Tuesday, 15 June 2021

UEFA EURO 2020 - Referee appointments - 17 June 2021

Matchday 2 continues with Thursday 17 June games. Here you can find the referees appointed by committee. 


Group C
Bucharest, 17 June 2021 15:00 CET
UKRAINE - NORTH MACEDONIA
Referee: Fernando Andrés Rapallini (ARG)
Assistant Referee 1: Juan Pablo Belatti (ARG)
Assistant Referee 2: Diego Yamil Bonfá (ARG)
Fourth Official: Slavko Vinčić (SVN)
Fifth Official: Tomaž Klančnik (SVN)
Video Assistant Referee: Alejandro José Hernández Hernández (ESP)
Assistant  Video Assistant Referee 1: José María Sánchez Martínez (ESP)
Assistant  Video Assistant Referee 2: Filippo Meli (ITA)
Assistant  Video Assistant Referee 3: Juan Martínez Munuera (ESP)
UEFA Referee Observer: David Fernández Borbalán (ESP)
UEFA Delegate: Rotem Kamer (ISR)

Group B
Copenhagen, 17 June 2021 18:00 CET
DENMARK - BELGIUM 
Referee: Björn Kuipers (NED)
Assistant Referee 1: Sander van Roekel (NED)
Assistant Referee 2: Erwin E. J. Zeinstra (NED)
Fourth Official: Andreas Ekberg (SWE)
Fifth Official: Mehmet Culum (SWE) 
Video Assistant Referee: Pol van Boekel (NED)
Assistant  Video Assistant Referee 1: Kevim Blom (NED)
Assistant  Video Assistant Referee 2: Benjamin Pagès (FRA)
Assistant  Video Assistant Referee 3: François Letexier (FRA)
UEFA Referee Observer: Bo Karlsson (SWE) 
UEFA Delegate: Jovan Šurbatović (SRB)

Group C
Amsterdam, 17 June 2021 21:00 CET
NETHERLANDS - AUSTRIA 
Referee: Orel Grinfeeld (ISR)
Assistant Referee 1: Roy Hassan (ISR)
Assistant Referee 2: Idan Yarkoni (ISR)
Fourth Official: Davide Massa (ITA)
Fifth Official: Stefano Alassio (ITA)
Video Assistant Referee: Pawel Gil (POL)
Assistant  Video Assistant Referee 1: Paolo Valeri (ITA)
Assistant  Video Assistant Referee 2: Lee Betts (ENG)
Assistant  Video Assistant Referee 3: Stuart Attwell (ENG)
UEFA Referee Observer: Francesco Bianchi (SUI) 
UEFA Delegate: Milovan Đukanović (MNE)

47 comments:

  1. Kuipers is back for DEN-BEL ! Good news

    ReplyDelete
  2. Expected matches for Kuipers and Rapallini. I'm very curious about Rapallini, never seen a match of him before.
    Really good match for Grinfeld, with two teams who won their first match. Rosetti seems to have real trust in him.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Would have loved to see the group C appointments swapped. However good and sensuele appointments. Kuipers quite expected given also that Makkelie has the other group B match.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Now the designation of Kevin Blom as AVAR in Finland - Russia the day before, puts the handball situation in ITA-TUR (45') in an other perspective. Was committee not so happy with the non-intervention? What do you guys think?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Wow, such a game for Grinfeld after his very poor performance in Rangers - Slavia? I'm surprised!

    UKRMKD could be a feisty game and it's a good choice to appoint the CONMEBOL referee to it!

    Standard appointment for Kuipers, he is being prepared for something big I think.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Three expectable names for Thursday with their first match each.
    DEN-BEL needed a big name, so Kuipers makes a lot of sense as there is apparently no issue anymore with Dutch referees for Belgium.
    In group C, Grinfeeld with the more sonorous match, while Rapallini's could be the more difficult also given the group situation. So hard to say, which one is the better appointment.
    Double appointment for van Boekel. Maybe they just decided, that he is the more experienced Dutch VAR and therefore will be used for both referees during the rest of the tournament. Just a bit strange then, that they didn't do it for the opening match.
    Spanish referee for Rapallini was expected.
    Gil with his first appointment as (head) VAR.
    Normal 4th official appointments, but maybe worth mentioning that they don't have a problem with a Swede for Denmark and a Slovenian for North Macedonia - I am not sure, whether that would also be done in the referee position.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Concerning Grinfeeld vs. Rapallini, I am not sure which of the two matches is considered "more important" by UEFA: Currently, both the Netherlands and Austria would be qualified for the knockout stage whereas the Ukraine and North Macedonia battle for the third place which could mean a third ticket for the participants of group C. In other words: The winner of the latter game could still hope to advance to the round of sixteen, the loser rather not.

      Delete
    2. Why would a Swedish referee with Denmark or a Slovenian referee with North Macedonia be an issue? Imposing such stringent restrictions solved a nonexistent problem and creates plenty of issues itself.

      Delete
  7. Well I am immediately fascinated by how Rapallini will handle the UKRMKD game. More than any other in the GS, this game surely requires a law-enforcer approach, whereas the Argentine has focused (in the games I've seen), on careful match management.

    Other two appointments are perhaps a trifle surprising but mostly predictable. Because all my friends here will ask me :D - who do you think will be the referee of ENGSCO?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Turpin candidate for ENG - SCO.

      Delete
    2. I would love to see Cakir for ENGSCO!

      Delete
    3. ENG-SCO: I think Mateu Lahoz or Turpin.

      Delete
    4. I would also tend towards Turpin - with Mateu being an equally good and realistic option.

