Wednesday 1 September 2021

2021/22 FIFA WC European Qualifiers - Referee Appointments MD4 (1 September 2021)

The first set of 2021-22 FIFA WC European Qualifiers with VAR. Matchday 4,  games to be played on 1 September 2021.    

Benoît Bastien (FRA) will officiate Turkey - Montenegro

Group D
16:00 CET - Nur Sultan (Astana Arena)
KAZAKHSTAN - UKRAINE
Referee: Donatas Rumsas (LTU)
Assistant Referee 1: Aleksandr Radius (LTU)
Assistant Referee 2: Dovydas Sužiedėlis (LTU)
Fourth Official: Robertas Smitas (LTU) 
Video Assistant Referee: Kevin Blom (NED)
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Clay Ruperti (NED)
FIFA Referee Assessor: Fritz Stuchlik (AUT)
FIFA Match Commissioner: Vakhtang Bzikadze (GEO)

Group A
20:45 CET - City of Luxembourg (Stade de Luxembourg)
LUXEMBOURG - AZERBAIJAN
Referee: Irfan Peljto (BIH)
Assistant Referee 1: Senad Ibrisimbegović  (BIH)
Assistant Referee 2: Davor Beljo (BIH)
Fourth Official: Admir Sehović (BIH) 
Video Assistant Referee: Marco Fritz (GER)
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Markus Sinn (GER)
FIFA Referee Assessor: Lassin Isaksen (FRO)
FIFA Match Commissioner: Patrick Wattebled (FRA)

Group A
20:45 CET - Faro-Loulé (Estádio Algarve)
PORTUGAL - REPUBLIC OF IRELAND
Referee: Matej Jug (SVN)
Assistant Referee 1: Matej Žunić (SVN)
Assistant Referee 2: Robert Vukan (SVN) 
Fourth Official: Nejc Kajtazović (SVN) 
Video Assistant Referee: Paolo Valeri (ITA)
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Jure Praprotnik (SVN) 
FIFA Referee Assessor: Laurent Duhamel (FRA)
FIFA Match Commissioner: Lars Richt (SWE)

Group D
20:45 CET - Strasbourg (Stade de La Meinau)
FRANCE - BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
Referee: Sandro Schärer (SUI)
Assistant Referee 1:  Stéphane De Almeida (SUI)
Assistant Referee 2: Bekim Zogaj (SUI)
Fourth Official: Alain Bieri (SUI)
Video Assistant Referee: Fedayi San (SUI)
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Lionel Tschudi (SUI)
FIFA Referee Assessor: Vítor Manuel Melo Pereira (POR)
FIFA Match Commissioner: Vito Di Gioia (ITA)

Group F
20:45 CET - Tórshavn (Tórsvøllur)
FAROE ISLANDS - ISRAEL
Referee: Dennis Higler (NED)
Assistant Referee 1: Rogier Honig (NED)
Assistant Referee 2: Rens Bluemink (NED)
Fourth Official: Martin Pérez (NED)
Video Assistant Referee: Jochem Kamphuis (NED)
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Sander van der Eijk (NED)
FIFA Referee Assessor: Uno Tutk (EST)
FIFA Match Commissioner: Sabine Bonnin (FRA)

Group F
20:45 CET - Chişinău (Stadionul Zimbru)
MOLDOVA - AUSTRIA 
Referee: Paul Tierney (ENG)
Assistant Referee 1: Richard Cook (ENG)
Assistant Referee 2: Constantine Hatzidakis (ENG)
Fourth Official: Darren England (ENG)
Video Assistant Referee: Jarred Gavan Gillett (AUS) 
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Lee Betts (ENG) 
FIFA Referee Assessor: Vlado Svilokos (CRO)
FIFA Match Commissioner: Desislava Ralkova (BUL)

Group F
20:45 CET - Copenhagen (Parken)
DENMARK - SCOTLAND
Referee: Ovidiu Hategan (ROU)
Assistant Referee 1: Radu Ghinguleac (ROU)
Assistant Referee 2: Sebastian Gheorghe (ROU)
Fourth Official: Andrei Chivulete (ROU) 
Video Assistant Referee: Marco Di Bello (ITA)
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Stefano Alassio (ITA) 
FIFA Referee Assessor: Zoran Petrović (SRB)
FIFA Match Commissioner: Peter Lundström (FIN)

