Saturday, 8 August 2020

Champions League 2019/20 - Referee Appointments - Round of 16 (Second Leg, IV)

After Europa League, Champions League is back as well. The following officials have been assigned  to Round of 16 Second legs to be played on 8 August 2020. 
08.08.2020, 21:00 CET
Camp Nou, Barcelona (ESP)
FC Barcelona (ESP) - SSC Napoli (ITA)
Referee: Cüneyt Çakır (TUR)
Assistant Referee 1: Bahattin Duran (TUR)
Assistant Referee 2: Tarik Ongun (TUR)
Fourth Official: Halil Umut Meler (TUR)
Video Assistant Referee: Mete Kalkavan (TUR)
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Ali Palabiyik (TUR)
UEFA Referee Observer: Rune Pedersen (NOR)
UEFA Delegate: Nils Fisketjonn (NOR)

08.08.2020, 21:00 CET
Allianz Arena, München (GER)
FC Bayern München (GER) - Chelsea FC (ENG)
Referee: Ovidiu Alin Hațegan (ROU)
Assistant Referee 1: Octavian Șovre (ROU)
Assistant Referee 2:Sebastian Eugen Gheorghe (ROU)
Fourth Official: Radu Marian Petrescu (ROU)
Video Assistant Referee: Massimiliano Irrati (ITA)
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Marco Guida (ITA)
UEFA Referee Observer: Costas Kapitanis (CYP)
UEFA Delegate: Philippe Prudhon (FRA)

113 comments:

  1. Very-very good match for Cakir
    Candidate for 2 UCL final or he`ll be honoured UEL final for his big career?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I want to thank Dr Emu a very powerful spell caster who help me to bring my husband back to me, few month ago i have a serious problem with my husband, to the extend that he left the house, and he started dating another woman and he stayed with the woman, i tried all i can to bring him back, but all my effort was useless until the day my friend came to my house and i told her every thing that had happened between me and my husband, then she told me of a powerful spell caster who help her when she was in the same problem I then contact Dr Emu and told him every thing and he told me not to worry my self again that my husband will come back to me after he has cast a spell on him, i thought it was a joke, after he had finish casting the spell, he told me that he had just finish casting the spell, to my greatest surprise within 48 hours, my husband really came back begging me to forgive him, if you need his help you can contact him with via email: Emutemple@gmail.com or add him up on his whatsapp +2347012841542 is willing to help any body that need his help. 

      Delete
  2. Three potential Serious Foul Play incidents from the FL Championship Playoff Final, handled by Martin Atkinson.

    29' - Decision: Yellow Card
    https://vk.com/video-154719835_456241107?t=34m30s

    67' - Decision: Yellow Card
    https://vk.com/video-154719835_456241107?t=1h29m30s

    98' - Decision: Yellow Card
    https://vk.com/video-154719835_456241107?t=2h8m59s

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Atkinson with his typical "soft approach"

      Delete
    2. All three are red cards.

      Delete
    3. Why on earth is the third a red card? It looks ugly at first glance, but when you see the replay, it's just awkward and clumsy. The point of contact is low.

      I also think you have no real feel of English referees if you think the first one would have been a red card in this match from any other English referee. The low point of contact and the appearance that the fouling player tries to mitigate the seriousness of the foul would be enough for ANY English referee to go yellow card in the EFL Championship Playoff Final. Your criticism is with England, if you have one, not with Atkinson (though I would suggest that wouldn't be a red card anymore at the World Cup or in UEFA competitions, either).

      The second is the worst of the lot. But even there it's hard to discern point of contact. It's a plausible red card, but without further evidence I'm not convinced it's 100% SFP.

      Delete
    4. I'm not an Atkinson fan but he got all of those calls right. None are red cards.

      The first one is orange perhaps, but in the first half of a Championship playoff final, I sure wouldn't want to be sending someone off for that. We can analyze the technical 'correct' decision all day long, but you have to have a feel for the game too. The first one was manageable under the right circumstances with a yellow.

