Saturday 14 October 2023

2023/24 European Qualifiers - Referee Appointments MD7 (14 October 2023)

2023/24 European Qualifiers, third set of referee appointments for MD7, games to be played on 14 October.

Daniele Orsato (ITA) to referee Slovenia - Finland


Saturday 14 October 2023 

15:00 CET - Prague, CZE (epet Arena)
UKRAINE - NORTH MACEDONIA | Group C 
Referee: Slavko Vinčić SVN
Assistant Referee 1: Tomaž Klančnik SVN
Assistant Referee 2: Andraž Kovačič SVN
Fourth Official: David Šmajc SVN
Video Assistant Referee: Nejc Kajtazovič SVN 
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Matej Jug SVN 
UEFA Referee Observer: Karen Nalbandyan ARM 
UEFA Delegate: Eugène Westerink NED 

15:00 CET - Belfast (National Football Stadium at Windsor Park) 
NORTHERN IRELAND - SAN MARINO | Group H 
Referee: Bram Van Driessche BEL
Assistant Referee 1: Yves De Neve BEL
Assistant Referee 2: Rien Vanyzere BEL
Fourth Official: Kevin Van Damme BEL
Video Assistant Referee: Jan Boterberg BEL
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Erik Lambrechts BEL
UEFA Referee Observer: Gylfi Þór Orrason ISL 
UEFA Delegate: Patricia González García ESP 

18:00 CET - Sofia (Natsionalen Stadion “Vasil Levski”) 
BULGARIA - LITHUANIA | Group G 
Referee: Giorgi Kruashvili GEO 
Assistant Referee 1: Levan Varamishvili GEO
Assistant Referee 2: Zaza Pipia GEO 
Fourth Official: Aleko Aptsiauri GEO
Video Assistant Referee: Jeroen Manschot NED
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Erwin Blank NED 
UEFA Referee Observer: Kjell Gunnar Alseth NOR 
UEFA Delegate: Octavian Goga ROU 

18:00 CET - Ljubljana (Stadion Stožice) 
SLOVENIA - FINLAND | Group H 
Referee: Daniele Orsato ITA
Assistant Referee 1: Ciro Carbone ITA
Assistant Referee 2: Alessandro Giallatini ITA 
Fourth Official: Rosario Abisso ITA 
Video Assistant Referee: Massimiliano Irrati ITA
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Valerio Marini ITA 
UEFA Referee Observer: Luc Wouters BEL 
UEFA Delegate: Philippe Prudhon FRA 

20:45 CET - Bari (Stadio San Nicola) 
ITALY - MALTA | Group C 
Referee: Duje Strukan CRO
Assistant Referee 1: Bojan Zobenica CRO
Assistant Referee 2:  Alen Jakšić CRO
Fourth Official: Fran Jović CRO
Video Assistant Referee: Ivan Bebek CRO 
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Mario Zebec CRO 
UEFA Referee Observer: João Francisco Lopes Ferreira POR 
UEFA Delegate: Sviatlana Hrynkievič BLR 

20:45 CET - Budapest (Puskás Aréna) 
HUNGARY - SERBIA | Group G 
Referee: François Letexier FRA
Assistant Referee 1: Cyril Mugnier FRA
Assistant Referee 2: Mehdi Rahmouni FRA 
Fourth Official: Jérémy Stinat FRA 
Video Assistant Referee: Jérôme Brisard FRA
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Bastien Dechepy FRA 
UEFA Referee Observer: Frank De Bleeckere BEL 
UEFA Delegate: Aristídis Stavrópoulos GRE 

20:45 CET - Copenhagen (Parken - Connected by 3) 
DENMARK - KAZAKHSTAN | Group H 
Referee: Michael Oliver ENG 
Assistant Referee 1: Stuart Burt ENG
Assistant Referee 2: Lee Betts ENG
Fourth Official: Andrew Madley ENG 
Video Assistant Referee: Stuart Attwell ENG
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Michael Salisbury ENG 
UEFA Referee Observer: Levan Paniashvili GEO 
UEFA Delegate: Knut Bjørn Nordheim NOR

94 comments:

  1. Expected appointment for Orsato. I appreciate the Refcom that they never keep him away from challenging contexts or games with some sort of ‘political’ background...