Group G
20:45 CET - Riga (Daugava)
LATVIA - GIBRALTAR 
Referee: Pavel Orel (CZE)
Assistant Referee 1: Ivo Nadvornik (CZE)
Assistant Referee 2: Kamil Hajek (CZE)
Fourth Official: Ondrej Berka (CZE)
Video Assistant Referee: Karel Hrubes (CZE) 
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Ondrej Pechanec (CZE)
FIFA Referee Assessor: Shmuel Shteif (ISR)
FIFA Match Commissioner: Sergiu Lisnic (MDA)

Group G
20:45 CET - Oslo (Ullevaal Stadion)
NORWAY - NETHERLANDS
Referee: Szymon  Marciniak (POL)
Assistant Referee 1: Pawel Sokolnicki (POL)
Assistant Referee 2: Tomasz Listkiewicz (POL)
Fourth Official: Tomasz Musial (POL)
Video Assistant Referee: Pawel Gil (POL) 
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Tomasz Kwiatkowski (POL)
FIFA Referee Assessor: Peter Sippel (GER)
FIFA Match Commissioner: Duncan Fraser (SCO)

Group G
20:45 CET - Istanbul (Beşiktaş Park)
TURKEY - MONTENEGRO 
Referee: Benoît Bastien (FRA)
Assistant Referee 1: Hicham Zakrani,(FRA)
Assistant Referee 2: Aurélien Berthomieu (FRA)
Fourth Official: Jérémie Pignard (FRA)
Video Assistant Referee: Benoît Millot (FRA) 
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Willy Delajod (FRA)
FIFA Referee Assessor: Vladimir Medved (SVK)
FIFA Match Commissioner: Ivan Tsitovich (RUS)

Group H
20:45 CET - Ta' Qali (National Stadium)
MALTA - CYPRUS
Referee: Fabio Maresca (ITA)
Assistant Referee 1: Giorgio Peretti (ITA)
Assistant Referee 2: Daniele Bindoni (ITA)
Fourth Official: Luca Pairetto (ITA) 
Video Assistant Referee: Massimiliano Irrati (ITA) 
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Alberto Tegoni (ITA)
FIFA Referee Assessor: Frank De Bleeckere (BEL) 
FIFA Match Commissioner: Paul Lyon (GIB)

Group H
20:45 CET - Ljubljana (Stadion Stožice)
SLOVENIA - SLOVAKIA 
Referee: Istvan Kovacs (ROU)
Assistant Referee 1: Vasile Marinescu (ROU)
Assistant Referee 2: Ovidiu Artene (ROU) 
Fourth Official: Horatiu Fesnic (ROU)
Video Assistant Referee: Christian Dingert (GER)
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Mark Borsch (GER)
FIFA Referee Assessor: Matteo Simone Trefoloni (ITA)
FIFA Match Commissioner: Metin Kazancıoğlu (TUR)

Group H
20:45 CET - Moscow (Luzhniki Stadium)
RUSSIA - CROATIA 
Referee: Orel Grinfeeld (ISR)  Roi Reinshreiber (ISR) 
Assistant Referee 1: Roy Hassan (ISR)
Assistant Referee 2: Idan Yarkoni (ISR) 
Fourth Official: Eitan Shmuelevitz (ISR)
Video Assistant Referee: Roi Reinshreiber (ISR) Orel Grinfeeld (ISR)
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: David Fuxman (ISR) 
FIFA Referee Assessor: Juan Antonio Fernández Marín (ESP)
FIFA Match Commissioner: Miroslaw Ryszka (POL)

Friendly
20:45 CET - Debrecen (Nagyerdei Stadion)
QATAR - SERBIA 
Referee: Filip Glova (SVK)
Assistant Referee 1: Peter Bednar (SVK)
Assistant Referee 2: Tomáš Vorel (SVK)
Fourth Official: Michal Ocenáš (SVK)

128 comments:

  1. Jarred Gillet (Australia) is VAR for Paul Tierney according to UEFA. I thought Jarred had to lose his FIFA badge when he left Australia.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He did. He no longer has his FIFA badge but is probably one of the most experienced in the use of VAR in the world having been part of the initial experimentation when Australia became one of the very first leagues in the World to use VAR.
      Big show of trust by UEFA to use him.