      The second and especially third one are never SFP for me. The third one is little more than a clumsy collision.

      Delete
    5. I mostly agree with usaref here.
      1) For me 60:40 towards RC, because of the intensity and danger. However, the tackling is aimed towards the ball (there even is a slight touch), the leg ist not completely straight and the contact ends on the foot after being higher at the first contact.
      2) Quite difficult to detect the point of contact, but when stopping the replay, one can see it is above the ankle. I am not sure, whether he gets the ball first. If not, I would evaluate it as clear mistake. Otherwise, the YC is only just acceptable for me.
      3) I don't see much of a SFP here. More an unlucky, or as usaref said "clumsy" crash.

      Delete
  3. Excellent recovery by Çakır in terms of appointments after SVNAUT and his suspension.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Interesting, that a 2nd group referee is enough as 4th official in Barcelona. Özkahya or even e.g. Soares Dias would have been alternatives.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Indeed, something is not clear under this aspect regarding fourth officials. The choice is not made on the importance of the game, otherwise we would have had a different name in Barcelona, but in Turin Sidiropoulos was appointed...

      Delete
  5. Excellent appointment for Cakir.

    ReplyDelete
  6. is RAP 2020:1 out or we need to wait more?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes the DVD is out but I don't think UEFA are ready to release it through eg. Jan ter Harmsel just yet. Maybe he could give us some info on when we can expect it ;)

      Delete
  7. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T8Vx7tz8haM
    00:55
    Your opinion about this penalty call after OFR with VAR in Deportivo La Coruna - Fuenlabrada, very decisive for the game but also for the standing (minute 95')?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No penalty for me. Defender even tries to take the arm away, the touch is purely accidental. Reminds me a bit of the penalty that Soares Dias awarded in GER-NED last year.

      Delete
    2. In my opinion correct decision, the player had so much time to remove his arm, and it wasnt unexpected movement, so at least supportable call.

      Do you know if it was clear mistake or missed incident VAR intervention?

      Delete
    3. I watched this game. Isidro Díaz de Mera Escuderos (1989, candidate for promotion) had this incident in injury time after a quiet night.

      Unlike in the case of De Ligt's handball in GER-NED, I find this handball PK decision correct. De Ligt didn't even know where the ball was, FUE23 knew exactly where the ball is, tries to control it with the chest but fails and controls it with the arm. Stupid but IMO correct penalty.

      @Forlan Idk what you mean, referee and almost all players except DEP10 (bottom left, with an excellent view who is the only one to ask for handball) missed it.


      Poor Díaz de Mera Escuderos, the last time I watched him in a decisive game (Zaragoza-Huesca, Aragonese derby 2nd vs 3rd for promotion) he had a good performance but another controversial and decisive incident in minute 94'. XD

      Delete
  8. Hategan awarded a penalty but ar2 raise the flag for offside. VAR intervene and said onside. Hategan gave yc for dogso attempt on ball

    ReplyDelete
  9. Correct penalty to Bayern and YC for Chelsea by Hategan. AR2 decided before offside and VAR confirmed onside.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Possible foul before 1-0 by Barcelona, Cakir should have whistled it but NO VAR stuff.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. It's a clear foul before the gol. It's VAR staff. VAR is useless if is not used in sucha cases ...

      Delete
    3. VAR has to intervene because it was a clear foul.

      Delete
  11. Dear Chakir. This is clear offensive foul in my opinion.

    ReplyDelete
  12. There was an appeal by Napoli player about a push from barca no.9 but Cakir awarded goal and VAR confirmed.

    ReplyDelete
  13. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Pushing is mostly at referee's discretion, who knows how VAR works, is also aware of that. I agree that it was a foul and maybe Cakir totally missed it, but VAR can't intervene there. We must blame protocol, if we want to change.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. Chefren, common-sense is common-sense.
      I know what you want to say. If referee see a contact and in his opinion is not foul that VAR can not intervene. Tehnically VAR can intervene when referee completely missed the foul.

