Thursday, 17 June 2021

UEFA EURO 2020 Match 16: Denmark - Belgium (discussion)

Björn Kuipers  makes 2020 EURO debut in Denmark - Belgium, let's discuss here his performance.
 


Group B
Copenhagen, 17 June 2021 18:00 CET
DENMARK - BELGIUM 
Referee: Björn Kuipers (NED)
Assistant Referee 1: Sander van Roekel (NED)
Assistant Referee 2: Erwin E. J. Zeinstra (NED)
Fourth Official: Andreas Ekberg (SWE)
Fifth Official: Mehmet Culum (SWE)
Video Assistant Referee: Pol van Boekel (NED)
Assistant Video Assistant Referee 1: Kevim Blom (NED)
Assistant Video Assistant Referee 2: Benjamin Pagès (FRA)
Assistant Video Assistant Referee 3: François Letexier (FRA)
UEFA Referee Observer: Bo Karlsson (SWE)
UEFA Delegate: Jovan Šurbatović (SRB)

68 comments:

  1. AR1 missed a careless/reckless foul in min ‘1 in front of him.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not so far away from SFP in my view!

      What a start! Instantly reminded me of Atlético - Barcelona 2014 with Howard Webb. And Kuipers displayed excellent emotional intelligence at 11' too.

      Delete
    2. I agree Mikael. Reckless challenge, should be a YC. But Kuipers cannot be blamed. This is responsibility of AR.

      Delete
    3. 1' and 11' important moments so far.

      Delete
  2. Kuipers stoped the play himself at the 10th. Well handled

    ReplyDelete
  3. Very nice moment for Eriksen. Goosebumps and this is why football united.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This was a great moment for this tournament and we all continue for Eriksen’s complete and swift recovery. I do however hope the UEFA bug wigs were hanging their heads in shame at this gesture… especially after hearing the conflicting views that the Danes were ‘forced’ to play on in Saturday night. This was shameful and will be the worst decision taken / made during this Euro Championships.

      Delete
  4. With his blatant incompetence and reluctance to show mandatory cards Kuipers will soon inflame the match to an extreme level... Just wait a bit...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh wait ! Kuipers' haters is back

      Delete
    2. I don't hate Kuipers - I don't like him AND ALL THE REFEREES who think that the laws of the game are not written for them.

      Delete
    3. Circumstances matter. And sometimes it's better to relax certain rules.

      Delete
    4. Yep, I agree - SOMETIMES but not during your whole career. That's why I say that he is incompetent and does not feel the game - he referees all the game in one way. And if it is OK for the games in Netherlands, it is ridiculous for the most European matches.

      Delete
    5. Hahaha go ahead and just act like fools. Kuipers has shown for years that his style works in the big matches. For me his team as a whole is GOATING for years.... the fact that more than half of the comments here are nothing less than bashing says it all to me. Great officiating by Kuipers so far in a match that is "only" challanging at an emotional level so far

      Delete
    6. That's why he is widely seen as the best referee in the world currently? I think your logic is flawed...

      Delete
    7. Thanks for the last comment Anonymous ! All agree !
      Stop Kuipers' haters. Please, be objective. He make mistakes (sometimes big, unfortunately), as all referees at this level. It's normal.
      He's 48 and he's better than many ref.

      Delete
    8. I guess the reasons why he's got a CL final, two EL finals, one FIFA U20 final, one Confederations cup final, one UEFA U21 final and a UEFA U17 final are either there are a lot of incompetent people in the committees or that his styles suits a lot of matches. Your choice.

      Delete
  5. Kuipers put his hand up to block the sun at one point. Why doesn't FIFA allow referees to wear hats? I understand that they don't look so good, but their usefulness in blocking the sun should outweigh that.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hats also obstruct the field.of vision somewhat. They might be useful for ARs facing a low blinding sun but I'm not so sure for a referee

      Delete
    2. Interesting point. Duly noted.

      Delete
  6. I think there was foul on Danish player uncalled there, as contact began with player and then the ball.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Missed corner for denmark.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes corner missed, ball rebounds from the back of the defender. And before a foul missed on Denmark defender. He can be happy no goal from this free kick.

      Delete
  8. Good first half of Kuipers. So far not difficult with less fouls and respectful play. I expect a more challenging second half. Only footnote I can make is that Kuipers could be more active in positioning and movement. He walks a lot, something that Brych and Lahoz are doing better. But this has no influence on his decision-making.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Technically speaking not the best performance by Kuipers. Rather a lot of minor mistakes in foul detection, corner vs. goal kick decisions. Nothing important to report but also nothing to ignore. Indeed full match control.
    Let me also say that in German Bundesliga, Danish player would have got a YC for kicking the ball away.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Perhaps because he follows a little too far away of play? Some accelerations and sprints would bring him more close to the situations.

      Delete
  10. Some small mistakes, but overall fine. Not as much convincing like Brych. However, nothing major to add. That’s most important.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I don’t think this was a foul, but free kick blocked so no problem

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In the world of modern referee, mistake is mistake, independent of that does that affect on game or not. Of course, it is minor mistake if not affect on game. Something more that I would like to express is very low level of running and movement of Kuipers. This is not final referee shape.

      Delete
    2. It was a clear foul though. In the second replay you could see that the defender was clearly pulling the attackers jersey.

      Delete
  12. Unfortunately another wrong foul detection. Defender Belgium played clearly the ball and Denmark player committed the foul. Aggressive protest of Belgium players can’t be tolerated.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Kuipers wouldn't book any player in any game. Is that refereeing or just walking around?

