Wednesday 11 July 2018

2018 FIFA World Cup Match 62: Croatia - England (discussion)

Let's discuss here the performance of Cüneyt Çakır  in Croatia - England. Good luck to the officiating team! 
Match #62
Moscow, 11 July 2018 20:00 CET
Croatia - England
Referee: Cüneyt Çakır (TUR)
Assistant Referee 1: Bahattin Duran (TUR)
Assistant Referee 2: Tarik Ongun (TUR)
Fourth Official: Björn Kuipers (NED)
Fifth Official: Sander van Roekel (NED)
VAR: Danny Makkelie (NED)
AVAR1: Bastian Dankert (GER)
AVAR 2: Carlos Astroza (CHI)
AVAR 3: Felix Zwayer (GER)
Posted by at
Labels:

188 comments:

  1. Unknown11 July 2018 at 19:38

    hello
    hope for a gg

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. MWolf11 July 2018 at 19:42

      Me too, I don't expect Cakir to dissapoint. Still sucks that Kuipers is FO..

      Delete
  2. Unknown11 July 2018 at 19:51

    the best color for referee this game? Yellow

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Peter11 July 2018 at 19:52

      Transparent - the best referee is always transparent. ;-)

      Delete
    2. VG11 July 2018 at 20:07

      Blue clearly

      Delete
  3. john oxford11 July 2018 at 19:52

    Var3 is felix zwayer. I don't know how fifa still appoint him. There is too much speculation about him lately. Cakir has to be careful about the feedback that he will ger from the VAR.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Soham11 July 2018 at 19:58

    Çakir and Kuipers standing together in a match for the last time... This is an emotional moment for me 😢 Farewell to both!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. MWolf11 July 2018 at 20:00

      I feel you :(

      Delete
    2. Soham11 July 2018 at 20:05

      I don't know really, but this is definitely the most emotional football match for me in all my years of watching football... The scene of both of them walking out together for one final time just made me emotional, I need to gather myself together quickly! 😭

      Delete
    3. Peter11 July 2018 at 20:18

      For those of us without your knowledge or experience, can you explain why it has such an effect on you?

      Delete
    4. Ref-world11 July 2018 at 21:28

      Cakir is 41, so in 2022 he will be 46, but when the list of fifa referees is making at december, when he wiil be 45...

      Delete
  5. Soccer Guy11 July 2018 at 20:03

    I dislike how the refs are wearing red in this game... green, yellow, or even blue would have been a better choice. It clashes with the Croatian uniforms too much.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The AR11 July 2018 at 20:05

      Really? Not on my TV

      Delete
    2. Ugur B11 July 2018 at 20:06

      English goalkeeper is yellow, Croatian goalkeeper is green. He chose red.

      Delete
    3. VG11 July 2018 at 20:10

      He didn’t choose anything. FIFA decides.. But obviously it should have been blue.

      Delete
    4. Filip V11 July 2018 at 20:13

      Croatia is dark blue

      Delete
    5. Soccer Guy11 July 2018 at 20:13

      Honestly I'd rather the refs clash shirts with the one goalkeeper on the pitch than clash slightly with an entire team. The Croatia is in dark blue and red, while the refs are in red and black... ugh. You can tell the difference but it's not pleasant aesthetically.

      Delete
    6. VG11 July 2018 at 20:37

      The blue ref jersey is not even close to the blue Croatia has. The ref blue is turquoise.

      Delete
  6. Fab GX11 July 2018 at 20:04

    3' No fault to ENG - First mistake

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. john oxford11 July 2018 at 20:06

      No mistake. Clear faul from Modric.

      Delete
    2. Panterwe11 July 2018 at 20:07

      Exactly clear faul

      Delete
    3. Unknown11 July 2018 at 20:08

      Mistake? Clear foul

      Delete
    4. Fab GX11 July 2018 at 20:08

      The english player already falling before the contact

      Delete
    5. Soham11 July 2018 at 20:12

      Oh come on! We only see what we want to see... This was a totally correct foul called!

      Delete
    6. Soccer Guy11 July 2018 at 20:14

      Fab, you're right there was no contact with the back, but look more closely at the legs; there's a trip which sends Alli down.