      Delete
    5. Sorry, i don't remember my predictions for 2nd MD....it's possible to publish? Thank you!

      Delete
    6. I predicted Felix Brych for ENG-SCO and I do not change my prediction...

      Delete
    7. Nicola Lonardi, I got your mail, just wait for a while and we will send you an answer. Thanks.

      Delete
  8. Mateu for ENG-SCO?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Replies
    1. England easy win but match with high tension. Kovacs is perfect.

      Delete
    2. Very rarely do these fixtures result in an easy england win

      Delete
  10. Interesting remark, Rapallini with Spanish VARs and observer as well (David Fernández Borbalán). This has been made to ensure communication in Spanish between them. CONMEBOL referees have shown in FIFA tournaments that they don't like English too much.
    This also intrigues me, how Rapallini will communicate with players in UKR - MKD? A game to be watched.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. MKD - UKR may be such a difficult match. I don't think that aregentinian referee is a suitable choice. I bet he never heard or seen any if both teams.
      Such a mistake by UEFA. The experiment is about to become a fiasco. They should have chosen other teams for this referee.

      Delete
  11. Replies
    1. Lots of referees don’t have a game yet. He will get his chance, there is no need to worry.

      Delete
    2. "Lots of ..."? Oliver, Kovacs - who else?

      Delete
    3. Lots of referees: Oliver, Oliver, Oliver, Oliver and Oliver.

      Delete
    4. He is FO at ITA-WAL.

      Delete
    5. ITA-SUI sorry

      Delete
    6. To be number one referee in the best league in the world but still no game, I am hoping this means Rosetti has something special for him lined up!

      Delete
    7. Huh, I thought there were more. My bad

      Delete
  12. Unimportant but fun trivia about these appointments: referees from three different continents working this tournament on the same day!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Another unimportant but fun trivia about Kuipers: His last appearance at a EURO game was at a quarter-final in 2016 between Iceland and Kurdistan - according to WORLDREFEREE:

      https://worldreferee.com/referee/bjorn_kuipers/

      Delete
    2. Three continents? Why? Israel is in UEFA, if you mean that.

      Delete
    3. I think, smala017 referred to the official geographic mapping. Inside FIFA, also Australia is part of Asia etc.

      Delete
  13. FIFA referee Bas Nijhuis explained extensively on Dutch TV/Radio (Veronica Inside) and other media that it’s clearly obvious that UEFA’s strategy is to bring Kuipers smoothly to the final with not only a late appointment but also a “normal” match comparing to some others. In this way committee keeps him out of troubles for the important matches, including the final. Kuipers would have been asked by UEFA to continue refereeing after WC2018, after he indicated in interviews that he wanted to stop. A final at this EURO would be his reward for continuing and of course a nice farewell appreciation.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If the final is already awarded in concept to Kuipers, that wouldn’t be fair to Brych, Lahoz, Cakir and Orsato. Then they already have no chance! Besides this Brych is in a much better shape than Kuipers.

      Delete
    2. Sounds like what happened in 2014 with Rizzoli getting the big call although Kuipers was by far the best ref back then. Dont get me wrong I wouldnt mind it if Brych or Lahoz get the big call instead of Kuipers. However we dont have to act like Kuipers is not the clear and obvious nr.1 choice for this years final and deservedly so

      Delete
    3. Dutch National team reached the SF in 2014 and therefore there was no chance to achieve more for Kuipers. So it had nothing to do with Rizzoli.

      Brych is clearly performing better than Kuipers the last two years. Juventus - Porto, England - Poland and Inter - Dortmund were not that good of Kuipers this season. Even Lahoz is better at the moment with an superb CL final. But I still hope Cakir has a big chance.

      Delete
  14. My guesses.
    Sweden-Slovakia: Michael Oliver
    Czechia-Croatia: István Kovacs
    England-Scotland: Felix Brych

    ReplyDelete
  15. Three expectable appointments this time. It's interesting to see the Dutch VAR in those positions again, I certainly think that we should question commitee's happiness about ITA-TUR...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If that’s true my admiration for Rosetti is completely gone! But even worse then we can conclude he’s a slave of Italian media. Here in Germany the VAR was praised for not intervene and positively supported by Manuel Grave in Sportstudio. Also Gary Lineker in England said he would like to see the same approach in Premier League where handball is a disaster. Changing the VAR after one situation that isn’t even clear and obvious wrong and praised in the news all over Europe would be dictatorial. I am curious if he would have done the same in a different match or with Irrati..

      Delete
    2. Even if Rosetti prefers a handball there, I can't see how this can be considered a "clear and obvious" situation and therefore a mandatory VAR intervention. Only if Makkelie didn't see the handball at all, a VAR intervention would be an option.

      Delete
    3. And apart from that, íf Uefa would consider this a clear mistake by VAR, what’s the point of swapping VAR and AVAR? I would say AVAR (Pol van Boekel) in that case would be responsible for the non-intervention as well. I assume there’s mutual consultation between VAR and AVAR(‘s).

      Delete
  16. I think Orsato and Mateu for semifinals and Kuipers for final.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your tips are too early. 😄

      Delete
    2. Especially since Spain, Italy or the Netherlands may very well end up in the Semifinal / Final. Plus, Brych and Turpin might also end up with a semifinal if Germany/France do not end up in the semis...

      Delete
    3. I also think that if Italy, Spain and the Netherlands do not reach the semifinals, the appointments will be those of anonymous at 15:09 today.

      Delete

Thank you for writing a comment on our blog!