Thursday 17 March 2022

Europa Conference League 2021/22 - Referee Appointments - Round of 16 (II)

 2021-22 Europa Conference League Round of 16. Referee appointments for Second Legs. 


17 March 2022

18:45 CET - Basel (St. Jakob-Park)
FC Basel 1893 (SUI) - Olympique de Marseille (FRA)
Referee: Artur Dias (POR)
Assistant Referee 1: Rui Tavares (POR)
Assistant Referee 2: Paulo Soares (POR) 
Fourth Official: Tiago Martins (POR)  
UEFA Referee Observer: Neale Barry (ENG) 
UEFA Delegate: Mark Bos (NED) 

18:45 CET - Rennes (Roazhon Park)
Stade Rennais FC (FRA) - Leicester City FC (ENG)
Referee: Anastasios Sidiropoulos (GRE)
Assistant Referee 1: Polychronis Kostaras (GRE)
Assistant Referee 2: Lazaros Dimitriadis (GRE)
Fourth Official:  Aristotelis Diamantopoulos (GRE) 
UEFA Referee Observer: Stefano Podeschi (SMR) 
UEFA Delegate: Eduard Kindle (LIE)

18:45 CET - Copenhagen (Parken)
FC Copenhagen (DEN) - PSV Eindhoven (NED)
Referee: William Collum (SCO)
Assistant Referee 1: David McGeachie (SCO)
Assistant Referee 2: Francis Connor (SCO) 
Fourth Official:  Nicholas Walsh (SCO)  
UEFA Referee Observer: Miroslav Tulinger (CZE) 
UEFA Delegate: Thura Win (ENG)

18:45 CET - Alkmaar (AZ Stadion) 
AZ Alkmaar (NED) - FK Bodø/Glimt (NOR)
Referee: Ivan Kružliak (SVK)
Assistant Referee 1: Branislav Hancko (SVK)
Assistant Referee 2: Jan Pozor (SVK)
Fourth Official: Peter Kralović (SVK)
UEFA Referee Observer: Peter Sippel (GER) 
UEFA Delegate: Nikoloz Jgarkava (GEO)

21:00 CET - Rotterdam (Stadion Feijenoord 'De Kuip') 
Feyenoord (NED) - FK Partizan (SRB)
Referee: Anthony Taylor (ENG)
Assistant Referee 1: Gary Beswick (ENG)
Assistant Referee 2: Adam Nunn (ENG) 
Fourth Official: Darren England (ENG)
UEFA Referee Observer: Robert Sedlacek (AUT) 
UEFA Delegate: Karl Espen Eriksen (NOR)

21:00 CET - Sankt Pölten (NV Arena)
LASK (AUT) - SK Slavia Praha (CZE)
Referee: Lawrence Visser (BEL)
Assistant Referee 1: Rien Vanyzere (BEL)
Assistant Referee 2: Thibaud Nijssen (BEL)
Fourth Official: Bram Van Driessche (BEL)
UEFA Referee Observer: Erol Ersoy (TUR) 
UEFA Delegate: Zaur Haji-Maharramov (AZE)

21:00 CET - Gent (KAA Gent Stadium)
KAA Gent (BEL) - PAOK FC (GRE)
Referee: Daniel Siebert (GER)
Assistant Referee 1: Jan Seidel (GER)
Assistant Referee 2: Rafael Foltyn (GER)
Fourth Official: Sven Jablonski (GER)
UEFA Referee Observer: Miroslav Liba (CZE) 
UEFA Delegate: Ciprian Paraschiv (ROU) 

21:00 CET - Rome (Stadio Olimpico)
AS Roma (ITA) - Vitesse (NED)
Referee: Radu Marian Petrescu (ROU) 
Assistant Referee 1: Radu Ghinguleac (ROU)
Assistant Referee 2: Mihai Marica (ROU) 
Fourth Official: Marcel Bîrsan (ROU)
UEFA Referee Observer: Orhan Erdemir (TUR) 
UEFA Delegate: Jean Paul Mievis (BEL)         

52 comments:

  1. Taylor to FEYENOORD must be expecting problems

    ReplyDelete
  2. We have different choices by committee to comment in this set.
    Let's start with the remaining Elite we were expecting: all have been appointed, unless Kulbakov, but we know the Russian / Belarusan situation. A bit disappointing to see Soares Dias name there, but as I said he had a weak group stage. Taylor has been appointed in this competition to stay away from spotlights, while I think that Siebert is there as result of his performance in Villarreal - Juventus. Knowing the reputation he has by committe, he was clearly expected in Europa League and not here. Good games, considering the stage of the competition, for the Category 1 referees, especially Petrescu in Rome.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Taylor might be the front runner for UCL final we never know especially if there is no English teams there because avoiding the spotlight for just a play off match doesn’t make any sense!!! It’s one thing to avoid Italy teams and irs another team to be kept out all together.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, avoiding the spotlight when there are so many English teams in competition is also quite strange. Makes no sense.

