Monday 16 October 2023

2023/24 European Qualifiers - Referee Appointments MD8 (16 October 2023)

MD8 of 2023/24 European Qualifiers continues on Monday 16 October with the following referee appointments.

Alejandro José Hernández Hernández (ESP) referee of Greece - Netherlands


Monday 16 October 2023 

18:00 CET - Baku (Tofiq Bəhramov adına Respublika Stadionu) 
AZERBAIJAN - AUSTRIA | Group F 
Referee: Aristotelis Diamantopoulos GRE
Assistant Referee 1: Konstantinos Psárris GRE
Assistant Referee 2: Andreas Meintanas GRE 
Fourth Official: Anastasios Papapetrou GRE 
Video Assistant Referee: Angelos Evangelou GRE
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Vassilis Fotias GRE 
UEFA Referee Observer: John Ferry NIR 
UEFA Delegate: Alojzije Šupraha CRO 

20:45 CET - Athens (OPAP Arena) 
GREECE - NETHERLANDS | Group B 
Referee: Alejandro José Hernández Hernández ESP
Assistant Referee 1: José Naranjo ESP 
Assistant Referee 2: Diego Sánchez Rojo ESP 
Fourth Official: José Luis Munuera ESP: 
Video Assistant Referee: Juan Martínez Munuera ESP
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Ricardo De Burgos ESP 
UEFA Referee Observer: Peter Sippel GER 
UEFA Delegate: Jean Paul Mievis BEL 

20:45 CET - Faro-Loulé, POR (Estádio Algarve)
GIBRALTAR - REPUBLIC OF IRELAND | Group B 
Referee: Christian-Petru Ciochirca AUT
Assistant Referee 1: Maximilian Weiß AUT
Assistant Referee 2: Michael Obritzberger AUT
Fourth Official: Harald Lechner AUT
Video Assistant Referee: Alan Kijas AUT 
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Manuel Schuettengruber AUT
UEFA Referee Observer: Martin Ingvarsson SWE 
UEFA Delegate: Karl Espen Eriksen NOR 

20:45 CET - Brussels (Stade Roi Baudouin / Koning Boudewijnstadion) 
BELGIUM - SWEDEN | Group F 
Referee: Maurizio Mariani ITA
Assistant Referee 1: Daniele Bindoni ITA
Assistant Referee 2: Alberto Tegoni ITA
Fourth Official: Matteo Marchetti ITA 
Video Assistant Referee: Aleandro Di Paolo ITA
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Fabio Maresca ITA 
UEFA Referee Observer: Stávros Tritsónis GRE 
UEFA Delegate: Luca Zorzi SUI 

20:45 CET - Reykjavík (Laugardalsvöllur) 
ICELAND - LIECHTENSTEIN | Group J 
Referee: Abdulkadir Bitigen TUR
Assistant Referee 1: Ceyhun Sesigüzel TUR 
Assistant Referee 2: Mehmet Tugral TUR 
Fourth Official: Bahattin Şimşek TUR
Video Assistant Referee: Christian Dingert GER 
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Hakan Ceylan TUR 
UEFA Referee Observer: Marco Borg MLT 
UEFA Delegate: Diana Andersen DEN 

20:45 CET - Zenica (Stadion “Bilino polje”) 
BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA - PORTUGAL | Group J 
Referee: Halil Umut Meler TUR 
Assistant Referee 1: Mustafa Emre Eyisoy TUR 
Assistant Referee 2: Kerem Ersoy TUR 
Fourth Official: Arda Kardeşler TUR 
Video Assistant Referee: Benoît Millot FRA
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Alper Ulusoy TUR 
UEFA Referee Observer: Gediminas Mažeika LTU 
UEFA Delegate: Vilmos Szabó HUN 

20:45 CET - Luxembourg (Stade de Luxembourg) 
LUXEMBOURG - SLOVAKIA | Group J 
Referee: José María Sánchez ESP 
Assistant Referee 1: Pau Cebrián Devís ESP 
Assistant Referee 2: Iñigo Prieto ESP 
Fourth Official: Guillermo Cuadra ESP 
Video Assistant Referee: Carlos Del Cerro Grande ESP
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Santiago Jaime Latre ESP 
UEFA Referee Observer: Gunnar Jarl Jónsson ISL 
UEFA Delegate: Jaroslav Doležal CZE

125 comments:

  1. Which referee for England - Italy? Do you think it could be Szymon Marciniak?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Possible. Usually they give these games to lower ranked elites to gain experience in big games, but considering the problems Jovanovic had in Naples, maybe they won't take that risk this time

      Delete
    2. The Serbia - Montenegro match seems more important and hotter. Do you think such a match is reserved for the high elite?