    ReplyDelete
  14. Good YC on 59' in order to calm down everything.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Now missed YC for Belgium after reckless kick on the shin. Why this angry face? Just give a YC which would be justified.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Good communication with AR1 on 66'

    ReplyDelete
  17. Excellent YC for diving. Mandatory.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Correct yellow card by Kuipers

    ReplyDelete
  19. Phantom foul on goal keeper..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He was stepped on the foot, what are you talking about?

      Delete
  20. 82’ yellow card for SPA is absolutely the expected call but I don’t really agree with it. The ball was definitely rolling out of play and there was nothing the attacker could have done to save it.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Whatever Kuipers will do, good performance according to this blog.
    I would be as good as him.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Please, stop your nonsense comments!!

      Delete
    2. Why don’t you give us examples from this game and what you would have changed? Maybe Kuipers will read it and take your tips with him for his next game

      Delete
    3. Obviously it's usually also a good performance according to the committee. Otherwise he wouldn't be appointed for all the top matches..

      Delete
    4. Why? Did you ever read poor performance by Kuipers? Never. Impossible, because he is perfect. That's not fair.

      Delete
    5. I mean Kuipers was criticised for a number of his performances towards the end of the season and rightly so. There's something silly about criticising the cult of Kuipers while being un-objective about the decisions being made in this game to fit your own agenda.

      Delete
    6. Anonymous, I would look toward the Juventus Porto Second leg. It was definitely a challenging game but people on the blog were rather objective of his shortcomings that match. I think with more time and experiences and good performance over a career, it’s sometimes easier to overlook the minor mistakes compared to the larger body of work. Obviously mistakes should be avoided and corrected.

      Delete
  22. IMO Kuipers controlled the game well. No major mistakes and a correct simulation decision. All cards correctly given, two YC’s missed. Besides this some issues in foul detection and could have been stronger in protest approach. But most important nobody will speak about refereeing. I would rate his performance as expected, but based on today’s performance not enough yet for a final.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Well, Kuipers was correct, but I don't think that this kind of performance is contender for Euro final. Very low running performance, positioning could be better. Rappalini impressed me more today.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Rappalini will at most get quarterfinal, it would be insult to strength of european refs to have HIM take their spot. Same goes for the European ref at copa america

    ReplyDelete
  25. Good performance by Kuipers. Not perfect indeed, but for me it is very clear that Kuipers can only loose the final in case of crucial mistakes. When he continues on this level, there is no doubt in my mind that Rosetti will choose him because of his whole career... even if i too agree that Brych impressed me a bit more until now

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Why are we assuming that Kuipers has been preselected for the final? In my opinion he is not the most deserving, after somewhat poor champions league form at the end of this season. He did excellent today of course, but there have been so many excellent performances by referees so far this tournament too. So many referees deserve to be in consideration for this final, not just Kuipers.

      Delete
    2. We can act as if there is no preselection and the most deserving ref gets it (imo that would be rappalini). However Orsatos CL nomination in 2020 showed that this is utopic

      Delete
  26. Great performance by Kuipers today, good to see a “classic” Bjorn Kuipers performance after some of his last few CL matches just didn’t feel the same.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What was wrong with his champions league performances?

      Delete
    2. I can't put my finger on exactly what it was (maybe others can remember better than me?) but it just didn't feel like his normal masterful self. It didn't feel like he was as alert as normal.

      Of course, a below-par Kuipers performance is still a good game at the end of the day.

      Delete
  27. I don't see why he shouldn't be awarded the final match. Some of you criticised him mentioning the CL matches. In that sense, Karasev shouldn't have been at the Euro in first place.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Good, solid performance from Kuipers. Not outstanding, not absolutely stellar, but he was solid. I thought there was at minimum a foul in 1' and I think he misinterpreted the first foul by Wass in 2H, which he gave the other way, but no major mistakes and overall no one will talk about him after the game. Expected level, nothing more, nothing less.

    It says a lot about the excellent standard of refereeing so far at the Euros that this was on the whole an average performance.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Watched the game live at the stadium today. From there, a good performance. Only major issue was the lack of consequence regarding time wasting. Two situations:

    1. Cortuis got fouled when Belgium was up 1-2. Free kick and seemed like he was hurt. Help is called in. Cortuis then clearly signals to the doctors that they should slow down. So they walked in to help him. A difficult situation to handle, but quite unsportsmanlike from Belgium.
    2. Cortuis took very long time with every goalkick after the 1-2 goal. Kuipers clearly signaled that he should speed up. At a point, he took his focus of the game dor about 10 seconds to communicate to Cortuis that he actually meant it. But what happened? Nothing. Cortuis kept on being very slow and just laughed of Kuipers' attempt to make him speed up. I counted 7 times were Kuipers signaled that he should speed up. No consequence.

    For me, this is not understandable. Kuipers will referee Cortuis many times and Kuipers has now signaled to him that he does not need to take Kuipers' management serious.

    Off topic: Uefa was so unsensitive with their handling of such a sensitive match. " let's watch the highlights from Denmark's last match" just before the game and then showing the images of Eriksen getting treated. Why would you do that?

    ReplyDelete
  30. Calm, strong control, as usual. Respected by players. YCs correct including good card for diving.

    Couple of wrong free kicks but generally accurate. No YC for dissent - number of Belgium ‘discussing’ his (wrong) FK decision. Didn’t need it for control but tournament aim was to be firm with dissent. Needed??

    Don’t understand the fitness comments? Fast-paced game at times but was right up with play, into penalty area even, where needed.

    Another solid, good performance - Referee team will be very happy.


    ReplyDelete
  31. Great performance by Kuipers. Loved the simulation call.

    ReplyDelete
  32. HIGHLIGHTS

    https://we.tl/t-Ocs48rNNUN

    ReplyDelete

Thank you for writing a comment on our blog!