    Letexier - I like that they give him different types of games. Not just fair and football focused west-European teams (like Turpin for a while), but also heated south-European teams and Balkan mentality :)

    Vinčić - interesting that he is ALWAYS appointed. IIRC, he missed one Euro qualification round but was appointed to the Nations League instead. He truly benefits from being the single Elite referee from his country. To compare, other Elites have been two qualification rounds off for rotation purposes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As Hungarian im happy with Letexier's appointment. I had wait a bigger name to be honest like Marciniak or Makkelie, but Letexier's previous matches was extremly good in my opinion so this kind of heated 'full house' match absolutely deserved. ( The tickets sold out after 2 hours, 67,000 fans will be there)

      Delete
    2. The referee for SVNFIN probably had to come from Italy or Poland, in the end. The other member of the ‘top two referees in the Qatari WC’ club is now free to officiate Slovenia in November, too. Letexier is a very good choice for HUNSRB, because his control-focused performance in the last window of qualifiers was a clear nod to being able to solve problematic clashes effectively; still, a big name watches over his performance in Budapest though (Frenchman fighting for a EURO ticket?).

      Delete
    3. I assume, Ceferin himself would reject any other name…

      Delete
    4. @Anonymous (original post): Vinčić is not "always" appointed: UKR - MKD is his third qualifying match. Also Gözübüyük, Orsato and Siebert, just to mention three, got three appointments so far and definitely did not benefit from being the single Elite referees from their countries.

      Delete
    5. Sorry Peter, I disagree. Vinčić was appointed for qualifiers in March, September and October. In June, he was not appointed for a EC qualifier, but he got a Nations League SF instead. This means, he worked all 4 (!!) international breaks.

      Compare this with Marciniak: 1 game so far (2nd expected soon).
      Or Gil Manzano and Makkelie: they just got their 2nd game and they were off twice. Obviously had to rotate with other Elite referees from their country.

      Delete
    6. @Anonymous: See above - also Gözübüyük, Orsato and Siebert have three matches each. There is nothing to agree or disagree, that's a fact. And it is also a fact that those three referees are from countries with at least one compatriot who is also an Elite referee.

      Delete
  2. On the bright and *cynical* side, I’m glad they send a referee with huge diplomatic support to Slovenia, cause we’ve seen what happened with some referees (from smaller nations) after sensitive games when that isn’t the case.

    Marciniak is a good name for SVN as well. Not too much to lose.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The game for Strukan on paper can look like extremely below standard for a referee of such experience, but we know that with national teams the appointments are indeed very sensible. At this point the game is extremely crucial for Italy, despite of an easy win absolutely expected against Malta. One could have guessed a less experienced Category 1 for this game, but committee didn't want to take risk. Maybe Bebek, if not busy in anothrer games, will be the VAR.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Having in mind that it is an important game for Italy, that in the last few years for Italy games mostly elite referees were appointed, I think this can be seen as a normal appointment. Kabakov was appointed for the game in Malta, for instance, a referee with more experience and 5 previous CL appointments, and Strukan is still to have a CL deby
      Ut (maybe this year).

      Delete
  4. So UEFA are punishing Dan Cook as well. Running out of FIFA AR'S for the English referees if Pawson/ Brooks are appointed. Burt, Betts, Beswick and Nunn out. Leaves Bennett, Davies and Lennard. Might as well consider Hatzidakis a non FIFA AR.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hatzadakis is on FIFA list

      Delete
    2. Don't forget Ian Hussin :) also James Mainwaring refereed BUL-SRB with Pawson in June despite being a non-FIFA AR

      Delete
    3. Hatzaidakis very rarely gets European games because he is a fairly poor assistant referee

      Delete
    4. There are other fifa assistants in the uk

      Delete
    5. Constant Hatzidakis, Neil Davies, Simon Bennett and Harry Lennard the only 3 not yet appointed.

      Delete
  5. 11 Elite referees (+ most likely one in ISRSUI) appointed for this matchday - a clear increase to previous ones (max. 7).
    On the other hand, only three referees from 2nd group.
    So UEFA clearly reacted to the rising importance at the end of the group stage.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I tried some early UCL predictions, MD3 + MD4 as one set. Very difficult, I must say. Not easy to find a game for some referees, taking neutrality and previous games into account

    MD3
    Galatasaray - Bayern: GIL MANZANO
    Man United - Copenhagen: HERNANDEZ
    Sevilla - Arsenal: MARCINIAK
    Lens - PSV: PINHEIRO
    Braga - Real Madrid: KABAKOV
    Union Berlin - Napoli: PELJTO
    Benfica - Real Sociedad: ZWAYER
    Inter - Salzburg: LETEXIER
    Feyenoord - Lazio: OLIVER
    Celtic - Atletico Madrid: NYBERG
    Newcastle - Dortmund: GOZUBUYUK
    PSG - Milan: VINCIC
    Crvena Zvezda-Leipzig: GUIDA
    Young Boys - Man City: LAMBRECHTS
    Antwerp - Porto: STIELER
    Barcelona - Shakhtar: JORGJI