      But honestly, this is a clear and obvious mistake. Perception of Cakir was clearly wrong.

      Anyway, it's already 3-0, no one will talk aanymore about that ...

      Delete
    3. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
  15. disallowed goal to Chelea by VAR because possible offside

    ReplyDelete
  16. Now very long check after 3-0 by Barcelona, to be checked a possible handball by Messi before the goal, and before that, a possible handball in Barça's penalty area, about this latter incident no replay was shown. In these early minutes VAR with big work, Cakir looks to be not so brilliant.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not a clear replay shown which shows the handball yet...

      Delete
    2. It was visible on the last of the replays shown.

      Delete
    3. I think, the best replay was shown quite early (before the VAR check) from behind the goal.

      Delete
  17. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No you“re wrong this time. In case of a handball if“s a factual decision which has never been shown to the referee himself!

      Delete
    2. Completely normal for a factual decision like handball before a goal.

      Delete
    3. Whether it hit the hand is now considered factual so no OFR needed.

      Delete
    4. Handball before goal/GSO is considered factual decision as all handballs are punishable.

      Delete
  18. I must say that annulling this goal by Messi but then allowing the previous one for 1-0 shows exactly how VAR works (especially with the last law changes about handballs) but raises many questions about the real use of this tool. A clear foul can't be detected, an almost inexistent handball is spotted.

    ReplyDelete
  19. To be honest, very poor first half by Cakir. Now a big penalty for Barça missed. VAR should intervene there.

    ReplyDelete
  20. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Penalty for me, Coulibaly 'clears' Messi's leg before the ball...

    ReplyDelete
  22. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Seems like a gap in the rules to me, like a foul not being able to occur if the ball is out of bounds. A player should be able to try to kick the ball in a normal manner without being charged for a foul if another player gets in between the kicking and the ball.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Are Zwayer and Cakir among the best European referess? Omg!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. So top referees aren‘t human and are not allowed to have (a) bad game(s)?! I‘m a bit dusgusted by some comments today honestly...

      Delete
    3. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    4. Of course Zwayer and also Cakir gave us material to criticise them. Indeed one can discuss bad decisions/performances but discussing also means explaining and giving arguments instead of making one sarcastic comment after another.
      And for me VAR doesn‘t take the Human element out. There will always be errors where humans are used...

      Delete
    5. "VAR was supposed to alleviate the "but he's human" element."
      That's wrong IMO. VAR is supposed to reduce clear errors (which it did today), but won't remove all mistakes or even the human aspects of refereeing.

      Delete
    6. Thank you Philipp, completely agreed!

      Delete
    7. Surely they are human and they can have a bad night. But so many wrong decisions in two crucial games seem to show that maybe they were not the right names for such important matches. Also, in my opinion, if you don't focus in a single decision but you see their way of refeering you can easily see how they far from the best are. And VAR (not) decisions make things even worst...

      Delete
    8. Yes, of course. I was suprised to see Zwayer for this game and he didn‘t do well (as „expected“). With Cakir it is a bit different. Usually he is the one for difficult games, unfortunately not today especially in terms of evaluating key incidents correctly.

      Delete
    9. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
  25. No yellow card for Koulibaly is quite surprising.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. For me right, as the contact was accidentally and therefore only careless

      Delete
    2. Hm, but the intensity was quite high, which would support reckless. Also DOGSO has to be considered.

      Anyway, without the YC, Messi should have left the field for or after his treatment (because he didn't take the penalty).

      Delete
    3. The question is, was there a chance for the defender to foresee the danger for Messi? Imo clearly not, he just wanted to play the ball without the possibility of knowledge, so there's imo no reason to consider the intensity.

      Delete
    4. Classic accidental kick situation where the sanction is at the referee's discretion - considering the high force of the kick notwithstanding it's position on the pitch, yellow card is the best solution there.