      Delete
    2. Am I correct if England select him. He can't referee England or Australian teams

      Delete
    3. Is there any way to find out how many games Gillett has actually acted as VAR for PGMOL? I know he got internally suspended from the role after they rejected an intervention by him in an Arsenal vs Crystal Palace match in 19/20, but not sure for how long.

      He has definitely stood as VAR this season though, correctly allowing Burnley's goal against Brighton in the first round of matches.

      Delete
    4. He's done 3 this season. VAR 3. 4th 2 OFR 0

      Delete
    5. Thanks, David. Do you know about 19/20 and 20/21?

      Delete
    6. An internal suspension because of one single wrong intervention 2 seasons ago? Is that soooo relevant to bring up in relation to this appointment?

      Delete
    7. No details on previous seasons. Sorry

      Delete
    8. I don't know if that is 100% correct but it should be like that:
      19/20: VAR 8 PL, 1 FA Cup
      20/21: VAR 15 PL, 2 FA Cup

      Delete
    9. Thanks, Dominik! (btw I replied to your question now on the last page :)). Did you use a site for that record or do you keep one personally? I use football-lineups for that sort of thing but never found a good site for a database of VAR appointments.

      So, to reply to Known - no, in my eyes it is not important really at all. But I recalled that PGMOL sh*t the bed after this game, and while the whole project was a disaster, they didn't appoint him as VAR for the whole rest of that season after this(!). Ridiculous.

      But Dominik's data shows that last season they appointed him regularly as a VMO so my fear that he'd only worked a small number of games in the role (because of this suspension, hence why I brought it up) was misplaced.

      Delete
    10. Yeah keeping track of VAR appointments is indeed quite difficult...

      The only website that kind of works for that is transfermarkt.com/de. They do keep track of some VAR appointments. It's quite random though which matches are included for some reason. So definitely not the most reliable source but I guess better than nothing :D
      For example here is Gillett's page: https://www.transfermarkt.com/jarred-gillett/profil/schiedsrichter/4929/plus/0?funktion=6&saison_id=2019&wettbewerb_id=
      You can filter through the seasons and Referee/VAR appointments.

      I just went with what they had in there for the 19/20 season as it seemed quite balanced and included pretty much all matchdays but who knows really... Could be way off.
      For the 20/21 one, I went through all PL appointments as there was pretty much nothing on transfermarkt and just searched via CRTL+F :D Yup, took 10 minutes but I was really curious :D

      Btw I don't know much about the Arsenal v. Crystal Palace match but it doesn't seem like he was suspended after that. He was VAR the next matchday and was appointed as VAR for the rest of the season but I really don't know.

      I was thinking about keeping a personal database for VAR for a while now, I think I'm gonna do it now for this season and onwards.

      Delete
    11. Slightly off topic but could Gillett actually go on FIFA list in January - normally have to be second January after debut in top division but not if renominated. England ‘finally’ have enough refs to fill their 10 slots without him after an embarrassing period of drought (could Gillett be an 11th as an UEFA exception?). Seems a shame to waste his experience?

      Delete
    12. Ah, whoops, I got the info about the whole season suspension wrong then - apologies.

      Delete
  2. Strange that Paweł Gil announced his retirement, is not active in Poland anymore but still accompanies Szymon Marciniak in UEFA competitions.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Interesting appointments!

    It becomes immediately obvious that the referees department were not really ready for the political decision to implement VAR for these games after the incidents last March.

    Fedayi San - who correct me if I'm wrong was never even considered safe enough to be AVAR for Schärer in CL/EL - is now lead VAR for the Swiss referee. Same with the Czech VARs.

    I guess Čeferin (understandably) doesn't really care about a VAR mess in a Pot 4 vs Pot 6 game, compared to a missed goal in SRBPOR. But I do think that UEFA have really risked quite a lot here.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. To clarify - that's nothing against San who I think is a very good referee, though I'm not familiar with his VAR work at home.

      But it is weird that UEFA essentially said that he wasn't good / experienced enough in the role to work with his compatriot before... and now he is.

