Wednesday, 9 March 2022

Champions League 2021/22 - Referee Appointments - Round of 16 (Second Leg, II)

2021-22 UEFA Champions League, Round of 16, Second Legs. Referee appointments for the matches to be played on 9 March 2022. 


9  March 2022

21:00 CET - Madrid (Estadio Santiago Bernabéu)
Real Madrid CF (ESP) - Paris Saint-Germain FC (FRA)
Referee: Danny Makkelie (NED) 
Assistant Referee 1: Hessel Steegstra (NED)
Assistant Referee 2:  Jan de Vries (NED) 
Fourth Official: Allard Lindhout (NED) 
Video Assistant Referee: Pol van Boekel (NED)
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Kevin Blom (NED) 
UEFA Referee Observer: Vladimir Šajn (SVN)
UEFA Delegate: Jovan Šurbatović (SRB)
UEFA Referee Liaison Officer: Manuel Ángel Pérez Hernández (ESP)

21:00 CET - Manchester (City of Manchester Stadium) 
Manchester City FC (ENG) - Sporting Clube de Portugal (POR)
Referee: Halil Umut Meler (TUR) 
Assistant Referee 1: Mustafa Emre Eyisoy (TUR)
Assistant Referee 2: Ibrahim Çaglar Uyarcan (TUR)
Fourth Official: Arda Kardeşler (TUR) 
Video Assistant Referee: Paolo Valeri (ITA)
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Abdulkadir Bitigen (TUR)
UEFA Referee Observer: Hugh Dallas (SCO)
UEFA Delegate: Dennis Cruise (IRL)  
UEFA Referee Liaison Officer: David Babski (ENG) 

152 comments:

  1. So it is Makkelie in Madrid with a committee memeber. Basically, big observers are always appointed for top clashes, but I think that there is surely something more there. Extremely important test for the Dutch if he wants to have big dreams in this season.
    Umut Meler in Manchester: definitely an expected and reasonable choice, with a game that is surely already decided.
    Dallas will accompany him.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Indeed, Makkelie is not kept away from the big matches as some commentators assumed.
      This also means that the obvious game for Taylor now is Ajax-Benfica (as it is for CdG), because he had Villareal on MD6.

      As expected, a new Elite in Manchester. Not so clear though, whether this CL match or a more exciting EL R16 match is the bigger appointment.
      Maybe Meler is already overtaking Cakir, especially if the latter doesn't get a CL KO match this season.

      Delete
    2. I wouldn't rule 100% out Taylor from Juventus - Villarreal, a perfect name for this clash according to Italian media. :)
      But if he is not appointed due to Atalanta - Villarreal as last game in group stage, then his only option is indeed Ajax - Benfica, as you wrote, and this would leave Del Cerro Grande out from CL for this round.
      Your prediction for Juventus - Villarreal at moment?

      Delete
    3. I don't think Taylor is ruled out for the Villareal game because he officiated Villareal in MD6.

      This has happened before (f.e. Makkelie with Liverpool in 2020)

      Delete
    4. Yes, not ruled out completely, but it would be more natural to give him different teams this time.
      But indeed difficult to find an alternative. Maybe another Italy-Spain game for Kovacs? Could be still too big for him though. Or using a First Leg referee again (Marciniak or Vincic).
      I would wait for the Thursday appointments though before making full predictions.

      Delete
    5. I agree that it would be a very big game for Kovács, in case of appointment. I think possible on paper, but in reality maybe we should think about a different name and then there aren't other possible options apart from Taylor.
      About the Romanian, one could say that Barcelona - Napoli was already a big test, but for something even bigger to follow...
      Let's see tomorrow's assignments.

      Delete
    6. I also expect a big name for Juventus-Villareal because it is such a tight game, including some players that can be impetuous.

      I hope that committee won't underestimate the Ajax-Benfica game. The clubs might be "mediocre" in terms of name and status, however considering the standings, intensity of the 1st leg and some previous meetings between Portuguese and Dutch teams, this requires a very experienced name.

      Delete
    7. Unknown, look how serious they consider Bayern-Salzburg. There is no way committee will underestimate the game in Turin.

      Delete
    8. @Matei: Honestly, I interpret Turpin's appointment as an opportunity to recover. His last CL match wasn't that great. I don't think committee already forgot that game. The Bayern game is a tight one, but also a safe one, in terms of players and their behaviours.

      Delete
  2. Roberto Rosetti was an absolutely brilliant referee. He was a phenomenal communicator on the FoP, who brilliantly understood tactical approach, and is without any doubt one of the best football referees in history.

    However - his work as UEFA Chief Refereeing Officer has been regrettable, in my opinion. We all, his referees included, all know exactly the thesis for Meler’s appointment.

    Politics and refereeing will forever be intertwined, and similar sorts of things happened in UEFA before - after Kuipers badly messed up Chelsea vs. Paris and ended his 14/15 season, then-1st Cat Bas Nijhuis was appointed to the EL QF, Sevilla vs. Zenit, as compensation for KNVB.