      Delete
    3. Turpin is the other big name still available, but he can't get SRB-MNE. So probably Marciniak in Serbia.
      Then Turpin would be an obvious choice for ENG-ITA, but indeed could also be someone less experienced like Peljto or Grinfeeld (if he can travel).

      Delete
    4. Based on the regular observer name and incidents in ITA-ENG, I’m leaning towards a big name in London

      Delete
    5. Peljto will probably referee the Zrinjski-Velez match on Wednesday.

      Delete
  2. England ıtaly marciniak Türk kafilesine iyi randevular

    ReplyDelete
  3. Who is the referee between USA - Germany ?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Referee Observers Matchday 3 + 4

    UCL
    Match: Referee observer (MD3) / Referee observer (MD4)
    Galatasaray - Bayern München: Bernardino González Vázquez / Vladimir Šajn
    Manchester United - Copenhagen: ? / Darko Ceferin
    Sevilla - Arsenal: ? / Costas Kapitanis
    Lens - PSV: ? / Nuno Parreira De Castro
    Braga - Real Madrid: Stefan Johannesson / Björn Kuipers
    Union Berlin - Napoli: Marinus Koopman / Boško Jovanetić
    Inter Milan - Red Bull Salzburg: Juan Antonio Fernandez Marin / Elmir Pilav
    Benfica - Real Sociedad: Edgar Steinborn / Sokol Jareci
    Feyenoord - Lazio: Stéphane Lannoy / Carlos Gomez
    Celtic - Atlético Madrid: Frank De Bleeckere / ?
    PSG - Milan: Tomasz Mikulski / Kyros Vassaras
    Newcastle United - Borussia Dortmund: ? / Thomas Einwaller
    RB Leipzig - Red Star Belgrade: Alain Hamer / Marian Ruzbarsky
    Young Boys - Manchester City : ? / Nicola Rizzoli
    Barcelona - Shakhtar Donetsk: ? / ?
    Antwerp - Porto: Vladimir Petrov / Jan W. Wegereef


    UEL
    Match: Referee observer (MD3) / Referee observer (MD4)
    Olympiacos - West Ham: Terje Hauge / Kenneth William Clark
    TSC - SC Freiburg: Uno Tutk / Karen Nalbandyan
    Marseille - AEK Athens: Stefan Messner / ?
    Brighton & Hove Albion - Ajax: Lucilio Batista / Alain Sars
    Sparta Prague - Rangers: Dejan Filipovic / ?
    Aris Limassol - Real Betis: Emil Bozinovski / Drago Kos
    Sturm Graz - Atalanta: Rune Pedersen / Sabri Celik
    Raków Częstochowa - Sprting CP: Vlado Svilokos / Martin Ingvarsson
    Union Saint-Gilloise - LASK: Martin Hansson / Pascal Pierre Garibian
    Liverpool - Toulouse: Alexandru Deaconu / Pawel Gil
    Villarreal - Maccabi Haifa: Vladimir Antonov / Cüneyt Çakır
    Panathinaikos - Rennes: Leslie Irvine / Itchko Lozev
    Roma - Slavia Prague: David Fernández Borbalán / ?
    Sheriff Tiraspol - Servette: Manuel Diaz Vega / ?
    Molde - BK Häcken: João Ferreira / Mehmet Ilgaz
    Bayer Leverkusen - Qarabağ: Stavros Tritsonis / Gylfi Thor Orrason


    UECL
    Match: Referee observer (MD3) / Referee observer (MD4)
    Lille - Slovan Bratislava: Nerijus Dunauskas / Ante Vučemilović
    KÍ - Olimpija Ljubljana: Ognjen Valjić / Pavle Radovanović
    Gent - Breiðablik: Michael Koukoulakis / Michael Johansen
    Maccabi Tel Aviv - Zorya Luhans: ? / Asim Khudiyev
    Ballkani - Astana: Lee Evans / Clayton Pisani
    Dinamo Zagreb - Viktoria Plzeň: Robert Schörgenhofer / Mika Peltola
    Lugano - Club Brugge: Mark Whitby / ?
    Bodø/Glimt - Beşiktaş: Jens Larsen / Georgi Vadachkoria
    AZ - Aston Villa: Tony Asumaa / Carlos Velasco Carballo
    Zrinjski Mostar - Legia Warsaw: Karel Vidlak / ?
    Genk - Ferencváros: Robert Sedlacek / Lassin Isaksen
    Fiorentina - Čukarički: Calum Murray / ?
    Eintracht Frankfurt - HJK: Matteo Trefoloni / Mike Riley
    Aberdeen - PAOK: Charles Schaack / Laurent Duhamel
    Fenerbahçe - Ludogorets Razgrad: Nicolae Grigorescu / Kristinn Jakobsson
    Spartak Trnava - Nordsjælland: Christos Nicolaides / Gevorg Hovhannisyan

