Tuesday, 26 April 2022

Champions League 2021/22 - Referee Appointments - Semifinals (First Leg, I)

Referee appointment for the first semifinal of 2021/22 UEFA Champions League, to be played between Manchester City and Real Madrid. 


26 April 2022

21:00 CET - Manchester (City of Manchester Stadium) 
Manchester City FC (ENG) - Real Madrid CF (ESP) 
Referee: István Kovács (ROU)
Assistant Referee 1: Vasile Florin Marinescu (ROU)
Assistant Referee 2: Ovidiu Artene (ROU)
Fourth Official: Artur Dias (POR)  Sandro Schärer (SUI)
Video Assistant Referee: Marco Fritz (GER)
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Bastian Dankert (GER) 
UEFA Referee Observer: Herbert Ernst Fandel (GER)
UEFA Delegate: Loukas Siotropos (GRE)

195 comments:

  1. Wow. Kovacs for World Cup maybe?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. To be honest, after Hategan health issues (we wish him the best), it is quite sure that Kovacs will attend WC, at least as Romania nr. 1, then one must discuss about the "overall reputation", including FIFA as well.

      Delete
  2. May be... :) Sure after medical problem of Hategan

    ReplyDelete
  3. Incredible achievement! Congratulations and good luck! Maybe we have a new candidate for the UECL final ?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Good luck kovacs he deserved this semi final after his performance this season

    ReplyDelete
  5. 1/4 MC-Atletico (István Kovács)
    1/2 MC-Real (István Kovács)
    F - MC- (?) (István Kovács)
    )))

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We know the issues by committee in finding names for the appointments, it is becoming common and common to read always the same referees in the various KO stages over the years, but for Kovacs I must say, in this case, it is a very "appreciated" exception.
      Still, one should wonder why with so many Elite referees we are always in the same situation...

      Delete
    2. Rosetti is one nullity.

      Delete
  6. After this appointment the name for Paris should be absolutely clear. Makkelies name is written all over it. I like the appointment of Kovacs, however for me it should have been the smaller CL SF and not this one. I hope he will be up for the huge task ahead

    ReplyDelete
  7. Marciniak for Liverpool-Villarreal.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And this likely means EL or ECL final to him.

      Delete
    2. Prediction? Source?

      Delete
    3. Regarding Liverpool-Villarreal its serious source from Poland, regarding finals its my prediction only.

      Delete
  8. Excellent referee appointment - Kovacs
    Terrible VAR appointment - Fritz + Dankert

    How can UEFA keep assigning these shockingly bad VAR's from germany? Especially after the clear penalty they didn't see in yesterday's Bayern vs Dortmund.


    ReplyDelete
  9. This match should have been Turpin, always the same referees, the same teams, at least for Kovacs Liverpool-Villareal,

    ReplyDelete
  10. I feel sorry for Hategan. Maybe, this was his year to finally get a Semi final CL. Wish him a speedy recovery.
    Now they are repeating Kovacs again with Man. City, and again in Etihad stadium, after the QF CL. Options are really limited.

    I must say, excellent game for Kovacs. He handled the Man. City - Atletico game very well. We all know that Atletico is not an easy team to referee. I really like him. Kovacs has that very natural authority/ascendant. That’s a big gift for a referee IMO. Some other Elite referees are more depending on a tactical approach – their style is more suitable to the modern, fluent football, Nordic teams focused on playing football. Kovacs, on the other hand, I can see him in charge of many hot (and potentially problematic) clashes in future. He has that authority to succeed in those games.

    If Kovacs performs well, I hope that they will reward him with a UECL final if he performs well in this game.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Predictions for other matches in semi finals: Liverpool vs villareal 1 st : Turpin 2 nd : marciniak/ real Madrid vs man city vincic / ( the final : makkelie )

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Chefren please i need your predictions for ucl semi finals and final

      Delete
    2. Marciniak, Vincic and Turpin semifinals, Makkelie final, I agree with you. Turpin maybe for second leg of Real - City, while Marciniak in LIV - VIL. Vincic VIL - LIV.

      Delete
    3. Thanks my best friend chefren

      Delete
    4. So Orsato will not recover from injury in time? I read on this blog that more than a few thought his name was already pencilled in for a Champions League Semi-final.

      Delete
  12. Congrats to Istvan. This must be a new record set by Kostavs for how many seasons it takes a referee to get a semi final. Even the likes of Makkelie Kuipers Skomina etc wasn’t this quick.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Velasco Carballo reached the semifinals in his first season and Cakir in his second season.