      Delete
    5. In favour of common sense, correct. In favour of the book of law I would, at least if you go exactly with the written text, a YC is only possible with an contingent intend = recklessness. But it's of course possible to suspect an intend.

      Delete
  26. Very messy game of Cakir. I would be very suprised if we see Cakir again in this seasons CL. To much mistakes

    ReplyDelete
  27. Not a foul on first goal by Barca. This type of pushing and shoving is normal during corner. This is football not ballet. Great game by cakir so far.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. Guess you have not watched rugby.

      Delete
    3. Great game ? Are you joking ? I love cakir as a superb ref but tonight, poor first half for sure...

      Delete
    4. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
  28. Correct PK for Napoli now. Challenging 1st half...

    ReplyDelete
  29. First clear decision directly taken by Cakir: penalty to Napoli.
    But too much VAR in first half for the Turkish.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Am I the only person not convinced by the penalty for Napoli?

    Let's wait for halftime replays.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No, I‘m with you. No VAR stuff but for mee (too) soft penalty based on the few replays I‘ve seen

      Delete
    2. Me too. For me not too soft, but rather wrong. Incredibly bad evening for Cakir, he was going from bad to worst. Missed clear foul prior first goal, I didn’t see handball from Messi, but maybe I am wrong. Missed absolutely clear penalty and he was few meters away, had perfect angle and he had even to hear the foul. Unbelievable. And finally this penalty for Napoli for nothing after missing almost leg breaking foul. One of the worst performances in one half at this level. And VAR - it’s a joke. This kind of VAR has no sense.

      Delete
    3. Mikael, how can you agree with Zwayers first penalty decision but not this one? Clear contact and supportable. Yet yesterday you agreed with almost imaginary contact. The double standard on this thread today is laughable. Yesterday complaining about not enough VAR and now complaints about too much.

      Delete
    4. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    5. Completely different situations. In this case both opponents just hitting eachother while yesterday one player hit the other one.

      Delete
  31. Looking at halftime replays. Looks like Messi tripped Napoli player before his sensational solo goal.

    ReplyDelete
  32. This should be in the other section, but yesterday when Juventus player clipped Napoli player, you can see Juventus player raise his hands in gesture to prove his innocence, which is sure sign that he did make contact with Napoli player, but was the clip enough to bring down the Napoli player or did he basically dive and let himself fall once he felt the contact, basically diving? Because of that doubt that creeps in due to so many players diving, I wouldn't have called the penalty kick. For me, there has to be certainty to call a PK.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Cakir is having a bad game, rather unconvincing.

    However, I think that a penalty for Napoli was a correct and good decision, at least supportable.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Cakir gave yc for spa to Napoli but the throw in that led to the promising attack looks like to be a foul. Barca's player one foot was on the air while throwing the ball

    ReplyDelete
  35. By the way, it seems that the list of the candidates for finale is getting shorter with each game.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Brych turpin makkelie kuipers skomina lahoz grande hategan marciniak taylor orsato

      Delete
    2. Only Turpin, Makkelie, Lahoz, Hategan or Orsato, if I can guess.

      Maybe even Orsato could have a pole position, due to his nationality and age.

      Delete
    3. All these referees can continue in UCL and UEL.

      Delete
    4. Chakhtar - Bale : HATEGAN Ovidiu
      Wolverhampton - Seville : MAKKELIE Danny

      Atalanta - Paris : MARCINIAK Szymon
      Leipzig - Atletico : ORSATO Daniele
      Barcelone - Bayern : KUIPERS Bjorn
      Manchester - Lyon : DEL CERRO GRANDE Carlos

      Delete
    5. FCB -FCB with Kuipers is 100 % sure For me

      Delete
  36. It looks like Koulibaly has a certain immunity this evening, I can't believe he is not still booked by Cakir.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Seems like there is a lot of VAR comments. I found these videos that the MLS has released about their VAR communications. Might offer some light on this process
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7PQCumRGQ_c
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9hI1k6Ec8xo
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KA6TFFNcfdk

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Always very interesting.
      Would be quite nice to have this for other competitions as well.