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Big names for Bayern Munchen - Galatasaray, Real Madrid - Braga and Aston Villa - AZ, all on MD4, waiting for the missing appointments. Having to predict a debut with committee member, I would rather say more likely in Madrid than München (but also possible in Germany), while for Conference League very different, debuts can be in all games, given that competition is less important.

      Delete
    2. @Mathias I’m rooting for a Belgian debut with Rizzoli or Kuipers

      Delete
    3. If both Kuipers and Sajn's appointments are for debuts then my prediction would be Strukan and Lambrechts respectively

      Delete
    4. Do you think there is a possibility that Cesar Soto Grado or Guillermo Cuadra Fernandez will be appointed for the Fenerbahçe - Ludogorets match?

      Delete
  5. Like for Massa, I was expecting a committee member as observer for Sanchez Martinez, to check if he is suitable for Euro 2024.

    ReplyDelete
  6. @Chefren why did Umut Meler get such a meaningless game?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Türküm Halil Umut Meler Türkiye'de en üst düzeyde hakem Uefa'dan beklenen ilgiyi görmüyor Respect

      Delete
    2. Surely not the best game in terms of importance, but still Bosnia and Herzegovina - Portugal, not bad. I think this can be the very last chance for Bosnia for a small chance to qualify, a nice game for them surely, but definitely meaningless for Portugal.
      My opinion about the Turkish is that he has not still made a step ahead in the Elite category and committee is still waiting before making certain assignments. We can say that his CL game has been excellent, so let's wait for the next one on MD3 or 4. This is just something "in the middle".

      Delete
    3. Rosetti (and in particular Signor Calcagno) can tell all about the difficulty of handling Bosnia vs. Portugal in Zenica...

      Delete
  7. Yuck another categorie 1 level Italian with a big game which imo should be for a elite ref. Rosettis nepotism is getting too huge to miss.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And the end of the day, I can only hope that an elite referee outside Big 5, could lead UEFA refcom, maybe name like Mazic or Proenca, referees with strong personality at their time. I have no doubt about Collina but Rosetti, simply need to step down. I have also no doubt about Italian integrity but I mean we need to realise that their era it’s over, I mean we should not live with the hegemony from the past. It’s fortunate and also unfortunate for Italy to have Orsato, Tagliavento, Rocchi, and Rizzoli born in the same era, and maybe for Maresca and Irrati. But now who are Mariani, Massa, and Sozza? Maresca and Irrati simply are much better. How about Kabakov, Treimanis, Rumsas, Lucjancukas, Kruashvili, Ekberg, Frankowski, and the others are they much worse than the trio Italian now? Or if name like Kabakov cs are Italian, would they automatically become elite?

      Delete
  8. Some fairly insignificant observers patrolling these games.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No observer is insignificant

      Delete
  9. Even more with tonight's results, Hernandez got a really big match.
    After missing out in CL MD1/2, this was not expected, I think.
    E.g., swapping him with Gil Manzano in the less important AUT-BEL would have been the more obvious choice.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I think Alejandro Hernandez was the right choice for the Greece - Netherlands match.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Offtopic, just curious. What is the reason for temporarily disabling anonymous comments? The admin's favourite referee in action? ;-)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think that you can understand by yourself the reason.
      The tone of some comments is simply unacceptable, no matter which referee is (are) involved. We try always to open it because there are many readers who deserve to write even without an account, but still, this doesn't seem to work.
      And... I think your comment is not intelligent because all people can write with an account, so the blog is not closed when anonymous comments are disallowed.
      Enough explanation?