      I do think Taylor is kept away from spotlight because of the WC play off final (C). Similar to Makkelie f.e. who also got an extremly low profile match before the RMA-PSG appointment. Don't underestimate the Italians and their focus on referees :)

      Delete
  4. Yes indeed, appointing referees in this stage of Conference League, without VAR, is a double face choice by committee.
    They will avoid a name under the spotlight, but then if something very big happens without VAR, this could cost the rest of KO stage. However, we should also add that after the handball goal, the Polish was appointed again. They would do the same maybe with a big Elite in case, I think.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Replies
    1. Vassaras works for Romanian FA, so not much difference :)

      Delete
  6. Some First group referees, who (IMO) surprisingly didn't get a KO match: Hernandez, Jovic, Jug

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Some possible reasons to explain Hernandez Hernandez out from appointment, while Jovic and Jug would have been possible: with 4 Spanish Elite referees and 3 of them in CL + 2 appointments for Sanchez Martinez in EL maybe there wasn't room for another Spanish, considering the teams of nations involved.
      He could have officiated in ECL, but probably difficult having frequently worked as VAR on Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday on previous weeks.

      Delete
    2. I think, also Guida has to be listed as candidate as he had the best appointments this seasons among the First group referees.

      Next CL debutants could be Dabanovic and Mariani, I think.

      Delete
    3. Tohver at least belongs in the list of referees, where it is a bit surprising, that they didn't get a KO match (although it was clear, because he wasn't on the winter course list). As he is still missing this experience, I rather don't expect him in CL soon.

      Another (and younger) candidate for a CL debut would be Nyberg.

      Delete
  7. The choice for Taylor in a match that already is decided, is very strange imo

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think the appointments were made earlier?

      The purpose however must be clear. My guess: we will see Taylor in the WC play-off final.

      Delete
    2. Taylor is one referee finished.

      Delete
    3. I'm soory, but what a stupid comment, Anonymous

      Delete
    4. Taylor and Siebert are being kept away from the spotlight in order to use them for something bigger coming up soon.

      Delete
    5. Siebert is one referee young.

      Delete
    6. Siebert is young but he is not a good referee.

      Delete
    7. I agree, Anonymous, Siebert is not a good referee, he is great 😎

      Delete
    8. Siebert is not one Brych.

      Delete
    9. But one Brych is not two Sieberts!

      Delete
    10. @Kosino94 calm down... don't put pressure on a younger ref �� and on german competitors he isn't as great as you are talking about.

      Delete
  8. what is your ranking with the new elite referees?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Missed penalty by Kruzliak (handball)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No 100% prove that the handball was inside, but yes, it was a punishable handball for sure and it looked inside the box (11’)! AZ very unlucky with the refereeing this KO stage…

      Delete
    2. Guys, there was no one replay showing it was inside

      Delete
  10. Correct penalty and YC for genuine DOGSO by Soares Dias, however I think that arguments for SFP or maybe not a genuine attempt to play ball were possible.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Clear penalty given by Soares Dias in 34'.
    Also IMO correct DOGSO-YC, because it was a sliding tackle foul.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is more of a general remark but I feel like as soon as you make a sliding tackle it is deemed to be a genuine attempt to play the ball but many times this just isn't the case. Just look at this situation, no chance for the defender to play the ball but as it's a sliding tackle, it's only a YC.

      Delete
    2. Law no longer states genuine attempt, just a foul that's an attempt to play the ball, and there is a (very) slight possibility to play the ball here and I think UEFA will prefer the yellow.

      But I don't think this is the scenario that the DOGSO downgrade was meant to apply to within the spirit of the game, but that doesn't matter as it's 100% correct in law.