      Delete
    2. To say it directly, there are surely specific choices by UEFA and FIFA regarding VAR assignment. While in some games we have VARs who never worked in UEFA games (like the Swiss), in other ones we have different choice. Valeri VAR with a Slovenian AVAR for what sounds a big match on paper is the example of that.
      So, to answer your question, yes. Important matter was to introduce VAR, and this can be enough for some games, but regarding other games, UEFA wants specific VARs to be assigned.

      Delete
    3. Hmmmm - I would say that PORIRL and FRABIH are basically the same level of prestige. The question is of necessity surely. Slovenia's VAR project debuted this season, if I recall correctly? ISR, CZE, SUI officials are all much more experienced with the system.

      But not seen as experienced / skilled enough until now :)

      Delete
    4. But some match needs to be the first international match for any VAR. So it's unavoidable, that there are some debuts in the WC qualifiers and/or the EL group stage. I think, it's understandable to rather do it in these competitions than in CL.

      However it's interesting that UEFA doesn't really follow FIFA's idea of having dedicated FIFA VMOs - with some officials appointed, who are not on the list.
      BTW, the link here is broken:
      http://law5-theref.blogspot.com/2021/01/fifa-2021-refereeing-international-list.html
      Maybe the document can be uploaded and linked either there or below the UEFA categories in the side bar?

      Delete
    5. https://www.fifa.com/technical/refereeing

      Then:
      https://digitalhub.fifa.com/m/73018d1c158c1fd5/original/2021-FIFA-Refereeing-International-Lists.pdf

      Delete
    6. I can add a link on the right column of the blog.

      Delete
    7. Thanks, so indeed two VARs, who are not on the list: Gillett and Hrubes. While Gillett might be a special case, Hrubes clearly wasn't planned by FIFA to act in that role.
      Then, several AVARs are also not on the FIFA list.

      Delete
    8. This is not correct. Fedayi SAN was for example AVAR in the following match:
      in UEL on 18 February 2021 (Real Sociedad de Futbol – Manchester United)
      Referee: Sandro Schärer (SUI, photo)
      Assistant Referee 1: Stephane de Almeida (SUI)
      Assistant Referee 2: Bekim Zogaj (SUI)
      Fourth Official: Alain Bieri (SUI)
      VAR: Paolo Valeri (ITA)
      AVAR: Fedayi San (SUI)
      Referee Observer: Roberto Rosetti (ITA)

      Delete
  4. Jarred Gillett is the VAR in Moldova v Austria.
    It's misspelled as 'Jarret Gavan Gillett' here.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Today, Skomina has press conference about retirement.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Confired. Skomina retired from refereeing. He will hold a press confirence this afternoon.

      Delete
    2. it's official: https://www.nzs.si/novica/Kariera_Damirja_Skomine?id=52974&id_objekta=1

      as i can tranlate with translator, there is written that he ended his career.

      Delete
  6. IIRC First UEFA match for Tierney this season (and none last season)

    Quite weird.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Nice appointment for Jug and also happy to see Marciniak in a very important match. I like him as a referee and I hope to see him back among the top names.

    Also very clear that domestic performances do not influence international appointments. Otherwise Dennis Higler would never be there after two rather disastrous performances in the Dutch league. I hope he will surprise us with a good performance in Torshavn but if he brings his Dutch league form we can probably prepare for quite some controversy there.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't completely agree with your comment about Higler's form.
      I didn't see FC Utrecht - Feyenoord yesterday, so I can't judge about that match. But I think Higler's performance in FC Twente - Ajax was actually pretty good.
      It started as a really tense match, but he managed it very well with two pretty early correct YC's, which calmed things down. He didn't make any important mistakes and was completely in control.
      I heard FC Utrecht - Feyenoord was chaotic, but - as I said - I didn't see anything of the match

      Delete
    2. Higler's foul detection in Enschede was terrible. Besides, he missed a crystal clear red card in that game. Yesterday, his foul detection was again not good + he had to be corrected two times for giving ghost penalties.

      Delete
    3. I am sorry but Higler´s performance during Twente-Ajax was very weak. And he lost the control completely. Unfortunately his start of the season is very poor.

      Delete
  8. It's official, Damir Skomina has retired. Thank you Damir for everything

    ReplyDelete
  9. Russia VS Croatia for Grinfeeld : IMO it's a risk taken by UEFA.
    It can be a tough game... And the Israelian referee did bad performances last weeks... Good luck to him !
    Good appointment for Bastien, but Slovenia VS Slovaquia or Russia VS Croatia should be better. Good luck !
    Good appointments for Marciniak (a good come back) and Hategan !