      Delete
    2. Thanks. Sure, I do notice those comments. Unacceptable and always anonymous people with a favourite club, protecting a referee from their own country, or bashing a referee they don’t like.
      🙂
      If you disable comments for just ~2 days, it can give the impression to protect certain referee(s) from negativity, if you get what I mean, cause there won’t be many comments on those days. But it must be difficult to find a proper solution… I understand the issue you’re facing as an admin.

      Delete
    3. Btw, I am not writing with a Google account cause it doesn’t work on my phone for some reason :)

      Delete
    4. Yes, it's a shame some people cannot see that tone often creeping into their comments ; ) .

      Delete
  12. Already three quite interesting Austrian penalty appeals for Diamantopoulos - tripping (6'), goalkeeper challenge (18'-ish) and finally holding (29'). I'll cut clips when I can.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It seems like the penalty that the Greek ref awarded Austria at the start of the second half was correct (47’) - handling in the wall. No YC given either, whereas it would have been prior to this season.

      Delete
  13. OT: If you slow the video at https://youtu.be/EJciPW4oQCc?si=5grxx_887boZWi2r&t=132 down to 25% speed, the ball looks like it clearly hits Pulisic's upper arm, yet there was no OFR. Why not?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I reported this incident on the blog a few days ago.
      Official explanation by Rocchi is that VAR didn't have 100% evidence that goal was scored by arm. It seems that he agrees with this decision, but many people stated what you are saying now and it stays as very controversial.
      Rocchi will publish the VAR audio on next Sunday.
      I will make a clip, but the nature of decision is already known.

      Delete
    2. Thanks for the explanation. It just seems like a massive error, a VAR fail reminiscent of the Liverpool one, though of course not as obvious. I wish FIFA could hand down some universal guidelines to help the domestic league VARs, as there is so much pressure on VAR to review things quickly. Maybe something as simple as broadcasters going to a three minute commerical might take some of the pressure off of VAR, because the Liverpool audio showed that they were talking very quickly, which perhaps led to the error.

      Delete
  14. Siebert replaced Stieler and Seidel for Kempter at short notice between France and Scotland

    France - Scotland : Siebert - Seidel, Gittelmann - Schlager - Perl, Pickel

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Maybe it was noticed too late that Stieler had two games in a so short time.
      A possible explanation is that Stieler had been already assigned to this friendly game when it was still unknown whether Siebert would have got an official appointment, otherwise easy to think that Siebert could have been directly assigned to the friendly.

      Delete
  15. In a tense ending, Guido Burgstaller was correctly sent off (SYC for reckless striking), but after a big delay, and I would suggest perhaps even hearing “check complete for VC” in his ear. Clips to follow!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Maybe i can help you with the clip https://streamin.one/v/edeba065

      Delete
    2. Watched the full game, no clear wrong decisions but I'm not fully convinced either. Many decisions with a small delay, could be a problem in a hotter game than today. Game was really fair until the last 3 minutes.

      I'm okay with the play on calls in PA in the first half, maybe the last one for holding could have been given if the player goes down right away.

      A clear wrong offside was given in first half, ball was coming from defender, difficult to see for AR but referee must not whistle this offside as he had clear view.

      YC's were all correct in my book, but I doesn't like the procedure of the sending off, he whistles for foul and then before the execution of FK he issued YC... Maybe the one for AZE near the corner flag at about 80' wasn't necessary as he played the ball and the Greek didn't whistled any "small fouls" before, didn't suit his line but not an mistake.

      Delete
    3. I think "correctly" can only apply to the second yellow. The incident that brought the first yellow for Burgstaller (and three other cards) was very, very poorly handled.

      At a very basic level, Burgstaller was booked for failing to respect the distance or delaying the restart of a free kick that Azerbaijan was attempting to take from 15 yards away from the actual restart spot. Once he stepped in front of it, Diamantopoulos's hands were possibly tied. But the inability to prevent it was poor, as was the handling of the aftermath.

      Delete
  16. Sandro scharer ne durumda?

    ReplyDelete
  17. Don't know how he spotted it, but an excellent call by Umut Meler with this handball penalty to Portugal. Rather open arm by defender to stop ball.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This penalty calls are disaster dor football! Deflection, no intention to play the ball, ball was going out. In their PK area the only way not to make such a penalty is that defender should tie their arms at the back. Doesn’t have any sense.

      Delete
    2. Very rarely I have to disagree with you Chefren,but there it is 😀.

      Ball hits defender's body and then his arm,I would never whistle that,but then againwith handball rules different in evey other country,you never know.