    MD4
    Bayern - Galatasaray: ORSATO
    Copenhagen - Man United: MASSA
    Arsenal - Sevilla: TURPIN
    PSV - Lens: GRINFEELD
    Real Madrid - Braga: OBRENOVIC
    Napoli - Union Berlin: KRUZLIAK
    Real Sociedad - Benfica: TAYLOR
    Salzburg - Inter: ZWAYER
    Lazio - Feyenoord: KOVACS
    Atletico Madrid - Celtic: JOVANOVIC
    Dortmund - Newcastle: MELER
    Milan - PSG: SOARES DIAS
    Crvena Zvezda - Leipzig: MAKKELIE
    Man City - Young Boys: SANCHEZ
    Porto - Antwerp: ESKAS
    Shakhtar - Barcelona: FRANKOWSKI

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Meanwhile, still no observers' appointments for MD3 and 4.
      It was asked on the blog whether both matchdays will be appointed together by committee, the answer should be "yes", but maybe now they are waiting for EURO qualifiers performance, at least for some of the involved referees (there is still a week until last games to be played on next Tuesday and for that time I tink assignments will be already made).

      Delete
    2. Now checking again some games, we have already some assignments at least in Conference League.

      Delete
    3. Argh. I wrote Zwayer twice. That shows how difficult it was :) I hope that Siebert gets a shot somewhere.
      I started with the Spanish, English, Italians, French, etc., due to their limited availability. Not many options for PSG-Milan as well.
      Maybe, Peljto can get something bigger. Let’s see.
      Curious about Nyberg’s next game.
      Difficult to find a game for eg. Makkelie. You don’t want him in group F and many games that require an upper Elite have Dutch teams in group.
      Hope to see a Belgian debut.

      Delete
    4. @Chefren: Yes, I’d also expect MD3-MD4 to be appointed as one set again. It should be possible without repeating a referee in UCL, but it will need some puzzling. Appointments should be released this week, as some FA’s announce the domestic appointments already on Monday.

      Delete
    5. I don't expect Turpin for Arsenal - Sevilla in the group of Lens.

      Delete
    6. Yes, indeed an interesting puzzle task due the challenges, that you mentioned.
      On the other hand, it will be a good opportunity for some less experienced referees to prove in challenging games that they are ready for more.

      My current idea is (written as MD3 / MD4)
      Galatasaray - Bayern: Orsato / Gil Manzano
      Man United - Copenhagen: Pinheiro / Petrescu
      Sevilla - Arsenal: Vincic / Nyberg
      Lens - PSV: Jorgji / Mariani
      Braga - Real Madrid: Makkelie / Oliver
      Union Berlin - Napoli: Kruzliak / Collum (unclear, which group C pairing should be considered bigger, I think)
      Benfica - Real Sociedad: Grinfeeld / Rumsas
      Inter - Salzburg: Zwayer / Taylor
      Feyenoord - Lazio: Marciniak / Meler
      Celtic - Atletico Madrid: Kabakov / Treimanis
      Newcastle - Dortmund: Hernandez / Peljto
      PSG - Milan: Jovanovic / Soares Dias
      Crvena Zvezda-Leipzig: Kovacs / Letexier (not sonorous, but on paper the decisive pairing of the group)
      Young Boys - Man City: Massa / Frankowski
      Antwerp - Porto: Bastien / Aghayev
      Barcelona - Shakhtar: Gözübüyük / Turpin

      Delete
    7. Thanks Peter. I can see Turpin land somewhere in Inter or Lazio’s group. Difficult challenge to complete the puzzle, which might be part of the reason why observers are not announced yet. On one hand, they want to give most Elites a game, on the other hand, a bit early to repeat referees in their MD1-2 group again (not 100% sure though). And some referees work with the same VAR, e.g. Oliver and Taylor thus they have to work on different matchday’s. I think if a VAR works two days in a row as ‘main VAR’, it is not a rule, rather an exemption. Some Elite referees will be assigned to a game below their level. That’s for sure. But there are some interesting fixtures in Europa League as well…

      Delete
  7. Just maybe will we see Kulbakov? I think he much better than Collum, Sidiropoulos, and Bastien.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He has been appointed as fourth official in a under 21 game.