    Maybe it’s just me, but Rosetti’s politics feels much more brazen than ever before - the scandalous sending of Çakir to London at the EURO before humiliatingly asking him to go back home to Istanbul is simply catastrophic HR management. One could hardly imagine Collina, Cornu doing the same.

    His getting rid of 2nd Cat in the winter was simply lazy, now it’s easier to make political promotions, making the development path shorter. While rightly much praised, the internal refereeing operation at the EURO was not so successful either.

    I’m quite sure that Rosetti does care about meritocracy. It just seems that: 1) giving Mr Čeferin his way; 2) trying to keep the national associations happy at any cost, and, 3) keeping Italy’s media onside, are all more important to him.

    I’m quite sure that UEFA’s referees understand that too. Finally, I want to wish both referee teams good luck for their respective huge appointments on Tuesday - we will be cheering you on for great performances!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mikaeal W,
      in regard to your statement about Collina, Cornu and their HR compared to Rosetti, I invite you to read the book written by Eriksson. Nobody is perfect.

      Delete
    2. @anonymous - for sure! I saw some of Eriksson's allegations serialised in the media.

      I would really like to read his book, but I don't think(?) there are plans for there to be an English version?

      Delete
    3. Jonas has told that his book will come out in English and other languages in 2022.

      Delete
  3. Replies
    1. You have a crystal ball?

      Delete
    2. I wrote the same names on the forum yesterday, no need for the crystal ball, I was just thinking of different names in the Europa league, but these were obvious

      Delete
  4. Any chance for Oliver appointed to Ajax-Benefica?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Impossible because this would mean no Taylor and two games for Oliver in Round of 16.

      Delete
    2. Thank you. Forgot he already had one.

      Delete
  5. As a Dutch person, I was a bit surprised to read some comments on this blog lately that the Netherlands has a lot influence. Could somebody please explain me why?

    -FIFA list (nations): 13th place.
    -UEFA coefficient (clubs): 7th place
    -Last decade, just one club played a role in KO-stages of CL/EL.

    The biggest football nations are England, Spain, Italy and Germany. Followed by France and Portugal. These countries have great and strong competitions and obviously should be able to develop great referees. Their referees are used to a high football level, big interests, pressure, etc.

    NL is a very small country. In terms of refereeing, NL is/was just really lucky to have talents like Kuipers and Makkelie. Björn Kuipers was lucky to be coached by a former committee member, however he stated in an interview last year that he was not pushed. His way to the top took time and he didn't want to go faster either. IMO the competition with Makkelie was a good thing for Kuipers, to maintain his level for a long period. At the same time, Makkelie was able to learn from Kuipers (as a VAR). A win-win situation. Makkelie was also early involved in the FIFA VAR-project, which I think was a great benefit for him to build a name.

    The same applies to other small football country Slovenia; a country that obviously has a big influence within UEFA, however: Skomina - and now Vincic - are great referees and deserved to be in Elite.
    I agree that politics play a big role and that UEFA wants to keep several federations happy, but come on… Some promotions and appointments are deserved.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The biggest countries have most influence. Netherlands is not one of these countries.

      Talking about politics, I read that some people have the opinion that Gozubuyuk wouldn't be Elite if not Dutch. I'm not sure. In Dutch League he can be a bit inconsistent however I don't think he really messed up in his CL games so far. If people don't agree on this, please provide examples.

      The appointment of Meler is particular. Why does he get a chance - after just 3 CL games - and not for example Schaerer who has more experience? This is really weird, indeed. I completely agree with @Mikael on his appointment. It is clear that UEFA wants to keep federations happy. If Kuipers is injured, let's appoint Nijhuis. If Marciniak is injured, then let's appoint Raczkowski. Etc etc. That's not a good thing.

      I also read that people blame Italy and Italian referees a lot. Massa for example shouldn't be an elite and would never be promoted if he wouldn't be Italian, bla bla. I agree that big football countries should have more Elites than smaller countries. Indeed, referees from those countries are used to a high level of football. People forgot that Italy is a big football nation (and a tough one for referees!) and only had 1 Elite referee which is toooo little compared to the 4 Germans and 3 Spaniards. I completely understand why Italy got a 2nd Elite referee and probably also a 3rd in the near future.






      Delete
    2. In addition, I don't understand why some federations decide do NOT demote their Elite referees? I think KNVB decided to do so, and replaced Nijhuis with Makkelie. Refereeing is topsport. Why do other countries not make demotions?

      Delete
    3. I think there is a significant difference when it comes to promotions between categories. I think Gözübüyük showed quite big deficiencies in UEFA games (I don't watch Eredivisie and I don't think UEFA cares about domestic competitions, rather about who is pushed by domestic federations) and deservedly spent some years in the first category. Then, he has series of 3-4 good performances and is immediately promoted. The same speech about Massa or Sánchez Martínez who can be one of the best in their countries but didn't fully convince in UEFA last seasons. But they are representatives of big federations, so they 'have to' be promoted to satisfy big federations. That's why we talk about the Netherlands (and, I think, Romania) are treated differently to, for example, Belgium, Poland or other 'similar' nations.