      Delete
    3. Yes, one can have different opinions on that topic. For my taste, only giving YC for those situations is the better solution.
      The LotG only say "attempt to play the ball", so it's not directly stating, that there needs to be a realistic chance to play it. And in most cases one can assume, that the player actually wanted to get the ball (even in a desperate attempt) instead of committing a foul.
      So for me, it seems right to give DOGSO-RC only for offences like holding or pushing, which clearly are not attempt to play the ball. Also in extreme cases of kicking or tripping, where the defender's action is not even targetted in the direction of the ball.
      One advantage of this approach is more uniformity, because cases like today are not borderline, but with a clear outcome.

      Delete
  12. Possible rc missed by Collum for Vavro

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Unfortunately I think that's a definite red card missed, high force, contact with the knee to the back of the calf and traps the leg of the PSV player. (Challenge is in 49')

      I think it should be a red card for endangering the safety of an opponent, and it has caused an injury.

      Delete
    2. https://streamable.com/4zrtu0
      A clear red card for me, 100% agree with TJ. Oss.

      Delete
    3. IMO 100% RC. Foul endangering the safety of an opponent commited by a very frustrated player from the losing team.

      Delete
  13. Possible penalty for handball in the very last minute of Rennes - Leicester, could have been decisive in case for qualification.
    https://streamable.com/0jr4o4
    The only argument against penalty is that ball came from a teammate.
    I think VAR shouldn't have intervened for this reason, but a call by Sidiropoulos was possible. Big chaos at the final whistle.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No PK for me. Sánchez Martínez had an OFR last week in Porto-Lyon to cancel a PK that he initially called in a similar situation.

      Delete
    2. Agree with Quilava, as almost always

      Delete
    3. @quilava it's not the same with that of Sanchez Martinez. Here the arm is clearly in unnatural position, above the shoulder and is going in penalty area. The OFR you're talking, the ball hits the body than the arm.

      Delete
    4. No penalty for me also

      Delete
  14. Extremely sour elimination of AZ Alkmaar, very undeserved. Unfortunately Dabanovic’s last minute penalty in the 1st leg turned out to be a very decisive mistake.

    ReplyDelete
  15. The 1st half of Lawrence Visser in Lask Linz - Slavia Prague:
    Score 1-2 (2-6)
    3x yellow card (2x Lask and 1x Prague)
    1x double yellow card (Prague)

    ReplyDelete
  16. So far an outstanding performance of Romanian Petrescu in AS Roma-Vitesse Arnhem! Totally unimpressed by the Italian theater, mobbing and asking for cautions and just deciding on what he sees.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agree! And after 19 asking for a card gesture by a Roma player finaly a yc for the asking player

      Delete
  17. Second YC and RC in Visser game (Holding - SPA):
    https://streamja.com/yQd2J

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And straight RC for SFP:
      https://streamja.com/M4KmB

      Delete
    2. Good game for Visser tonight, I think. What do you think about it ? Maybe next candidate for Elite group ?

      Delete
    3. IMO the second YC is very harsh. I understand the decision, but it seems to me that the forward stumbles alone.
      The straight red seems to me a brave and very good decision.
      I think Visser is a great referee

      Delete
  18. I can report an extremely good Performance of Oliver in Frankfurt tonight. His style suits perfectly to the game. The player Accept his relative lenient style. Very fair Game also. I would like to underline His outstanding communication with the players tonight. Theo are laughing a lot together (for example Oliver and Iglesias at beginning of second half in extra time) and talking very calm.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. (I assume this was meant to be posted in the EL section!)
      I didn't watch the game so can only take your word for it, however the way you describe his performance sounds exactly like his approach in EPL games. He is always in control, has absolutely full acceptance from players as well as a good relationship with many of them. He is certainly a fantastic referee and I hope his European career will very soon reach the level of his EPL one.

      In England I feel that he is by far the #1 whereas UEFA prefer Taylor's style. I am not going to start this debate on a night like this when there is no need - I must say Taylor always performs well in UEFA anyway and perhaps, currently, his style is better adapted to UEFA's biggest matches than Oliver.

      However, Oliver is still young and has the chance to adapt his style to UEFA matches if this is what is required. I truly believe he is a future UCL final referee and I base this on his consistently excellent level of refereeing in the EPL.

      Delete
  19. I disagree on his chances for Qatar.
    As he only got Conference League in this KO stage, he can't be rated highly by UEFA at the moment.
    If he had delivered the same performance e.g. in Lille-Chelsea this week, I would agree more.

    ReplyDelete

Thank you for writing a comment on our blog!