      Delete
    2. IMO Kovacs partly is Just Lucky that hategan is out. Hategan deserved it much more. However he did perform well in his CL QF so also deserved

      Delete
    3. The same was said for Vincic after Skomina's injury, I remember.
      I think that Vincic showed to deserve the trust, and Kovacs is doing the same. Maybe you will remember that even before the unlucky issue for Hategan, there were discussions on the blog comparing them. Hategan himself will be very happy, I'm sure, for his compatriot's career.

      Delete
  13. is there any chance for turpin in paris?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, as French you can see him very often walking the streets of Paris.

      Delete
    2. It's not out of the question surely

      Delete
  14. I think we can now welcome Cuneyt Cakir back to refereeing at Turkish Super Lig after a few months out. Its possible he still has a chance for Qatar 2022

    ReplyDelete
  15. So what about the Turkish committee and all that happened before? I really can't believe that today we are reading again his name for a Süper Lig match. Also, he must be praised for having accepted to return, another referee could have easily gone away forever afte the treatment he reached.
    To add, still in my opinion, for me simply unbelievable what we saw in past days, I think it can't stay without discussions.
    All the involved people should question about themselves in a very deep way!

    ReplyDelete
  16. Yes, you are absolutely right. Chefren. The former committee chairman accused Çakır of inciting the referees against him and the committee, this was personal to them and I think this case is completely closed.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Wow, what a appointment for Kovacs!

    After many years with Kuipers, Brych, Cakir, Skomina, it is really strange to see a "new" names in SFs. Probably 4 referees will debut in this stage.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Any EL & ECL Predictions?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. UEL
      LEI-RAN: 1° Vincic/ 2° Jovanovic
      WHU-FRA: 1° Del Cerro/ 2° Makkelie

      UECL
      LEI-ROM: 1° Umut Meler/ 2° Mateu
      FEY-MAR: 1° Gil Manzano / 2° Gozubuyuk

      Delete
    2. Sure, Gözübüyük for Feyenoord ��

      Delete
    3. @Unknown. comic predictions

      Delete
  19. 3rd appointment with Man. City out of 9 for Kovacs.

    Certainly not the best management by Rosetti. It also shows that despite the 32 referees on the Elite Group, the real Elite consists of 10-12 referees.

    ReplyDelete
  20. sandro schaerer replaces artur dias

    ReplyDelete
  21. Kovacs developed faster than Hategan. Congratulations Kovacs.

    ReplyDelete
  22. It is confirmed in uefa.com and UCL app that Sandro Schärer has replaced Artur Dias as Fourth Official for Man City - Real Madrid.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Artur Dias was injured in a Portuguese league game, hence his absence.

      Delete
  23. AFC Champions League

    Ryuji Sato (Japan) had to show a red card for clutching his FIFA badge by the player.
    What punishment will the AFC give the player?
    https://twitter.com/kogekidogso/status/1517676356112293889?s=21

    ReplyDelete
  24. Great appointment for Kovacs, well deserved, i did not expect that he could get a SF so soon. Happy for him.

    Sources from Poland are reporting Marciniak for Liverpool Villarreal, now it’s quite easy to guess Vincic and Turpin in 2nd legs, if Orsato is still unavailable.

    Final:
    Makkelie 99%: it would be a nonsense to keep the best referee away from CL QF and SF and then to not choose him for final :) but impredictable things could always happen (covid, injuries), or a (unlikely) Final RMA-VIL that could officiate also Anthony Taylor.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Are Fritz & Dankert the best VARs UEFA has? Seems like they are in every other high stake match

    ReplyDelete
  26. OT:
    Daniel Siebert, referee of yesterday's controversial Bundesliga clash Bayern vs. Dortmund, gave an interview today. He evaluated the two mostly criticized scenes.
    49' reckless vs. SFP sliding tackle, decision was play-on: Siebert is unhappy about his decision here; he percieved 'ball played' but actually it was a dangerous ankle contact and he assesses it as FK + YC now.
    59' penalty appeal (clip posted by Chefren yesterday), decision play-on: Siebert says that his decision was a mistake and a spot-kick should have been awarded. He couldn't percieve the incident properly because his view was obstructed; VAR should have intervened.

    I like Siebert's openness here! I don't really think that he has the main responsibility for the 59' mistake.. but with the fact that he didn't percieve the foot contact Fritz' non-intervention is even more inexplicable IMO.
    Full statement:
    https://www.kicker.de/siebert-strafstoss-waere-die-richtige-entscheidung-gewesen-899520/artikel

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I really appreciate the transparency, honesty and competence of the communication of the refereeing federation in Germany, it is fantastic! In Italy, almost nothing ever transpires and, in doubtful cases, AIA simply considers any decision made on the field to be right in order to avoid controversy, even when there are clear and obvious errors (for example the OFR in Juve-Inter or the goal not given for offside in Inter-Milan).