      Delete
    7. Chiagozie11 July 2018 at 20:15

      U must be kidding right?

      Delete
    8. Chiagozie11 July 2018 at 20:16

      That was a foul

      Delete
    9. Emre11 July 2018 at 20:18

      100% faul

      Delete
  7. AG11 July 2018 at 20:14

    He is calling it tight...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. MWolf11 July 2018 at 20:17

      Yea, keeping it really thight. But maybe he will loosen up, if he senses that it's possible.

      Delete
  8. Andrasch Neunert11 July 2018 at 20:16

    A crystalclear foul and free kick. Contact with legs. No doubt.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Soccer Guy11 July 2018 at 20:20

    If we want to be harsh, I'd argue Cakir is having some issues with foul recognition during the opening 20 minutes.

    ReplyDelete
  10. ssendiwala11 July 2018 at 20:21

    Not the best perfomance so far.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Soccer Guy11 July 2018 at 20:22

    That *should* be a yellow for stopping the promising attack, but, as we saw from Cunha yesterday and as we've seen the whole tournament, FIFA seems intent on not punishing those unless they absolutely have to.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. MWolf11 July 2018 at 20:23

      Exactly, but should have been YC. That was as clear as it gets.

      Delete
    2. Referee analyst11 July 2018 at 20:24

      Missed YC...by FiFA...again.

      Delete
    3. Andrasch Neunert11 July 2018 at 20:24

      It looked like Cakir gave him yellow after talk. Or did I see that wrong? The YC was mandatory IMO

      Delete
    4. MWolf11 July 2018 at 20:26

      It didn't see a YC.

      Delete
    5. MWolf11 July 2018 at 20:26

      Add: where I think it should have been (but FIFA...)

      Delete
  12. Andrasch Neunert11 July 2018 at 20:23

    Lovren YC after harsh tact.foul. well deserved.
    Afterwards easy offside-call.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. MWolf11 July 2018 at 20:23

      Easy call indeed, but very bad shot from Kane, haha!

      Delete
    2. Andrasch Neunert11 July 2018 at 20:25

      No YC. True. And def wrong.

      Delete
  13. AG11 July 2018 at 20:23

    He could have shown a YC but this is not the standard in this WC game unfortunately

    ReplyDelete
  14. Referee analyst11 July 2018 at 20:23

    Agree. Weird wish to let the play excessively rough. Not convinced at all.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Andrasch Neunert11 July 2018 at 20:26

    Lovren is really begging for yellow.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Ref_170711 July 2018 at 20:27

    At least now a YC for Lovren should have been given...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. MWolf11 July 2018 at 20:28

      This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. MWolf11 July 2018 at 20:29

      I wouldn't have given a YC to Lovren. He is on the edge, I admit that, but that was way too easy. (And not a promissing attack IMO)

      Delete
    3. Fab GX11 July 2018 at 20:29

      It was nothing. Follow The game

      Delete
  17. Filip V11 July 2018 at 20:27

    It was correct no YC by standards in this tornament

    ReplyDelete
  18. Referee analyst11 July 2018 at 20:28

    And Lovren again...

    ReplyDelete
  19. Ref_170711 July 2018 at 20:30

    Wrong offside call in 30‘ by AR2.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Referee analyst11 July 2018 at 20:30

    30´: wrong offside call by Ongun...

    ReplyDelete
  21. MWolf11 July 2018 at 20:31

    Agreed, no offside.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Ex Eng Ref11 July 2018 at 20:31

    Poor offside call

    ReplyDelete
  23. AG11 July 2018 at 20:31

    Correct implementation of offside with VAR but incorrect decision

    ReplyDelete
  24. Andrasch Neunert11 July 2018 at 20:31

    30.min. completely wrong offside-call!!! If Kane scored we would have been hoping for VAR.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. MWolf11 July 2018 at 20:32

      Not hoping. We would have had VAR. Makkelie would have taken that.

      Delete
  25. Chefren11 July 2018 at 20:32

    Wrong offside, I think, difficult situation to read, however good by AR2. Very delayed call, VAR would have corrected him, in case.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Anonymous11 July 2018 at 20:33

    It looked like he flagged because the ball was out?

    ReplyDelete
  27. stockfish11 July 2018 at 20:33

    Maybe he meant he ball was out ...