      Delete
  38. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Isn't everyone tested before the match, who is allowed into the technical area and on the field?

      Delete
    2. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
  39. Since we know Cakir is appointed for final tournament in Portugal, it will be interesting to see if he will get any match there or maybe only fourth official appointment....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It was a low Çakir's performance; IMO not expected appointment for him.

      Delete
  40. Cakir, cakir...this season he is very poor. First svn:aut match and now this one...

    ReplyDelete
  41. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Guys I can't believe Suarez reaction to yellow card by Cakir, he laughed to ref.

    ReplyDelete
  43. After yesterday’s and today’s games there is no discussion about who is among the best referees in the world when it comes to the whole career. Surely a referee can have a bad day in his office but with VAR there should be no big mistakes. I’m now fully convinced that Brych is along the best referees. He is a strong and proper referee who doesn’t let anyone do what they want to. In my opinion Cakir is way to gentle on the pitch and players do notice it. Today Skomina should be appointed for this game, but I’m still supporting Cakir because of his long and wonderful career.

    ReplyDelete
  44. Has ANYONE watched Hategan? No mistakes?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Now I see that AR's werent at their best.

      Delete
    2. Here’s the penalty (after overturned offside decision):

      https://streamable.com/rgadw3

      Delete
    3. Two VAR interventions: penalty-offside-penalty (AR2) for Bayern and a Chelsea goal disallowed for offside (AR1).

      Delete
  45. Italy Serie B Play Off
    Semi Final First Leg

    Sunday 09 August

    21:00 Frosinone - Pordenone
    Luca Massimi - Luigi Rossi - Andrea Zingarelli - Federico Dionisi
    [Aleandro Di Paolo - Antonio Di Martino]

    ReplyDelete
  46. Was Messi not supposed to leave the field after being attended by the medical team, at the penalty situation, since the player who committed the foul was not cautioned?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think he left, that's why Suárez took the PK and not him.

      Delete
    2. Because one player from each team received a treatment (Messi and Coulibaly), both of them are allowed to stay on the field.

      Delete
  47. NJ open a medical spa
    If you looking to open a medical spa in NJ ? If you don't have a practice medical spa lawyer helping you review all regulations – reach out to usto know.

    ReplyDelete
  48. medical spa law in new york
    If you looking to open a medical spa in NJ ? If you don't have a practice medical spa lawyer helping you review all regulations – reach out to usto know.

    ReplyDelete
  49. I Finally Got Helped !! I'm so excited right now, I just have to share my testimony on this Forum.. The feeling of being loved takes away so much burden from our shoulders. I had all this but I made a big mistake when I cheated on my wife with another woman and my wife left me for over 4 months after she found out.. I was lonely, sad and devastated. Luckily I was directed to a very powerful spell caster Dr Emu who helped me cast a spell of reconciliation on our Relationship and he brought back my wife and now she loves me far more than ever.. I'm so happy with life now. Thank you so much Dr Emu, kindly Contact Dr Emu Today and get any kind of help you want.. Via Email emutemple@gmail.com or Call/WhatsApp cell number +2347012841542 Website (https://emutemple.wordpress.com/)

    ReplyDelete
  50. I was diagnosed of herpes virus, I have tried all possible means to get cure but all my effort proved abortive, until a friend of mine introduced me to a herbal doctor called Chief Dr Lucky, who prepare herbal medicine to cure all kind of diseases including herpes virus (Herpes), when i contacted this herbal doctor via his email, he sent me herpes virus herbal medicine via courier service, when i received the herbal medicine he gave me step by step instructions on how to apply it, when i applied it as instructed i was totally cured from the virus within 3 weeks of usage. Contact this great herbal doctor today to get your cure. 

    Visit website : https://chiefdrluckyherbaltherapy.wordpress.com/
    What's App number : +2348132777335 
    Via Email : chiefdrlucky@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete

Thank you for writing a comment on our blog!