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Grinfeeld will not referee this game. Replaced by Reinshreiber. Grinfeeld will perform as VAR. Reason unknown. Probably injury. The only logical explanation.

      Delete
    2. Confirmed information. Reason not given.

      Delete
    3. The reason for such replacement can be an injury. For other reasons, he would have been fully removed.

      Delete
    4. Yep. I mentioned an injury. It cannot be covid or personal reasons. As a result we're gonna have the ref of a lower qualification for the potentially hard game.

      Delete
    5. Even a bigger risk now after the swap. This can be a really hot game.

      Delete
    6. UEFA official explanation: minor injury.

      Delete
  10. Marciniak's great match,good luck Simon!!!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Romania- Liechtenstein: Kateryna Monzul, Maryna Striletska, Svitlana Grusho (4th: Liudmyla Telbukh, VAR: Ievgenii Aranovksyi, AVAR: Viktor Matyash)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I've been never convinced by her in her men's international matches. I'd give a chance to Pustovoitova instead, also as a reward for Olympic final.

      Delete
    2. The reason behind Women's appointments in Male's UEFA games so far is the fact that they officiate in male domestic top league (Frappart and Monzul).

      Delete
    3. agreed! however, all of the above named received their fifa-badge for female-competitions. if their national fa's would need to choose between the male and female refs going on and counting for the same list, i am very sure we would all know who they would choose...i also think we all know that uefa does this for political and image reasons. to propagate some sort of female empowerment and equality even to the highest level...i really like frapparts management, it is top-class even in her own country...monzul, i think we agree has no right to be anywhere near a fifa spot in male refereeing.

      Delete
  12. Hello,
    Do you know the nominations for the qualifying matches in Africa please?

    ReplyDelete
  13. Excellent onside by AR2 Suziedelis to concede Ukrainian goal in 90+3'!

    I'd say a good performance by Lithuanian crew (in an EPIC game!)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Any VAR involvement in the game?

      Delete
    2. Nope, only checks confirming a correctly disallowed offside goal to Kazakhstan in 68' and correct onside by AR2 in Ukrainian goal in 90+3'

      Delete
    3. Clips:

      43' YC KAZ14 (stamp?): https://streamable.com/mt68vj

      51' YC UKR16 (SPA): https://streamable.com/zx166w

      68' Goal disallowed to KAZ: https://streamable.com/fecoy5

      74' YC Zinchenko (stamp): https://streamable.com/dh880n

      90+3' Ukraine 1-2 goal: https://streamable.com/13vdyz

      Delete
    4. Thank you so much!
      43': looks soft, but without further replay impossible to judge, I think not 100% wrong.
      51': Correct YC but the fouled player who made the gesture of YC should have been booked as well.
      68' Good timing by AR1 with VAR. Waiting and then raising flag. We must remember that this shouldn't be taken for granted by assistant referees from countries without VAR, correct decision.
      74' Correct YC.
      90'+3 A couple of great ONSIDES first pass, and then ball in the middle, but what about this third offside, punishable?
      https://ibb.co/JFSQrpW
      From 01:02 video minute. Maybe defender who tried to make the very last save was a bit impeded by attacker movement... however this would be a very harsh and "by book" call. :)

      Delete
    5. 90+3' - The position of the blue player at the moment of shot is indeed very problematic. If he wasn't there, would the yellow player have had a chance to make a save? Possible. But I don't think it's all clear enough for VAR to intervene.

      Delete
    6. 43' Debatable YC, I prefer no YC here
      51' I disagree the player who made the gesture of YC should be booked as this is a "minor" gesture rather than a protest. Good decision for me
      68' Correct
      74' Correct
      93' Wonderful onside decision

      Delete
    7. Excellent cautions by Rumšas - I would highlight 41' especially as a brilliant call. Of course, on a EURO level, that would be an absurd booking, but in a KAZUKR game you simply have to act as a law enforcer (against such deliberate kicks); the Lithuanian was well prepared for a KAZUKR game. Good work from the assistants - I agree with Chefren and ESR re. +93'.

      Delete
    8. IMO all YCs are spot-on, the assisant's work looks great, absolutely correct offside prior to KAZ goal, decisive goal correctly allowed. Well done.