    ReplyDelete
  28. Fidje11 July 2018 at 20:33

    Replay showed that the ball was behind the goal line. Signal was for a goal kick.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. VG11 July 2018 at 20:40

      No he took offside. And clearly you saw the indirect free kick was taken and the assistant yelled ”offside”

      Delete
  29. Fab GX11 July 2018 at 20:34

    He assigned ball out

    ReplyDelete
  30. ssendiwala11 July 2018 at 20:34

    our man looks to be on pressure.what's wrong mr soham?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. RikB11 July 2018 at 20:40

      Just ask it too everyone. Nothing against Soham, but it's an open blog. Anyone should be able to respond.

      Delete
  31. The AR11 July 2018 at 20:34

    The replay seemed to indicate the ball went out. Did anyone see whether the ref signaled an offside as opposed to a goal kick?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. MWolf11 July 2018 at 20:35

      I'll watch the replay

      Delete
    2. Ugur B11 July 2018 at 20:38

      It started with an offside kick... not from the box

      Delete
  32. Filip V11 July 2018 at 20:34

    I also think that flag was for goalkick, although it should have been corner

    ReplyDelete
  33. Andrasch Neunert11 July 2018 at 20:36

    35 min Cakir ignored clear holding against CRO player in midfield and that made a good atrack for ENG possible. What's up with him?

    ReplyDelete
  34. Ex Eng Ref11 July 2018 at 20:38

    Cakir indicated idfk. It was deflected out of play so would have been a corner

    ReplyDelete
  35. Jonas11 July 2018 at 20:40

    41‘ IMO very clear YC missed clear revenge foul from Rebic!

    ReplyDelete
  36. Ugur B11 July 2018 at 20:41

    Missed YC to Cro #18 at 40’. It was deliberate foul.

    ReplyDelete
  37. AG11 July 2018 at 20:41

    This is neither Cakir’s style or his standard

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ugur B11 July 2018 at 20:43

      Mr. Guvener, why do you think standards are different between UEFA and FIFA refereein

      Delete
    2. Ugur B11 July 2018 at 20:48

      Even though both is run by same person, Mr. Collina?

      Delete
    3. AG11 July 2018 at 20:49

      Ask Collina he is responsible for both :-)

      Delete
  38. Soccer Guy11 July 2018 at 20:41

    I'm ok with no YC there for Rebic. Very hard public warning from Cakir, next hard foul he's in the book. Consistent with the rest of the game, and with the rest of the tournament, in my opinion.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Andrasch Neunert11 July 2018 at 20:41

    And our friend with a revengefoul. Wild card by Cakir?40.min

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Soccer Guy11 July 2018 at 20:44

      I like how he handled it. Now everyone knows the next one is a yellow card. Perhaps he will do as Cunha did yesterday (and Geiger earlier) and withold cards until the second half, so that he has the freedom to book players a lot when he really needs to, without risking a second yellow.

      Delete
  40. MWolf11 July 2018 at 20:41

    He gave a last waring, trying to give as least cards as possible

    ReplyDelete
  41. Ref_170711 July 2018 at 20:42

    Too many fouls remain unpunished. I don‘t like that, Cakir should definitely go for a YC in the next minutes.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Mailoudinho11 July 2018 at 20:43

    Cakir os So bad this evening 😱

    ReplyDelete
  43. Filip V11 July 2018 at 20:43

    First possible missed foul on Rebic, than foul by him on Young. This games threatens to get out of Cakir hands in 2nd half if he doesnt improve his performance

    ReplyDelete
  44. Soccer Guy11 July 2018 at 20:46

    Interesting strategy in the first half by Cakir. We'll see if it works in the second half.

    ReplyDelete
  45. Fab GX11 July 2018 at 20:47

    PEN for Crotia in 46'

    ReplyDelete
  46. Soccer Guy11 July 2018 at 20:47

    Interesting, with a check occurring after the halftime whistle. Could have been a penalty but would've probably been a bit soft, so good on the VAR to not call for a review there.

    ReplyDelete
  47. M11 July 2018 at 20:48

    Possible penalty????VAR?