      Delete
    2. I mean for UCL

      Delete
  8. I feel for Michael Oliver, it was Simon Bennett being removed from him, got Dan Cook and Cook make an error, now he is with Lee Betts, hope he keep Lee till 2026 FIFA World Cup

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lee Betts is a very good AR. We don’t know why Bennett was removed from Oliver? Could be a personal choice. Cook May well be back

      Delete
    2. Let’s hope that Oliver stick with Lee Betts for Euro 2024 and World Cup 2026

      Delete
  9. Very strange that Lambrechts now will act as AVAR only, whereas the VAR for this match is not even a semi official Belgian referee... Van Driessche will promote next time probably to ref 1 Category. Also, strange that 4th ref is not among the 7 FIFA Belgian refs... But okay : San Marino, I can understand... We still hope to see Lambrechts on MD 3 or 4 in UCL. And by the way, Visser left the pitch injured last Friday in Belgian competition...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In such appointments, the choice about VAR and AVAR is from domestic federation, so Belgium decided in this way.

      Delete
  10. Who is referee for USA 🇺🇸- Germany 🇩🇪?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Apparently Fernando Guerrero from Mexico (without official source though).

      Delete
    2. Referee : Fernando Guerrero (MEX)
      AR1 : Pablo Hernandez (MEX)
      AR2 : Michel Morales (MEX)
      FO : Diego Monato (MEX)

      Delete
  11. I think Vinčić should have cautioned Ristovski for his deliberate foul on Mudryk (18’), or at least changed his whistle tone/gestures to indicate that he saw it was definitely more than a simple careless challenge.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Decent 1H overall by the Slovenian, who was always ready to talk with players to prevent conflicts, including with the officials (well-warned Alioski after twice dissenting-ish behaviours in a few mins).

      Delete
  12. Vincic is clueless with foul detection. Embarrassing

    ReplyDelete
  13. Now Malinovskyi booked for reckless use of arm, I think it was borderline to careless, opponent made a bit of scene, but can't question too much about the decision of referee.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yep but his lenient approach is leading to players becoming more and more nervous.

      Suprised we haven't seen any bookings for protests and complaints cause Vincic is strict on that.

      Delete
    2. In 84', after a conflict, the two players insulted each other in Italian.

      Delete
    3. Indeed there were two cautions for dissent (player+coach) after a bad play on denying N. Macedonia a promising freekick in +93’. Typical Vinčić performance overall, I’d still say an okay one in a pretty tense match.

      Delete
    4. Isn’t it typical Vincic to issue YC’s for dissents after missing clear fouls himself :D

      Delete
    5. Vincic's performance are always the same-good,too much leniency that leads to players protesting.

      For how many years have we been saying this?

      Why doesn't he get better in that aspect?

      For sure he would be top 3 in the world if he gets better in disciplinary control...

      I think that is his biggest flaw...

      And UEFA will tolerate that cause no controversies happened,like in rest of his matches...

      But the same thing happened in Lazio-Atletico match,same thing happened in some other matches...

      Delete
  14. Reading some of the comments, I don't know if I saw the same match. Full match control by Vincic. Maybe a few missed fouls but nothing important. Respect by the players through the whole match. A real leader on the pitch.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Noone said nothing about match control.
      But disciplinary control, giving cards is something that can be improved.

      Delete
  15. @ Anonymous 16:57:

    In my opinion, this has nothing to do with a referee being a male of female.

    Some “male” referees are big personality’s and very charismatic. In general, they will receive more criticism than, for example, Vincic. With all the respect, he is a decent referee, but not one of the most colorful personality’s amongst the Elite referees. Many of us won’t stay at home to watch a Vincic game, if you get what I mean. That’s why you will probably read more negative comments about e.g. Turpin, Marciniak or Oliver performances.

    Frappart is used as a PR tool by FIFA and Uefa. She’s a high profile person in media, therefore it is logical that she receives more criticism than e.g. Vincic or most other female referees.

    ReplyDelete
  16. As always, many exaggerated comments, when a fair analysis should be made.
    This is Vincic style and this will be forever, I think we must accept that.
    As long as he doesn't have particular problems in a game, like today, we can't say anything, but surely the standard of officiating is below what one could expect in terms of actions against players. He rather seems interested only in ending game withour controversy, without going "deep" in the disciplinary control.
    Nevertheless, I think that today one can't be harsh, there weren't major issues and all was OK, but when such approach doesn't work, it can be a mess, and this is the point of discussion, the Slovenian stays firm with his ideas.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Vincic is a referee that will sooner or later get the Champions League final (maybe 2024), not because he is faultless, always at 8.0 - 8.2 level with room for improvement, but he somehow always manages to avoid controversies.