      Delete
    3. https://ibb.co/ph4t58Q good VAR intervention

      Delete
    4. I accept some fans disagree with the handball rule, but this PK is absolutely correct and in accordance to the LotG

      Delete
  18. What a start for Umut Meler🔥

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hmmm not the best tonight Meler

      Delete
  19. I expected a VAR intervention after a handball from Greece. Gesture before VAR check of Hernandez was hand close too the body but that wasn't the case

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I didn't expect an intervention but imo it should have been a penalty, deliberate handball!

      Delete
    2. And then the penalty given isn't wrong, but is actually a bit dubious in my eyes - Van Dijk pins himself to the defender and also tugs his shirt. Play on would have been the optimal call based on what I saw. Tough gig for Hernández as the tension rises in Athens.

      Delete
    3. And no booking for that foul that resulted in penalty?

      Wow.

      Delete
    4. Not convincing penalty, to be honest using very easy words, looks to me rather a random call...

      Delete
    5. It is a call to make up for the PK which should have been given before. 2 crucial mistakes already in my book. Could become a disaster match. Again a spaniard with dutch teams after Mateu in Quatar and Sanchez at Eindhoven....

      Delete
  20. OFR in ISL - LIE, penalty for handball suggested to Bitigen by Dingert. Correct decision, naive movement with arm by defender who maybe wanted to protect the face, but he just increased body volume.

    In LUX - SVK, OFR for removing a wrong penalty by Sanchez Martinez, no contact, opponent with a raised leeg played ball, but this was the paramount example of indirect free kick for dangerous play, an infringement that seems now disappeared from modern football, people want to see either penalties or play on.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ISL - LIE https://streamin.me/v/44bbc05f

      Delete
    2. LUX SVK,quickly heating up,would not be surprised if we see RC,not an easy job for Martinez.

      Delete
  21. Scandalous decision by Hernandez. Van Diyk pushes the Greek. It's such an important game!But not goal, this is good.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Tough night for both officials from Spain,that's for sure.

    ReplyDelete
  23. I liked how Hdz Hdz started the game, not fooled by players theatrics and looked very confident, but later on some dubious calls. And allowing too much dissenting behavior from both sides

    ReplyDelete
  24. 2 swedish supporters were shoot to death in Brussels. Why don’t Uefa stop the game?!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Shocking news, indeed. Maybe news came too late for taking some decisions about the game.

      Delete
    2. Oh come on Chefren dont act like a fool and try to find excuses where there are none. We all know that for UEFA/Ceferin and Fifa/Infantino the only thing that matters is the money. The show must go on....

      Delete
    3. I think they will stop the game during halftime.

      Delete
    4. The safest place for Swedish football fans is probably inside the stadium at the moment considering the shooter is still on the loose, but it still feels wrong to play football at this moment, I agree

      Delete
    5. Let's see what will happen at half time! We must give the benefit of the doubt, insted of attacking... decisions are not always easy to take.

      Delete
  25. Until now an excellent Maurizio Mariani in BEL-SWE... Penalty, YC, management, positioning. Italian referees are always fit for international game...

    ReplyDelete
  26. Clear penalty for Belgium directly given by Mariani.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Many handball incidents today. Penalty in Iceland whistled by Bitigen, confirmed by VAR.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The penalty given to LIE appeared to a textbook deflection to arm. Cannot believe that VAR did not intervene

      Delete
    2. And then retake ordered by VAR, because players of both teams entered too early (and one of them scored after a save by the GK).
      Handball itself shouldn't be whistled, but probably supported by UEFA.

      Delete
    3. https://streamin.me/v/00d258a3
      Here the second penalty, in this case very controversial, I must admit.
      Let's say VARs are forced to accept almost all handballs whistled, always for the same reasons...

      Delete
    4. This penalty, as well as the one in BOS-POR, are clear deflections by player or teammate, with arms not in clear unnatural decisions. Hard to accept no interventions in these cases imo

      Delete
  28. Too much dissent and talking allowed by Hernandez,especially during penalty incident, no punishment for players that crowded and protested to referee.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Belgium-Sweden will not restart, at least not tonight. It seems to have been a decision which both teams agreed on. Swedish TV now even forced to stop their broadcasting from the stadium

    ReplyDelete
  30. Don't know why this one should be a clear and obvious mistake.
    VAR shouldn't have called referee, very confusing.
    At least one can understand final decision by Hernandez Hernandez, confirmed penalty, then one can discuss about it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Again,no card?
      Atleast YC was deserved here.