      Delete
  27. Everytime I see Kooij in action, I wonder what Van Egmond drunk when he proposed him for the FIFA list.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I too wonder what pills van Egmond took, or how much Frank de Boer paid van Egmond for Kooij on the FIFA list.... ;) but all jokes aside he is indeed by far the worst ref in the Dutch first league for my taste.

      Delete
    2. Can you specify why you don't like his officiating? I very rarely watch the Dutch league so I'm not really familiar with the non fifa/the new fifa refs.

      Delete
    3. Well, he is just bad. I think it's a combination of his arrogantic presentation and his inconsistent decisions. Today in Fortuna - Go Ahead he went from whistling for everything to whistling for nothing in a few minutes. Besides, the 1-0 was a consequence of a wrong free kick, and he missed a hand ball in the last minutes.

      Delete
    4. Agree. Especially relegation games are not for Kooij. Then he is even worse. I think in new generation there are a few lads that are more talented.

      Fun fact: supporters of Go Ahead always start singing ‘We want Makkelie’ when a referee is bad or not in their favor. I heard it today in first halve… :D

      Example in other game: https://youtu.be/Qj2bClreCVE
      Pretty funny :)

      Delete
    5. Yes, that is because of a match in 2013 vs. Vitesse. At that time, Makkelie wasn't as good as now and gave Go Ahead two easy RCs and interrupted the match.

      Delete
    6. Yeah, I read that it all started as a cynical thing. Great humour! And still singing after so many years…
      But I guess things turned around now. Its a thin line between love and hate :)

      Delete
    7. @Unknown Are you sure about two easy red cards? As far as I remember it were 2 penalties, of which 1 in a DOGSO scenario (so red card).

      Delete
    8. Great reaction from the referee on the pitch

      Delete
    9. @Unknown: it seems that one of the biggest newspapers agrees with your view. Bad rating for Kooij:

      https://www.ad.nl/nederlands-voetbal/kenneth-taylor-maakt-indruk-bij-eerste-basisplek-voor-ajax-ook-mauro-junior-imponeert-weer~a935a229/

      Delete
  28. What happened to his AR’s Duran and Ongün?

    ReplyDelete
  29. MY PREDICTIONS

    UCL
    RMA-MCI: 2° Turpin
    LIV-VIL: 1° Marciniak / 2° Vincic

    ***FINAL: Makkelie



    UEL
    WHU-FRA: 1° Makkelie / 2° Massa
    LEI-RAN: 1° Del Cerro / 2° Jovanovic

    ***FINAL: Marciniak



    UECL
    LEI-ROM: 1° Gil Manzano / 2° Cakir
    FEY-MAR: 1° Vincic / 2° Siebert

    ***FINAL: Del Cerro

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I like Cakir very much, but that would be too early.

      Delete
  30. What do you think about YC in Lazio-Milan? (7')

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Correct YC for SPA, without handball outside the box by keeper, I don't think that there would have been an OGSO.

      Delete
    2. If we approach it from the usual DOGSO perspective of what happens if the player committing the offense is removed then we have a ball that is clearly moving so fast that it would go out for a goal kick. I think a red would be harsh.

      Delete
  31. Liverpool-Villareal: Szymon Marchinak

    Leipzig-Rangers: Jovanovic/Cakir
    Westham-Frankfurt: Umut Meler/Mateu Lahoz

    Leicester-As Roma: Gil Manzano/Schaerer
    Feyenoord-Marseille: Anthony Taylor/Zwayer

    ReplyDelete
  32. Soares Dias has been injured at last him game in Portugal.
    Silva (POR) replace him at Half-Time.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Do you think Cakir will be able to take part in a few of the remaining matches? (UCL-UEL-UECL) Also, when will the list of referees who will participate in the world cup be announced?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The list will be announced around 1 month before tournament.

      Delete
  34. What a match for Diaz De Mera,lot of cards, protests and bad behaviour from both teams resulting in 10 cards.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In my opinion, total descontrol...No good performance.

      Delete
    2. One doesn't get his real 'baptism' as a LaLiga referee until he referees a challenging Real Madrid or Barça game ;)

      11 minutes of extra time, eventually extended to 13 after 2 Rayo players got booked for DtR offences, wow.

      Delete
  35. Çakır got a standing ovation from the fans in the match she directed yesterday, she was also very emotional and first bowed to them and then she applauded the fans, her appearance in the match was very good, she still seems in shape.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Cüneyt Cakir's comeback

      https://twitter.com/beINSPORTS_TR/status/1518277337808265218?t=AokTibpb-9vcp0y7-jUM9w&s=19

      Delete
    2. What respect, great Cakir!!!

      Delete
  36. I am very very happy Cakir is back. He is still a brilliant referee and I hope to see him in Qatar, too!