      Delete
  17. Perfect, perfect caution by Orsato! Bravo.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Soft opening of cards by Orsato and that's rare by him, maybe suggested by fourth official, but I wouldn't have booked for such foul.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I also thought like @Mikael that it was good decision,but seeing replay very soft.

      Maybe he was tricked by player that rolled like somebody killed him,but then again,Abisso(if I'm not weong)was right there.

      Delete
    2. And now penalty spot on.

      Delete
    3. It was a deliberate body check to prevent the Finnish player receiving a ‘one-two’ (-> reckless). According to Orsato’s body language, Abisso probably did take the lead there though.

      Delete
    4. Slovenia player was very clever by putting his leg across but in the end even I can’t deny this penalty (the ball was roughly in the attacker’s reach so defensive freekick is no option there, penalty).

      Delete
    5. The kind of penalty that I hate, but it belongs to world of football, indeed this was created by attacker, but impossible to whistle against and a VAR call in case of play on even expected.
      With the exact perception of what happened I would never whistle such penalties, but please don't follow me :)

      Delete
    6. Very, very, very soft penalty. If it were in Slovenia's box, Orsato woul not have whistled it by any means. Yeah, ee all know what happened to Mr. Çakir, right?? So sad!

      Delete
    7. True, Ceferin is watching in the stands. We can expect another penalty for Slovenia in the 2nd half :D

      Delete
  19. 34': Orsato issued the YC even before the end of the foul. That's something outstanding, impossible to see by some referees from other countries!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hmm, a few seconds before there was a deliberate late foul by a Finn which Orsato ought to have blown up for (he played advantage for no reason other than 'letting the game pass him by'), so this wouldn't be the best example of excellent officiating imo. But no question the caution for the consequent reckless stamp was well-seen and justified/mandatory.

      My feeling is that Orsato isn't sooo much at the top today (a bit stuck in the middle of the pitch, eg. 37' where he nearly got tackled himself in midfield, and 'siga siga' style a bit), but unless Finland come out a different team in the second half, both Čeferin and Rosetti can be very happy with the outcome of this match from their different perspectives :).

      Delete
  20. Whilst looking for a clip of Orsato's penalty, I found this incident from the Northern Ireland vs. San Marino match earlier - a rejected OFR for SFP. My reaction would be - well done Bram Van Driessche, I don't think this was excessive force (despite the ugly nature of the hitting point).

    What do you think?

    https://streamja.com/obQGn

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. For me, VAR's advice to be followed. The force isn't that bad and he's trying to get his foot out of the situation, but I would still say that he came in in a way that endangered the safety of the Sammarinese player

      Delete
    2. For me, this should be a RC. Straight leg, no low force, not even touching the ball are all arguments in favour of SFP - together with the dangerous hitting point, of course.

      Delete
    3. BTW, unusual way to confirm the YC. I don't think, I have seen that before.

      Delete
    4. Wow, Mikael, you surprised me! :D

      IMO, it's SFP. The way the Irish player enters the challenge, the opponent is in front of him (not unexpected presence, not playing the ball before making a contact), full studs contact above the ankle, not ultra high but also not negligible force. To me, all criteria for RC are met.

      Delete
    5. For me (from English pov) it lacks enough force and I understand the lack of height argument too for a RC, but slightly surprised in a Uefa context to see just a YC, but agree with Mikael. What I really don't like is the confirming YC procedure. Running quickly on to the pitch, showing the card, for it to stay as YC is highly irregular and confused everyone initially. Walk on, have a word with player (plus explain to both captains if necessary), and restart play

      Delete
    6. I must say I am surprised that the referee didn't issue a RC here. For me it's 70/30 in favor of SFP, if I were to see it on the monitor I'd give a red due to the hitting point, nature of the tackle and the existing force (although not excessive, it's still reasonable force). This in conclusion endangered the safety of the opponent in my opinion.