      Delete
    2. Very very soft penalty.

      Delete
  31. Martínez Munuera thought it was DOGSO but Hernández disagreed - did I miss sth? Very strange OFR in GRENED otherwise…

    ReplyDelete
  32. Great hernandez rejecting this rediculous OFR. Never crucial mistake to call this penalty for NL. Wrong OFR in my view

    ReplyDelete
  33. Strange OFR now in Greece. I dont understand this VAR tonight

    ReplyDelete
  34. What is Martínez Munuera doing today? 2 wrong interventions and 1 failing intervention

    ReplyDelete
  35. DOGSO! Red card!

    ReplyDelete
  36. Well done Hernandez for rejecting the review, no matter if it was for no penalty or DOGSO. However he should've issued a YC after going to the monitor

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Pfoe. Now hernandez with a baffling decision. How is the action from Greece player on Brobbey no PK. Mixed bag performance from him today. Disastrous VAR

      Delete
    2. I agree, the second rejection was completely wrong. It happened just after I wrote my comment

      Delete
  37. Now wrongly rejected OFR from Hernandez, I have a feeling that he was a bit frustrated with Martinez after the first but that shouldn't influence the decision making

    ReplyDelete
  38. I have no explanation for the last decision by Hernandez Hernandez if not that he wanted to go deliberately against VAR because mad at him... really sorry to say that!
    A big mess the end of this game, extremely poor performance, never clear what referee wanted to punish, to be honest I think he was influenced by many penalty area incidents and was in trouble to have a real foul detection.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Again a really bad Spaniard in a game with Dutch involvement....

      Delete
  39. Bye bye Hernandez!

    ReplyDelete
  40. Hernandez with a superb performance. Takes guts in these UEFA-VAR times to stand by your on-field decision (twice) after having been called to the VAR booth. Normally giving stick to the refs, but this was a great performance (IMO).

    ReplyDelete
  41. Percentage-wise:
    Initial decision Hernandez Hernandez: 50% correct
    VAR-decisions Martínez Munuera: 25% correct
    Final outcome: 50% correct

    Awful night by Spanish crew, worst performance Netherlands have witnessed since Lahoz

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You already forgot Sanchez Martinez? Awful too

      Delete
  42. Great VAR, bad Referee!

    ReplyDelete
  43. I think Hernandez decided to continue playing after OFR because the defender had the ball.

    ReplyDelete
  44. Poor Peter Sippel

    ReplyDelete
  45. Did Umut Meler perform well?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Match was done in 15 minutes soit wasn't really a challenge for him.

      Delete
  46. Hernandez with a average performance in terms of disciplinary control, calling fouls and having control.

    Not having consistent criterium is a problem and a big one for him.

    However, I would like to point 3 crucial decisions ,all involved penalties for NED.

    1st is for pulling I guess,I mean total grey zone-no card.

    2nd is penalty, also,defender trips attacker who had atleast promising attack,therefore it's SPA-no card again.

    Munuera even called him to see if there were elements for DOGSO but that would be too much-booking was needed there.

    And then,3rd penalty that should have been-no explanation,just as some anonymus users would say-bad.

    To make decision based of how annoywd you are,I mean goal difference could have been what separates these 2.

    And to allow your big ego to not whistle penalty is beyond me.
    These type of refs should not be allowed to handle matches that have such big implications.

    And also about that last situation that was not whistled-no card. 😉

    ReplyDelete
  47. GIB - IRL

    https://streamable.com/fe1pph

    This reminds me of the situation between Neuer and Higuaín in the 2014 world cup final. Never a foul by the the player from GIB.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mr Ersoglu, you are very interested in Austrian refs' performances... ;)

      Unlike in Rizzoli's final (pen+yc), I think play on / no offence committed is the right call here. Look how high the ball is - Higuain had a >10x better chance of reaching the ball than the Gibraltar attacker (indeed Neuer had to clatter through in order to win the ball). Defensive freekick is indeed wrong but that is sth small, tbh.

      Delete
  48. What a poor time management from Hernandez Hernandez. He added 6 min, and whistled penalty in 89'. VAR + penalty + celebrating = 3-4 min. In 90+8' he spent 2 min to another VAR.. The game should have 13-14 min more.., no 10...

    ReplyDelete
  49. Spanish referees again. They really never fail to amaze.