    ReplyDelete
  37. Especially the UEFA refs for Qatar will be difficult to choose. If we assume the following nominations being safe... :
    Makkelie, Marciniak, Orsato, Siebert, Taylor, Turpin, Vincic, one of the Spanish refs, we have only 1 place left for...
    Cakir, Hategan, Jovanovic, Kovacs, Soares Dias.
    Conmebol: Claus or Sampaio, Rapallini, Tobar, Valenzuela, Ginzalez or Ostojich, 1 place left:
    Vargas or Haro
    Concacaf: Elfath, C. Ramos or Guerrero, then 2 from 4:
    Escobar, Martinez, Barton, Fisher
    Africa: Safe: Gassama, Ghorbal, Tessema. Plus Gomes or Jiyed
    Asia: Safe: Al Jassim, Beath, plus 2 from 4: Faghani, Makhadmah, Ning Ma, Sato
    Ozeania: Conger.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ostojich and Fischer can only be chosen as VARs since they are not on the pre-selected referees list.

      Delete
    2. Fischer won't be selected, but I would point out Marrufo went last time without being on the pre-selected list. I also wouldn't ignore Marrufo's chances of returning again as on on-field referee. It's Elfath, an FMF referee,

      Delete
  38. Mohamed Abdullah uae will referee as main referee in wc 2022 in Qatar

    ReplyDelete
  39. The UEFA Introductory Course for new referees who got the badge for 2022 will be held in Nyon, 8 - 13 May 2022, after having been annulled on last months for COVID reasons.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @Chefren Is there a UEFA new story confirming the rescheduled introductory course dates or something that you have heard through sources?

      Delete
  40. Any info from our Spanish readers on Valentin Pizarro Gomez?

    Clattenburg has chosen him for the Greek Cup SF 2nd Leg of Olympiakos - PAOK.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. After a weak season 20/21 where He struggled and had many var interventions, His current season is quite good in my opinion.
      I enjoy that he always trys to let the game flow and though keeps good control. He is a relativelye "cool" ref that you can see sometimes laughing with the players. Nevertheless He can get very angry in hot matches which I think helps him to control the game

      Delete
    2. This is actually the job of Mark Clattenburg in Greece: picking referees random and appointing them in Greek games. Well done for the development of Greek refereeing.

      Delete
  41. The appointment between Kovacs and Marchiniak should have been reversed honestly, to avoid Kovac meeting Man City just so soon again and the third time this season while the VAR Marco Fritz was the VAR in the second leg for Seibert.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't see the difference. In that case Marciniak and his VARs would have repeated Real Madrid. And Marciniak had Real in the second leg, so two consecutive games - it is mandatory to avoid that.

      Delete
  42. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. David Crammond - the Dunning-Kruger principle in human form.

      Delete
    2. I wonder when you watched him last time. He had a great season. The only game when he had small problems was Sevilla-Lille. In the rest of the games he was World Class.

      Delete
    3. Oh bugger just realised I made a mistake and it's Vincic not Kovacs. Sorry.

      Delete
    4. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
    5. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
  43. Easy game for Kovacs. Only 5 faults whistled in firt half. Both teams are focused on playing. Let´s see the second half.

    ReplyDelete
  44. Very easy first half. Only 4 fouls in toatal (!), nothing else to whistle. Beautiful football!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 4 or 5 foults, whatever.

      Delete
    2. A beautiful game indeed, and no discussions about referee, that's what we would like to see in all matches, but it isn't possible. I think that the game in Madrid on next week will be totally different than this first leg, but let's wait today's second half before. Sometimes games can be really easy for referees, thank to the fact that teams think only to play.

      Delete
  45. The kind of half a referee loves, both teams fully focussed on playing, let's hope Kovacs continues to be unnoticed

    ReplyDelete
  46. What an excellent athletic profile / movement style that Kovács has, wow. Good 1H by the Romanian too. Not too many foul duels to assess vis-à-vis the 'dreaded winter guidelines'; an ever-so-slightly chaotic play on at 4' aside, the most obvious incident when was referee and assistant Marinescu (who made the only offside mistake of the half at 15'), visibly had different ideas about a charging duel at 40'. In the end foul was the expected choice I think. Probably Schärer missed reporting an IFK in his favour, but then, very good that Kovács INSISTED on connecting with de Bruyne (a 'small name ref' vs. a big name player, easy for IK to be shy, but to his credit, not so) when verbally warning him for dissenting-ish behaviour at 27'. Besides that, not too much to report really, hope he can keep up the good job in the 2H.

    (what a post-modern piece of football btw :)).