      Delete
  21. Second YC by Kruashvili in Bulgaria - Lithuania, reckless challenge:
    https://streamin.me/v/e7460722
    Very particular incident. It seems as originally the tackle is rather fair and ball-oriented (maybe not reaching it, but still), then the opponent joins the path of the tackle and he gets the foul.
    Should we consider this as still reckless action?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Probably there was a SPA more than reckless

      Delete
  22. The penalty whistled to Slovenia: https://streamin.me/v/c20052e1

    ReplyDelete
  23. The third Slovenian goal should have been ruled out for offside imo.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. +1, for me Offside because the attacker is in line of Vision of the goalkeeper

      Delete
    2. https://streamin.me/v/d749dfdd
      Strange that Irrati didn't call to OFR.

      Delete
    3. Not strange, he is well known for not intervening even when required ;)

      Delete
  24. In 16', a penalty appeal by Italy. Very strong body language by Strukan who was there and played on. Agree with his decision.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Well, appointing an English official for a game involving Kazakhstan was a very bad idea of Rosetti. :D Many dirty challenges from Kazakhs and mostly it's play-on by Oliver. In the meantime, two of three(?) fouls by Danes correctly punished with YCs.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Quick highlights of the 1st half:
      https://files.fm/u/rce4hvwgt7

      Delete
    2. Well, 4' is a mandatory booking due to step on foot, Oliver missed it, 17' is another challenge that I expect to be punished by YC. Reckless for me.
      In 22' there is also bad luck, KAZ player originally kicking ball but then opponent coming closer, here card possible but not 100% mandatory for me, due to how it happened.
      YC to Danish player in 23' absolutely correct, but after all what had happened before looks strange, A few minutes later we can't disagree on the very clear YC for SPA to Danish defender.
      In my opinion in this case it wasn't that Oliver wanted to wait before issuing cards, to me he just didn't notice the severity of some offenses before the opening of cards. KAZ was indeed more lucky side there.

      Delete
    3. Yes, he completely missed most of Kazakhstan's offences and then had to caution Danish players. One can say bad luck, one can say lack of alertness - I think it was a combination of these two.

      Delete
  26. Letexier so far so good. Totally in the background, two teams focusing on the game. Only 5 faults says it all.
    Will be interesting to see if anytime the game will change, and then check how Letexier reacts.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agreed, but his positioning is not on his usual level tbh. Too often he needs to move out of the situation or pass lines.

      Delete
  27. OT: very obviously missed YCs in 31' and 33' in Germany-USA.

    ReplyDelete
  28. A very accurate Strukan regarding disciplinary control, didn't miss any single bookable offense so far.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Two correct consecutive YC by Letexier in Budapest in 77' for SRB4 (SPA) and HUN19 (dissent towards AR2 over a possible foul and throw-in), both mandatory.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Final whistle in DENKAZ :D
    https://streamable.com/z3h8wz

    Not the best evening for the English official who was fortunate that it was Denmark and not Southern team that suffered from some of his (non-)calls early in the game. Then, Danes took the lead and almost nothing happened afterwards. The performance won't be discussed, of course, but it's interesting if that's all that matters for UEFA RefCom.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not ideal to whistle the end with a promising attack, but checking carefully the video, I think that Oliver was convinced that the position of the ball, close to sideline, wouldn't have allowed player to continue the attack. I say that because a few seconds before, when 4:00 minute was already ended, they were in the midfield and it was perfect moment for final whistle. Not the best management, then if you make this one to a team not called Denmark, as you wrote, you will have a bad moment after the final whistle...

      Delete
  31. Perfect Letexier, I must say he did really well! Last 15 mins the tension was there and he reacted quickly.
    He might gave a YC to Mitrovic when he started to confront with the fans, as this also raised the tension in the game, but maybe that's my taste.
    After the last whistle mass confrontation what he could not really avoid and correct 2YC to HUN13 in that.
    I think there should be no doubt that he will attend to EURO24 next to Turpin.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And to mention perfect work from ARs. Mugnier denied two Mitrovic goals with correct offside decisions on-field. Brilliant work!

      Delete
    2. I must say from the few games I've seen from Letexier, he seems to make correct decisions that feel very obvious. Good body language and technique as well. I like him from what I've seen!

      Delete
  32. Clips of YC shown by Letexier, all correct.

    77'
    https://streamff.com/v/utt9Nh_8Po

    78'
    https://streamff.co/v/yfMAztseec

    90'+3
    https://streamff.co/v/WYuhEQnZ9r

    Especially the second YC, mandatory for the attitude shown against assistant referee. To be honest, I think this was very close to RC, it can depend on what player said. Not booking after that, would have lead the French referee to an extremely poor assessment in terms of mark.

    ReplyDelete

Thank you for writing a comment on our blog!