      Then, we have referees from smaller countries who need to be almost faultless for two-three seasons in order to get UEFA's trust. I think UEFA broke some good referees by not promoting them when they deserved that. Kabakov and Treimanis come to mind (surprisingly, Kovacs was promoted when everybody expected the whole trio to get their promotions). Now, after UEFA obviously disappointed them, they maybe lost motivation and don't believe they can make the last step and their performances are not longer of such good quality like before.

      Also, it's a secret knowledge in refereeing community that big names are assessed very kindly by observers. Even big mistakes like missed second YCs are forgiven or not even mentioned in the reports. They can feel very safe unless they make a mistake that causes big media attention. At the same time, referees from smaller nations, potential candidates for elite, are assessed very strictly and everything is written down in the reports by observers. The marks are adequately adjusted while big names constantly get high marks for their performances.

      Delete
  6. OT
    Some clips from matches in RPL.

    Lokomotiv - Khimki second yellow for Khimki player.
    referee - Artem Lyubimov https://streamable.com/9u4fwm

    Krylia Sovetov - Arsenal Tula penalty for Krylia
    referee - Pavel Shadykhanov https://streamable.com/1r2hc3

    Krasnodar - Ural 1) goal for Krasnodar, then annulled after VAR intervention
    referee - Evgeny Turbin [Aleksei Sukhoy] https://streamable.com/l5pf0i
    2) penalty after OFR https://streamable.com/eulgru

    Dynamo - Spartak two yellow cards for Dynamo player
    referee - Sergei Karasev
    first yellow - https://streamable.com/jvrh8r
    second yellow - https://streamable.com/00k73r

    Rostov - Sochi red card for Rostov goalkeeper
    referee - Igor Panin https://streamable.com/pyd4d4

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for these! Would be nice if you keep posting the controversial / big incidents in the future.

      @Chefren, any controversies / big calls in Serie A last weekend?

      Delete
    2. Karasev is not wearing a FIFA badge in his match. Is that standard in the RPL for FIFA referees or is this somehow related to the FIFA ban--either Karasev not wearing it in protest or some interpretation whereby he believes he's not allowed to do so?

      Delete
    3. @usaref, It isnt a standard in RPL so I believe, its a protest from him.

      Delete
    4. ... unless his badge fell off during the match :)

      Delete
    5. Karasev was wearing his FIFA badge during the Saudi Arabia game some days ago, reported by Mikael:
      http://law5-theref.blogspot.com/2022/02/202122-uefa-youth-league-referees_26.html?showComment=1646404137535#c9058780245875153098

      What about the other FIFA officials appointed for Russian Premier League games on this matchday?

      Delete
    6. @Anonymous 19:59
      it would be too long to write about all games, however I can say that the most controversial game has been Venezia - Sassuolo with Pairetto in charge. Four penalties were whistled and the referee was not accepted since the beginning with many protests especially from home side, with coach sent off before an OFR for a penalty in his favor.
      Two penalties whistled from the pitch, two after OFR, the second OFR for the last penalty in the last minutes of the game is in my opinion a mistake by VAR Doveri, if not directly asked by referee, while first OFR absolutely correct. The penalty he whistled from the pitch are rather OK, but the first one can be described as soft.

      Orsato in Napoli - Milan was excellent, especially in second half, he showed to be still the top of serie A referees, with a full contro of an extremely challenging game, two penalty appeals at the beginning, one from each side, I think the second shout in 12' was more penalty than play on but still OK to support, while the first (4') OK play on for me.
      An outstanding reproach to both players and YC for mutual misconducts in 77' was the masterpiece of Orsato, not the first time he does that.
      These are the penalty appeals:
      https://streamable.com/8i21e7
      in contrary order, you see the one at 12' before the previous at 4'.

      Delete
    7. Thanks a lot! If you know any interesting incidents from other games, please list them with minutes without details if that's not a problem for you, of course!

      Delete
    8. Thank you russian ref, I also appreciate these posts a lot! :)

      Delete
    9. @Chefren, about other FIFA referees wearing/not wearing FIFA badges. Kukuyan, Ivanov and Moskalev were wearing 2021 FIFA badges.

      Delete
  7. After the decisions of the Turkish Refereeing Committee, Mete Kalkavan left the refereeing in response to the decision. In addition, assistant referees Bahattin Duran, Tarık Ongun and Aleks Taşçıoğlu also resigned.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Some interesting news about the next FIFA games for WC qualification.
    Thank to Arbitro Internacional, we know that CAF has asked for European VAR for the decisive ties, we already know 8 of the 10 appointments (5 games, first and second legs):
    https://twitter.com/ArbitroInteBlog/status/1501342034665291781/photo/1
    After AFCON, Sikazwe is missing so far. Let's remember that these appointments are made by CAF together with FIFA.