    ReplyDelete
  47. If we compare this YC to Guardiola in such a fair context of a nice football game, to what was allowed to Simeone in many games, we must praise Kovacs for his quickness, and I also liked that he waited for a signal by coach before leaving the scene. I think he was accepted by Guardiola.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. YC doesn't change the fact the goal was scored from a wrong throw-in.

      Delete
    2. There was no replay, so we have no clue if the throw in was wrong or not. And even if there was about half a minute in between throw in and goal, so I don‘t think this will
      be a discussion

      Delete
  48. 3-2 what a match. This is the Champions. Great teams and great referees :)

    ReplyDelete
  49. Kovacs went from massive struggling in SEV vs LOSC in group stage to full control in MCI vs RMA in SF. Impressive.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No matter the stage of the competition, in my opinion some games are clearly more difficult than others!

      Delete
  50. What an advantage by Kovacs

    ReplyDelete
  51. EXCELLENT advantage by Kovacs!!

    ReplyDelete
  52. Excellent advantage, bravo Kovacs.

    ReplyDelete
  53. What an advantage for 4-2! Big plus for Kovacs!

    ReplyDelete
  54. Great advantage let! Brilliant decision !!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Was just about to say. That had to be the best advantage ever I've seen.

      Delete
  55. Guardiola should praise both Bernanrdo and Kovacs equally for this goal

    ReplyDelete
  56. The dream advantage for a referee!

    ReplyDelete
  57. Even Kovacs himself looked surprised after the advantage he gave, he wanted to say something like: "I didn't realize that". :D

    ReplyDelete
  58. WHAT AN INCREDIBLE ADVANTAGE!!! GREAT DECISION BY KOVACS, AUTHENTIC MASTERCLASS!

    ReplyDelete
  59. Until now what an excellent refereeing by Kovacs. He’s for sure a strong candidate for the WC in december.

    ReplyDelete
  60. But he ruined everything with this penalty. The defender played the ball with his head clearly before the handball. How can VAR support this penalty? There is no element for a handball.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. please stop commenting on city games if you’re a city fan. clear penalty

      Delete
    2. Are you blind ? Are City Fan ? Are you acting in bad faith

      Delete
    3. Please delete the comment from 22:41

      Delete
    4. Please delete the comment from 22:51

      Delete
    5. Please learn the laws of the game. Unnatural position is always a handball no matter if you play the ball first or not. Just like a deliberate handball or goal scored with the hand. Always a foul no matter what.

      Delete
  61. Regarding the penalty, if the shot results in a goal kick, what should the referee do? A goal kick or a free kick?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. sorry the advantage.

      Delete
    2. He showed, as you probably noticed, the gesture of advantage only after goal scored. He applied the "wait and see". In case of ball out he could have whistled free kick, without having made advantage gesture. However, basically this is a bit against the LOTG, it is a common practice in UEFA refereeing, but according to book, you must take a decision, if advantage, and shown before the shot, nothing to follow, goal kick.

      Delete
    3. Chefren watch the incident very well !! He did show the advantage with his right hand only before the goal was scored then did a full 2 hand advantage signal after the goal was scored, so he did show it and would probably have given a goal kick or corner and not a free kick.

      Delete
  62. What a game by Kovacs.

    ReplyDelete
  63. Now this penalty, header before touch by arm, I think it was assessed as deflection and not deliberate play, and I can agree. In case of movement by head, the subsequent touch by arm should have been considered as not punishable. A bit delayed whistle by the Romanian, he analyzed that in his mind, no help by AR1, I think, he was too far from the scene.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for the important details. For the first time, I learned that the difference between "deflection" and "deliverate play" is important in this case. I hope IFAB will write this in the Laws of the Game. It's very difficult.

      Delete
    2. Deliberate play doesn’t matter.

      3 criterias exist:
      Making yourself unnaturally bigger, scoring with the hand, deliberate handball.

      If any of these exist then it’s a foul. In this case he made himself unnaturally bigger. If none of these 3 criterias happened then it wouldn’t be a foul because he deliberately played the ball just before.

      Delete
    3. If this is relevant, IFAB should really write it into the LotG.
      Because currently, there it is only about making the body unnaturally bigger (which was clearly the case tonight)...
      Previous contacts by the same player aren't mentioned as condition anymore.

      Delete
    4. It’s just bad wording by IFAB and incorrect interpretation by federations who teach he law. Those 3 criterias must always be considered first. If none of them happened then it’s not handball.

      Delete
    5. Ah, I see that Anass beat me to the "deflection" vs. "deliberate play" point! Completely agree, this is an excellent way to help assess such scenes as this tonight and C. del Cerro's penalty last season in Dortmund vs. Man City (-> both to be given).