    ReplyDelete
  48. Andrasch Neunert11 July 2018 at 20:48

    Well due to his natural aura and authority Cakir will NEVER loose control. But he must protect the technical players/attackers much better!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. T_Protector11 July 2018 at 20:54

      Cakir is not born with his qualities. There is no natural authority al.s.!

      Delete
  49. Filip V11 July 2018 at 20:48

    Did maybe Cakir refused OFR at the end of half for possible penalty on Lovren

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Andrasch Neunert11 July 2018 at 20:49

      Def.too soft for PK, come on!

      Delete
    2. Filip V11 July 2018 at 20:52

      I am not talking about was it penalty or not, but he let players leave the pitch while check in VAR room was still in progress

      Delete
  50. "Dynamic Personality"???11 July 2018 at 20:49

    It's a sad sight to see. The directives and guidelines have led to the a referee having to hang his head in defeat and endure the constant flow of verbal abuse and dissent.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. VG11 July 2018 at 20:57

      He has nothing to lose. His last world cup match. He should do whatever he wants to, in other words, follow the laws of the game.

      Delete
    2. Ugur B11 July 2018 at 21:02

      He will still target for Euro 2020 final and Collina is head of UEFA refereeing.

      Delete
    3. "Dynamic Personality"???11 July 2018 at 21:22

      In UEFA, these useless garbage poor excuse of instructions, directives, and guidelines are not force fed to the referee's. UEFA still has some respect for The Law's of the Game. FIFA has none. Their motto is "Do as we say. Not as we do." Fair Play? In their dreams!

      Delete
  51. The Livermans of St. John's11 July 2018 at 20:49

    I thought an excellent half by Cakir. Maybe could have shown at least one YC but chose to manage the game in other ways, and very successfully.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Soccer Guy11 July 2018 at 20:51

      I wouldn't say excellent. You can peg the "missed" yellow cards down to FIFA directives and management strategy, but his foul recognition wasn't too great.

      Delete
    2. DrMr11 July 2018 at 20:53

      Soccer Guy, you perfectly describe mark 8.3

      Delete
    3. Soccer Guy11 July 2018 at 21:00

      DrMr, isn't 8.3 "expected level of performance?" IMO I expect a little bit better from Cakir. His foul recognition hasn't been great this game.

      Delete
  52. MWolf11 July 2018 at 20:49

    I am sorry, penalty?! No...? Did I miss something? Haha!

    ReplyDelete
  53. Ref_170711 July 2018 at 20:49

    Just an okayish performance by Cakir. While his style of refereeing is a matter of taste (I‘m not the biggest fan to be honest) his foul detection and disciplinary control is not the best. Lovren should have received a YC - just have a look at his behaviour after the game. It wouldn‘t be possible for him to behave like this if he had got a YC. That‘s smart refereeing!

    ReplyDelete
  54. john oxford11 July 2018 at 20:51

    I think he has the control of the game until now without yellow cards. This is exactly what fifa wanted.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Panterwe11 July 2018 at 20:55

      +1

      Delete
    2. Soccer Guy11 July 2018 at 20:59

      Agreed. We must see how it plays out in the second half to fully judge though.

      Delete
  55. DrMr11 July 2018 at 20:52

    I'm reading some comments and can't belive what are some people writing...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Dynamic Personality"???11 July 2018 at 20:56

      Stop reading? Go read something else? Accept that people might just possibly have a different perspective and opinion that doesn't mesh with yours? I know shocking!

      Delete
    2. DrMr11 July 2018 at 20:58

      Hello Sheriff

      Delete
    3. Mikael W11 July 2018 at 21:01

      DrMr I agree

      Delete
    4. DrMr11 July 2018 at 21:10

      Hello Mikael :)

      Delete
  56. Referee analyst11 July 2018 at 20:53

    I m SAD. Because wonderful ref as Cuneyt Cakir became lenient and so-so just because of ridiculous instructions by FIFA and Collina. We don’t see Cakir himself but just his reactions towards wishes which change completely his refereeing soul. Disgusting.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. T_Protector11 July 2018 at 20:56

      Modern Times...

      Delete
    2. Fab GX11 July 2018 at 20:59

      I think for no get out any player to final match. But in 2nd half time he changes this.