    Lahoz, Del Cerro Grande, Sanchez Martinez and Hernandez are all the same. All referee as if they own the place- yet decision making is a massive issue. They never seem in control and result in completely excessive whistle blowing. The VAR officials are even worse.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Big incidents from Greece vs. Netherlands:

    https://www.streambug.io/v/b877bb
    https://www.streambug.io/v/427bef
    https://www.streambug.io/v/37ff38
    https://www.streambug.io/v/1ce22b

    Another idea is that maybe the first OFR was 'self-intiated' in order to win acceptance for a big call at the end of the game? (as they used to in the Clattenburg days in Saudi Arabia).

    Anyway, as a general remark I agree with what M said above - Hernández Hernández lacks a clear 'criterion' in his games and beginning from last season, the previously high-flying Spaniard seems to have lost his way. He seems quite unsure when deciding on duels, whereas in the past with his excellent movement he was rock solid in this regard.

    I don't agree with EnglandRef said above, but it does make me think: Mateu, Del Cerro, Hernández, Sánchez Martínez - all of these referees significantly DE-improved in recent years and got a lot worse (the latter two of course having retired now). What are RFEF/Velasco/Medina doing to these guys? Only Gil Manzano got better in the last few years...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 1) Blatant handball offence. The player knows where the ball is, his action is targeted only to block the ball / prevent an opponent from being able to play it, there is also a clear hand move towards the ball. OFR required.

      2) Replays really don't help to make a judgement. It seems there is holding but also the reaction of the attacking player looks exaggerated. IMO, soft penalty.

      3) VAR suggesting the referee there was no foul at first? I would agree with that! Very soft penalty, slight touch, exaggerated fall by the attacking player (see how he trails his leg). No DOGSO. Should've been a YC for SPA/no-attempt - again, if deemed as foul...

      4) I can understand both VAR and referee. It looks like a foul - and de fact it is a careless tackle. But we also know how UEFA treats such challenges - even slight touch on the ball is enough for them to deem the tackle fair. Very difficult to find the optimal decision here. I would support Hernández Hernández knowing how UEFA treats such tackles. I would like him to wait for the bench calming down before going to the monitor, though.

      Delete
    2. I hadn't still watched first incident, the possible handball.
      Indeed, punishable for me as well, player is aware and knows where ball is under his eyes, he does the movement by arm on purporse to block it. Nevertheless, differently from other incidents, here you can understand why VAR didn't intervene, still not 100% sure about the intention due to the particular situation.
      About 3 and 4, I have to disagree with you Euro Soccer Ref, in the meaning that both are situations that shouldn't happen: in the first case, a call by VAR is always a mistake, simply impossible to think that this wasn't foul, I would accept more the argument that VAR called for a possible RC for DOGSO, but not because it wasn't foul. Then, about last incident, once watched at monitor, no ball and only opponent, even if only careless, must bee given as penalty. The argument of soft is weak here, in the context of a desperate attempt to save ball with referee away, it is clear that Hernandez Hernandez at first glance hadn't made a proper assessment, so refusing the penalty is too much controversial, and against what one can expect. The expected call by football fans is penalty, we shouldn't complicate things.
      Agree with you about 1 and 2, and this makes the performance by Spanish referee very poor, never a clear line and one couldn't understand what he wanted to do. Only good thing seems having refused OFR in the third case.

      Delete
    3. Reading comments from last night, I thought about a very bad performance by Martínez Munuera. Actually, that is not the case. The third incident is way too soft to be called. Here in Spain it is expected to have a VAR call for such incidents in which there is a very soft contact and in which the attacker clearly decides to fall.

      The second VAR intervention is fully correct.

      I wouldn't give the first incident, too many doubts about if it is deliberate or not, and given it is the arm going to the ground, I'd stick to the instruction. I wouldn't consider it a mistake if someone thinks it is deliberate, as the actions of the defender might look like it.

      No doubts about the second incident, clear holding when running backwards.

      Delete
    4. 1. No deliberate handball, no PK, too many doubts as @George said..
      2. Too soft, no PK. Holding of two players attempting to get the position they wanted, ended up with white player pulling orange player, that again was result of orange player pushing the white...
      3. Too soft, again. No PK. There was a contact, but there was no intensity, the attacker exaggerated it. However, I can understand the original referee's decision because alive, it looked so PK. If PK, than YC for SPA.
      4. Clear PK and YC for DOGSO when trying to play the ball.