      Delete
    6. To further this point - an example of what is absolutely NOT a penalty from Saudi Arabia with Señor Roldán and his VAR compatriot Acuña. A clear deliberate play, contrary to tonight's deflection example.

      https://youtu.be/45TVdwbx4ns?t=60

      Delete
    7. I agree that the Roldan example should not be a penalty, however it's worrying that arguments need to be used, which have nothing to do with the LotG text.
      To justify a play-on after a hand contact, we should try to find arguments, why it is a) not deliberate AND b) not making the body unnaturally bigger.

      Delete
  64. Árbitros da UEFA para o Catar 2022
    Makkelie
    Marciniak
    Turpin
    Orsato
    Taylor
    Kovacs
    Del Cerro
    Vincic
    Siebert

    ReplyDelete
  65. A very important detail. The arm was very far from the body, and the ball hit Laporte in the hand OVER the shoulder, which is decisive in taking the decision. I think that was the right decision. Kovacs waited a few seconds before whistling, consulting AR or analyzing in mind.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree with you Matei, in my oppinion the arm is in a unnatural position (speaking in law of the game terms) and is punishable.

      Delete
  66. Never del Cerro, always Lahoz

    ReplyDelete
  67. Italian commentators (SKY) are falling in love with Kovacs.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The same comment in belgian french speaking TV

      Delete
    2. Same in Germany😁

      Delete
    3. And Dutch tv commentator with the same words of praise as well!

      Delete
    4. Same in Turkey

      Delete
    5. Same in English in DAZN Canada

      Delete
  68. Another very good advantage by Kovacs, followed by a YC to Nacho when ball went out of play. Fantastic performance by the Romanian.

    ReplyDelete
  69. Good call on the penalty. Yes the defender got a touch but it hits his hand in a unnatural position

    ReplyDelete
  70. What a performance by Kovacs! Wow!

    ReplyDelete
  71. Kovacs deserves another European night this season.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Biggest candidate for UECL finale if Leicester gets there

      Delete
  72. I don't know exactly how referees assessments work, but it should be over 8.5, isn't it? If someone could make a complete report I would be grateful.

    ReplyDelete
  73. The second leg is actually a Cakir game, but given Cakir's current situation, it's almost impossible.

    ReplyDelete
  74. I can't believe that this game just happened, in real life. :D

    What a brilliant night for István Kovács. Elite refereeing (actually all refereeing, but there are so many more relevant agents at the top) is all about building TRUST in your abilities and creating a PROFILE for yourself over a period of time. It's how B. Johnson became Prime Minister despite always scoring low in competenacy polls, and an out-of-form B. Kuipers got the EURO final appointment (and reffed it excellently). In this regard, for (previously!) 'no-name' Kovács, this night simply could not have gone better for him.

    Some incidents:

    54mins • To be able to win Guardiola's respect by determination, even after a(n obviously) wrong throw-in; deeply impressive.

    74mins • The result was excellent, but the advantage was NOT a masterclass decision. He actually went to blow up - more of a very good passive delayed whistle than 'real' advantage.

    80mins • I like using offside terminology here - defender's headed touch was more of a deflection, not deliberate play, so 100% right call. Marinescu's, even Schärer's, shout?

    Praise on Italian, French, German, Turkish (I can add, British) television; immediate connections with this all-time CL classic game (in a positive way, compare to 'the guy who lost control in Atlético vs. x), it couldn't have gone better for Kovács. I don't think he should get tooo ahead of ourselves - Sevilla vs. Lille, and I am not 200% convinced that it 'would not' happen again - this was an extremely fair game, but still.

    Kovács's crew can be very proud of themselves for the markedly net positive impact they had on this Champions League semifinal!

    ReplyDelete
  75. Fantastic performance tonight, one of the best of all season. I am really impressed. Congratulations!

    ReplyDelete
  76. Congratulations to Kovacs and his team!

    ReplyDelete
  77. An excellent performance by Kovacs and his team. Thought he got all the major decisions correct especially the handball for the penalty and that he was cool, calm and collected for someone as inexperienced at this level. Thought the advantage he played was one of the best i've seen for ages and wasn't afraid to put players/managers in their place if need be. Definitely a 10/10 from me.

    ReplyDelete
  78. Kovacs simply wow! He deserves a final either EL or ECL

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not to attack your point of view specifically, but I don't necessary agree with the final sentence. As a comparable example: this was also many people's reaction after Velasco's performance in Schalke vs. Man Utd SF in 2011 ('newbie' stands out very positively in an important + football-focused game). In both the short-term, not really good performance in the EL final he then got as a consequence, and in the long-term, not always the most motivated impressions in his games it is fair to say, I'm not really sure that his instant reappointment for a big final was a good idea (at all).

