 1 another holding from Inter player. So they had 2 chances…

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree penalty missed by Letexier

      Delete
  53. Peljto: could have booked Napoli player for his deliberate action against opponent, but it was rather something soft, if you ask me, ok to solve with management.
    Video:
    https://streamff.co/v/ynWwPEh6Oh

    ReplyDelete

Thank you for writing a comment on our blog!