      Delete
    5. Players in the Greek league feel like kings of the field. They don't care about the referee. This habit was a problem for them in the European game. It's amateurish that they pull the Dutch players in the penalty area in every position. I think this habit comes from their league. In my opinion:

      1. PK
      2. PK
      3. No PK
      4. PK

      The referee tried to keep his tail up despite the VAR. This stubbornness will be a problem for him in UEFA.

      Delete
    6. wow...what a difficult match! so many tricky situations...

      1. punishable handball, pk (intervention missing)
      2. soft pk, holding by both players...supportable? no intervention by either decision
      3. no foot-contact = no foul, correct intervention
      4. foul, pk + yc for dogso, correct intervention

      and what do i do with the mark?
      1. 7,9 for the handball (6 for var)
      2. 7,9 standing, for supportable pk
      3. 7,4 wrong pk-call, 6,9 sticking to wrong decision after ofr
      4. 6,4 pk missing, 5,9 sticking to wrong decision after ofr...

      so 5,9 would be the final mark...apart from any other missing yc etc...

      Delete
  51. With a hindsight, this article is interesting after the Greece-Netherlands game:
    https://www.vi.nl/nieuws/koeman-hoopt-op-vernuft-dan-leg-je-druk-op-een-scheidsrechter

    I'll try to summarize. Dutch head coach made statements before the game. He said, Dutch players lack the 'south-European' mentality. In other words, do everything to win, including deceiving a referee. He gave an example of midfielder Reijnders, who was fouled in the midfield against France and still tried to stay on feet and run through. Sometimes, you should be smart and win a free-kick, because it also puts pressure on a referee. Before the game, they also discuss the appointed referee and where he comes from (eg. card management).

    Interesting statements by the Dutch head coach in the light of all KMI's yesterday:
    - Van Dijk wins a penalty >> falls easily, leaning backwards, also pulling on a shirt himself
    - Dumfries wins a penalty (must've learned that in Italy ;)) I had the impression that Hernandez was called for an OFR because the VMO saw a foul in the box by Brobbey (punish the first offence), but this was never clear and obvious if you ask me. For sure, good to sell the final decision at the very end of the game.
    - The Brobbey incident and rejected OFR: the expected call is definitely penalty here (like Chefren says). However, if you ask me: is it VAR-stuff? I'm not so sure. Was it possible for the attacker to avoid the tackle? My answer would be Yes. The tackle is targetted at the ball. I found it interesting that the VMO just showed a super-slowmotion to Hernandez., which isn't optimal IMO. I think (through a Greek glasses) you can even make the assessment that the attacker uses the contact, by putting his feet deliberately behind the greek leg to make himself trip. Certainly not an objective criterium like a step on foot. Of course in normal speed, the context is very different, and the expected call is PK.

    ReplyDelete
  52. How did José María Sánchez did in Luxembourg - Slovakia? I am particulary interested in this game because it was pretty much decisive for the 2nd place in group J; and frankly, I was expecting a bigger name in this game given the importance, a referee that attended the WC level.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I didn't watch full game but here the OFR in first half I mentioned yesterday:
      https://streamff.co/v/EJmiGIP6GO
      Easty to be deceived, I would say extremely difficult to see that there wasn't any contact. Maybe AR1 in the best position to help referee, but he couldn't.
      Once watched at replay, clearly an indirect free kicm for dangerous play, but as I said, not given anymore in modern football.
      And, do you know who is the man in UEFA suit, close to monitor during OFR? :)

      Delete
    2. He did okayish.

      Of course he had that crucial mostake that wqs chamged with VAR help,but in terms of foul detection,disciplinary control and being boss on the field,he was good.

      He continues to improve after that famous PSV-Rangers in terms of disciplinary control.

      In 1st half he had very tricky situation,tensions were rising and he managed to quickly turn out the fire with 3 YC's in 3 minutes.

      Those cards were neccesary,both teams calmed down and it wqs easier match for him.

      These 3 cards in 3 minutes to calm teams kinda reminded me of 2016 and Kassai's performance in Italy-Germany match where he also had to react quick and manage to calm down players by issuing cards in small amount of time.

      After that,classic tense match that he brought home to the end,issuing 8 cards and finishing match without crucial mistake,apart from that penalty call in 1st half.

      Delete
  53. MEX-GER friendly
    Vazquez, Parker (both USA), Yee Sing (JAM), Encarnacion (DOM)

    ReplyDelete

Thank you for writing a comment on our blog!