    Then, we have already some (Spanish) appointments for upcoming friendlies (a post will be opened in due time, though):

    25/03
    Romania - Greece Ricardo de Burgos
    Malta - Azerbaijan Alejandro Hernández
    Andorra - St. Kitts & Nevis Juan Martínez Munuera

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Norway - Slovakia Mattias Gestranius (I think this will be his international farewell).

      Delete
    2. Well Sikazwe has actually been appointed for CAF Champions league round 1 to a rather Top game so I don’t think CAF has the Afcon incident against him.

      Delete
    3. Fédération Tunisienne de Football

      The final round of World Cup qualifiers:
      The appointment of referees of the match of Mali Tunisia that will be held on March 25, 2022 in Bamako
      - Chief Judgement: Pammalak Tessima - Ethiopia
      - Assistant of the First Judge: Ibrahim Abdullah - Sudan
      - Assistant Referendum: Samuel Buadotakam - Nigeria
      - The Fourth Judgement: Ahmed Umtehaz - Maurice Islands
      - VAR Reference: Martinez Sanchez - Spain
      VAR Assistant Referee: Frndaz Cuadra - Spain

      Delete
    4. @Chiagozie, surely CAF has nothing against him, but that's not the same for FIFA I think!

      Delete
    5. With all the Spanish VARs busy on the 25th, it seems quite unlikely now, that a Spanish referee will handle a UEFA play-off on the 24th.

      Delete
    6. Good remark, in addition we have Del Cerro assistant referees in two games, on 25 and 28 March, so this should mean that surely he has not a play off. Still possible for Mateu, though. I didn't read the name of his assistant referees for a friendly, and a double appointment friendly - VAR for a referee is still possible.

      Delete
    7. Chefren I wasn’t saying anybody has anything against Sikazwe , i was just saying he has been appointed after Afcon which is a great step for him, whether he goes to the World Cup is yet to be seen but what happened at Afcon hasn’t been used so greatly against him. In UEFA I am sure after such an incident we may not see the referee until about a year or 2 years later, or at least in a lower competition but he was thrown straight back into CCL.

      Delete
    8. Regarding a possible appointment of Mateu, his AR2 (Díaz Pérez del Palomar) should be De Burgos' AR1 (as is in LaLiga), and Yuste Jiménez is appointed instead, so that could be a clue.

      Delete
  9. Hey guys,
    Sorry if I missed it in the comments, is Cakir really suspended in domestic league until the end of the season, and if yes, what is the background of that?!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You can read many comments on the blog, basically to make a short recap, Turkish federation took this decision for making a renovation of refereeing in Super League, excluding Cakir and other big names until the rest of the season. This has created a big astonishment inside the international world of refereeing, the exact reasons for this action are still unclear. Both Cakir assistant referees resigned, as well as other referees, and now we will see that is about to happen, but basically I think his WC dreams are over.

      Delete
  10. OT: interesting situation from the biggest Albanian derby (KF Tirana vs. Partizani Tirana) played this weekend. Referee was Juxhin Xhaja, VAR was experienced non-FIFA VMO Kreshnik Bajramaj.

    https://send.cm/d/9KGy

    1 - reckless vs. violent conduct action by KF Tirana no.8
    2 - potential penalty to KF Tirana (charging / tripping)

    [+ VAR intervention(s) for: a) RC if incident missed by officials?; b) RC after YC decision for no.8?; c) penalty if not given?; d) penalty if given, either for mistake or missed foul in APP?]

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In my opinion a clear violent conduct (player looks for opponent when he hits him) that must annul all the rest.
      The penalty incident itself, if we don't consider what happened before, is not enough for a VAR intervention for me.

      Delete
    2. A bit strange, that the on-field officials gave the YC for no 8, but didn't stop the match immediately for his action - no reason for advantage. Maybe the 4th official gave some input, but even that should lead to an immediate whistle.

      Otherwise I agree with Chefren: Clear VC, that should lead to a VAR intervention in all cases. And for the penalty itself I would not expect a VAR intervention in both directions. But giving the foul seems the better decision to me.

      Delete
    3. Interesting situation, i assume that referee gave advantage for the first foul by partizani player and he didn't saw the second foul by tirana player. Judging by the late time he showed the card i thought it was a suggestion by the 4th official. About the challenge the foul is clear but is this an excessive force to give a RC for VC? Imo no, i don't see an excessive force in this challenge. As for the contact in the penalty area it's a small contact the referee has clear view and no var stuff.
      What is your opinion @Mikael W ?

      Delete
    4. I'm surprised at the equivocalness of the above comment - until about eight years ago, the Tirana player would be sent off without question (excessive force), but nowadays, I'm not so sure to be honest. I think yellow card is the cleverer call, and maybe even the more correct one.

      The scene reminds me distinctly of one from Taylor's GEOMKD playoff. The kick isn't completely off-the-ball, maybe we can say that the kick is simply a (very) reckless tactical foul in order to prevent the Partizani player challenging for the ball?