      Delete
  14. Hot start for Jug and we have a possible RC for Cristiano Ronaldo!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No, the OFR is for the penalty, there was something close to a violent conduct by Cristiano Ronaldo as well!

      Delete
    2. Too long OFR by Jug in front of monitor, this is not how VAR should be used.

      Delete
    3. I agree, that UEFA probably doesn't like that intervention - and by your comment I assume, it's also not expected in Italy, so surprising action by Valeri.
      However I have some sympathy for it. As it is indeed really hard to determine, it seems sensible to let the referee take that critical decision - especially if the referee had a wrong perception (e.g. of a clearer foot contact).
      Once at the monitor, it's understandable, that Jug took so much time as the different perspectives gave different impressions on whether the foot or the ball was touched first / at all.
      As there is an angle, where a decisive touch on the foot seems quite likely, it is correct IMO to stay with the penalty decision.

      Delete
    4. The CR7 incident lacks intensity for a VC, I think. If the referee completely missed it, an OFR for a missed incident was still possible, but not necessary IMO.

      Delete
    5. Regarding the first part of your answer - let's also remember that these are FIFA games, WC qualifiers. So the "conflict" between FIFA and UEFA about how to use VAR could be the reason behind such intervention! I don't know whether in such games Rosetti & Co. give guidelines for VAR, or it is something managed directly by FIFA. In the second case, we would have an answer about Valeri's call: in line with what we saw at Olympics... but surely the confusion about VAR and this dualism don't help in looking for consistency.

      Delete
    6. Interesting point. If there are really specific FIFA instructions in place, they must have delivered them somehow to all the VARs appointed this week, ideally with at least some video training.

      Delete
  15. Monitor check in progress in Portugal vs Republic of Ireland

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm not sure why that was sent down for an OFR. If we can't tell if the foot was kicked first or the ball, then let the referees decision remain.

      Delete
  16. NORNED

    10' - dark yellow card to #6 NOR missed, stamp in front of fourth official Musiał...
    11' - cynical tackle without a chance to play the ball by #2 NOR, again only FK given, no further reaction

    bad start by Polish crew :/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Rafał you probably watched different 1st half. Everything under control so far....

      Delete
    2. What Rafał? :D :D :D

      Very meritoric comment by the way. Did you turned on your TV after first 12 minutes?

      Delete
  17. Anyone know why the moldova vs austria game is delayed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. UEFA says:
      Kick-off has been delayed due to security reasons. The match will start at 21.15 CET.

      I don't know what exactly, maybe related to fans.

      Delete
    2. Due to a drone. 🙃 Match to be started at 21:15 CET.

      Delete
    3. Just saw security reason on the uefa website

      Delete
    4. It is reported that the drone was piloted by a young boy.

      Delete
  18. VAR acting as Goal line Technology in awarding a goal for France initially missed by the referee as the ball crossed the line… no conclusive pictures but it was very well more in to the net than out of it. VAR already justified

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. But I really hope, that VAR found more conclusive pictures than the TV director. Otherwise the intervention is doubtful, because the VAR needs a proof and can't just make a good guess.

      Delete
    2. Hopefully they had a goal line camera as you'd expect the national stadium of France to have and the length of time the check took was just clearing the APP. Because you are right that awarding a goal based on the camera angles we saw is very dubious even if it really does look like a goal.

      Delete
    3. Video:
      https://streamwo.com/1eCM7xZ
      Based on that, I agree with Philipp, there isn't any evidence. I just hope that VAR had a clear proof to intervene.

      Delete
    4. It’s not played at the national stadium of France but at Strasbourg and I do not think they have otherwise we would have seen the footage!!!

      Delete
  19. It been a while since i saw Marciniak but his fout detection is very poor tonight. It looks like he is not 100% fit so that he must gamble somtimes. Also AR many times not on the right place to make the right judges

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The foul detection is not the best indeed. But even more serious was no disciplinary sanctions after those two fouls in 10' and 11' I mentioned above. If the fourth official is not able to help in 10'... But we also must mention positives: correct YCs for holding (18', 25') and reckless scissor tackle (43'). Also good warning to Depay for UB after whistle (33').