      Delete
  57. Unknown11 July 2018 at 20:54

    Why are so many reviewers negative? In my opinion a very good half by cakir.. only small things here and there that couldve decided differently, but such things happens every game. Overall in the big picture, the important decisions were right. The no card policy is definetly fifas guideline.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Soccer Guy11 July 2018 at 20:58

      I agree in general, but usually Cakir is better. I hope I don't sound harsh, he is clearly one of the best referees in the world, and being as good as Cakir usually is is quite a high bar!

      Delete
    2. Panterwe11 July 2018 at 20:59

      Exactly,he did very good job,some comments really stupidly,and no need to write answer this fanatics

      Delete
  58. Ugur B11 July 2018 at 20:55

    This is not general style of Cakir, this is how FIFA instructed all referees to be in the game. Because the standards of this tournament it is a good first half, imo only a missed YC for Revenge foul on 40’.
    I believe FIFA instructed SF referees not to show easy YC, which might end with sent off for 2nd YC preventing the player to be in the WC final.

    ReplyDelete
  59. Fab GX11 July 2018 at 20:57

    If a simple contact was foul in 3' now in 46' he must had assign PK for Croatia by the same criteria

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AG11 July 2018 at 21:01

      Because this is what football expects..,

      Delete
    2. MWolf11 July 2018 at 21:02

      I could not disagree more.

      Delete
  60. Soccer Guy11 July 2018 at 21:05

    And now Rebic gets his yellow.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11 July 2018 at 21:06

      Mandzukic got the yellow for kicking the ball away

      Delete
    2. Soccer Guy11 July 2018 at 21:09

      My bad, you're right

      Delete
  61. MWolf11 July 2018 at 21:06

    Wrong player YC?

    ReplyDelete
  62. Andrasch Neunert11 July 2018 at 21:06

    And now YC to the wrong player? Rebic should be booked but Mandzukic was... but why???

    ReplyDelete
  63. Ref_170711 July 2018 at 21:06

    Finally! YC was given for which player? A little bit confusing. VAR was checking as well.

    ReplyDelete
  64. Ugur B11 July 2018 at 21:07

    Mandzukic is booked for his reaction to the foul, hitting the ball to the ground.

    ReplyDelete
  65. Anonymous11 July 2018 at 21:07

    Belgian commentator said that Mandzukic got the yellow for kicking the ball away after the foul was called.

    ReplyDelete
  66. AG11 July 2018 at 21:08

    At this level there should not be a confusion who was YCed. Cakir should have made it clearer

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ugur B11 July 2018 at 21:08

      He can’t make it clearer than this .

      Delete
    2. VG11 July 2018 at 21:09

      He was extremely clear. The brodcaster was very unclear because they only showed Cakir and not the player.

      Delete
    3. MWolf11 July 2018 at 21:09

      He made it clear. Everybody got it wrong. De ref gave a YC for kicking the ball away. The rest just didn't get it.

      Delete
    4. AG11 July 2018 at 21:09

      I apologize after viewing the replay it was very clear who was YCed.

      Delete
    5. Emre11 July 2018 at 21:10

      I disagree. I think Çakır made it quite clear.

      Delete
    6. Soccer Guy11 July 2018 at 21:11

      Yeah, I was confused as well but after rewinding my TV, it was the fault of the commentator that confused me, not Cakir.

      Delete
  67. Ref_170711 July 2018 at 21:08

    Mandzukic got the YC and Rebic didn‘t get anything... Really?

    ReplyDelete
  68. Ref_170711 July 2018 at 21:11

    Disciplinary control is a catastrophe, I‘m sorry to say that.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Soccer Guy11 July 2018 at 21:15

      A "catastrophe" is too harsh as of right now... but the poor (or deliberately lenient?) foul recognition is not helping him control this game.

      Delete
    2. Ref_170711 July 2018 at 21:18

      Maybe inconsistent is the better word, but we all know a different Cakir...

      Delete
  69. Robin Hartman11 July 2018 at 21:12

    Dumb action by Walker. Deserved YC.

    ReplyDelete
  70. James Knavettier11 July 2018 at 21:13

    He already did dear güvener. İt is just a broadcasting error.