      I think that's an important detail which separates it, eg, from say Turpin's VC RC in the Club WC, or Brizio Carter's in the WC94 opener, which were 100% off the ball, so the force required for "excessive" is much less, and in both those cases a RC was required, and correctly given.

      While the Tirana player was very stupid and couldn't really have complained if Xhaja sent him off, I think the better decision (YC) was reached.

      As for the PAI - giving a penalty there would be a travesty IMO. The attacker simply waits to be crashed into simply in order to illicitly win a pk; match officials see through it and make the right call, play on.

      Delete
  11. Sorry, but UEFA are complete idiots if they genuinely believe that they can conceptually eliminate impeding-the-progress-of-an-opponent-with-contacts fouls from their games. It’s absolute lunacy. And look how Makkelie is already losing control having to implement them in a hot game.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Makkelie seems to be struggling for a consistent foul line at the start of the match.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Very strong Makkelie in these early minutes, he immediately adapted his style to the game. I rarely saw him so angry, to be honest, a good way to face pressure.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
    2. So far, you are the only person insulting people here.

      Delete
  14. Great 1st YC of the match to Paredes for dissent.

    Now let's see whos has the guts to say something to Makkelie!

    ReplyDelete
  15. Judging from the first 10 minutes Makkelie could be in for a tough night.

    ReplyDelete
  16. This is by far a most intense game.
    Makkelie will NEED his most talents of keeping players to stay in control!!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The game on Old Trafford could be even hotter next week. No many options, probably Orsato will be in charge.

      Delete
  17. Remember Rosetti's advice? Protect the game and have little tolerance to dissents and simulations. So far so good.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Is there anyone as strong and speedy as mpappe.

    ReplyDelete
  19. 14 minutes, Carvajal's hard foul on veratti showed no yellow card

    ReplyDelete
  20. I do like that Makkelie is actually giving yellow cards for dissent.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Good AR2 with a correctly disallowed goal and a YC reported to Makkelie.
    This evening the Dutch is extremely strict with protests, a thing that it is needed in this game.

    ReplyDelete
  22. At about 40', there was a skirmish before a corner kick, and Makkelie pushed a player back--ha! I also like that he is giving YCs, but was that 4 in the first half? Not a very challenging game so far, so just wondering if he can keep same strict line in second half and be consistent by giving YCs for similar fouls? There was one YC when it looked like two players went down and simply bumped knees on the ground but would have to see replay.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Difficult evening for Makkelie. Players don't accept his calls and are impossible to manage. That all after missed foul on Mbappé in 5' and every decision is discussed since then. In addition, this year's instructions to set the threshold for a FK being given extremely high and to avoid cards at all cost are big enemies of referees...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's all a problem to the referees themselves. If some of them are so stupid to accept such instructions - of course they will have problems. True referee (like Orsato, for example) who know the rules of the game and follow them, not dubious instructions, don't have problems.

      Delete
    2. Agree tough match. What is out there are three referees. Real Madrid and PSG BOTH want to control the game. Because they ARE probably the TOP teams in the competition they KNOW they need to control Makkeli. They both have swagger. We shall see who wins

      Delete
  24. Offside missed by assistant in Manchester, goal cancellation by VAR, offside only from shoulder gabriel Jesus

    ReplyDelete
  25. 60' very clear YC to issue, but I never saw a player running like Mbappe.... it looks like he is not human.

    ReplyDelete
  26. No foul on Donnarumma who made a clear mistake and tried to save him by protesting against referee. I know him very well from Italian serie A.

    ReplyDelete
  27. It was also in the first half of the Real Madrid-psg match. In the second half, 15-20 cm offside in Manchester-S.lisbon is against the spirit of football, we could not understand that it was offside if there was no line. Football dies with offsides like this, drawn in VAR, but still the decisions and the intervention of Var

    ReplyDelete
  28. Game will get more difficult now.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Makkeli does not have a problem staying with play.. will need it

    ReplyDelete
  30. Stamp on foot right in front of Makkelie. No card or even foul given.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Game Over. PSG have blown it.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Before the 2-1 goal by Real and then the 3-1 I was sure something was about to happen in that exact moment of the game. Another excellent ONSIDE by AR2, both assistant referees faultless, and now still 10 challenging minutes to follow for Makkelie + injury time.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Makkelie is about to finish the game with 1-2 minor mistakes, the assistant referees were flawless, bravo Dutch people

      Delete
  33. Toughest 10 minutes for Makkeli in entire tournament

    ReplyDelete
  34. There is no referee that will be able to handle the last minutes of this game.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A goal could have changed everything until the end, the difficulty of this game was by far bigger than first leg.

      Delete
    2. But makkelie is doing quite well in my opinion :)

      Delete
  35. Very well Makkelie IMO, superb referee

    ReplyDelete
  36. Makkelie is the next Kuipers.

    ReplyDelete
  37. IMO great match from Makkelie, tough to manage both teams with few hot heads and he did very well tonight.