      It's hard to say but his choice of teammates is not the best. Listkiewicz who openly says that he doesn't like Paweł Gil in social media (shocking and highy unprofessional, like watching Olympics on smartphone when being AVAR...) or Musiał who is after a one-year break (lyme disease) and never presented high level both domestically and internationally.

      Delete
  20. 2nd yellow for simulation for Cyprus. He certainly tried to sell a PK, but there was also some contact on his foot which to me makes the simulation yellow harsh.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Video:
      https://streamja.com/AKAam
      Fabio Maresca is the most strict referee of the world regarding simulations!
      I agree with you, but this is his style. Be sure that even after rewatching it, he would take same decision.
      Correct NO VAR intervention.

      Delete
    2. I even had the impression, that the attacker immediately signalled, that he doesn't want a penalty.
      I agree that the YC is a harsh decision and that this was nothing for VAR (who could only intervene for a missing penalty, but not for a wrong 2ndYC).

      Delete
    3. I actually doubt Maresca see the contact, IMO this is not a harsh but a wrong decision

      Delete
    4. Very harsh, I dont like this decision

      Delete
  21. Although attacker's body language looks ''guilty'' imo this is not a full 2YC!!!

    ReplyDelete
  22. Incredible that Ronaldo didn’t get RC for that VC. He strongly punched (or was very close to punch) oponent in the head by his fist.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. By my perception, he only hits the opponent's arm - without real brutality. The opponent (who previously kicked the ball away) then simulates a contact at the head.
      Therefore YC for both players would be the best solution IMO.

      Replay at 10:43, if anyone wants to make a clip.

      Delete
    2. I agree with Philipp. YC for both players is the best solution. Sue, Red if he would hit him in the head but he touched only his arm.

      Delete
  23. What do you think about Koundé RC for SFP after OFR by Schärer? (YC initial decision)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I like it. Those challenges that go through an opponent and pin their ankle to the ground can cause major ligament damage and often go under punished.

      Delete
    2. A RC can certainly be justified (high intensity and danger), but I don't think, the YC was a clear and obvious mistake.

      Delete
    3. Video:
      https://streamwo.com/QEKAbmy

      Delete
    4. Well done by OFR, 100% RC from my view

      Delete
    5. Basically for me a RC to be preferred, but I think YC not a 100% clear mistake for VAR, something like a 10% - 15% would be still missing.

      Delete
    6. I disagree Philipp. This is a 9/10 on UEFA scale for me. The lunge at high speed directly into the opponent. The lead leg is high with knee locked and studs exposed and the rest of his body/trail leg goes directly into the opponent taking out both legs with excessive force and endangers the opponents safety by pinning his ankle under the force of his challenge.

      Delete
    7. I like the intervention, well done by 'newboy' Fedayi San IMO :)

      Delete
    8. As french, 200% RC here. Look at leg torsion ! Clear violent tackle.

      Delete
    9. I agree with the most of earlier comments, RC preferred but not sure if YC cannot be supported.

      Delete
    10. Agree with Sam and ref ana here

      Delete
    11. I would highly praise the VAR for that correct decision. We cannot justify YCs for such dangerous attacks because there may be some doubts that it's 100% clear. The FRA player jumps into the opponent dynamically and with high intensity without a real chance to play the ball. The BOS player's leg buckles severely.
      The FRA player seriously endangers the opponent's safety - Red Card.

      Delete
  24. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Latvia - Gibraltar penalty whistled after OFR
    https://streamja.com/EZ1Q1

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Correct in my opinion: Unusual action, but in the end a clear foul.

      For the first penalty of the game (without OFR), the replays are not conclusive: I can't detect a contact, but it seems quite possible, that there is one. So we need to trust the referee and hope that the VAR had better pictures.

      Delete
  26. Cristiano Ronaldo incident.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yaPkVqWDBvI

    ReplyDelete
  27. Clear penalty and great game for Peljto
    https://streamable.com/sjjt4x

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'd urge you (and anyone else) to watch this again. I'm seeing one of the most sophisticated and successful dives I've ever seen.

      #16 starts to drag his right toe prior to any contact--FAR prior.

      He then flicks his left leg outward into the tackling player to ensure contact in the hamstring region.

      Look, it's a silly challenge. So I don't have a ton of sympathy for the defender. At the same time, in no way whatsoever is his tackle what brings the attacker down. The attacker could have easily hurdled or went around this challenge. I completely understand why the defender protested in the manner he did, while his teammates probably felt it was a stonewall penalty.