      It's surely possible though, Vassáras will be cheering him on and as we know Rosetti has no real long-term plan to manage the referees and their expectations. Kovács was great(!!) tonight, but perspective is important too.

      Delete
  79. Too early for a final, I think, and too "late" for another semifinal (appointments have been already made). But surely after today Kovacs can be more than happy, he achieved a big goal in his career, gaining the full trust by committee for big games (now it is 100% sure if you ask me), reinforcing his position as WC candidate and being praised by all people. Congratulations, the best possible outcome for him. When he officiated Barcelona - Napoli, there were already many signals of that, if you ask me.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The remaining WC play-offs are another option for a next big game for Kovacs.

      Delete
  80. What an awesome referee! He fully deserves a final this year, EL or ECL. I think the committee has found a certainty to bet on

    ReplyDelete
  81. Looks like I am in the minority here on referee's advantage to Silva. The foul itself, blatant for ALL to see, the referee's body language, shoulders, arms, the hand with whistle to his mouth, ALL SHOW I am stopping the play. All players MC and RM hesitated for moments..even Silva.
    There are Laws of the Game which this referee can STAND behind. BUT as the old timers say there is a higher authority: "WHAT THE GAME WANTS" was not given.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes. One must admit that part of the reason that advantage was so 'good' (-> goal resulted) is that (R. Madrid) players stopped upon seeing whistle go to mouth. That is still their fault as professional athletes, but I can't share everyone's pure excitement as this call. However, the result is still definitely / clearly good IMO: a referee directly made a move which favoured exciting football!

      Delete
    2. When kids start playing football they are told: you don't hear the whistle - you don't stop

      Delete
    3. Exactly. They're not told, "If you SEE the whistle stop"

      Delete
  82. Excellent performance by Kovacs and his team tonight 👏 great to see uefa given less experience Referees the opportunity to move forward with games like this .

    ReplyDelete
  83. Perhaps I am a minority here but Kovacs had a very good/excellent first 80 mins and just good the last 14'. The decisive moment was the penalty he gave for RM. The whistle came too late and he tried to avoid the protesting players instead of managing them. After that scene, he seemed a little unfocused.

    Still a very good performance, though.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sorry if all my comments seem like I'm trying to impose my view, but I hope they add some kind of value or at least a different perspective.

      In a classroom setting, his management of the penalty mobbing was definitely weak (and expected mobbing after such a delay, not so firm gestures / presence to accompany it, etcetera).

      Though:

      1) it is UEFA's vision to be completely calm in the scene itself, not to inflame any players (-> risk a SYC (to a top player)), and then to issue a caution after the event, which Kovács did, Fernandinho's name taken.

      2) somehow, it fitted in fine with his whole PROFILE (see above) of the evening; of course, you can say I'm being an apologist and talking in too abstract terms, but I do believe there is sth in this; (the public) would expect instant YC(s) from Stark, and Brych, Orsato to shout back at the players, but somehow, what Kovács did fitted his whole PROFILE, he was a young referee determined to show he didn't think that he was bigger than the game for the whole 90mins, why he did so well in de Bruyne + Guardiola scenes, and tried (successfully!) to serve football on the night with his whole approach.

      So it's not making excuses, or even trying to especially defend Kovács, just a different idea to consider maybe. :)

      Delete
  84. Kovacs with the game of his life tonight. So happy for him.

    ReplyDelete
  85. Why not Massa in VIL-LIV? If Orsato does not recover

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Massa appointed to a SF? He doesn't deserve it. Let's wait for italian appointments and we will see if Orsato has recovered. He could officiate Cagliari - Verona on Saturday, out of the spotlight but an important match.

      Delete
  86. OT:
    The player who was expelled by the Referee for using insulting language and gestures towards Ryuji Sato is suspend for 5 matches by AFC.
    How is your opinion?

    https://twitter.com/sato_fanaccount/status/1519135821978210305?s=21&t=a4lxvZxhmPyQW4zAliU6nQ

    ReplyDelete
  87. Great performance Istvan!

    So far, we have seen 3 masterclasses in refereeing this year:
    -RMA - PSG (Makkelie)
    -RMA - CHE (Marciniak)
    -MCI - RMA (Kovacs)
    3 intense games full of entertainment.

    Now watch Turpin getting the final :’)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Isn’t that what’s happening every year? The strongest and best performing ref never gets the final.

      Just look at EURO2020 and Kuipers’ appointments. He was not used in sth like FRA-GER, FRA-POR, BEL-POR or ENG-GER. He was chosen already before the tournament and they kept him away from such clashes. Rosetti burned Mateu.