    Handled the protests from Paredes, Vinicius, Donarruma and others so well, card management was perfect.

    Now big decision was no foul on Donnaruma, IMO no foul and correct play on.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Since PSG is out I hope Turpin for final

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ...in a challenging 'high profile' game.

      Delete
  39. What is your opinion about missed stamp and no second YC Paredes in 67' (replay in 68')? Anyone with clip?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Would be too harsh imo to show 2nd YC for that.

      Other players were aroind him so supportable call.

      Delete
  40. In my opinion another very good performance by Makkelie today, I liked his approach from the beginning, some troubles indeed, but he decided to be absolutely strict as needed and this lasted the full game in regard to both teams. I liked his consistency and control of the game.
    Both assistant referees were faultless, all crucial decisions OK. No foul on Donnarumma was another excellent spot in my opinion because too often we see easily fouls in favor of keepers. I like when refereee has courage and plays on, but this was not even a foul, if you ask me, just normal contact.
    If this was an exam for a possible appointment in CL final, waiting for the other referees, after today he is in very strong position under my eyes.
    Sometimes the difficulty of a game is made also by what "could have happened" but "didn't happen" thank to referee, if you understand what I mean.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. +100 (because +1 would not be enough for your comment)

      the last paragraph is important - and sadly not many readers and commentators on this blog have your abilities to see: "what could have happened" and "what didnt happen" thank to another masterclass of refereeing!!

      Delete
  41. Most probably. He is ready for that! Very good performance tonight!

    ReplyDelete
  42. Predictions for Manchester United vs Atletico Madrid?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I would say Marciniak, but Orsato seems equally possible.

      Delete
    2. Indeed I agree with Philipp and I think this will be the only game with a referee having the second assignment. Orsato or Marciniak are the most likely.
      For the rest, Taylor maybe in Turin, Kovacs can get Ajax - Benfica, and I don't know if true, but a Turkish reader reported an appointment in CL for Cakir on next week. In case I think Lille - Chelsea would have been the choice, but we can't know what will happen now with this news coming from Turkey.

      Delete
    3. Very hard to say. No many options, I will go with Orsato.
      In Lille-Chelsea we could see Kovacs, and also Taylor should be or in Ajax-Benfica or in Juventus-Villareal. This brings the question, who will be in the other game? CdCG somehow lost the confidence of Rosetti - I really don't think he will get a game. Marcinaik seems very likely to be here I think or who knows, maybe Cakir?

      Delete
    4. If Cakir is indeed available and selected, he might even be an option in Manchester. (Decisions from 9 years ago should not be relevant for today's appointments...)
      I would rather swap Kovacs and Taylor.
      If they want to go really safe, I could also imagine Marciniak in Turin (with Orsato in Manchester, Taylor in Amsterdam and Kovacs in Lille).
      Then there is also del Cerro Grande, as discussed, only possible in Amsterdam. I would say, if he should remain a WC candidate, he nearly must get a CL R16 appointment. A direct QF after only 2 GS matches, including some problems, would be strange.
      Also Soares Dias could have a chance (in Lille), especially if he still is under serious WC consideration.

      Delete
    5. Wait, I remembered that Kovacs had some problems in group stage in Sevilla-Lille, so this would make him unavailable for this game. And I think he will get a game next week - this bring me now exactly to Chefren`s predictions above.
      Anyway - we all have the same 5-6 names in mind.

      Delete
    6. Philipp, the problem if Cakir gets United - Atlético is about the other team, in case, the Spanish side. He comes from the very discussed Milan - Atlético and for this reason in my opinion impossible to see him again with them, even though it was Milan to make complaints for the performance.

      Delete
  43. I fully agree, he succeeded in the path towards the final. In this extreme difficult match he took brave and correct decision. Very strong personality and with respect to players. It was a big pleasure to watch. I think one of, or maybe the best referees in Europe at this moment.

    ReplyDelete
  44. My predictions:
    AJA-BEN Del Cerro Grande
    LIL-CHE Kovacs
    JUV-VILL Taylor
    MANU-ATM Orsato

    ReplyDelete
  45. According to Spanish media, Al Khelaifi tried to enter referees' dressing room and security had to stop him.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Frankly, I can not imagine what he can possibly reproach Makkelie tonight.

      Delete
    2. Why??? He should be entering his team’s dressing room!!! They completely blew it and Makkelie had not a single hand in it… he would want to claim the foul on His goal keeper but even after that let’s play the devils advocate, did Makkelie cause the 2 goals after?? His team lacks mentality, he should look at that and not sack coaches anyhow or try to blame the referee. Makkelie was so close to perfection today.

      Delete
    3. The possible foul on the goalkeeper, I think

      Delete
    4. Never a foul, it’s called pressure. He took too long to play the ball.

      In any case look at his reaction, he doesn’t stay down and appeal he gets back up because even he accepts it’s not a foul. And then he protests after conceding.

      Delete
    5. Refsav: are you saying a referee should look at how the player reacts? He got a tackle on the thigh. It was a foul and that’s why he fell down.