      Delete
    2. Very particular incident, indeed. In my view, I share usaref view, attacker had in mind to simulate before any contact with defender, and he started to fall down without any contact (this is clearly visible in the first replays), then there is for sure at least a touch by defender with that tackle on the other leg when attacker is already falling down, VAR had to support for this reason. We can draw conclusion that attacker was lucky he could "mask" the simulation.
      However, in reality it was impossible to see for referee, and VAR was right in supporting.

      Delete
    3. I would prefer an OFR for this - and here I fully agree with usaref - dive. What is VAR for, if not for incidents that are impossible to detect without replays.

      Delete
    4. It's in line with the VAR interventions from the last months, to stay silent here - BUT those are the scenes I strongly prefer a OFR for.
      usaref explains very well, why I think that this penalty is de facto wrong.

      Delete
  28. Good match for Hategan, in what was an easy match he still showed great detection to avoid any cards been shown.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Interesting situation in POR-IRL, 87':
    A shot on goal is deflected by the defender with the arm and the ball comes to a player who has a OGSO and is in an offside position. After the delayed flag, the referee gives a free kick for the handball.
    In the LotG, we have this quote
    "A player in an offside position receiving the ball from an opponent who deliberately plays the ball, including by deliberate handball, is not considered to have gained an advantage, unless it was a deliberate save by any opponent."
    So if the handball was deliberate, it could not be offside afterwards.
    However I think, the decision still can be supported, because the handball doesn't have to be deliberate - "unnaturally bigger" is sufficient.
    But I am interested in other opinions on that.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think the simpler answer is that this was a deflection and a save. Personally I don't think this is a handball offense, but you open up an interesting point. I guess it's a lot like a player scoring with their arm. We need to decide how accidental it was to whether we issue the yellow.

      Delete
    2. The handball must be deliberate or the offside will still be active. It's 100% clear in the laws of the game what they mean so don't misunderstand it. Unnatural position is absolutely not sufficient and will not cancel the offside at all.

      Delete
  30. No problems for Marciniak in the second half. So after the weak start he was able to recover. It's a very important thing in refereeing. Well done!

    (maybe now YoungRef will be satisfied :D)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. To be honest, i was not impressed by Marciniak at all tonight! Seen him far better! Missed a lot of minor fouls, and i'm sure iff this match was more intense he would have lost control totally, a lot of late whistles, and control was there because off the good behavior of the players, not because Marciniak was there.

      Delete
    2. Indeed. This was not the best Marciniak and the whole team has not the required fitness

      Delete
  31. OT
    Jihād Jarīsha from Egypt, a referee of WC2018, ended his career.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Not convincing performance by Bastien. To many YCs. More than the game required

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Very strict disciplinary line yes but homogenic between two teams so sorry but disagree. Very brave decision against Turkey to give 2-2 last FK near penalty area. Very good foul detection and some very good advantages given. Not a lenient approach but match under control all the time.

      Delete
  33. Matej Jug in Portugal - Republic of Ireland, full sequence video of the penalty incident, includes the possible violent conduct by Cristiano Ronaldo:
    https://streamable.com/wlo3dg

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That’s not a penalty. Clearly the ball in a fair way. The Ronaldo incident is never a red card. Not even yellow. He just nudged the players shoulder.

      Delete
    2. IMO the penalty incident is very difficult, the defender hits the attacker lightly, but it's Not enough for me. Rather wrong. Ronaldo should have seen a YC, as well as the other player he was unhappy with..

      Delete
  34. Matej Jug in Portugal - Republic of Ireland
    Potential penalty later in the second half. (59')
    https://streamable.com/xhu7i5

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Better replay video can be found here: https://www.reddit.com/r/soccer/comments/pgglsq/palhinha_running_into_connolly_and_penalty_appeal/

      Delete
    2. In my opinion this is penalty but referee should have whistled it on the pitch. No VAR stuff because, despite of being evident, it is always a question about intensity of the charge and VARA is ruled out. It should be assessed as mistake by referee.

      Delete
    3. Thank you. I think it should be a VAR intervention, it just looks too clumsy from the defender to be ignored.

      Delete

Thank you for writing a comment on our blog!