      This stinks. UEFA = politics. Now they are looking at nationality, and “whose turn is it to have a final?” Refereeing = top sport. Not a healthy situation for a top sporter. I guess we all prefer a meritocracy system…

      Delete
    2. Batta: ‘Roberto, I’m stepping back but promise me one thing: not a Dutchman again in the finals”

      This is how it goes right :D

      Delete
    3. Mmm I quite liked it that Kuipers had the Euro final, after missing the WC 2014 final because his country reached the semi final, however I don’t like the used appointment strategy by committee “to hide the selected final referee”.
      Last year I also never realized that Kuipers might frustrate Makkelie’s final chances on a short term.
      Honestly I think that Makkelie is even more talented and passionated when it comes up to refereeing. Fortunately he is still quite young. 5-6 years to go

      Delete
  88. Rosetti is always hiding the anticipated final referee and burning all others great referees. This is exactly what Mikael motivated a while ago on this blog and I can only agree.

    At Euro 2020, Mateu (FRA-POR): use him in that game and he was burned in advance.
    Brych (BEL-POR) also had a tough game. He stayed but no final chances for him. Cakir: well, we all know what happened…

    CL 2022: Makkelie (RMA-PSG) had a great(!) game but still burned, as the losing side (el Khalaifi and Poch) blamed their loss on him. The same applied to Marciniak (RMA-CHE). Tuchel blamed him after the match.

    When you use a referee in a return leg, in a high profile game, and the game is tight, you already know that the manager of the losing side will (almost) always point at the referee. Looking for excuses, trying to save his own ass

    This is starting to be predictable. Politics at its best. Disgusting.

    Anyway, on-topic, great(!) game of Kovacs. I’m very happy for him!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Siebert also destroyed

      Delete
    2. Seibert got set up to fail by Rossetti. Not the first time he has done that. Seibert refereeing Atletico who are 1-0 down away in Madrid in his NINTH EVER game in the CL?

      A normal person would indicate he is being fast tracked for the World Cup, to be the next ‘Felix Brych’. I say he is being set up to fail by Rossetti

      Delete
  89. Vincic has no game this weekend.

    Can we expect him in Madrid next week with Kuipers?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Someone mentioned that 4th officials are probably saved for a final. Vincic is saved for the UEL final.

      Makkelie with Kuipers also not possible unless they swap observers. Orsato back ??

      Delete
    2. I did not agree with assumption that 4th official cannot have any game next week. Obvious prediction is Turpin in Madrid, the only big name last. Orsato could be recovered but he didnt officiate any domestic/international game for 40 days, so hard to appoint.
      We will have a surprise name in VIL-LIV (Vincic/Jovanovic/Siebert/Cakir/Zwayer) and Turpin in RMA-MCI, and the Dutchman in Paris.

      Delete
  90. I am going against the overwhelming majority here on Kovacs performance last night.
    He will not get another game in the Champions League, the Europa League or the Conference league this tournament.
    3 reasons:
    In addition to what I blogged yesterday about his blundering the advantage on Silva's goal, Kovacs didn't even signaled advantage until the ball was in the net.
    2. He mismanaged the penalty by allowing players to mob him
    3. The game was managed by the players themselves. They "came to play". Something ALL of us who have refereed at high levels know what a joy that is AND how it allows you to focus.
    Bensama's reaction to the bundled advantage says it all: he smiled and shook his head knowing how he and his teammates were "fooled" by the referee BUT fooled within technically by the Law.
    Politics plays the deciding card in appointments BUT the cards the referee plays before hand can put you out of the running before then.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He did signal advantage with one arm before the ball went in, have a look

      Delete
    2. Good nuance. I agree that he was helped by 22 players focused on playing football, good behaviours and almost no fouls. However, when a game is quiet, this can also be thanks to the referee. Kovacs is very talented. He has a bright future.

      Maybe an unpopular opinion in general, but I really think that, if we want to ‘separate the wheat from the chaff’ (the good referees from the best), you can only do that by observing a referee in a really challenging game. For example games with players that try to control or mob a referee, or games that are full of KMI’s.

      Delete
    3. Is the use of just one arm to signify advantage in the rules? I thought it needed to be both arms.

      Delete
  91. I find some of the comments baffling, especially John M.
    Delaying whistle was perfect for that situation, allowed a goal
    Penalty gave himslf thinking time, "mobbing" needs to be stopped by the governing body supporting referees more, not picking on 1 referee in a SF
    His calm manner assisted the game but no it was "too easy" - you have obviously never refereed any game of significance
    Yet had it been over whistled that would have been his fault.
    No performance is perfect but last nights was pretty close

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I completely agree with you Ex Eng Ref, every word! I was astonished by the lack of understanding of refereeing by John M as well.
      And even if his observations would have been valid, it would have been minor points in a generally very good performance. Using words like ‘blundering’ and ‘mismanagement’ is simply laughable.

      Delete