      Delete
    6. Watch it again in full speed. The goalkeeper couldn't clear the ball thanks to the great pressure by the Benzema and other RMA players. Goalkeeper tried to save himself / the team by falling.

      Makkelie didn't whistle these (light) contacts during the whole match.

      Delete
    7. At the end of the day the consistency shown by Makkelie was exceptional. He didn’t whistle the light contacts during the game unless it was a clear-cut foul. And on Donnarumma it was not.

      The players reaction after being “fouled” just confirms the fact that he didn’t initially think it was a foul, but a bad mistake from his part.

      We should all know that PSG find a new referee to blame every year they go out lol. It’s never their fault

      Delete
  46. This is what the referee is supposed to have written in the minute book:

    "ACTA Madrid-PSG

    ✍️Tras el partido, el Presidente y el Director Técnico del PSG mostraron un comportamiento agresivo e intentaron entrar al vestuario de los árbitros. Bloquearon la puerta y el presidente deliberadamente
    golpeó la bandera de uno de los asistentes, rompiéndola"
    "After the match, the President and the Technical Director of PSG showed aggressive behavior and tried to enter the referees' locker room. They deliberately blocked the door and the president
    hit the flag of one of the attendees, breaking it".

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wow! Who would want to be a referee.

      Delete
    2. I said before to match to my intimates: this ref needs some balls of steel.

      Big pressure, big interests, many players with bad behaviours. Everything the ref does is under a magnifying glass and in the end, one of the teams is not happy with him!

      Of course, it is never the fault of the goalkeeper, the defenders, the coach' tactics. No, let's blame the ref for everything. Unbelievable.

      Delete
    3. Even more terrifying for Makkelie given how powerful Al Khelaifi is in UEFA nowadays. To include everything in the official report (if true) is a sign of huge braveness and very professional approach by the Dutchman. While one can debate about the possible foul on Donnarumma (I expected a very polarising debate here on the blog while most-all people agreed it was no foul), the reaction of Leandro and Al-Khelaifi is terrible.

      Delete
    4. Why do they even care. CL is every year and nobody remembers who won previous years.

      Delete
    5. makkelie is experienced police officer and with kuipers he has a countryman in referee commission whose name is bigger and better liked than al khelaifi or leonardo. also remember in uefa matches there is an official match-delegate and the venue director who can also report this inacceptable behaviour...this should be written with all honesty and without fear of names.

      Delete
  47. I liked that Makkelie didn’t give easy freekicks, in a consistent way, and still controlled the game well. A game with great pace.

    ReplyDelete
  48. After this tie between PSG and Real Madrid we read always that many things have happened in regardo to referees, it was reported as well for first leg with Orsato. I wonder how much true his can be, because in case it really happens, UEFA should take disciplinary actions against the responsible. Now we will see what will be decided for the French team officials, if they did that.
    My solidarity to Makkelie team, it is easy to accuse the referees after years and years of failure, with all that money they spent for the team.

    ReplyDelete
  49. Before the match, I was curious how Makkelie present himself. I call him the chameleon of Elite ref’s :D
    In terms of style and strategy. He can be:
    1) Smiling and interacting a lot with player’s ('one of the guys').
    2) Lenient, managing situations with his personality and trying to keep the cards in his pockets
    3) A no-nonsense ref. Strict when he needs to be with sero tolerance regarding dissents, or;
    4) an arrogant man, who is not afraid to shout at player’s and doesn’t give a f***

    Yesterday, I’d say it was a combination of 3 and 4. I don't see him like this very often! Very interesting how he adapts to the game he is officiating. He always seems to have a clear strategy.

    *Note:
    I liked the fact that the contact with Donnarumma was not whistled. Especially because Makkelie wouldn’t have whistled it on the midfield as well (if I consider some other play-on calls during the match). It all started with the goalie’s fault. He decided to join the rondo, was pressed by the Madrid attacker and couldn’t clear the ball. For me a normal contact.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Clear clear clear foul on Donnaruma

      Delete
  50. On socials, I read some comments from Dutch people:

    'Imagine Makkelie getting injured and Lindhout has to take over...'

    Bad management?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is valid for all referees, you can't always ensure another Elite as reserve.

      Delete
    2. @Chefren:
      In this case they are right! Lindhout is let's say not the best referee in "hot" matches, and this game would be a nightmare for him! he lacks personality, and has a lenient style..... the worst you could get in such a match, in my taste the best Nederland has to offer as 4th official in Europe is Jeroen Manschot (lot off experience, but non-Fifa ref), and can handle hot games due to his personality, With Lindhout this game would have gone terribly wrong, in to a big fight, not even a doubt about that!

      Delete
  51. Not only that Al-Khelaifi has an immense power in UEFA, but from all the cities guess where decided UEFA to move the UCL final. Exactly, in Paris. And this could be a problem.
    Totally unfair, it was not foul on PSG's GK. The decisio was correct imo.