    ReplyDelete
  71. Soccer Guy11 July 2018 at 21:13

    Similar play to the Mbappe incident in stoppage time yesterday, and in the same area of the field too. Where a player runs away with the ball and the other team retaliates and physically dispossesses him. IMO this should be a yellow to both players, but it seems that perhaps FIFA's guidance is to only card the time waster on this play? Consistent application in both SF games... but I disagree

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Robin Hartman11 July 2018 at 21:23

      Mbappé and Walker had no right to interfere. Walker even picked up the ball after some time.
      KRO defender simply took the ball, did hardly touch Walker.
      So, one side foul.

      Delete
  72. Andrasch Neunert11 July 2018 at 21:14

    Now Walker YC. Correct.

    ReplyDelete
  73. Fab GX11 July 2018 at 21:15

    There are many england fans here. I think that was a referee blog, but I was wrong

    ReplyDelete
  74. john oxford11 July 2018 at 21:15

    Ref is very near to the actions, i ilke it. He didn't miss anything until now. Perfect.

    ReplyDelete
  75. "Dynamic Personality"???11 July 2018 at 21:17

    I'm going to be honest. After yesterdays gentlemanly played match. I woke up today craving a fiery and intense match with a high level of physicality. You know, a match that tests and demands the most from any high level referee. With the curiosity of how this type of match would play out by using the "limp wrist" instructions that have been force fed to the referee's.

    I know, weird desire. But hey, at least I'm keeping it real.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Soccer Guy11 July 2018 at 21:20

      You already saw how such a match plays out, in England - Colombia...

      Delete
    2. "Dynamic Personality"???11 July 2018 at 21:23

      Don't forget about Argentina vs Croatia.

      Delete
  76. Soccer Guy11 July 2018 at 21:18

    60' now, we will see if Cakir starts brandishing more yellow cards, in my opinion this game needs him to clamp down now.

    ReplyDelete
  77. Emre11 July 2018 at 21:19

    Roldan should have been booked

    ReplyDelete
  78. Panterwe11 July 2018 at 21:21

    Perfect management so far,well done cakir

    ReplyDelete
  79. Andrasch Neunert11 July 2018 at 21:21

    Cakir not bad. True. But without looking through turkish glasses I must say that I have seen him several times much better.
    Now no PK after Vida's may-be-foul. Well done.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AG11 July 2018 at 21:28

      I agree this is not one of its better performances

      Delete
  80. Ref_170711 July 2018 at 21:24

    Very strict towards unsporting behaviour, very lenient towards reckless fouls, persistent infringement and dissent. Inconsistent!

    ReplyDelete
  81. Unknown11 July 2018 at 21:25

    Now two right no penalty decisions 🖒

    ReplyDelete
  82. Unknown11 July 2018 at 21:27

    Ever since Euro 2016 I haven't been the biggest fan of Çakir, and tonight shows exactly why. This WC he has been doing better, hence why he got the SF, but this match I just never had the idea he was fully in control of the game.

    ReplyDelete
  83. Fab GX11 July 2018 at 21:27

    The match is burning to Cakir. Let see now

    ReplyDelete
  84. Marco Neri11 July 2018 at 21:27

    Some protests from ENG players. For me, ok to allow the goal

    ReplyDelete
  85. Robin Hartman11 July 2018 at 21:27

    Wasn't that leg a little bit too high?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Soccer Guy11 July 2018 at 21:29

      A bit but Walker's head was also too low. At the professional level, shouldn't be called IMO, but in one of my games I'd probably call it.

      Delete
    2. Ref_170711 July 2018 at 21:29

      On the other hand one can say that the defender‘s head was quite low, too. Supportable to play on.

      Delete
    3. Fab GX11 July 2018 at 21:35

      Walkers head low

      Delete
  86. Andrasch Neunert11 July 2018 at 21:28

    So often... ENG leaning back after scoring and now they are in real trouble...

    ReplyDelete
  87. stockfish11 July 2018 at 21:35

    I am so surprised that there is no direct RC except 2 DOGSO by Skomina (both are correct) ...

    ReplyDelete
  88. Panterwe11 July 2018 at 21:35

    I think Collina thought this match will be more hot, that's why cakir is here ,, and he is right till now

    ReplyDelete

New comments are not allowed.

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)