    ReplyDelete
  52. It will be very interesting to see if UEFA will support Makkelie 100%. If the reported behavior indeed happend, this should lead to long suspensions. I mean break the flag of an AR... But Qatar/PSG has a lot of power...

    ReplyDelete
  53. how was the performance of meler?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Meler didn't do much for her, it was a comfortable match, only City's goal that was canceled in VAR was a very difficult offside, the assistant missed but no one can blame her, offside over the shoulder, it was a tough decision.

      Delete
  54. You guys think Nasser's anger and power could impact Makkelie's CL campaign or even a place (or different treatment) at the World Cup in Qatar?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No, I think, Makkelie's status in the refereeing world at UEFA and FIFA is stable enough.
      But I am afraid also Nasser's (VIP) place at the WC is not in danger - but at least his CL campaign is over. ;)

      Delete
    2. I think is will come a stop for Makkelie. I don’t know how it was no foul... For sure hi will not appoint for final

      Delete
  55. There are reports regarding Çakır that the assistant referees Bahattin Duran and Tarık Ongun are in a bad mood and do not want to win the match, they will probably not be able to take office next week or later. . We can say that Çakır and his assistants have little chance in Europe and in the WC match.

    ReplyDelete
  56. As french, i say first of all congratulations to Danny for his great overall performance.
    On second hand, i'm not astonished by behaviour of paris' team..same on domestic league. last year again City they accused B. Kuipers to swear at players.

    According to me he made the right call on Donaruma's mistake. Football is not a dancefloor game but contact one and Gk was playing ball with feet so had to accept to be challenged by Benzema who anticipated and sprinted towards GK.

    On last hand, as Lyon chairman (Aulas), everyone tries to consider the referee as a lazy pillow.
    but this morning french press does not reproach anything to ref but to Paris and on social networks all posts are written to make paris players fool of themselves...after Barca's remontada in 2016. Weak mental. These two team's officials (president and manager) should look for the straw in their eyes before looking elsewhere.

    Again big congrats to Danny and his team (great AA) for this great performance.

    ReplyDelete
  57. https://www.fcupdate.nl/voetbalnieuws/398667/uefa-en-makkelie-tevreden-over-optreden-bij-real-madrid-psg/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Donnarumma is in possession of the ball and is kicking. The attacker RMadrid intervenes on Donnarumma's left supporting leg while he is kicking. It is a clear foul and it is really inexplicable not to whistle. This situation is different from the normal contacts that rightly did not blow the whistle because there is no challenge for the ball here.

      Delete
  58. Yes, I couldn't find any clips, but the ones at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mr99kXgGCjg and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umlZlvYtIg0 support your argument. At first, I thought, even if it were a foul, it didn't affect the kick, but watching the videos at 25%, one could argue that it did affect the kick and that the contact caused or partially caused the goalkeeper to miskick the ball. And saying that Makkelie was consistent in not calling such contact a foul doesn't mean that this situation doesn't warrant a foul call. Makes me miss Kuipers more, as no one has been found to fill his boots yet.

    ReplyDelete
  59. One YouTube commenter astutely noted that it was Makkelie who gave a PK for Sterling's dive at the Euros, so I bet that was in the back of Makkelie's mind and decided no call would be safer or less controversial for him.

    ReplyDelete
  60. And almost every YouTube comment under both videos that questioned the call said it was a foul. Very surprising more people on the blog didn't agree during the match.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Then very surprising as well that most important international media speak about Donnarumma’s mistake and don’t mention a mistake by the referee

      Delete
  61. I didn’t understand how is not a foul to Donnarumma.

    ReplyDelete
  62. Memory time. Remember Oliver's call in injury time on Juventus and Buffon went crazy. I didn't think it was a foul to be called. Thought defender had every right to ball as Real Madrid player. Isn't this almost the same thing but opposite in called NOT called? Your thoughts?

    ReplyDelete
  63. I think it speaks to a larger issue in that hip checks have become accepted and often go uncalled, whereas traditionally a fair charge is shoulder to shoulder contact.

    ReplyDelete
  64. Football is a physical sport. Today, referees often whistle for trivial matters. They hardly dare to take risks by often protecting themselves. This is not good for football. In this specific case, contact with the keeper is minimal. Conversely, you don't give a penalty for it either. In addition, the keeper no longer has a protected status. He must be seen as a player. Makkelie and his team added to the entertainment. They dared to play football and to let the game flow. This has been a great CL match to watch for quite some time now. With passion, battle and fast pace. That is why they deserve praise and no comment.

    ReplyDelete
  65. To all the people who said it was a foul on Donnarumma: Think again.

    Pls turn it around and imagine a referee giving a penalty kick for a contact like that. The world would be mad and call it S-O-F-T.

    Also consider that the goalkeeper is 1,96m tall and 200 pound. And you know that the fall was exaggerated. :')

    And finally, one should consider that these kind of contacts were not whistled throughout the whole match. Consistency is key.


    ReplyDelete

Thank you for writing a comment on our blog!